博碩士論文 984206031 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:40 、訪客IP:13.58.138.83
姓名 陳家新(Jia-Sin Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 工業管理研究所
論文名稱 智慧資本影響跨界知識移轉能力之研究
(The influence of intellectual capital on the types of knowledge for across boundary capabilities)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 在現今競爭激烈與多元化的經濟環境下,公司內所能擁有的知識將是企業最重要的核心能力,而要如何創造知識的價值,將是一個公司有沒有競爭優勢的關鍵因素。組織知識是越來越繁雜,專案團隊牽涉到不同專精知識領域,總會有太多模糊與矛盾的資訊,導致知識分享與接受的障礙,如何衡量、評價與管理組織所擁有的知識,因此本研究欲探討跨界知識管理與智慧資本之間的關連性。
在過去關於跨界知識管理為主題的研究,僅提出了理論性概念,對於如何實踐跨界知識管理,鮮少有實證性的研究,因此,本研究乃將理論與實務進行配合,以實證的方式驗證理論概念。實證分析是針對台灣的製造業之廠商為研究主體,並請有參與過新產品開發專案的人員及主管為問卷填答對象,所得樣本為280 份。經由實證結果發現,組織資本與社會資本對於跨界知識管理(轉移能力、解釋能力、轉化能力)有正向影響;而人力資本對於跨界知識管理的轉移能力與解釋能力有正向的影響,但對於轉化能力必未顯者。
知識移轉過程能實踐轉化,要有一個完善的組織架構,建立有制度化、標準化知識管理系統,可以增加日常作業的效率;良好的跨部門協調機制,增加對於共同詞彙的解釋一致性;在關係良好的基礎,互相尊重不同的專業知識,建立彼此的共同利益才足以整合各知識的貢獻。
摘要(英) In today’’s increasingly competitive and diverse economic environment, the company can have the knowledge will be the company’’s most important core competencies. However, how to create the value of knowledge will be a company have a key competitive advantage. Organizational knowledge is more complicated, but also in involving different areas of specialization of knowledge, there will always be too vague and conflicting information that involving different fields of specializes knowledge. This lead to barriers to knowledge sharing and acceptance, so become a key competitive factors that how to measure, access and manage organization’’s knowledge . Therefore, this study is to investigate relation between with across boundary knowledge management and intellectual capital .
Previous paper examines managing knowledge across boundaries that only presented a theoretical concept, there is little empirical research on how to practice. This study is an empirical way to verify the theory .Our empirical analysis focus on Taiwan manufacturing industry and we send the questionnaires to the NPD team, totally we collected 280 questionnaires. Through the empirical result, Organizational capital and social capital for across boundary knowledge management (transferring capability, translating capability, transforming capability) has significantly positive effects. Human capital for across boundary knowledge capabilities (transferring capability, translating capability) has significantly positive effects, but not significant for those who will be transforming capability.
Knowledge can practice, to establish a sound organizational structure, establish a systematic and standardized knowledge management system that can increase the efficiency of daily operations. Good across department coordination mechanisms to increase consistency of the explanation for the common lexicon. The basis of the close relationship, mutual respect for different expertise, to establish common interests with each other, just enough to integrate the contribution of knowledge.
關鍵字(中) ★ 人力資本
★ 組織機制
★ 跨界知識管理
★ 智慧資本
關鍵字(英) ★ boundary management
★ human capital
★ intellectual capital
★ organizational mechanisms
論文目次 摘要 ii
Abstract iii
誌謝 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與問題 2
1.4 研究範圍與限制 2
1.5 研究流程 3
1.6 章節架構 4
第二章 文獻探討及假說 5
2.1跨界知識管理(Boundary Management) 5
2.2 智慧資本(Intellectual Capital) 10
2.3 組織資本(Organizational capital) 12
2.3 社會資本(Social capital) 14
2.4 人力資本(Human capital) 15
第三章 研究設計 17
3.1 觀念性架構 17
3.2 研究假說 18
3.3研究變數與操作性定義 19
3.4結構化模型 24
3.5抽樣方法與問卷設計 25
第四章 研究結果 26
4.1基本資料之統計分析 26
4.2衡量模型評估 28
4.3結構模型評估 34
4.4研究假設分析 37
第五章 結論與建議 40
5.1 研究結果與結論 40
5.2研究貢獻 42
5.3研究限制與未來研究建議 42
參考文獻 43
參考文獻 1.Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. The Academy of Management Review , 27 (1), pp. 17-40.
2.Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions. Strategic Management Journal , 22 (6-7), pp. 521-543.
3.Allen, T. J. (1997). Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge: MIT Pres.
4.Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly , 37 (4), pp. 634-665.
5.Argote, L. (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer.
6.Barley, R. S. (1986). Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments. Administrative Science Quarterly , 31 (1), pp. 78-108.
7.Bontis, N. (1996). There's a price on your head: managing intellectual capital strategically. Business Quarterly , 60, pp. 40-44.
8.Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. London: International Thomson Business Press.
10.Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective. 12 (2), pp. 298-213.
11.Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. Organization Science , 2 (1), pp. 40-57.
12.Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions. The Academy of Management Review , 20 (2), pp. 343-378.
13.Bruhn, M., Georgi, D., & Hadwich, K. (2008). Customer Equity Management as Formative Second-order Construct. Journal of Business Research , 61 (12), pp. 1292-1301.
14.Buren, M. E. (1999). A Yardstick for Knowledge Management. Training Development , 53 (5), pp. 71-78.
15.Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multi-Trait–Multi-Method Matrix. Psychological Bulletin , 56 (2), pp. 81-105.
16.Carlile, P. R. (2002). A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science , 13 (4), pp. 442-455.
17.Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries. Organization Science , 15 (5), pp. 555-568.
18.Carlile, P., & Lucas, W. (2003). Taking care of complex boundaries:Knowledge and boundary activities on technology development teams. Cambridge: Sloan, MIT.
19.Chao, G. T., O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology , 79 (5), pp. 730-743.
20.Chin, W. w. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research. NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
21.Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational Routines Are Stored As Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study. Organization Science , 5 (4), pp. 554-568.
22.Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
23.Cooper, R. G. (2001). Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
24.Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science , 32 (5), pp. 554-571.
25.Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. The Academy of Management Review , 9 (2), pp. 284-295.
26.Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
27.Deshpande, R., & Zaltmand, G. (1982). Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research , 19 (1), pp. 14-31.
28.Dewar, R. D., Whetten, D. A., & Boje, D. (1980). An Examination of the Reliability and Validity of the Aiken and Hage Scales of Centralization, Formalization, and Task Routineness. Administrative Science Quarterly , 25 (1), pp. 120-128.
29.Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management , 17 (4), pp. 263–282.
30.Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development. Journal of Marketing Research , 38 (2), pp. 269-277.
31.Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms. Organization Science , 3 (2), pp. 179-202.
32.Drucker, P. F. (1999). Managing Oneself. Harvard Business Review .
33.Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company's true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York: HarperBusiness.
34.Egelhoff, W. G. (1991). Information-Processing Theory and the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies , 22 (3), pp. 341-368.
35.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They? Strategic Management Journal , 21 (10/11), pp. 1105-1121.
36.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18 (1), pp. 39-50.
37.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. Journal of Marketing Research , 18 (1), pp. 39-50.
38.Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
39.Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation. Strategic Management Journal , 19 (12), pp. 1193-1201.
40.Garud, R., & Nayyar, P. R. (1994). Transformative Capacity: Continual Structuring by Intertemporal Technology Transfer. Strategic Management Journal , 15 (5), pp. 365-385.
41.Gittell, J. H. (2001). Supervisory Span, Relational Coordination, and Flight Departure Performance: A Reassessment of Postbureaucracy Theory. Organization Science , 12 (4), pp. 468-483.
42.Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal , 21 (4), pp. 473-496.
43.Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis. The American Journal of Sociology , 72 (5), pp. 503-519.
44.Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis. American Journal of Sociology , 72 (5), pp. 503-519.
45.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1987). Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillian.
46.Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly , 42 (4), pp. 716-749.
47.Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm Effects in Pharmaceutical Research. Strategic Management Journal , 15(S1), pp. 63-84.
48.Hill, C. W., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation. The Academy of Management Review , 28 (2), pp. 257-274.
49.Homa, B., & Stuart, E. (1987). Stratocracy in High-Technology Firms. California Management Review , 30 (1), pp. 51-66.
50.Huber, G. P. (1990). A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design, Intelligence, and Decision Making. The Academy of Management Review , 15 (1), pp. 47-71.
51.James, W. (1907). Pragmatism . New York.: The American Library.
52.Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? The Academy of Management Journal , 48 (6), pp. 999-1015.
53.Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. The Journal of Consumer Research , 30 (2), pp. 199-218.
54.Johnston, A. C., & Warkentin, M. (2010). Fear Appeals and Information Security Behaviors. MIS Quarterly , 34 (3), pp. 549-566.
55.Johnston, A. C., & Warkentin, M. (2010). Fear Appeals and Information Security Behaviors: An Empirical Study. MIS Quarterly , 34 (3), pp. 549-566.
56.Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers' Adjustments to Organizations. The Academy of Management Journal , 29 (2), pp. 262-279.
57.Kanter, R. M. (2009). What Would Peter Say. Harvard Business Review .
58.Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M. H. (2010). Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor. Organization Science (21), pp. 469-489.
59.Klein, R., & Rai, A. (2009). Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships. MIS Quarterly , 33 (4), pp. 735-762.
60.Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science , 3 (3), pp. 383-397.
61.Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. U.K: Cambridge University Press.
62.LawrenceRPaul, & LorschWJay. (1967). Managing Differentiation and Integration. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
63.Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006). Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools. Organization Science ,17 (3), pp. 353-366.
64.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal , 13, pp. 111-125.
65.Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
66.Lin, X., & Germain, R. (2003). Organizational Structure, Context, Customer Orientation, and Performance: Lessons from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. Strategic Management Journal , 24 (11), pp. 1131-1151.
67.Litwak, E., & Hylton, F. L. (1962). Interorganizational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Co-ordinating Agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly , 6 (4), pp. 395-420.
68.Loch, K. D., Straub, D. W., & Kamel, S. (2003). Diffusing the Internet in the Arab World: The Role of Social Norms and Technological Culturation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 50 (1), pp. 45-63.
69.Maanen, J. V., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization. Organizational Behavior , 1 (1), pp. 209-264.
70.Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys , 26 (1), pp. 87–119.
71.Matusik, S. F. (2002). An Empirical Investigation of Firm Public and Private Knowledge. Strategic Management Journal , 23 (5), pp. 457-467.
72.Mclagan, P. A. (1989). Models for HRD Practice. Training and Development , 43 (9), pp. 49-59.
73.Menon, A., Bharadwaj, S., Adidam, P., & Edison, S. (1999). Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making. Journal of Marketing , 63 (2), pp. 18-40.
74.Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review , 23 (2).
75.Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science , 5 (1), pp. 14-37.
76.Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University.
77.Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
78.Petter, S., Straub, D. W., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly ,31 (4), pp. 623-656.
79.Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: building profits by putting people first . Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
80.Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best. Harvard Business Review .
81.Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N. (2006). Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Quarterly , 30 (2), pp. 225-246.
82.Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective. The Journal of Marketing , 65 (2), pp. 1-18.
83.Rowley, T., Behrens, D., & Krackhardt, D. (2000). Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries. Strategic Management Journal , 21 (3), pp. 369-386.
84.Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review , 51 (1), pp. 1-17.
85.Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). A mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
86.Snell, S. A., & Dean, J. W. (1992). Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective. The Academy of Management Journal , 35 (3), pp. 467-504.
87.Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Doubleday-Currency.
88.Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities. The Academy of Management Journal , 48 (3), pp. 450-463.
89.Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal , 17 (SI), pp. 27-43.
90.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal , 18 (7), pp. 509–533.
91.Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly , 31 (3), pp. 439-465.
92.Tushman, M. L., & Murmann, J. P. (1998). Dominant Designs, Technology Cycles, and Organizational Outcomes. Research in organizational behavior , 20, pp. 231–266.
93.Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. The Academy of Management Review , 3 (3), pp. 613-624.
94.Tyre, M. J., & Hippel, E. V. (1997). The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations. Organization Science , 8 (1), pp. 71-83.
95.Verona, G. (1999). A Resource-Based View of Product Development. The Academy of Management Review , 24 (1), pp. 132-142.
96.Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97.Wensley, A. (2001). Editorial: Some Further Thoughts about Knowledge Transfer and Understanding. Knowledge and Process Management , 8 (4), pp. 195-196.
98.Winter, S. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge , pp. 159-184.
99.Withey, M., Richard, L. D., & William, H. C. (1983). Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. The Academy of Management Journal , 26 (1), pp. 45-63.
100.Wold, H. (1982). Systems under Indirect Observation Using PLS. New York: Praeger.
101.Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms. Strategic Management Journal , 22 (6/7), pp. 587-613.
102.Youndt, M. A., Subramaniam, M., & Snell, S. A. (2004). Intellectual Capital Profiles: An Examination of Investments and Returns. Journal of Management , 2, pp. 335–362.
103.Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organization Science , 6 (1), pp. 76-92.
指導教授 陳碩炫(Ken Chen) 審核日期 2011-6-15
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明