潛能、工作績效、挑戰性工作經驗與晉升力關聯性之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：78

、訪客IP：3.133.159.125

姓名

葉譯元(Yi-yuan Yeh) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

潛能、工作績效、挑戰性工作經驗與晉升力關聯性之研究
(The Relationship between Promotability, Potential, Job Performance and Challenging Job Experiences)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

現今的環境變化快速，要很有效率且精準地在內部晉升或從外部尋找到一個領導潛能人才，是企業極為重要的一件事，這也正反映了「人才戰爭」的時代來臨了。對員工自身來說，晉升不僅對其職涯發展是一大突破，也具有激勵效果，提供工作上的動力來源；對組織來說，晉升對於接班人計劃和人力資源管理都有極大的影響。而在建立人才庫（talent pool）時，最關鍵的步驟之一尌是找出高潛能人才，這些人才不僅有利組織在這個快速變化的環境中做改變，更能讓組織維持良好的競爭力。
本研究利用工作績效（非行為性）、潛能和挑戰性工作經驗（行為性）當作晉升力的預測指標，共調查了143 對主管和部屬配對問卷，其中潛能為本研究經由文獻探討和實務訪談，並經由探討萃取出的四個構面，包括學習敏捷性、適應力與彈性、組織任務熱誠和人際影響力。進行迴歸分析後發現，工作績效、潛能和挑戰性工作經驗三者對於晉升力皆有解釋能力，但以潛能最強。此外，本研究藉由探索性因素分析，進一步將潛能分成兩個子構面─快速應變能力和組織投入，發現快速應變能力佔了整體潛能的大部分解釋力。最後，本研究針對研究結果進行討論並對日後的潛能相關研究提供參考方向。

摘要(英)

It is an important thing to accurately and efficiently identify a leadershippotential talent from internal or external the corporation in the changing environment,
that also means the generation of “ The War for Talent” is coming. For employees,promotion is not only a breakthrough for career development, but also a motivation.For organizations, promotion is vital to succession planning and human resourcemanagement. When we establish the talent pool, the most crucial step is to identifythe high potentials. These talents enable organizations to effectively adapt and
respond to change in the environment.
This study uses job performance(non-behavioral), potential and challenging job experiences(behavioral) as the predictors of promotability, investigating 143 supervisor-subordinate paired questionnaires. And potential is refined by literature review and practical interview that was included four dimensions: learning agility, adaptability and flexibility, dedication to organization and task, and relational influence. After the regression analysis, we found that promotability been influenced by job performance, potential and challenging job experiences, and potential is the most significant result. According to the exploratory factor analysis, we separated potential into two sub-dimensions: quick responding ability and dedication to
organization. The former one is more significant than the other variables to promotability in this study

關鍵字(中)

★ 晉升力
★ 工作績效
★ 潛能
★ 挑戰性工作經驗

關鍵字(英)

★ job performance
★ potential
★ challenging job perf

論文目次

中文摘要 ..................................................................................................................... I
英文摘要 .................................................................................................................... II
目錄 ........................................................................................................................... IV
表目錄 ........................................................................................................................ V
第一章緒論 ............................................................................................................ 1
第一節研究動機與目的 .................................................................................... 1
第二節研究貢獻與目的 .................................................................................... 2
第二章文獻探討 .................................................................................................... 4
第一節晉升力 .................................................................................................... 4
第二節工作績效和挑戰性工作經驗 ................................................................ 4
第三節潛能 ........................................................................................................ 6
第三章研究方法 .................................................................................................. 12
第一節研究對象 .............................................................................................. 12
第二節研究流程 .............................................................................................. 13
第三節變數衡量 .............................................................................................. 14
第四章研究結果 .................................................................................................. 17
第一節探索性因素分析 .................................................................................. 17
第二節相關分析 .............................................................................................. 18
第三節階層迴歸分析 ...................................................................................... 20
第五章結論與討論 .............................................................................................. 23
第一節結論與討論 .......................................................................................... 23
第二節管理意涵 .............................................................................................. 24
第三節研究限制與建議 .................................................................................. 25
參考文獻 .................................................................................................................. 26

參考文獻

1.Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111.
2Atwater, B. V. Kannan and A. Stevens. (2008). Cultivating systemic thinking in the next generation of business leaders. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 9-25.
3.Becker, G. (1975). Human capital. Chicago University Press.
4.Belet, D. (2007). Are “high potential” executives capable of building learning-oriented organizations? Reflections on the French case. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19(10), 465.
5.Berlew DE, Hall DT. (1966). The socialization of managers: Effects of expectations on performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 207-223.
6.Berns, Gregory. (2008). Iconoclast: A Neuroscientist Reveals How to Think Differently. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7.Borman, W., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include
elements of contextual performance. Personnel selection in organizations:71–98. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.Derr, C. B., Jones, C., & Toomey, E. L. (1988). Managing high potential employees: Current practices in thirty-three U. S. corporations. Human Resource Management, 27, 273-290
9.Brouther, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal on International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-223.
10.Charan, Ram, and J. Noel. (2001). The leadership pipeline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 13(1), 40-52.
12.Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1, 687-732.
13.Conger JA, Fulmer RM. (2003). Developing your leadership pipeline. Harvard Business Review, 81, 76–84.
14.Cope, Faye. Risher, Howard. (1998). Current Issues in Selecting High Potentials. Human Resource Planning, 21, 15-18.
15.Corporate Leadership Council. (2003). Assessment methods for identifying leadership potential. Washington DC: Corporate Executive Board.
16.Corporate Leadership Council. (2008). Identifying high-potential employees (HIPOs) through performance management processes. Washington DC: Corporate Executive Board.
17.Cox, Taylor, Jr., & Nkomo, Stella M.. (1992). Candidate Age as a Factor in Promotability Ratings. Public Personnel Management, 21(2), 197.
18.David Chan, Neal Schmitt, Danielle Jennings, & Lori Sheppard. (1999). Developing Measures of Basic Job-Relevant English Proficiency for the Prediction of Job Performance and Promotability. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(2), 305.
19.De Pater E. Irene, Vianen Van, E. M. Annelies, Myriam N. Bechtoldt, and Ute-Christine Klehe. (2009). Employees’ Challenging Job Experiences and Supervisors’ Evaluations of Promotability. Personnel Psychology, 62, 297-325.
20.Douglas A. Ready, Jay A. Conger, & Linda A. Hill. (2010). Are You a High Potential? Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 78-84.
21.Forbes, J. B. (1987). Early intraorganizational mobility: Patterns and influences. Academy of management journal, 30(1), 110-125.
22.Ford JK, Quinones MA, Sego DJ, Sorra JS. (1992). Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45, 511-527.
23.Fyffe, Don. (1970). How Managerial Style Affects Promotability. Management Review. 59(9).
24.Garrow, V G and Hirsh, W (2008) “Talent management: issues of focus and fit” Public Personnel Management, 37, 4.
25.Gladwell, Malcolm. (2008). Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown Publishers.
26.Greenhaus JH, Parasuraman S, Wormley WM. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86.
27.Gretchen M. Spreitzer, Morgan W. McCall Jr. & Joan D Mahoney. (1997). Early identification of international executive potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 6-29.
28.Harris KJ, Kacmar KM, Carlson DS. (2006). An examination of temporal variables and relationship quality on promotability ratings. Group & Organization Management, 31, 677-699.
29.Hay Group. (2008). High potential employees: Your organization’s treasured asset.
30.Heilman, M.E., C.J. Block and J.A. Lucas. (1992). Presumed Incompetent? Stigmatization and Affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536-44.
31.Hermans, J. (2007).High Potentials: A CEO Perspective. Journal of studies in International Education, 11, 511-521.
32.Hesketh, B., & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development, 21-55. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
33.Hoobler, J.M., Wayen, S.J. & Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 939-957.
34.Ishida, Hiroshi, Seymour Spilerman, and Kuo-Hsien Su. (1997). Educational Credentials and Promotion Chances in Japanese and American Organizations. American Sociological Review, 62(6), 866-882.
35.Jackson Leadership (2005). Using the Jackson Leadership “Performance/Potential Matrix”™ for Succession Planning and Talent Management:
36.Jerusalim, R.S. & Hausdorf, P.A. (2007). Managers' justice perceptions of high potential identification practices. Journal of Management Development, 26(10), 933-950.
37.Karaevli A, Hall DT. (2003). Growing leaders for turbulent times: Is succession planning up to the challenge? Organizational Dynamics, 32, 62-79.
38.Kouzes, James and Barry Posner. (2007). The leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.Lombardo, M. M., & Eichinger, R. W. (2000). High potentials as high learners. Human Resource Management, 39(4), 321-329.
40.London, M., & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing, motivation, and development, 119-153. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
41.London M, Stumpf SA. (1983). Effects of candidate characteristics on management promotion decisions: An experimental study. Personnel Psychology, 36, 241-259.
42.Mainiero LA. (1994). Getting anointed for advancement: The case of executive women. Academy of Management Executive, 8, 53-67.
43.Malcolm Higgs, & Paul Aitken. (2003). Research Note: An exploration of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership potential. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(7/8), 814-823.
44.Mansoer W.D. & Oei T.P. (1999). Predictors of career commitment and employment level of tertiary-educated Indonesian women. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 29-36.
45.McCall MW, Lombardo MM, Morrison AM. (1988). The lessons of experience: How successful executives develop on the job. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
46.McCauley, C. D., Moxley, R. S., and Van Velsor, E. (1998). The Center for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.McCauley C.D., Ohlott, P.J. & Ruderman M.N.. (1999). Job challenge profile. New York: Jossey- Bass/Pfeiffer.
48.McEnrue, M. P. (1988). Length of experience and the performance of their careers. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 175-185.
49.Medoff, J.L., & Abraham, K.G. (1981). Are Those Paid More Really More Productive? The Case of Experience. Journal of Human Resources, 16(2), 186-216.
50.Moore, M., Miller, R., & Fossum, J. (1974). Predictors of managerial career expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(1), 90-92.
51.Motowidlo, S. J., & Schmit, M. J. (1999). Performance assessment in unique jobs. The changing nature of job performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development, 56-86. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
52.Murphy, K. R. and Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work role performance: Challenges for twenty-first century organizations and their Employees. The changing nature of performance: Implication for staffing , motivation , and development, 325-365. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
53.Nicky Dries, & Roland Pepermans. (2007). Using emotional intelligence to identify high potential: a metacompetency perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(8), 749-770.
54.Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Method. 2nd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
55.Pepermans, R., Vloeberghs, D., & Perkisas, B. (2003). High potential identification policies: an empirical study among Belgian companies. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 660-78.
56.Pulakos, E.D., Arad, S., Donovan, M.A., & Plamondon, K.E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624.
57.Quinones MA, Ford JK, Teachout MS. (1995). The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 48, 887–910.
58.Reid K. & Dawson D. (2001). Comparing performance on a simulated 12 hour shift rotation in young and older subjects. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 58, 58–62.
59.Robbins, S. P. (1993). Organization behavior: Concepts, controversies, and Applications, 6th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
60.Rogers, R.W. and Smith, A.B., (2004). Finding Future Perfect Senior Leaders: Spotting Executive Potential. Employment Relations Today, 31, 1.
61.Sandy J Wayne, Robert C Liden, Isabel K Graf, & Gerald R Ferris. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 979-1006.
62.Sessa VI. (2001). Executive promotion and selection. How people evaluate others in organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63.Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 529-537.
64.Snipes, J. (2005). Identifying and Cultivating High-Potential Employees. Chief Learning Officer, 4(11), 54-64.
65.Stewart, L. P., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1982). Differential factors influencing the hierarchical level and number of promotions of males and females within an organization. Academy of management journal, 25(3), 586-597.
66.Stricker LJ, Rock DA. (1998). Assessing leadership potential with a biographical measure of personality traits. Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 164-84.
67.Silzer, R., & Church, A. H. (2009). The pearls and perils of identifying potential. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(4), 377-412.
68.Silzer, R. F. & Church, A. H. (2010). Identifying and Assessing High Potential Talent: Current Organizational Practices. Strategy Driven Talent Management: A Leadership Imperative. Jossey Bass: San Francisco.
69.Tiffan, B.. (2009). Are You Considered A "High Potential?. Physician Executive, 35(2), 74-77.
70.Thacker, R.A. ,Wayne S.J.. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21, 739-757.
71.Tubbs, Stewart L. (2010). Keys to Leadership: 101 Tips for Success. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72.Van Scotter JR, Motowidlo SJ,Cross TC. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systematic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.
73.Viswesvaran C, Ones DS. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 224-235.
74.Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Zhu W. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: the role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61, 793-825.
75.Walker, J W and LaRocco, J M (2005). Talent pools: the best and the rest. Human Resource Planning, 25(3), 12-14.
76.Wayne SJ, Liden RC, Graf IK, Ferris GR. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50, 979–1006.
77.Whetton, D. and K. Cameron. (2005). Developing management skills (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.
78.William J. Rothwell (2009). The manager's guide to maximizing employee potential: quick and easy strategies to develop talent every day. New York : American Management Association.
79.Zavakos, A.. (2006). Selecting leadership: An analysis of predictors in assessing leadership potential. Ph.D. dissertation, Antioch University, United States -- Ohio

指導教授

林文政(Wen-jeng Lin)

審核日期

2011-7-25

推文