摘要(英) |
Rapidly shortened cycle of the industrial technology has lead to the declined market profit; enterprises have used many flexible team structures to achieve business goals. The key to team performance is mainly affected by the team structure, which presents the different interaction among team members. Interaction is a process, and the higher the interdependence, the more co-ordination needed to enhance organizational effectiveness. However, is the degree of team autonomy really a co-ordination mechanism for team members to affect team effectiveness?
Therefore, this study is to discuss the relationship among intra-team interdependence, team autonomy, and team effectiveness, which includes:
First, the effect of intra-team interdependence on team effectiveness.
Second, the effect of intra-team interdependence on team autonomy.
Third, the mediating effectiveness of team autonomy between intra-team interdependence and team effectiveness.
The study used purposive sampling method, covered the semiconductor, electronics, communications, precision machinery, and biomedical industries. Approached companies were above certain size and with willingness to participate in. The questionnaires were filled up by paired-upped team leaders and team members, and were issued to136 teams, 858 questionnaires in total. 119 valid team questionnaires which are equal to 744 individual questionnaires were returned. Effective team response rate was 87.5%, including 74 work teams and 45 project teams. Descriptive statistics, reliability test, correlation analysis and regression analysis methods were used for the analysis.
According to the analysis results, we found that:
First, intra-team interdependence has significant and positive relationship on team effectiveness.
Second, team autonomy has a significant positive relationship on team effectiveness.
Third, team autonomy has partial mediating effectives in intra-team interdependence to effect on output quality of team effectiveness.
Fourth, team autonomy has partial mediating effectives in intra-team interdependence to effect on creative ability of team effectiveness.
Fifth, team autonomy has partial mediating effectives in intra-team interdependence to effect on team satisfaction of team effectiveness.
All the above conclusions could be provided as recommendations and reference to researchers to follow up.
|
參考文獻 |
﹝1﹞ 王溥,「影響專案工程團隊績效之團隊管理研究」,國立中山大學,碩士論文,89年7月。
﹝2﹞ 毛凱立,「研發專案團隊管理:網絡、資源與績效」,國立暨南大學,92年7月。
﹝3﹞ 李世音,「新產品開發團隊知識來源對產品知識創新及產品績效之影響—以團隊成員對新知識共識程度為干擾變項」,國立成功大學,98年6月。
﹝4﹞ 林言鎂,「轉換型領導對工作滿意之影響—以組織文化為中介變數」,國立台北大學,99年6月。
﹝5﹞ 林鉦棽、彭台光(2006)多層次管理研究:分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報,23(6),649-675。
﹝6﹞ 林明達,「知覺組織支持、團隊自主性與專業團隊績效關係之研究—以台灣各縣市體育會為例」,國立高雄大學,97年7月。
﹝7﹞ 邱薇拉,「技術策略、直屬主管信任與團隊績效關聯性之研究—以高科技產業研發團隊為例」,國立彰化師範大學,94年1月。
﹝8﹞ 徐克成,「團隊人力資本、團隊學習型態異質性對團隊創新能力之影響:團隊互動型態、領導部屬交換關係之變異、以及團隊社會資本為干擾變項」,國立彰化師範大學,91年1月。
﹝9﹞ 翁賢哲,「應用團隊互動訓練促進團隊知識分享」,交通大學,碩士論文,2002年。
﹝10﹞ 陳盈純,「互依性和社會支持對研發團隊績效的影響—以溝通為干擾變項」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,91年6月。
﹝11﹞ 張琇惟,「團隊動作互動中學習曲線效果之實驗研究」,國立中正大學,碩士論文,97年6月。
﹝12﹞ 張翊祥,「團隊成員人格特質組合對團隊效能影響之研究—以團隊互動過程為中介變項」,中原大學,93年6月。
﹝13﹞ 黃敏萍、鄭博壎、王建忠,「轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能:IPO模型之驗證」,管理學報,第20卷第3期,397-427頁,92年6月。
﹝14﹞ 黃敏萍、戚樹誠、黃國隆,「跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能:一項結構權變之觀點」,管理學報,第19卷第6期,979-1007頁,91年12月。
﹝15﹞ 楊力彥,「團隊績效獎勵制度知覺對於員工薪資滿意度與工作態度之影響」,國立中央大學,90年6月。
﹝16﹞ 楊璧如,「由團隊規模、團隊成員組成與團隊溝通探討機構投資人研究團隊績效之良窳」,銘傳大學,96年6月。
﹝17﹞ 蔡芬櫻,「虛擬團隊中團隊信任與團隊自主性對團隊效能的影響—決策過程品質之中介探討」,國立台北大學,100年1月。
﹝18﹞ 潘韋汝,「團隊獎勵制度對員工工作態度之影響-以薪資制度與福利滿意度為干擾變項」,第十一屆企業人力資源管理實務專題研究成果發表會,國立中央大學,桃園縣中壢市,94年12月1日。
﹝19﹞ 劉乾彬,「團隊合作對團隊績效與工作滿意度影響之研究:以個人主義為干擾變項」,銘傳大學,97年6月。
﹝20﹞ 簡瑜君,「工作團隊特性與團隊效能之關係:以訓練與管理者支持為干擾變項」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2002年。
﹝21﹞ Stephen P.Robbins,組織行為學,十一版,李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬,華泰文化,台北市,民國95年8月。
﹝22﹞ Aime F, Meyer CJ, Humphrey SE, Legitimacy of team rewards: Analyzing legitimacy as a condition for the effectiveness of team incentive designs, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH ,2010
﹝23﹞ B Irlenbusch, GK Ruchala, Relative rewards within team-based compensation, Labour Economics,2008
﹝24﹞ Bliese, P. D. 1998. Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1: 355-373.
﹝25﹞ Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, nonindependence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
﹝26﹞ Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4): 823-850.
﹝27﹞ Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C., (1993). Personnel Psychology, 46(4): 823-850.
﹝28﹞ Doorewaard H, Van Hootegem G, Huys R, Team responsibility structure and team performance, PERSONNEL REVIEW,2002
﹝29﹞ Humphrey SE , Morgeson FP , Mannor MJ, Developing a Theory of the Strategic Core of Teams: A Role Composition Model of Team Performance, JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009
﹝30﹞ Kavadias S, Sommer SC, The Effects of Problem Structure and Team Diversity on Brainstorming Effectiveness, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009
﹝31﹞ Pearce, C. L., & Sims Jr., H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2): 172-197.
﹝32﹞ Richard L.Daft,Understanding the Theory and Design of Organization,Tenth Edition,South-western,U.S.,2009。
﹝33﹞ Sarin, S. & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34(4): 707-739.
﹝34﹞ Stephen P. Robbins,Timothy A.Judge,Organizational Behavior,Pearson,Taipei,2008。
﹝35﹞ Susman, G. I., & Ray, J. M., (1999).Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16(3-4): 223-245.
﹝36﹞ Swailes S, McIntyre-Bhatty T, Scale structure of the Team Role Self Perception Inventory, JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY,2004
﹝37﹞ Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E., (2009). Group and Organization Management, 34(2): 170-205.
﹝38﹞ Yang HL, Tang HH, Team structure and team performance in IS development: a social network perspective, INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT,2004
|