獨占廠商在面臨策略型消費者下的訂價與廣告策略

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：70

、訪客IP：18.189.171.134

姓名

林竣民(Jiun-min Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

獨占廠商在面臨策略型消費者下的訂價與廣告策略
(Pricing and advertising strategy of a monopolistic firm when facing strategic customers)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

一般而言，當商品在消費者心中的價值，即效用(utility)，比商品價格還要高或相等時他們就會購買，但是策略型消費者在這種狀況下卻不一定會購買，因為他們考慮到未來降價的可能性。即策略型消費者會比較當下購買的剩餘(surplus)與未來購買的期望剩餘(expected surplus)何者對自己較有利，才決定要在何時購買。
在本研究中假設零售商之銷售有兩期，且第二期的價格僅有維持原價( p1 =p2 )或降價( p1 > p2 )兩種可能。而消費者的效用是一隨機分配，消費者在考慮本身效用、商品價格、以及第二期購買到商品的機率之下，決定是否要購買或在何時購買。我們探討在各種不同的情況下對消費者購買行為與零售商策略的影響：情況一是消費者不知道第二期的價格與商品數量，僅能以第一期的價格來預想第二期可能的價格；情況二是消費者已知效用函數，但是也僅能以第一期的價格來預想第二期可能的價格；情況三是消費者已知效用函數，且零售商宣告第二期的價格與商品數量；情況四是消費者已知效用函數，但零售商僅宣告商品數量，消費者僅能以第一期的價格來預想第二期可能的價格。
此外我們假設廣告會影響消費者效用分配。接著再針對上述各種情況探討在廣告影響下的零售商策略與消費者行為。

摘要(英)

In this study, we discuss a monopolistic retailer’s pricing and advertising strategies when facing strategic customers. In general, the customers will make a purchase when their utilities are equal or more than the price of product. However, the strategic customers may have the different decisions in the same situation, because they consider the possibility of markdown in the future. The strategic customers will evaluate whether making a purchase right now or waiting for sales when making the decision. Therefore, strategic customers may wait for sales even their utilities are more than the full price when they discover that the waiting is more benefic.
We assume a monopolistic retailer sells one product in two periods, and he will keep or reduce the price of product in the second period. The customer’s utility is a probability distribution, and they will make the decision by considering their own utility, the price of product, and the probability of product availability in the second period. We discuss the customer’s behavior and the retailer’s strategies in four cases. In case 1, the customers have no idea about the price of second period and the quantity of product. In case 2, the customers can expect the quantity of product by knowing the utility function. In case 3, the retailer announces the price of second period and the quantity of product. In case 4, the retailer only announces the quantity of product.
Furthermore, we assume the customer’s utility will be affected by advertisement, and further discuss the foregoing cases with the effect of advertisement.

關鍵字(中)

★ 產品可得性
★ 策略型消費者
★ 效用
★ 消費者剩餘

關鍵字(英)

★ product availability
★ strategic customer
★ surplus
★ utility

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Table of Content iii
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research objective 2
2. Literature review 4
2.1 Utility and Surplus 4
2.2 Strategic customer 5
2.3 Product availability 6
2.4 Commitment 7
3. Model and Analysis 8
3.1 Environment statement 9
3.1.1 Selling environment 9
3.1.2 Customers’ behavior 9
3.2 The Notations and demand function 10
3.3 Basic model-without advertising 12
3.4 Basic model in four cases 14
3.4.1 Case 1 14
3.4.2 Case 2 15
3.4.3 Case 3 16
3.4.4 Case 4 18
3.4.5 Numerical examples 18
3.5 Advertising model 20
3.6 Advertising model in four cases 21
3.6.1 Case 1 21
3.6.2 Case 2 22
3.6.3 Case 3 22
3.6.4 Case 4 23
3.6.5 Numerical examples 24
4. Sensitivity analysis 26
4.1 Sensitivity analysis of parameter n 26
4.1.1 Basic model 26
4.1.2 Advertising model 29
4.2 Sensitivity analysis of parameter c 31
4.2.1 Basic model 31
4.2.2 Advertising model 33
4.3 Sensitivity analysis of parameter ca 35
4.4 Sensitivity analysis of parameter k 38
4.5 Sensitivity analysis of parameter , , r, t. 40
5. Conclusion and further research 43
5.1 Conclusion 43
5.2 Future research 45
Reference 46

參考文獻

1. Alexandrov, A. and Lariviere, M. A. (2007), “Are reservations recommended”, Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
2. Arya, A. and Mittendorf, B. (2006), “Benefits of channel discord in the sale of durable goods”, Marketing Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 91–96.
3. Aviv, Y. and Pazgal, A. (2008), “Optimal pricing of seasonal products in the presence of forward-looking consumers”, Manufacturing Service Operation Management, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 339–359.
4. Baker, R. C. and Urban, T. L. (1988), “A deterministic inventory system with an inventory-level-dependent demand rate”, Operation Research, Vol. 39, pp. 823–831.
5. Balakrishnan, A., Pangburn, M. and Stavrulaki, E. (2000), “Lot sizing with demand-stimulating inventories”, Manufacturing Service Oper. Management Conf. 2000 Proc., Ann Arbor, MI.
6. Besanko, D. and Winston, W. L. (1990), “Optimal price skimming by a monopolist facing rational consumers”, Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 555–567.
7. Bulow, J. I. (1982), “Durable-goods monopolists”, Political Economic, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 314–332.
8. Cachon, G. P. and Lariviere, M. (1999), “Capacity allocation using past sales: When to turn-and-earn”, Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 685–703.
9. Cachon, G. P. and Swinney, R. (2009), “Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers”, Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 497–511.
10. Coase, R. H. (1972), “Durability and monopoly”, Law Economic, Vol.15, No. 1, pp. 143–149.
11. Dana , J. D. (2001), “Competition in price and availability when availability is unobservable”, RAND J. Econom, Vol. 32, pp. 497–513.
12. Dana, J. D. and Petruzzi, N. C. (2001), “The newsvendor model with endogenous demand”, Management Science, Vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1488–1497.
13. Datta, T. K. and Pal, A. K. (1990), “A note on an inventory model with inventory level-dependent demand rate”, Operation Research, Vol. 41, pp. 971–975.
14. DeGraba, P. (1995), “Buying frenzies and seller-induced excess Demand”, RAND J. Econom, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 331–342.
15. Deneckere, R. and Peck, J. (1995), “Competition over price and service rate when demand is stochastic: A strategic analysis”, RAND J. Economic, Vol. 26, pp.148–162.
16. Desai, P., Koenigsberg, O. and Purohit, D. (2004), “Strategic decentralization and channel coordination”, Quant. Marketing Economic, Vol. 2, pp. 5–22.
17. Dyers, H. and Ouchi, W. (1993), “Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge”, Sloan Management Rev, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 51–64.
18. Gerchak, Y. and Wang, Y. (1994), “Periodic-review inventory models with inventory-level dependent demand”, Naval Res. Logist, Vol. 41, pp. 99–116.
19. Helper, S. (1991), “How much has really changed between US manufacturers and their suppliers”, Sloan Management Rev., Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 15–28.
20. Helper, S. and Sako, M. (1995), “Supplier relations in Japan and the United States: Are they converging”, Sloan Management Rev, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 77–85.
21. Jerath, K., Netessine, S. and Veeraraghavan, S. K. (2007), “Last-minute selling and opaque selling”, Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
22. Jerath, K., Netessine, S. and Veeraraghavan, S. K. (2010), “Revenue Management with Strategic Customers: Last-Minute Selling and Opaque Selling”, Management science, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 430–448.
23. Krishna, A. (1994), “The impact of dealing patterns on purchase behavior”, Marketing Science, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 351–373.
24. Lai, G. and Debo, L. G. and Sycara, K. (2009), “Buy now and match later: Impact of posterior price matching on profit with strategic consumers”, Manufacturing Service Operation Management, ePub ahead of print February 10.
25. Lee, H., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1999), “Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect”, Management Science, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 546–558.
26. Levin, Y., McGill, J. and Nediak, M. (2009), “Dynamic Pricing in the Presence of Strategic Consumers and Oligopolistic Competition”, Management science, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 32–46.
27. Liu, Q. and Van Ryzin, G. (2005), “Strategic capacity rationing to induce early purchases”, Working paper, Columbia University, New York.
28. McWilliams, G. (2004), “Minding the store: Analyzing customers, Best Buy decides not all are welcome”, Wall Street J, November8 A1.
29. Stokey, N. (1979), “Intertemporal price discrimination”, Quart. J. Econom,Vol. 93, No. 3, pp. 355–371
30. Stokey, N. (1981), “Rational expectations and durable goods pricing”, Bell J. Econom. Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 112–128
31. Su, X. (2007), “Intertemporal pricing with strategic customer behavior”, Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 726–741.
32. Su, X. and Zhang, F. (2008), “Strategic customer behavior, commitment, and supply chain performance”, Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 10, pp. 1759–1773.
33. Su, X. and Zhang, F. (2009), “On the Value of Commitment and Availability Guarantees When Selling to Strategic Consumers”, Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 713–72.
34. Su, X. (2010), “Optimal Pricing with Speculators and Strategic Consumers”, Management Science, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 25–40.

指導教授

曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng)

審核日期

2011-7-7

推文