當供應商面臨一個未知的風險趨避零售商下制定保險合約組合

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：55

、訪客IP：18.225.149.102

姓名

陳佩誼(Pei-yi Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

當供應商面臨一個未知的風險趨避零售商下制定保險合約組合
(Portfolio setting of insurance contracts when facing a retailer with unknown risk preference)

相關論文

★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例	★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究	★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業	★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標	★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理	★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究	★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率－以Ａ公司塗料充填流程改善為例	★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例	★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

供應鏈的協同合作已在許多論文中被廣泛的討論，部份的文獻是假設其情境為風險中立的供應鏈成員。然而，風險態度除了中立態度之外，尚有偏好及趨避兩種風險態度，單以風險中立態度是無法完整呈現供應鏈成員的行為。因此，在本研究中，我們在報童模型下討論當供應商面臨風險趨避零售商時，如何達成通路協調消弭雙邊際效應。為了達成供應鏈的協同合作，許多學者發展了許多協同機制，例如，營收分享契約、回購契約以及數量折扣等等。
在本研究中，我們假設供應鏈中成員為供應商及零售商各一位。此外，我們設定了三個情境及二種類型的協同契約，藉此呈現當供應商面臨風險中立及風險趨避零售商時利潤的差異。一般而言，相較於風險中立的零售商，風險趨避的零售商在面對不確定需求量的情形下，訂購量較少。然而，較少的訂購量將使得供應商的獲利相對減少。為因應供應商此問題，本研究的討論重點是由供應商提供一份契約組合給零售商，並藉由此機制設計誘因給零售商，使其願意接受契約，同時達成協同合作下的最適訂購量。

摘要(英)

Coordination of supply chain has been widely discussed in many research. Some of them only discussed the situation of risk-neutral agents. However, the assumption of risk-neutral seems to be inadequate for the supply chain in reality. Hence, in this study, we discussed the newsvendor model with risk-averse retailer. To eliminate the double marginalization, scholars extended many methods. Such as, revenue sharing contract, buyback contract, quantity discount and so on.
In our study, we assume that supply chain with one supplier and one retailer. Besides, we set three scenarios and two types of contract to identify the profits of risk-neutral and risk-averse retailer. In most cases, the risk-averse retailer will order less than the risk-neutral one. The lesser order quantity causes the lesser profits of supplier. Our study is focusing on dealing with the problem about the risk-aversion. Hence, the supplier gives the risk-averse retailer some incentive to order more. The way we measure the risk-aversion is mean-variance analysis, which is widely applied in the supply chain management, the economics, and the financial. Our goal is finding a suitable portfolio of insurance contracts offered by the supplier to maximize the supplier’s profit and the retailer will choosing the unique contract of the portfolio.

關鍵字(中)

★ 報童問題
★ 協同機制
★ 均異分析

關鍵字(英)

★ Coordination Mechanism
★ Newsvendor Problem
★ Mean-Variance analysis

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
Contents iii
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Background/Motivation 1
1.2. Research objectives 3
2. Literature Review 4
2.1. Newsvendor Problem 4
2.2. Coordination Mechanism 5
2.3. Mean-Variance Analysis 6
3. Model and Analysis 7
3.1. Scenario 0 — the original newsvendor contract (ONC) with risk-neutral supplier and retailer 12
3.2. Scenario 1 — the original newsvendor contract (ONC) with risk-neutral supplier and risk-averse retailer 13
3.3. Scenario 2 — the portfolio of insurance contracts (PIC) with risk-neutral supplier and risk-averse retailer 15
3.4. Discrete portfolio of contract apply to continuous risk parameter k 18
4. Numerical Example 20
4.1. Discrete Risk Parameter k 20
4.2. Continuous Risk Parameter k 22
5. Sensitivity Analysis 24
5.1. The scale of risk parameter k 24
5.2. The setting of , the scale of B 25
5.3. The wholesale price (w1) of the 1st contract 26
6. Conclusion and Future Research 28
6.1. Conclusion 28
6.2. Future research 29
Reference 31
Appendix: Proof of Lemma 33

參考文獻

1. Agrawal, V. and Seshadri, S. (2000). Risk intermediation in supply chains. IIE Transactions, 32(9), pp. 819-831.
2. Cachon, G. P. (2001, Sep.). Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts. in Handbooks in operations research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management, Chapter 11. Graves and Kok (eds.)
3. Cachon, G. P. and Lariviere, M. A. (2005, Jan.). Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations. Management Science, 51(1), pp. 30-44.
4. Chen, Y. J. and Seshadri, S. (2006, Aug.). Supply chain structure and demand risk. Automatica, 42(8), pp. 1291-1299.
5. Choi, T. -M., Li, D. and Yan, H. (2008, Jan.). Mean-variance analysis of a single supplier and retailer supply chain under a returns policy. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), pp. 356-376.
6. Freund, R. J. (1956, Jul.). The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model. Econometrica, 24(3), pp. 253-263.
7. Halek, M. and Eisenhauer J. G. (2001, Mar.). Demography of Risk Aversion. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), pp. 1-24.
8. Halek, M. and Eisenhauer, J. G. (2001). Demography of Risk Aversion. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(1), pp. 1-24.
9. Jeuland, A. P. and Shugan, S. M. (1983, Summer). Managing channel profits. Marketing Science, 2(3), pp. 239-272.
10. Khouja, M. (1999, Oct.). The single-period (news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research. The International Journal of Management Science, 27(5), pp. 537-553.
11. Lariviere, M. A. and Porteus, E. L. (1999, May.). Selling to the newsvendor. Northwestern University Working Paper(1569).
12. Levy, H. and Markowitz, H. M. (1979, Jun.). Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance. The American Economic Review, 69(3), pp. 308-317.
13. Lin Z., Cai, C. and Xu, B. (2010, Sep.). Supply chain coordination with insurance contract. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), pp. 339-345.
14. Markowitz, H. M. (1952, Mar.). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), pp. 77-91.
15. Pasternack, B. A. (1985, Spring). Optimal pricing and returns policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science, 4(2), pp. 166-176.
16. Petruzzi, N. C. and Dada, M. (1999, Apr.). Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions. Operations Research, 47(2), pp. 183-194.
17. Pratt, J. W. (1964, Jan.). Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 32(1), pp. 122-136.
18. Spengler, J. J. (1950). Vertical integration and antitrust policy. Journal of Political Economy, 58, pp. 347-352.
19. Tsay, A. A. (1999, Oct.). The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives. Management Science, 45, pp. 1339-1358.
20. Whitin, T. M. (1955). Inventory Control and Price Theory. Management Science, 2, pp. 61-68.
21. Wu, J., Li, J., Wang, S. and Cheng T.C.E. (2009, Jun.). Mean-variance analysis of the newsvendor model with stockout cost. Omega, 37(3), pp. 724-730.

指導教授

曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng)

審核日期

2011-7-11

推文