發展視覺化專利分析方法探討企業技術布局與研發策略

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：138

、訪客IP：18.118.150.80

姓名

高志昕(Chih-hsi Kao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

發展視覺化專利分析方法探討企業技術布局與研發策略
(Visualization Methods for Patent Analysis to Explore Enterprise Technological Deployment and R&D Strategies)

相關論文

★ 從生態共生觀點發展組織合作模式	★ 影響產業垂直分工因素之探討
★ 發展台籍專業管家的人力派遣模式	★ 影響軍事機關審計品質之關鍵性因素及其相對效率衡量
★ 台灣光碟片設備供應商競爭策略分析	★ 國防科技研發機構組織向心力之研究
★ 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效	★ 衡量半導體晶圓代工廠商生產單位之營運績效
★ 商業銀行營運型態與組織調整對分行營運效率的影響	★ 發展行動條碼為基礎的隨傳隨用視訊平台之應用
★ 飛機引擎定子零件維修之訂價調整方式	★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效：台灣上市公司董事會結構論析
★ 探討網際網路事件達成關鍵多數之影響因素	★ 生態循環農業產銷策略個案研究
★ 探討以政策規範高耗能產業參與再生能源開發之綜效－以太陽光電發電系統為例	★ 適地性服務(LBS)之顧客體驗整合性設計—以中華電信行動導遊為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

高科技產業的技術變革迅速，若企業管理者能有效掌控前瞻性技術趨勢或競爭者技術脈動時，將可提前布局專利與提高競爭者技術進入障礙，保有領先的技術能力與市場。有效搶先布局專利技術已成為提升企業競爭力的關鍵要素，因此發展分析方法作為企業技術研發與專利布局的參考依據已成為重要議題。專利指標為簡易與有效的專利分析方法，透過多類型專利指標或變數形成視覺化的專利組合圖，受到企業管理者或研發人員廣泛使用。本研究發展二個創新分析模式的專利組合圖，以探討企業專利布局與研發策略，並以實證分析結果提供相關產業參考。模式一是利用資料包絡分析法的特性演算專利指標與變數並給予最適的權重分配，此模式可使企業自由選擇對自己評估最為有利的專利指標或變數的權重組合，並限制數據值介於0至1之間。模式一能有效提高專利指標或變數權重的客觀性，提升數據易判別性與精確性，並增加企業標竿學習的功能，將實證於磷酸鋰鐵電池專利技術並提供相關企業技術布局與研發規劃情報。模式二是整合對應分析與群集分析的視覺化方法，以呈現專利指標或變數間相對應的複雜關聯性，並藉由關聯性挖掘隱藏的專利情報。模式二能使專利指標或變數依據最原始的資料關聯性反映於二維圖形，可使企業簡易利用幾何空間距離遠近與密度的直觀視覺效果，有效探討與獲取專利情報，將實證於薄膜太陽能電池專利技術並提供相關企業技術布局與研發規劃情報。

摘要(英)

The rate of technological progress in the hi-tech industry is increasing rapidly. If enterprise managers in industrial environments can identify the trends of emerging potential technology or the technological progress of its opponents, they could seize the opportunity to build patent fences and increase the entry obstacles of related technology. This, in turn, would allow them to maintain technological competitiveness and achieve dominance in technological capabilities or markets. Preempting the deployment of their patented technology could enhance the competitiveness of enterprises. Therefore, the development of analysis methods as reference for corporate research and development (R&D) and patent deployment has become an important issue. Patent indicators are simple and effective patent analysis methods that, through the use of multiple indicators or variables, form patent portfolio maps for enterprise managers or R&D personnel. This study develops two innovative models of patent portfolio analysis to explore the R&D planning and patent deployment of enterprise technologies and the practices in empirical patent analyses for related industries as a reference approach. Model 1 uses the characteristics of data envelopment analysis (DEA) to calculate the optimal weight set of patent indicators and variables for forming patent portfolio maps. This model allows enterprises to freely choose the patent indicator or variable weight set that is most advantageous by DEA evaluation, limiting the numerical values from 0 to 1. In addition, it increases the weight objectivity of indicators or variables, enhances the degree of distinguishability and accuracy, and increases the function of enterprise benchmark learning. Model 1 is evidenced in the lithium iron phosphate battery technology. Model 2 integrates the visualization methods of correspondence analysis and cluster analysis to visually present the effects of complex multiple patent indicators (or variables) corresponding with the relationships, which could be used in data mining to extract important patent information. This model allows enterprises to explore the associations among patent indicators or variables according to geometry distance or similarity, and to simultaneously visualize the results on a two-dimensional graphical display. Model 2 is evidenced in the thin film photovoltaic technology. These analysis results provide reference for patented deployment and R&D planning of enterprise technologies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 專利組合
★ 資料包絡分析法
★ 對應分析
★ 群集分析
★ 專利分析
★ 專利指標

關鍵字(英)

★ Patent indicator
★ Cluster analysis
★ Patent analysis
★ Patent portfolio
★ Data envelopment analysis
★ Correspondence analysis

論文目次

ABSTRACT IN CHINESE　i
ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH　ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS　iv
LIST OF FIGURES　vi
LIST OF TABLES　vii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION　1
1.1 Research background　1
1.2 Research motivation　4
1.3 Research purpose　5
1.4 Framework and outlines of this study　6
CHAPTER 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND　9
2.1 Patent analysis and patent indicators　9
2.2 Patent portfolio and map　11
2.3 DEA basic model　15
2.4 Correspondence analysis and cluster analysis　17
CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS PROCESS OF PROPOSED MODEL 1 AND LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE BATTERY EMPIRICAL STUDY　22
3.1 Research process and steps　22
3.1.1 Collecting patent data　23
3.1.2 Patent data analysis　26
3.1.3 Obtaining information and formulating R&D strategies　27
3.2 Research result　30
3.2.1 Patent portfolio on the company level　30
3.2.2 Patent portfolio on the technological level　34
3.3 Discussion and recommendations　42
3.3.1 Conclusion of the methodology　42
3.3.2 Conclusion at the practical application　44
3.3.3 Recommendations for Model 1　47
3.4 Summary　47
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS PROCESS OF PROPOSED MODEL 2 AND THIN FILM PHOTOVOLTAIC EMPIRICAL STUDY　49
4.1 Research process and steps　49
4.1.1 Collecting patent data　50
4.1.2 Patent data analysis　52
4.1.3 Obtaining information and formulating R&D strategies　53
4.2 Research Result　54
4.2.1 Patent portfolio for enterprise technological deployment and industrial technological gap　54
4.2.2 Patent portfolio for enterprise technological movement and industrial technological development trends　58
4.3 Discussion and recommendations　61
4.3.1 Enterprise situation　61
4.3.2 Technological development situation　62
4.3.3 Recommendations for Model 2　63
4.4 Summary　63
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS　65
5.1 Discussion and conclusions　65
5.1.1 Discussion and comparison of the two models　65
5.1.2 Conclusions　66
5.2 Future research　67
REFERENCE　68
APPENDIX 1　75
APPENDIX 2　76
APPENDIX 3　78

參考文獻

Arimond, G., Elfssi, A., 2001. A clustering method for categorical data in tourism market segmentation research. Journal of Travel Research 39 (4), 391–397.
Ashton, W.B., Sen, R.K., 1988. Using patent information in technology business planning - I. Research Technology Management 31 (6), 42–46.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, R.F., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (9), 1078–1092.
Basberg, B.L., 1987. Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Research Policy 16 (2-4), 131–141.
Berkowitz, L., 1993. Getting the most from your patents. Research Technology Management 32 (2), 26–31.
Brockhoff, K.K., 1992. Instruments for patent data analysis in business firms. Technovation 12 (1), 41–58.
Brockhoff, K.K., Ernst, H., Hundhausen, E., 1999. Gains and pains from licensing–patent-portfolios as strategic weapons in the cardiac rhythm management industry. Technovation 19 (10), 605–614.
Campbell, R.S., 1983. Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool. World Patent Information 5 (3), 137–143.
Cantwell, J.A., Fai, F., 1999. Firms as the source of innovation and growth: The evolution of technological competence. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9 (3), 331–366.
Carroll, J.D., Green, P.E., Schaffer, C.M., 1986. Interpoint distance comparisons in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 23 (3), 271–280.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6), 429–444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1979. Short communication: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 3 (4), 339.
Chen, Y.S., Chang, K.C., 2010. Exploring the nonlinear effects of patent citations, patent share and relative patent position on market value in the US pharmaceutical industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (2), 153–169.
Choi, C., Park, Y., 2009. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 76 (6), 754–768.
Clausen, S., 1998. Applied Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Curran, C.-S., Leker, J., 2011. Patent indicators for monitoring convergence - examples from NFF and ICT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (2), 256–273.
Dore, J.C., Ojasoo, T., Okubo, Y., Durand, T., Dudognon, G., Miquel, J.F., 1996. Correspondence factor analysis of the publication patterns of 48 countries over the period 1981-1992. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47 (8), 588–602.
Dore, J.C., Dutheuil, C., Miquel J.F., 2000. Multidimensional analysis of trends in patent activity. Scientometrics 47 (3), 475–492.
Ernst, H., 1995. Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to company performance. Technovation 15 (4), 225–240.
Ernst, H., 1997. The use of patent data for technological forecasting: The diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Business Economics 9 (4), 361–381.
Ernst, H., 1998. Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15 (4), 279–308.
Ernst, H., 2003. Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information 25 (3), 233–242.
Ernst, H., Fabry, B., Soll, J.H., 2004. Enhancing market-oriented R&D planning by integrated market and patent portfolios. Journal of Business Chemistry 1 (1), 2–13.
Fabry, B., Ernst, H., Langholz, J., Köster, M., 2006. Patent portfolio analysis as a useful tool for identifying R&D and business opportunities - an empirical application in the nutrition and health industry. World Patent Information 28 (3), 215–225.
Farrell, M.J., 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A General 120 (3), 253–290.
Greenacre, M.J., 1984. Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Greenacre, M.J., Hastie, T.J., 1987. The geometric interpretation of correspondence analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (398), 437-447.
Griliches, Z., 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (4), 1661–1707.
Gursoy, D., Chen, S.C., 2000. Competitive analysis of cross cultural information search behavior. Journal of Tourism Management 21 (6), 583–590.
Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, M., 2003. Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy 32 (8), 1365–1379.
Hall, B.H., Griliches, Z., Hausman, J.A., 1986. Patents and R and D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review 27 (2), 265–283.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F.M., Vopel, K., 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3), 511–515.
Hoffman, D.L., Franke, G.R., 1986. Correspondence analysis: Graphical representation of categorical data in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 23 (3), 213–227.
Hufker, T., Alpert, F., 1994. Patents: A managerial perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management 3 (4), 44–54.
Jaffe, A.B., Henderson, R., Trajtenberg, M., 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3), 577–598.
Ji, H., Zhu, Y., Wu, X., 1995. Correspondence cluster analysis and its application in exploration geochemistry. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 55 (1-3), 137–144.
Kayal, A.A., Waters, R.C., 1999. An empirical evaluation of the technology cycle time indicator as a measure of the pace of technological progress in superconductor technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 46 (2), 127–131.
Kim, Y.G., Suh, J.H., Park, S.C., 2008. Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Systems with Applications 34 (3), 1804–1812.
Lebart, L., 1994. Complementary use of correspondence analysis and cluster analysis. In Greenacre, M., Blasius, J., (Eds.). Correspondence Analysis in the Social Sciences, 162–178. London: Academic Press.
Lee, H., Kim, C., Cho, H., Park, Y., 2009. An ANP-based technology network for identification of core technologies: A case of telecommunication technologies. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (1), 894–908.
Lin, B.W., Chen, C.J., Wu, H.L., 2006. Patent portfolio synergy, technology strategy, and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53 (1), 17–26.
Milligan, G.W., 1985. An algorithm for generating artificial test clusters. Psychometrika 50 (1), 123–127.
Milligan, G.W., Soon, S.C., Sokol, L.M., 1983. The effect of cluster size, dimensionality, and the number of clusters on recovery of true cluster structure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 5 (1), 40–47.
Mogee, M.E., 1991. Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Research Technology Management 34 (4), 43–49.
Mogee, M.E., Kolar, R.G., 1994. International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 6 (4), 485–503.
Mowery, C.D., Oxley, J.E., Silverman, B.S., 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy 27 (5), 507–523.
Narin, F., 1995. Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics 34 (3), 489–496.
Narin, F., 1994. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 30 (1), 147–155.
Narin, F., Noma, E., Perry, R., 1987. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy 16 (2-4), 143–155.
Pilkington, A., Romano, D., Omid, T., 2002. The electric vehicle: Patent data as indicators of technological development. World Patent Information 24 (1), 5–12.
Podolny, J.M., Stuart, T.E., Hannan, M.T., 1996. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. American Journal of Sociology 102 (3), 659–689.
Punj, G., Stward, D.W., 1983. Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for applications. Journal of Marketing Research 20 (2), 134–148.
Reitzig, M., 2004. Improving patent valuations for management purposes–validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy 33 (6-7), 939–957.
Schmookler, J., 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Seiford, L.M., 1996. Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995). The Journal of Productivity Analysis 7 (2-3), 99–137.
Shen, Y.C., Chang, S.H., Lin, G.T.R., Yu, H.C., 2010. A hybrid selection model for emerging technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 (1), 51–166.
Shih, M.J., Liu, D.R., Hsu, M.L., 2010. Discovering competitive intelligence by mining changes in patent trends. Expert Systems with Applications 37 (4), 2882–2890.
Shin, J., Park, Y., 2007. Building the national ICT frontier: The case of Korea. Information Economics and Policy 19 (2), 249–277.
Stuart, T.E., Podolny, J.M., 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S1), 21–38.
Teece, D.J., 1996. Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31 (2), 193–224.
Tekaia, F., Yeramian, E., Dujon, B., 2002. Amino acid composition of genomes, lifestyles of organisms, and evolutionary trends: A global picture with correspondence analysis. Gene 297 (1-2), 51–60.
Tornatzky, L.G., Klein, K.J., 1982. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 29 (1), 28–45.
Tseng, F.M., Chiu, Y.J., Chen, J.S., 2009. Measuring business performance in the high-tech manufacturing industry: A case study of Taiwan's large-sized TFT-LCD panel companies. Omega 37 (3), 686–697.
Tseng, F.M., Hsieh, C.H., Peng, Y.N., Chu, Y.W., 2011. Using patent data to analyze trends and the technological strategies of the amorphous silicon thin-film solar cell industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (2), 332–345.
Valenchon, F., 1982. The use of correspondence analysis in geochemistry. Mathematical Geology 14 (4), 331–342.
Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., Rost, K., 2005. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy 34 (10), 1591–1607.
Yoon, B.U., Yoon, C.B., Park, Y.T., 2002. On the development and application of a self-organizing feature map-based patent map. R&D Management 34 (4), 291–300.
Zander, I., 1997. Technological diversification in the multinational corporation-historical evolution and future prospects. Research Policy 26 (2), 209–227.

指導教授

張東生(Dong-shang Chang)

審核日期

2011-6-23

推文