影響消費者自行攜帶旅館備品之因素

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：74

、訪客IP：3.139.83.27

姓名

黃俊榮(CHUN-JUNG HUANG) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

影響消費者自行攜帶旅館備品之因素

相關論文

★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響	★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯	★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響	★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響	★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響	★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務	★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究：五大廠商之個案分析
★ 服務花朵的創新與競爭優勢:以五家牙科診所的個案分析	★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究
★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響	★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來台灣旅遊業蓬勃發展，其所產生之廢棄物與造成之環境污染日益嚴重，為能有效降低消費者於旅館住宿時所產生之一次性備品廢棄物數量，本研究希望能夠找出最為有效說服及激勵消費者自行攜帶盥洗用品之方式。
本研究探討旅館價位(高價位/低價位)、備品收費方式(預先收取/預先扣除)、回饋方式(金錢/紅利點數/環保公益)，以及社會規範種類(國家/都市/性別/房間)、屬性框架效應(正面/負面)，對消費者自行攜帶盥洗用品意願的影響，同時並探討個人關聯化程度和環保意識對框架效應影響消費者自行攜帶盥洗用品意願的改變。研究結果顯示：
1.「低價位」的旅館價位相較於「高價位」的旅館價位，會使消費者產生較高的自行攜帶盥洗用品意願。
2.「預先收取」的備品收費方式相較於「預先扣除」的備品收費方式，會使消費者產生較高的自行攜帶盥洗用品意願。
3.「環保公益」的回饋方式相較於「紅利點數」和「金錢」的回饋方式，會使消費者產生較高的自行攜帶盥洗用品意願；而「紅利點數」的回饋方式相較於「金錢」的回饋方式，會使消費者產生較高的自行攜帶盥洗用品意願。
4.在「預先收取」的備品收費方式下，「環保公益」的回饋方式對消費者自行攜帶盥洗用品意願影響顯著大於「金錢」以及「紅利點數」的回饋方式。然而在「預先扣除」的備品收費方式下，這三種回饋方式之間皆沒有顯著差異。
5.「性別」的社會規範相較於「國家」與「房間」的社會規範，會使消費者產生較高的自行攜帶盥洗用品意願。
6.「正面」的屬性框架相較於「負面」的屬性框架，會使消費者產生較高的自行攜帶盥洗用品意願。
7.個人關聯化程度和環保意識在屬性框架效應對於消費者自行攜帶盥洗用品意願影響上具有交互作用。

摘要(英)

This research discusses how the hotel price (the higher price/the lower price), the way to charge customers for hotel’’s supplies (charge in advance/ doesn’t charge in advance), the feedback (money/bonus/environmental charity), the kinds of social norms (country/citizen/sex/guest of particular room) and the framing effect (positive/negative) influence the consumers’ wills to bring their own supplies. This research also discusses the interaction between high personal relevance, environmental protection consciousness, and the consumers’ wills to take along with their own toiletries affected by the framing effect. The result shows that:
1.Compared with the hotel of higher price, the hotel with lower price tends to enhance the consumers’ wills to bring their own supplies.
2.The hotel which charge customers for hotel’’s supplies in advance will make consumers have higher wills to bring their own supplies than the hotel which doesn’t charge customers for hotel’’s supplies in advance.
3.The feedback with environmental charity make consumers have higher wills to take along with their own toiletries than The feedback with bonus or money; Also the feedback with bonus make consumers have higher wills to bring their own supplies than The feedback with money.
4.When the hotel charge customers for hotel’’s supplies in advance, the feedback with environmental charity make consumers have higher wills to bring their own supplies than the feedback with bonus or money. But when the hotel doesn’t charge customers for the hotel’’s supplies in advance, the situation above won’t happen.
5.The social norm with sex will make consumers have higher wills to bring their own supplies than the social norm with country or guest of particular room.
6.The positive framing will make consumers have higher wills to bring their own supplies than the negative framing.
7.The high personal relevance and the environmental protection consciousness have the interaction with the consumers’ wills to bring their own supplies affected by the framing effect.

關鍵字(中)

★ 框架效應
★ 社會規範
★ 綠色旅館

關鍵字(英)

★ framing effect
★ social norm
★ green hotel

論文目次

中文摘要................................................　i
Abstract ..............................................　ii
致謝 ..................................................　iv
目錄 ...................................................　v
表目錄 ...............................................　vii
圖目錄 ..............................................　viii
第一章緒論 ............................................　1
第一節研究動機 ........................................　1
第二節研究目的 ........................................　3
第三節研究流程 .........................................　4
第二章文獻探討 .........................................　5
第一節綠色旅館 .........................................　5
第二節旅館價位 ........................................　8
第三節社會規範 ........................................　11
第四節框架效應 ........................................　13
第三章研究方法 ........................................　16
第一節研究架構 ........................................　16
第二節研究假設 ........................................　18
第三節變數的操作性定義與衡量方法 ......................　23
第四節前測實驗 ........................................　28
第五節研究方法 ........................................　32
第四章資料分析 ........................................　35
第一節樣本結構 ........................................　35
第二節假設驗證 ........................................　36
第五章研究結論與建議 ..................................　51
第一節研究結論.........................................　51
第二節研究結果討論.....................................　55
第三節研究限制與問題...................................　56
第四節建議後續研究發展.................................　57
參考文獻 ...............................................　58
附錄一旅館價位前測問卷 ................................　64
附錄二正式測驗問卷之一.................................　65

參考文獻

1.Bearden, William O. and Michael J. Etzel (1982), “Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 183–94.
2.Bearden, William O., Richard G. Nettemeyer, and Jesse E. Teel (1989), “Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (March), 473–81.
3.Brinberg, David and Linda Plimpton (1986), “Self-Monitoring and Product Conspicuousness on Reference Group Influence,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, ed. Richard J. Lutz, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 297–300.
4.Burnkrant, Robert E. and Alain Cousineau (1975), “Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (December), 206–15.
5.Carli, Linda L., Roseanne Ganley, and Amy Pierce-Otay (1991), “Similarity and Satisfaction in Roommate Relationships,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (4), 419–26.
6.Cialdini, Robert B., Carl A. Kallgren, and Raymond R. Reno (1991), “A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 24, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, San Diego: Academic Press, 201–34.
7.Cialdini, Robert B. and Noah J. Goldstein (2004), “Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity,” Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–622.
8.Cooper, Peter.(1969), Subjective Economics: Factors in a Psychology of Spending, Pricing Strategy, London: Staples Press, Ltd., pp.112-121.
9.Dan Ariely(2010), Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions.
10.Davis, Mark A. and Philip Bobko (1986), “Contextual Effects on Escalation Processes in Public Sector Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37 (February), 121–138.
11.Deshpande´, Rohit, Wayne D. Hoyer, and Naveen Donthu (1986), “The Intensity of Ethnic Affiliation: A Study of the Sociology of Hispanic Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (2), 214–20.
12.Dodds, W.B., K.B. Monroe and D. Grewal(1991), “Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers product evaluation, ” Journal of Consumer Research, 307-319.
13.Dunegan, Kenneth J. (1993), “Framing, Cognitive Modes, and Image Theory: Toward an Understanding of a Glass Half Full,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (June), 491–503.
14.Ecomall. (2000). A Place to Help Save the Earth. [Online]. Available: http:// www.ecomall.com.
15.Erickson, G. M. and J. K. Jonansson(1985), “The Role of Price in Multi-Attribute Product Evaluation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12,Sep, 195-199.
16.Festinger, Leon (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes,” Human Relations, 7 (2), 117–40.
17.Forehand, Mark R. and Rohit Deshpande´ (2001), “What We See Makes Us Who We Are: Priming Ethnic Self-Awareness and Advertising Response,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (3), 336–48.
18.Forehand, Mark R., Rohit Deshpande´, and Americus Reed II (2002), “Identity Salience and the Influence of Activation of the Social Self-Schema on Advertising Response,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (6), 1086–99.
19.Green Hotels Association.(2000) How green are your meetings. [Online]. Available: http://www.greenhotels.com/question.htm.
20.Green Mountain State.(2002) Green Hotels in the Green Mountain State. [Online]. Available: http://www.vtgreenhotels.org.
21.Griskevicius, Vladas, Noah J. Goldstein, Chad R. Mortensen, Robert B. Cialdini, and Douglas T. Kenrick (2006), “Going Along versus Going Alone: When Fundamental Motives Facilitate Strategic (Non)Conformity,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (2), 281–94.
22.Hochbaum, Godfrey M. (1954), “The Relation between Group Members’ Self-Confidence and Their Reactions to Group Pressures to Uniformity,” American Sociological Review, 19 (6), 678–87.
23.Hogg, Michael A. (2003), “Social Identity,” in Handbook of Self and Identity, ed. Mark R. Leary and June P. Tangney, New York: Guilford, 462–79.
24.Holbrook, Morris B., (1999), “Introduction to Consumer Value,” in Morris B. Holbrook (eds) Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, Routledge, New York, 1-28.
25.Kelman, Herbert C. (1961), “Processes of Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 25 (Spring), 57–78.
26.Kleine, Robert E., Susan S. Kleine, and Jerome B. Kernan (1993), “Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social Identity Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (3), 209–35.
27.Levin, Irwin P., John D. Jasper, and Gary J. Gaeth (1996), “Measuring the Effects of Framing Country-of-Origin Information: A Process Tracing Approach,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 23, ed. Kim Corfman and John G. Lynch, Jr., Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 385–389.
28.Levin, Irwin P. and Gary J. Gaeth (1988), “How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (December), 374–378.
29.Levin, Irwin P., Richard D. Johnson, Craig P. Russo, and Patricia J. Deldin (1985), “Framing Effects in Judgment Tasks with Varying Amounts of Information,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36 (December), 362–377.
30.Levin, Irwin P., Sandra L. Schneider, and Gary J. Gaeth (1998), “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (November), 149–188.
31.Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M. and Burton, S. (1993), “Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior: A Field Study,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30, May, 234-245.
32.Linville, Patricia W., Gregory W. Fischer, and Baruch Fischhoff (1993), “AIDS Risk Perceptions and Decision Biases,” in The Social Psychology of HIV Infection, ed. John B. Pryor and Glenn D. Reeder, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 5–38.
33.Marteau, Theresa M. (1989), “Positive and Negative Decision Frames: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of the Asian Disease Problem of Kahneman and Tversky,” in Process and Structure in Human Decision Making, ed. Henry Montgomery and Ola Svenson, New York: Wiley, 163–180.
34.Meyerowitz, Beth E. and Shelly Chaiken (1987), “The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (March), 500–510.
35.Monroe, K. B. (1973), Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1): 70-80.
36.Monroe, Kent B(1979), “Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, ” New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.Monroe, K. B.and Krishnan R.(1985), “The effect of price on subjective product dvaluations, perceived quality: how consumers view stores and merchandise. ” In J. Jacoby, & J. Olsion(Eds.), Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath, pp.209-232.
38.Moschis, George P. (1976), “Social Comparison and Informal Group Influence,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (August), 237–44.
39.Murray, David M., Russell V. Luepker, Anderson C. Johnson, and Maurice B. Mittelmark (1984), “The Prevention of Cigarette Smoking in Children: A Comparison of Four Strategies,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14 (3), 274–88.
40.Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988), “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, Sep, pp. 253-264.
41.Reed, Americus II (2004), “Activating the Self-Importance of Consumer Selves: Exploring Identity Salience Effects on Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (September), 286–95.
42.Rokeach, Milton J., (1973), The Nature of Human Values, New York: The Free Press.
43.Schneider, Sandra L. (1995), “Item Difficulty, Discrimination, and the Confidence-Frequency Effect in a Categorical Judgment Task,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61 (February), 148–167.
44.Shapiro, Jenessa R. and Steven L. Neuberg (forthcoming), “When Do the Stigmatized Stigmatize? The Ironic Effects of Being Accountable to (Perceived) Majority Group Prejudice-Expression Norms,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
45.Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I. and Gross, B.L.(1991). Why we buy:A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159-170.
46.Sniezek, Janet A., Paul W. Paese, and Fred S. Switzer (1990), “The Effect of Choosing on Confidence in Choice,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46 (August), 264–282.
47.Stayman, Douglas M. and Rohit Deshpande´ (1989), “Situational Ethnicity and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (December), 361–71.
48.Suedfeld, Peter, Stephen Bochner, and Carol Matas (1971), “Petitioner’s Attire and Petition Signing by Peace Demonstrators: A Field Experiment,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1 (3), 278–83.
49.Terry, Deborah J. and Michael A. Hogg (1996), “Group Norms and the Attitude-Behaviour Relationship: A Role for Group Identification,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (8), 776–93.
50.Terry, Deborah J., Michael A. Hogg, and Katherine M. White (1999), “The Theory of Planned Behaviour: Self-Identity, Social Identity, and Group Norms,” British Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (3), 225–44.
51.Tourism Council Australia.(1998). About Tourism Australia. [Online]. Available: http://www.tourism.australia.com.
52.Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1981), “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science, 211 (January), 453–458.
53.Park, C. Whan and Parker V. Lessig (1977), “Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (September), 102–10.
54.White, Katherine M., Michael A. Hogg, and Deborah J. Terry (2002), “Improving Attitude-Behavior Correspondence through Exposure to Normative Support from a Salient Ingroup,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24 (2), 91–103.
55.Zeithaml, V.A.(1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price and Value: A Means-End Model & Synthesis of Evidence,” J.mark, 2-22.

指導教授

林建煌

審核日期

2011-7-4

推文