產品負面訊息比例對產品評價與購買意願之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：9

、訪客IP：52.15.205.134

姓名

李亞儒(Ya-ju Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

產品負面訊息比例對產品評價與購買意願之影響
(The Influence about the Proportion of Negative Information on Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention)

相關論文

★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響	★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯	★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響	★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響	★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響	★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務	★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究：五大廠商之個案分析
★ 服務花朵的創新與競爭優勢:以五家牙科診所的個案分析	★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究
★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響	★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

訊息正反性(Message framing)是指廣告將訊息以正面或反面的方式傳達給消費者，本研究主要探討之訊息正反性則是指任何產品或品牌本身同時具有正面及負面的屬性項目。意在了解提供產品負面訊息比例對於產品評價與購買意願之影響，並加入了產品價格、產品涉入、內外控人格特質以及訊息本身重要性等干擾變數，了解這些干擾變數與產品負面訊息之間對於產品評價與購買意願之交互作用關係。
本研究發現以下結果：
一、不同的負面訊息比例、產品價格以及產品涉入程度，對消費者的購買意願呈現交互作用
二、內外控人格特質、不同負面訊息比例以及產品價格，對消費者的產品評價呈現交互作用
三、不同負面訊息比例會受到訊息重要性的影響，對消費者的購買意願呈現交互作用
期望透過這些發現，未來可延伸本研究，加入不同的干擾變數，了解消費者面對負面產品訊息時的處理方式及對產品評價與購買意願間之關係；並讓廠商了解如何在產品描述中適時的提供產品之負面訊息，增加消費者對該產品之產品評價與購買意願。

摘要(英)

Message framing means that messages are delivered to consumers by positive or negative form. The message framing of this research is that any product or brand has positive and negative characteristics simultaneously. This research discusses how proportion of negative message influence the product evaluation and purchasing intention in different price(expensive/cheap), involvement(high/low), locus of control(internal/external), and the importance of message. The result shows that:
1. The proportion of negative message, price, and involvement are interaction in purchasing intention.
2. The proportion of negative message, locus of control, and price are interaction in purchasing intention.
3. The proportion of negative message and the importance of message influence purchasing intention.

關鍵字(中)

★ 訊息正反性
★ 負面訊息
★ 產品評價
★ 購買意願
★ 產品涉入
★ 價格
★ 內外控人格特質

關鍵字(英)

★ locus of control
★ product evaluation
★ purchase intention
★ price
★ involvement
★ negative message
★ message framing

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究流程 4
第二章文獻探討 5
2.1 訊息正反性 5
2.2 涉入 8
2.3 價格 12
2.4 內/外控人格特質 14
2.5 訊息重要性 16
2.6 產品評價 18
2.7 購買意願 20
第三章研究方法 22
3.1 研究架構 22
3.2 研究假設 24
3.3 變數的操作性定義與衡量方法 28
3.4 前測實驗 32
3.5 實驗方法 35
第四章資料分析 38
4.1 樣本結構 38
4.2 信度分析 40
4.3 假設驗證 42
第五章研究結論與建議 56
5.1 研究結論 56
5.2 研究限制 59
5.3 對後續研究之建議 60
參考文獻 61
附錄一產品屬性前測問卷 68
附錄二正式問卷(一) 74
附錄三正式問卷(二) 90

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部分
1. 林建煌，2010。消費者行為，三版，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
2. 林建煌，2008。行銷管理，四版，台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
3. 鄭臻妹，2001。內外控人格特質、工作特性及工作績效之分析研究~以台灣高科技產業員工為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
4. 黃瓊瑩，2000。產品的特殊屬性、共同屬性與屬性重要性對消費者偏好選擇之影響，國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
5. 黃家蔚，2004。促銷方式、產品涉入程度與促銷情境對消費者品牌評價與購買意願之影響，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
6. 蔡季綾，2005。產品置入型態與置入效果、品牌態度間關係之研究—以產品涉入度與年齡為干擾變數，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
7. 孫良政，2006。折扣幅度、產品涉入程度與限制性銷售訴求對產品評價之影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
8. 吳文村，2001。產品製造來源國之國家形象、價格折扣與品牌知名度對於消費者產品評價之影響，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
9. 謝逸君，2004。產品品牌與產品價格對消費者感官知覺之影響，國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
10. 藍才洋，2003。產品價格與複雜度對線上購物決策行為之影響，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
11. 朱永正，2010。促銷方式對消費者知覺價值、購買意願與忠誠度影響之研究─以屈臣氏連鎖藥妝店為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
12. 陳俊傑，2001。訊息典型性、訊息正反性與認知需求對消費者品牌態度之影響，國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
13. 劉若蘭，2001。訊息訴求、訊息正反性、訊息來源可信度、與消費者認知需求對廣告效果之影響，國立成功大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
英文部分
1. Ahtola(1975), “The Vector Model of Preference: An Alternative to the Fishbein Model.”,Journal of Marketing Research, 12(February), 52-59.
2. Akaah,Ishmael P. and Pradeep K.Korgaonkar(1983), “An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Explicated,Huber-Hybrid,Traditional Conjoint and Hybrid Conjoint Models.”, Journal of Marketing Research 20(May), 187-197.
3. Ayn E. Crowley and Wayne D. Hoyer(1994), “An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-sided Persuasion. ”, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(March), 561-574
4. Bloch, P. H. and M. L. Richins(1983), “A Theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions”, Journal of Mmarketing, 47(Summer), 69-81.
5. Block, Lauren G. and Keller, Punam A.(1995), “When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32(May), 192-203.
6. Chang, Tung-Zong, and Albert R. Wildt(1994), “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An empirical Study. ” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(Number), 16-27.
7. Dodds, W. B., K. Monroe, and D. Grewal(1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319.
8. Dodds, William B. and Grewal(1991), “Effect of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyer’s Procduct Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319.
9. Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “ Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (August), 307-319.
10. Engel, James F., Roger D. Blackwell and Paul W. Miniard(1984), Consumer Behavior, 6th ed.
11. Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen(1975), “Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.” Reading,Mass: Addison-Wesley.
12. Green,P.E. and V.Strinivasan(1978), “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research : Issues and Outlook.”,Journal of Consumer Research, 5(September), 103-123.
13. Green,Paul E. and Frank J.Carmone(1981),“Model Misspecification in Multuattribute Parameter Estimation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 87-93.
14. Grewal Dhruv, R. Krishnan, Julie Baker and Norm Borin (1998), “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers, Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331-352.
15. Grewal, Dhruv, Gotlieb, Jerry and Marmorstein, Howard (1994), “The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(June), 145-153.
16. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe and William B. Dodds (1991), “Effect of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation.,” Journal of Marketing Research, XXVIII(August), 307-319.
17. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan(1998), “The Effect of Price Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perception of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value,and Behavioral Intention. ” Journal of Marketing, 62(2) (April), 46-59.
18. Hjorth-Anderson, Chr.(1984), “The Concept of Quality And Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(September), 708-718.
19. Hoepfl,Robert T. and George P.Huber(1970), “A Study of Self-Explicated Models,” Behavioral Science, 15(November),.408-414.
20. Holbrook, Morris B. and Kim P. Corfman (1985), “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again,” in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
21. Hong, Sung-Tai and Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (1989), “Effect of Country-of-Origin and Product-Attribute Information on Product Evaluation: An Information Processing Perceptive,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(2), 175-187.
22. Hong, Sung-Tai and Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (1990), “Determinants of Product Evaluation: Effects of the Time Interval Between Knowledge of a Product’s Country of Origin and Information About Its Sppecific Attributes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 277-288.
23. Houston, M. J. & M. L. Rothschild(1978), “Conceptual and methodological perspectives in involvement”, in S. Jain(ed.), Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Directions, Chicago: America Marketing Association, 184-187.
24. Huber,G.P.,R.Daneshgar and D.L.Ford(1971), “An Empirical Comparison of Five Utility Models for Predicting Job Preferences,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 6,267-282.
25. Huber,G.P.,V.Sahney and D.L.Ford(1969), “A Study of Subjective Evaluation Models,” Behavioral Science, 14(November), 483-489.
26. Humer,G.P.(1974), “Multiattribute Utility Models:A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies,” Management Science 20(June), 1393-1402.
27. Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47(March), 263-291.
28. Kamins, Michael A. and Henry Assael(1987), “Two-sided versus One-sided Appeals: The Impact on Advertising Effectiveness and Credibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24(February), 29-39.
29. Kamins, Michael A. and Lawrence J. Marks(1987), “Advertising Puffery: The Impact of Using Two-sided Claims on Product Attitude and Purchase Intention,” Journal of Advertising, 16(4), 6-15.
30. Kotler, P. (1999), How to Create, Win, & Dominate Markets, N.Y.: Free Press.
31. Lutz, Nancy A. (1989), “Warranties as Signals under Consumer Moral Hazard,” Rand Journal of Economics, 20(Summer) , 239-255.
32. Maheswaran, D. and Meyers-Levy, J. (1990), “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 27(August), 361-367.
33. Maynes, E. Scott(1976), “The Concept and Measurement of Product Quality,” Household Production and Consumption, 40(5), 529.559.
34. Meyerowitz, Beth E. and Chaiken, Shelly (1987), “The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-Examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(March), 500-510.
35. Mittal, B. (1989), “Measuring purchase decision involvement”, Psychology and Marketing, 6(2), 147-162.
36. Monroe, K.B.(1973), “Buyers’ Subjective Perceptions of Price,” Journal of Marketing Research,” 10(February), 70-80.
37. Monroe, Kent B. and R. Krishnan (1985), “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in J. Jacoby and J. Olson (eds.), The Perception of Merchandise and Store Quality, Lexington Books, 209-232.
38. Myung-Soo Lee and Banwari Mittal(1989), “A Casual Model of Consumer Involvement,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 363-389
39. O’Keefe, R.M., McEachern, T.(1998), “Web-based customer decision support systems,” CACM, 41(3)(March).
40. Olshavsky, Richard W., Andrew B. Aylesworth, and DeAnna S. Kempf (1995), “The Price-Choice Relationship: A Contingent Processing Approach,” Journal of Business Research, 33, 207-218.
41. Petty, Richard E. and Gleicher, Faith (1992), “Expectations of Reassurance Influence the Nature of Fear-Stimulated Attitude Change,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 86-100.
42. Rao, Akshay R. and Kent B. Monroe(1988), “The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(Septembe), 253-264
43. Richard N. Cardozo(1965), “An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation, and Satisfaction,” Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3)(August), 244-249.
44. Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational Behavior(8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice Hall International.
45. Robertson, T.S., Zielinski, S., Ward, J.(1985), Consumer Behavior, Illinois: Scott Foresman and Company, 279.
46. Rothschild, M.L. (1984), “Perspectives on involvement: Current problems and future directions.” Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 216-217.
47. Rotter, J.B.(1966), “Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs, 33(1), 300-303.
48. Schiffman, L. G. and Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer Behaviour, Prentice Hall.
49. Shapiro, Benson P.(1968), “The Psychology of Pricing,” Harvard Business Review, 46, 14-25.
50. Shocker,A.D. and V.Srinivasan(1979), “Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review.”, Journal of Marketing Research, May, 159-180.
51. Smith, Robert E. and Shelby D. Hunt(1978), “Attributional Process and Effect in Promotional Situation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5(December), 149-158.
52. Swinyard, W. R. (1993), “The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions”, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 271-280.
53. Teas, R. Kenneth and Sanjeev Agarwal (2000), “The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers' Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 280-292.
54. Traylor B. M. (1981), “Product involvement and brand commitment,” Journal of Advertising Research, 21(December), 51-56.
55. Valarie A. Zeithaml(1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” The Journal of Marketing, 52(3)(July), 2-22.
56. Wilkie,William C. and Edgar A.Pessemier(1973), “Issues in Marketing’s Use of Multiattribute Attitude Models.”,Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 428-441.
57. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1986), “Conceptualizing involvement”, Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4-14.
58. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341-352.
59. Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Retailing, 52 (July), 2-22.
60. Zhang, Yong and Buda, R (1999), “Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition on Responses to Positively versus Negatively Framed Advertising Messages,” Journal of Advertising, 28(summer), 1-15.

指導教授

林建煌(Chien-Huang Lin)

審核日期

2011-7-4

推文