採用ESG篩選準則對投資績效影響之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：17

、訪客IP：18.119.120.59

姓名

黎彥成(Yan-cheng Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

採用ESG篩選準則對投資績效影響之研究
(The Impact of ESG Screening on Portfolio Performance)

相關論文

★ 以資料包絡線分析法評估國內金融機構之經營效率	★ 我國企業員工行為守則分析--以新光金控為例
★ 理財專員的專業倫理探討	★ 證券投資信託業倫理議題的探討
★ 台資企業赴海外籌資之探討─以富士康科技個案為例	★ 大陸台商融資管道與操作模式分析-以個案企業為例
★ 本土銀行從事財富管理業務之現況與前景探討	★ 我國銀行業經營致勝的關鍵因素：公司治理、風險管理及競爭優勢的觀點
★ 新版巴賽爾協定下信用風險對中小企業授信行為之探討	★ 臺灣公司治理之探討-以銀行業為例
★ 以投資型保險作退休理財規劃	★ 連動債投資風險探討--C銀行一年期高收益型連動債個案研究
★ 信用評等機制與次級房貸危機	★ 私募股權基金之研究
★ 世代金融危機的比較:一九三○年代經濟大蕭條與二○○八年金融危機	★ 另類投資及其在資產配置中的地位

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究使用單因子模型及多因子模型以檢驗道瓊永續性美國指數(Dow Jones Sustainability Index United States; DJSI US)此一採用ESG (Environment, Social, Governance)篩選準則來挑選成分股的永續性指數是否存在異常報酬，並藉此推論若投資人採用此種ESG篩選準則進行選股，是否將使其投資組合之績效表現產生顯著異於大盤水準的情形。
本研究的研究結果發現，無論是在單因子模型、Fama and French三因子模型及Carhart四因子模型下，都並未檢驗出DJSI US存在有顯著之異常報酬；即便在考慮2007年之次貸風暴可能造成的結構性轉變後，仍然得到相同之結論；然而，本研究發現在長期間可能發生重大危機事件的情況下，DJSI US所承擔的系統風險顯著地較市場投資組合來得低。因此，本研究的結論為，若投資人採用ESG篩選準則以進行選股，則其所建構之投資組合的績效表現將無異於大盤水準，但其所承擔之系統風險將較大盤為低，因而能得到更為穩定的績效表現。

摘要(英)

By using the single-factor model and the multi-factor model to calculate the abnormal return of Dow Jones Sustainability Index United States (DJSI US), the goal of this study is to examine whether the portfolio performance of investor will be affected by the adoption of ESG (Environment, Social and Governance) criteria in the stock-picking process.
The results of this study find that no matter what kind of models have been used, single-factor or multi-factor, there have no abnormal returns in DJSI US. Even after considers the possible structure change which caused by US Subprime Mortgage Crisis in 2007, the results are still unchanged. However, this study finds that when we consider a longer period which consists one or more big negative event, then the systematic risk of DJSI US will be less than the level of market portfolio. Therefore, the conclusion of this study is that if investors use the ESG criteria to choose stocks, then the portfolio performance will have same level compare to the market portfolio. However, it will have less systematic risk than the market portfolio, and receive more stable portfolio performance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 社會責任指數
★ 永續性指數
★ 社會責任型投資
★ ESG篩選

關鍵字(英)

★ ESG Screening
★ Socially Responsibility Investment(SRI)
★ Sustainability Index
★ CSR

論文目次

中文摘要
英文摘要
目錄
表次
第一章緒論
1.1 研究背景
1.2 研究動機與目的
1.3 文獻回顧
第二章樣本資料介紹
2.1 研究對象選取與分析
2.2 資料來源與樣本篩選
第三章研究設計
3.1 研究方法與研究假說
3.2 變數定義
3.3 實證模型
第四章實證結果分析
4.1 報酬、標準差與Sharpe ratio
4.2 單因子模型下之實證結果
4.3 多因子模型下之實證結果
4.4 結構性轉變檢定
4.5 考慮結構性轉變下之實證結果
第五章結論與建議
5.1 結論
5.2 研究建議
參考文獻

參考文獻

【1】Bauer, R., K. Koedijk and R. Otten (2005), International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style, Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 1751-1767.
【2】Carhart, M. (1997), On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance 52, 57-82.
【3】DiBartolomeo, D. and L. Kurtz (1999), Managing Risk Exposures of Socially
Screened Portfolios, Northfield Information Services, Boston.
【4】Diltz, J. D. (1995), The private cost of socially responsible investing. Applied
Financial Economics,.5: 69-77.
【5】Efron B., et Tibshirani, R.(1993), An Introduction to the Bootstrap, New York: Chapman and Hall.
【6】Fama, E. and K. French (1993), Common risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds, Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56.
【7】Garz, H., C. Volk and M. Gilles (2002), More Gain than Pain - SRI: Sustainability Pays Off, WestLB Panmure.
【8】Geczy, C., R. Stambaugh and D. Levin (2004), Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, Wharton School Working Paper.
【9】Godfrey, L.G.and Orme, C. D. (2000),Controlling the significance levels of prediction error tests for linear regression models. Econometrics Journal, 3, 66–83.
【10】Godfrey, L. G. and Orme, C. D. (2002), Using bootstrap methods to obtain
nonnormality robust Chow prediction tests. Economics Letters, 76, 429–436.
【11】Hamilton, S., H. Jo and M. Statman (1993), Doing Well While Doing Good?
The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, Financial
Analysts Journal, November/December 1993, 62-66.
【12】Jegadeesh, N. et and Titman, S. (1993), Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91.
【13】Jemel, H., Arbelaez, H. and Cousin, J. G. (2006), Does Social Responsibility
Deter Shares from Higher Returns? An European Empirical Study, SSRN working paper.
【14】Kosowski, R., Timmermann, A., Wermers, R. and White, H. (2006), Can mutual fund “stars” really pick stocks? New evidence from a bootstrap analysis. Journal of Finance 61, 2551-2595.
【15】Mallin, C., B. Saadouni and R. Briston (1995), The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 22, 483-496.
【16】Paparoditis, E., and D. N. Politis (2005), Bootstrap hypothesis testing in regression models, Statistics and Probability Letters, 74, 356–365.
【17】Sauer, D. (1997), The Impact of Social-Responsibility Screens on Investment
Performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity
Fund, Review of Financial Economics 6, 23-35.
【18】Schröder, M. (2003), The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments:
Investment Funds and Indexes, Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 18, 122-142.
【19】Statman , M. (2000), Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, Financial Analyst Journal 56, 30–39.
【20】Volk, C. and Garz, H. (2003), Inside SRI - Update ‘‘More Gain than Pain’’& A
Fresh Look at New Index Structures, WestLB Panmure.

指導教授

邱慈觀(Tzu-kuan Chiu)

審核日期

2011-7-22

推文