以小組討論為基礎的JAVA程式語言學習-場地實驗研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：45

、訪客IP：3.145.176.49

姓名

劉瀚文(Han-wen Liu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

以小組討論為基礎的JAVA程式語言學習-場地實驗研究
(Learning JAVA Programming - A Group Based Field Experiment)

相關論文

★ 技術商品銷售之技術人員關鍵職能探討	★ 資訊委外之承包商能力、信任及溝通與委外成效關係之個案研究
★ 兵工技術軍官職能需求分析-以某軍事工廠為例	★ 不同楷模學習模式對VB程式語言學習之影響
★ 影響採購「網路資料中心產品」因素之探討	★ 資訊人員績效評估之研究—以陸軍某資訊單位為例
★ 高職資料處理科學生網路成癮相關因素及其影響之探討	★ 資訊服務委外對資訊部門及人員之衝擊-某大型外商公司之個案研究
★ 二次導入ERP系統之研究-以某個案公司為例	★ 資料倉儲於證券產業應用之個案研究
★ 影響消費者採用創新數位產品之因素---以整合式手機為例	★ 企業合併下資訊系統整合過程之個案研究
★ 資料倉儲系統建置之個案研究	★ 電子表單系統導入之探討 - 以 A 公司為例
★ 企業資訊安全機制導入與評估–以H公司為例	★ 從人力網站探討國內資訊人力現況–以104銀行資料為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在教學上，教學設計與學習者在小組合作中的學習績效及認知負荷是有緊密關係的，由於每個人有不同的個人特質，教師也必須依照不同的特質來調整教學設計，用以提升學習者的學習績效及降低學習認知負荷。因此，本研究試著由先備知識及分組方式的角度出發，以「JAVA」程式語言為知識域，透過場地實驗法來探討此二個因素對學習績效與認知負荷的影響差異。
本研究採用2 × 2二因子實驗設計，自變項為：「先備知識」分為高程度先備知識與低程度先備知識；「分組方式」分為同質分組及異質分組。依變項為：「學習績效」與「認知負荷」。透過對不同先備知識受試者的同質與異質分組操弄方式，對資管系大學部134位學生施以場地實驗法，進行六週的課堂學習及合作練習解題，本研究共實施四場（每場各2小時）小組學習的場地實驗，從學生小組合作討論與解題以及問卷的結果收集量化資料，統計分析後由研究結果發現：
1. 不同程度先備知識的學習者在學習成就上有顯著的差異。
2. 學習者在不同分組方式的小組中，對於學習樂趣有顯著的差異。
3. 學習者在不同類型小組中，學習的認知負荷有顯著的差異。
4. 團體學習績效中，不同類型小組其團隊效能有顯著的差異。
5. 女性較男性有顯著較高的小組凝聚力及小組滿意度。
根據以上結果，本研究最後提出教學設計應注意的事項與未來方向及建議，以提供學術界或實務界參考。

摘要(英)

In educational literature, close relationships among instructional design, cognitive load, and learning performance have been found. Because of the differences in personal characteristics between learners, instructors have to adjust instructional design accordingly in order to promote learners’ learning performance and decrease cognitive load. Therefore, this study employed JAVA programming language as learning subject to investigate whether different grouping types and prior knowledge level to make differences in learners’ learning performance and cognitive by a field experiment.
The study followed a 2 × 2 quasi-experimental design with two independent variables “prior knowledge” (high and low) and “grouping types” (homogeneous and heterogeneous). The dependent variables were “learning performance” and “cognitive load”. A six weeks field experiment including 134 undergraduates majoring in information management was conducted. The results are as following:
1. Subjects who have different prior knowledge level have significant difference in learning achievement.
2. Grouping types result in significant difference in subjects’ learning enjoyment.
3. Prior knowledge and grouping types have significant interaction effects on cognitive load.
4. Significant differences in team collective efficacy were found in different group types.
5. Female students scored significant higher in group cohesion and group satisfaction.
According to the results above, implications for future research and directions were provided at the end.

關鍵字(中)

★ 認知負荷
★ 分組方式
★ 先備知識
★ JAVA
★ 學習績效

關鍵字(英)

★ Learning Performance
★ Grouping types
★ Cognitive Load
★ Prior Knowledge
★ JAVA

論文目次

Table of Contents i
Figures iii
Tables iv
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Research Motivation 1
1.2 Research Question 3
1.3 Research Procedure 3
2. Literature Review 5
2.1 Collaborative Learning 5
2.2 Prior Knowledge 8
2.3 Cognitive Load 9
2.4 Learning Performance 14
3. Research Method 17
3.1 Research Model 17
3.2 Research Variables 18
3.3 Research Hypotheses 20
3.4 Participants 23
3.5 Learning Materials 23
3.6 Design and Procedure 23
3.7 Measurement 26
4. Results 30
4.1 Statistical Analysis Methods 30
4.2 Reliability and Validity Analysis 31
4.3 Sample 36
4.4 Hypothesis 1 Testing Results 41
4.5 Hypothesis 2 Testing Results 44
4.6 Hypothesis 3 Testing Results 46
4.7 Hypothesis 4 Testing Results 48
4.8 Hypotheses Testing Results Summary 50
5. Conclusion and Implications 51
5.1 Conclusion 51
5.2 Implications 55
5.3 Research Limitations 56
5.4 Future Research 57
References 58
Appendix 62
Appendix A Examination 62
Appendix B Research Questionnaire 78
Appendix C Collaborative Task 81

參考文獻

English References
Alexander, P. A. (1996). The Past, Present, and Future of Knowledge Research: A Reexamination of the Role of Knowledge in Learning and Instruction. Educational Psychologist, 31, 89-92.
Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression. Aggressive Behaviour, 18, 117-127.
Chen (1993). The Impact of Gender and Major on the Attitudes of College Freshmen Toward Computers (Master’s thesis). Available from National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. (System No. 082TKU00330005) (In Chinese)
Chien (2010). A Study on the Relationships among Classroom Climate, Learning Satisfaction, Teacher Leadership, and Subjective Class Well-being of Junior High School Students (Master’s thesis). Available from National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. (System No. 098NTNU5328058) (In Chinese)
Dochy, F. J.R.C. (1994). Prior Knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.). International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp.4698-4702). Oxford/New York: Pergamon.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction [4th ed.]. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagné, R. M. (1992). Tryout of an Organizing Strategy for Lesson Design: Maintenance Procedure With Checklist. Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal Configurations and Processing Strategies as Moderators Between Instructional Design and Cognitive Load: Evidence From Hypertext-Based Instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 33 - 41. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_5

Hacker, R. G. (1993). Study of the Effects of an Organization Change from Streamed to Mixed-Ability Classes upon Science Classroom Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 223-231.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. doi: 1047-7039/01/1204/0435/$05.00
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning [4th ed.]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice-Hall.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1994). Leading the Cooperative School [2nd ed.]. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and Group-based Learning From Complex Cognitive Tasks: Effects on Retention and Transfer Efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2011). Superiority of Collaborative Learning With Complex Tasks: A Research Note on an Alternative Affective Explanation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 53-57. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.012
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S., and Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co.
Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., & Miner, A. G. (2002). Groups Perform Better Than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-numbers Problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 605–602. doi:10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00003-1.
Lent, R. W., Schmidt, J., & Schmidt, L. (2006). Collective Efficacy Beliefs in Student Work Teams: Relation to Self-efficacy, Cohesion, and Performance. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68, 73–84.
Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
Miller, G. A. (1956). The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two Some Limit on Our Capacity to Process Information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-87.

Nancy, B. K. (1993). Logo and Transfer of Geometry Knowledge: Evaluating the Effects of Student Ability Groping. School Science and Mathematics, 93(7), 360-368.
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-solving Skills：A Cognitive-load Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133. doi: 0022-0663/94/$3.00
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1 - 4. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Qin, Z., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 129-143. doi: 10.3102/00346543065002129
Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived Collective Efficacy, Subjective Well-Being And Task Performance Among Electronic Work Groups. Small Group Research, 34(1), 43-73. doi: 10.1177/1046496402239577
Schwamborn, A., Thillmann, H., Opfermann, M., & Leutner, D. (2011). Cognitive Load and Instructionally Supported Learning With Provided and Learner-generated Visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.028
Shin, E., Schallert, D., & Savenye, W. (1994). Effects of Learner Control, Advisement, and Prior Knowledge on Young Students' Learning in a Hypertext Environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 33-46. doi: 10.1007/bf02298169
Simpson, E. J. (1966). The Classification of Educational Objectives, Psychomotor Domain. Urbane, Illinois: Illinois University.
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51. doi: 10.3102/00346543069001021

Sung (2000). The effect of Prior Knowledge, Text Structure, and Multimedia Presentations on Text Learning (Doctor dissertation). Available from National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. (System No. 088NTNU0328003) (In Chinese)
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. doi: 10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185-233.
Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. doi: 10.1023/a:1022193728205
Van Boxtel, C. A. M., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative Learning Tasks and the Elaboration of Conceptual Knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311–330. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752 (00)00002-5.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion Into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. doi: 1047-7047/00/1104/0342$05.00
Yang, W., Long, Y., Li, G., & Miao, S. (2010). Influence Effects of Cognition Match, Team Collaboration on Collaborative Efficiency of Team. 2010 3rd International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, Nov. 26-28, Kunming.
Online References
Gordon, A. (2010). Writing Instruction Objectives and Tests. Retrieved from http://instructionaldesign.gordoncomputer.com/Objectives.html.

指導教授

周惠文(Huey-wen Chou)

審核日期

2011-7-25

推文