摘要(英) |
The air conditioning industry in Taiwan develops along with its economic growth. Its humid weather in the subtropical summer also plays an important part in the development. According to the data of Yearbook of Industrial Production Statistics, the yearly demand amount of Room Air Conditioners in Taiwan Market is estimated around 0.8~1.0 million units. However, the market demand is heavily influences by the weather and country’s economy at that time.
For the residential air conditioners, non-inverter models used to be the mainstream, with the types like window-type, split-type and multi-system. Nevertheless, along with the development of the inverter application technology, the inverter models have taken the lead in the market whereas the sales of window-type and split type of non-inverter air conditioner were shrinking.
For the commercial air conditioning sector, the market demand for conventional types, such as the standing packaged type and the chiller, is about 60,000 ~ 80,000 units. In the recent years, VRV (Variable Refrigerant Volume) models have been commonly used by the construction companies. And those air conditioners are mainly from Japanese manufacturers, namely DAIKIN, Mitsubishi and HITACHI.
In the wake of environmental protection and the strong interest in the green building development, ECO and energy-saving have become the topics of discussion recently. The discussion has been focusing on whether the product’s energy efficiency ratio or coefficient of performance goes according to the energy regulation of the market. Using new refrigerant- HFC becomes a trend as well. Only those who possess new refrigerant technologies and the products will be able to grasp the niche market’s need. Hence, in order to strength the manufacturer’s competitiveness, it must improve its product differentiation and technical ability.
The company management strategy should aim at creating competitive advantages. And, they should be based on better efficiency, quality, innovation and the customer’s response, and they are further reflected directly on the company’s outstanding internal cost management and ability in product differentiation. In term of manufacturing, its unique manufacturing activities create company’s strength. The researcher uses the individual company’s performance as an example and adopts the questionnaire of “Analysis of Demand Characteristics”. He then further combines it with McKinsey & Company’s “Value Chain” to prove the above case’s competitiveness.
|
參考文獻 |
中文部份
1. 經濟部工業生產統計月報/工研院能環所整理資料
2. 台灣電力公司97年度家用電器普及狀況調查報告統計資料
3. 孫子兵法 徐瑜著 時報文化 (1993)
4. 李佳純,「以資源基礎理論探討持久競爭優勢形成之因素-以ePaper 電子報聯盟為例」,傳播與管理研究,1(1),93-120頁,2001。
5. 產品異質(product differentiation)現象的存在(蕭峰雄,1996)。
6. 林晉寬,「從資源基礎理論探討資源特性與成長策略之關係」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所,博士論文,1995。
7. 翁望回 (2008),策略管理與競爭優勢。台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司
8. 經濟部能源局無風管冷氣機能源效率比依CNS14464無風管空氣調節機與熱泵之試驗法及性能等級標準
9. 產業情報研究所(Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute, MIC)
10. 滕曉雲,上課講義,中央大學,2010。
11. 吳錦錩,「建構企業持續性競爭優勢-以台灣資訊科技公司為例」,東吳經濟學報,53,95-134頁,1996。
12. 蔡馥陞,Jay Barey、William Hesterly原著,策略管理與競爭優勢,台灣培生教育,台北市,2008。
13. 謝明炎,「臺灣染料化工產業競爭優勢個案分析-以遠東精密化學股份有限公司為例」,中央大學碩士論文,2010。
英文部份
1. Aaker, D. A.,” Strategic market management”, 1st ed, New York: John Willy, 1984.
2. Ansoff, H., “Implanting strategic management”, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-hill, 1985.
3. Barney, J. B., “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1: pp.99-120, 1991.
4. Collis, David J. and Cynthia A. Montgomery, ”Competing on resource strategy in the 1990’s”, Harvard business Review, July(Aug): pp.118-128, 1995.
5. Grant, R. M., “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp.114-135, 1991.
6. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, K. C., “Competing for the future”, Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press., 1994.
7. Hill, C. W. and Jones, G. R., “Strategy Management Theory – an Integrated Approach”, 3rd ed., Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1995.
8. Hunt, S. D. and Morgan, R. M. “The Resource-Advantage Theory of Competition: Dynamics, Path Dependencies, and Evolutionary Dimensions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, No. 4, pp.107-114, 1996.
9. Long, C. & Vickers-Koch, M., “Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 24, No.1, pp.7-21, 1995.
10. Michael j. Silverstein and Kate Sayre, ”The Female Economy”, Harvard Business Review, 2009.
11. Penrose, E. T., “The Theory of the Growth of the Firm.” Basil Blackwl, London, 1959.
12. Porter, M. E., “Competitive Strategy - Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors”, New York: Free Press, 1980.
13. Porter, M.E., “Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance”, New York: Free Press, 1985.
14. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G., “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, 68(May-June): pp.79-91, 1990.
15. Stalk, George, Philip Evans, and Lawerence E. Shulman, “Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules of Corporate Strategy”, Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, pp.57-69, 1992.
16. Wernerfelt, B., “A Resource-Based View of the Firm.” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, pp.171-180, 1984.
|