探討社會資本對於研究影響力之成效：以社會網絡為觀點

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：76

、訪客IP：18.191.235.210

姓名

廖建翔(Chien-Hsiang Liao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

探討社會資本對於研究影響力之成效：以社會網絡為觀點
(Examining the effects of social capital on research impact: A social network perspective)

相關論文

★ 零售業商業智慧之探討	★ 有線電話通話異常偵測系統之建置
★ 資料探勘技術運用於在學成績與學測成果分析 -以高職餐飲管理科為例	★ 利用資料採礦技術提昇財富管理效益 -以個案銀行為主
★ 晶圓製造良率模式之評比與分析－以國內某DRAM廠為例	★ 商業智慧分析運用於學生成績之研究
★ 運用資料探勘技術建構國小高年級學生學業成就之預測模式	★ 應用資料探勘技術建立機車貸款風險評估模式之研究－以A公司為例
★ 績效指標評估研究應用於提升研發設計品質保證	★ 基於文字履歷及人格特質應用機械學習改善錄用品質
★ 資訊系統使用成效之跨階層模式探討	★ 線上休閒社群成員之公民行為探討
★ 以關係基因演算法為基礎之一般性架構解決包含限制處理之集合切割問題	★ 關聯式資料庫之廣義知識探勘
★ 考量屬性值取得延遲的決策樹建構	★ 從序列資料中找尋偏好圖的方法 - 應用於群體排名問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

研究著作之優劣，實攸關於學者的聲望並反映出其研究潛能。然而，較佳的研究影響力表現不僅鼓舞學者可以繼續維持他的研究工作，也同時增加了取得較高研究經費的可能性。考量到研究影響力之重要性，本研究假定其善用社會資本(social capital)亦是讓學者達成具備較佳研究影響力的一種有效途徑。在現實情況中，我們往往看到有些學者能夠經常發表於頂尖期刊。除了他們在研究表現十分出色之外，他們的研究合作網絡亦有進一步作探討的空間。換句話說，這些學者所處的研究網絡，亦可能幫助他們取得社會資本上的優勢。在過去文獻中，社會資本被定義為處於社會關係(social relationships)或社會架構中的資源。而這樣的資源優勢，使得他們的研究可以達到較好的研究影響力或是發表於頂尖期刊。
然而，社會資本對於研究影響力之研究，在目前所能獲取的文獻當中，並未被深入地探討。因此，本研究的目的在於引用社會資本理論來發展研究模型，定義出在網絡中所扮演的六種角色對於研究影響力的關係。研究影響力乃以文章引用次數(citations)作為衡量。研究樣本取樣於社會科學索引指標(SSCI)資料庫中的72位資訊系統領域學者。研究結果顯示，在網絡中扮演資訊站(information center)與中介者(broker)的角色，最能在網絡中得到資源優勢，進而改善文章品質、獲取更高的文章引用次數。另外，拓展與傑出學者關係的社交名流(socialite)角色，亦能幫助學者增進網絡中各類型的結構資本，改善其結構位置。最後，常與不同學者合作的探索者(explorer)角色，對於成為網絡中的中心位置(core position)與中介者有所幫助；投稿年資較深(veteran)的學者，則對於成為網絡的資訊站有所幫助。

摘要(英)

The impact of research work is related to a scholar’s reputation and future promotions. Greater research impact not only inspires scholars to continue their research, but it also increases the possibility of a larger research budget from sponsors. Given the importance of research impact, this study proposes that utilizing social capital from peers, typically defined as resources embedded in a social structure, is an effective way to achieve better research impact. In reality, some scholars appear often in the highly rated journals. Besides their eminent contributions to research, this clue implies that these scholars might benefit from their social capital or social relationships, which in turn leads to better research outcomes and favorable consideration for publication in top-ranked journals. However, the extant literature rarely looks into the issue of social capital and its research impact. The contribution of this study is to define six roles (information center, core position, broker, socialite, explorer, and veteran) in the network based on three dimensions of social capital theory, and investigate how these roles interact and affect citations on publications. A total of 72 Information Systems scholars from the Social Science Citation Index database were collected to test the hypothesized associations. The results show that the roles of information center and broker receive more resources from colleagues in the network. Both roles can improve their research by taking advantages of receiving more resources, and thereby receive higher citations in publications. In addition, expanding relationships with outstanding colleagues (i.e., socialite) helps researchers develop all facets of structural capital. Moreover, if researchers collaborate with different scholars (i.e., explorer), it will help them shift to the structural positions of core position and broker. Finally, researchers with long publishing tenure (i.e., veterans) will contribute to the development of the information center in the network.

關鍵字(中)

★ 成員結構
★ 研究合作
★ 引用次數
★ 社會網絡分析
★ 研究影響力
★ 社會資本

關鍵字(英)

★ Team composition
★ Research collaboration
★ Citation
★ Social network analysis
★ Research impact
★ Social capital

論文目次

List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Background 1
1.2. What we know and what we do not know 2
1.3. Organization of this study 5
2. Theoretical background 6
2.1. Bounded rationality 6
2.2. The nature of collaboration 8
2.3. Collaboration and social capital 10
2.4. Social network analysis 11
2.5. Two types of team composition in member diversity: exploration and exploitation 16
2.6. Hypotheses development 18
2.6.1. Associations between social capital and citations 20
2.6.2. Interactions between the different dimensions of social capital 28
3. Methodology 33
3.1. Data sources 33
3.2. Measurement 37
4. Analysis 42
4.1. Hypotheses tests 44
4.2. Mediation test: A path validation of higher-order constructs 49
5. Theoretical and managerial implications 51
References 55

參考文獻

Aksnes, D.W. (2005). Citations and their use as indicators in science policy: Studies of validity and applicability issues with a particular focus on highly cited papers, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Twente, Netherlands.
Bammer, G. (2008). Enhancing research collaborations: Three key management challenges, Research Policy, 37(5), 875-887.
Baron, R. & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-82.
Bavelas, A. (1948). A mathematical model for group structures, Human Organization, 7, 16-30.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (1999). UCINET 5.0 version 1.00, Natick: Analytic Technologies.
Broadus, R.N. (1987). Toward a definition of “Bibliometrics”, Scientometrics, 12(5/6), 373-379.
Brown, L.D., & Gardner, J.C. (1985). Using citation analysis to assess the impact of journals and articles on contemporary accounting research (CAR), Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 84-109.
Burkhardt, M.E., & Brass, D.J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change? The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 104-127.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chen, G. (2005). Newcomer adaptation in teams: Multilevel antecedents and outcomes, Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 101-116.
Chi, L., Holsapple, C.W., & Srinivasan, C. (2007). Competitive dynamics in electronic networks: A model and the case of interorganizational systems, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(3), 7-49.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study, Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
Clark, J.G., & Warren, J. (2006). In search of the primary suppliers of IS research: Who are they and where did they come from? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 18, 296-328.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
Dean, D.L., Lowry, P.B., & Humpherys, S.L. (2011). Profiling the research productivity of tenured Information Systems faculty at U.S. institutions, MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 1-15.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & West, M.A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
Dequech, D. (2001). Bounded rationality, institutions, and uncertainty, Journal of Economic Issues, 35(4), 911-929.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H.M. (2001), Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269-277.
Eaton, J.P., Ward, J.C., Kumar, A., & Reingen, P.H. (1999). Structural analysis of co-author relationships and author productivity in selected outlets for consumer behavior research, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(1), 39-59.
Ferratt, T.W., Gorman, M.F., Kanet, J.J., & Salisbury, W.D. (2007). IS journal quality assessment using the author affiliation index, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19, 710-724.
Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarifications, Social Network, 1(3), 215-239.
Gabarro, J.J. (1978). The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In Athos, A.G. & Gabarro, J.J. (Eds.), Interpersonal behaviors: Communication and understanding in relationships, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 290-303.
Gardner, J.K., Rall, L.C., & Peterson, C.A. (2002). Lack of multidisciplinary collaboration is a barrier to outcomes research, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(1), 65-71.
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications, Scientometrics, 87(2), 251-265.
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. Jr. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and periphery effects in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000, Scientometrics, 53(3), 321-337.
Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J., & Coffey, J. (2006). A citation analysis of the evolution and state of Information Systems within a constellation of reference disciplines, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(5), 270-325.
Hanneman, R.A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods, Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside, (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/ ).
Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S-L., & Sonnenwald, D.H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 952-965.
Hauptman, R. (2005). How to be a successful scholar: Publish efficiently, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 36(2), 115-119.
Heinze, T., & Bauer, G. (2007). Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective, Scientometrics, 70(3), 811-830.
Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in Economics, Journal of Economic Perspective, 10(3), 153–158.
Inhaber, H., & Przednowek, K. (1976). Quality of research and the Nobel prizes, Social Studies of Science, 6(1), 33-50.
Inkpen, A.C., & Tsang, W.K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer, Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.
Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., & Kwok-Kee, W. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.
Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., & Hong, S. (2003). Objective quality ranking of computing journals, Communications of ACM, 46(10), 111-114.
Katz, J.S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model, Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
Katz, J.S., & Martin, B.S. (1997). What is research collaboration?, Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(14), 1306-1320.
Larivi?re, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities, Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797-818.
Lea, B-R., Yu, W-B., & Maguluru, N. (2006). Enhancing business networks using social network based virtual communities, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), 121-138.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
Liao, C.H. (2011). How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks, Scientometrics, 86(3), 747-761.
Liebowitz, J. (2005). Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 76-86.
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M.L., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community, Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1462-1480.
Lowry, P.B., Romans, D., & Curtis, A. (2004). Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of Information Systems journals, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(2), 29-80.
Lu, H., & Feng, Y. (2009). A measure of authors’ centrality in co-authorship networks based on the distribution of collaborative relationships, Scientometrics, 81(2), 499-511.
Marble, R.P. (2003). A system implementation study: management commitment to project management, Information & Management, 41(1), 111-123.
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Mattson, P., Laget, P., & Nilsson, A. (2008). Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU, Scientometrics, 75(3), 555-574.
McFadyen, M.A., & Cannella Jr., A.A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships, Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735-746.
Miller, K.D., Zhao, M., & Calantone, R.J. (2006). Adding interpersonal learning and tacit knowledge to March’s exploration-exploitation model, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 709-722.
Morrison, E.W. (2002). Newcomers' relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization, Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1149-1160.
Mumby, D.K., & Putnam, L.L. (1992). The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of bounded rationality, Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 465-486.
Mylonopoulos, N.A., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). Global perceptions of IS journals, Communications of ACM, 44(9), 29-33.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A review, Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.
Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Oh, W., Choi, J.N., & Kim, K. (2005). Coauthorship dynamics and knowledge capital: The patterns of cross-disciplinary collaboration in information systems research, Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 265-292.
Okoli, C., & Oh, W. (2007). Investigating recognition-based performance in an open content community: A social capital perspective, Information & Management, 44(3), 240-252.
Oppenheim, C., & Summers, M.A.C. (2008). Citation counts and the research assessment exercise, part VI: Unit of assessment 67 (music), Information Research, 13(2), Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper342.html.
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences, Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
Patel, N. (1972). Collaboration in the professional growth of American Sociology, Social Science Information, 12(6), 77-92.
Pawar, M. (2006). “Social” “capital”?, The Social Science Journal, 43(2), 211-226.
Peffers, K., & Ya, T. (2003). Identifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: Ranking the journals, Journal of Information Technology theory and application, 5(1), 63-84.
Perretti, F., & Negro, G. (2006). Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration versus exploitation in team design, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 759-777.
Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in Information Systems research, MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623-656.
Potosky, D. (2002). A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: The role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training, Computers in Human Behavior, 18(3), 241-255.
Presser, S. (1980). Collaboration and the quality of research, Social Studies of Science, 10(1), 95-101.
Raina, D., Gupta, B.M., & Kandhari, R. (1995). Collaboration in Indian Physics: A case study of the macro and micro parametrization of sub-disciplines (1800-1950), Scientometrics, 33(3), 295-314.
Rainer, R.K. Jr., & Miller, M.D. (2005). Examining differences across journal rankings, Communications of ACM, 48(2), 91-94.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E.W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams, Organization Science, 12(4), 502-517.
Reh?k, M., P?chouček, M., & Tožička, J. (2005). Adversarial behavior in multi-agent systems, Multi-Agent Systems and Applications IV, 3690, 470-479.
Reichers, A.E. (1987). An interactionist perspective on newcomer socialization rates, Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 278-287.
Sandhlom, T.W., & Lesser, R.T. (1997). Coalitions among computationally bounded agents, Artificial Intelligence, 94(1/2), 99-137.
Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration, Scientometrics, 84(2), 365-371.
Shumaker, S., and Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps, Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36.
Simon, H.A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality, in Decision and Organization, CB McGuire and R. Radner (Eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam, 161-176.
Simon, H.A. (1976). Administrative Behavior, New York: Free Press.
Simon, H.A. (1990). Invariants of human behaviors, Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
Soderbaum, F. (2001). Networking and capacity building: The role of regional research networks in Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 13(2), 144-163.
Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications, Scientometrics, 81(1), 177-193.
Stillman, F.A., Wipfli, H.L., Lando, H.A., Leischow, S., & Samet, J.M. (2005). Building capacity for international tobacco control research: The global tobacco research network, American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 965-968.
Taylor, A., & Greve, H.R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 723-740.
Troshani, T., & Doolin, B. (2007). Innovation diffusion: A stakeholder and social network view, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(2), 176-200.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464-476.
Wadhwa, A., & Kotha, S. (2006). Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 819-835.
Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F.W. (2007). Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital, Journal of Business Research, 60(7), 698-710.
Wang, J-C., Chiang, C-H., & Lin, S-W. (2010). Network structure of innovation: Can brokerage or closure predict patent quality?, Scientometrics, 84(3), 735-748.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and application, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wasko, M.M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1987). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.

指導教授

陳彥良、嚴秀茹
(Y. L. Chen、Hsiuju Rebecca Yen)

審核日期

2011-12-26

推文