 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：27 、訪客IP：3.147.68.224
姓名 張家瑜(Chi-yu Chang) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 環境工程研究所 論文名稱 以風險控制系統為基準的職安衛績效指標設計方法
(Risk Control System-based Design Methodology for Occupational Safety and Health Performance Indicators)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
摘要(中) 績效量測可幫助事業單位有效掌握管理系統運作的成效，事業單位常運用績效指標作為量測績效的方式。常見的職安衛績效指標主要分為兩類，被動式指標利用已發生的事故及職業疾病案例數作為職安衛執行績效的依據，這類資料雖容易收集，但在安全管理運用上仍有許多不足。主動式績效指標是於意外事故、職業病或事件發生前，量測事業單位安全衛生目標的達成度，但由於主動式績效指標不容易設計且國際安全衛生系統指引僅提供可能的量測方式或範例，未明確說明設計步驟，因此本研究以設計步驟為主題。英國安全衛生署於2006年頒佈「發展製程安全指標」指引，該指引結合績效指標與瑞士乳酪事故理論，提出以風險控制系統為基準的製程績效指標設計方法，但職安衛潛在的危害不同於製程危害，英國安全衛生署在「成功的衛生與安全管理」，亦將風險控制系統視為重要概念。
因此本研究參考HSG 65尋求OHSAS 18001中符合風險控制系統原則的控制系統，並參考發展製程安全績效指標的六大步驟，建立以風險控制系統為基準的職安衛績效指標設計方法。相較於常見的績效指標，能更早辨識管理系統的缺失，在事故或事件發生前，提早辨識風險控制系統潛在的問題。本研究將頻率、未正確執行的後果、功能隨時間衰退等辨識條件，依據程度的差異給予積分，以辨識風險控制系統的關鍵項目，辨識關鍵項目能避免多餘的成本、時間、資源浪費，同時達到監測風險控制系統的目的，並運用侷限空間作業及動火作業為案例，以驗證績效指標設計方法的可行性。
摘要(英) Performance measurement is an integral part of the PDCA management process. Benefits of performance measurement of an occupational health and safety management system include the provision of information on implementation status, identification of areas needing corrective actions, provision of the basis for continual improvement. Occupational health and safety management systems are measured by a set of reactive, or lagging, performance indicators and positive, or leading, performance indicators.
Most of the indicators used in measuring the performance level of an occupational health and safety management system are designed based on the organization’s experience in health and safety management or derived from national or international guidelines and standards. This approach greatly hinders the effectiveness of performance measurement. A performance indicator design methodology is proposed in this study to alleviate the commonly encountered problems in occupational safety and health management.
This study extends the design principles of HSE’s developing process safety indicators guide to the design of occupational safety and health indicators. This is based on the rationale that risk control systems are the core for both process safety management and occupational safety and health management. As illustrated in HSG 254, the reactive indicators are based on the intended outcomes of the risk control system while the positive indicators are derived from the critical elements of a particular risk control system. The risk control system-based design method provides a set of precursors to the
iii
traditional performance indicators. They are capable of detecting potential problems with the risk control systems before the occurrence of accidents or incidents. To facilitate the selection of critical elements of risk control system, weighting factors are assigned to the specifics of the system such as correct execution of activities, potential system deterioration over time and activities execution frequency. Effectiveness of the proposed performance indicator design mechanism is validated with confined space entry and hot work permit risk control systems. It is hoped that the proposed design technique will enhance the effectiveness of occupational safety and health management performance.
關鍵字(中) ★ 職安衛績效指標
★ 瑞士乳酪事故模式
★ 風險控制系統關鍵字(英) ★ Occupational health and safety management perfor
★ Swiss cheese accident theory
★ Risk control system論文目次 摘要 ...................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ............................................................................................................... ii
誌謝 .................................................................................................................... iv
目錄 ..................................................................................................................... v
圖目錄 ............................................................................................................... vii
表目錄 .............................................................................................................. viii
第一章 前言 ....................................................................................................... 1
1.1 研究動機 .............................................................................................. 1
1.2 研究目的 .............................................................................................. 2
1.3 預期成果 .............................................................................................. 4
第二章 文獻回顧 ............................................................................................... 5
2.1 績效量測 .............................................................................................. 5
2.1.1 被動式績效指標及範例 ........................................................... 6
2.1.2 主動式績效量測及指標範例................................................... 8
2.2 人為失誤與瑞士乳酪事故理論........................................................ 10
2.3 製程安全績效指標 ............................................................................ 12
2.4 英國安全衛生署管理系統的層級概念 ........................................... 17
2.4.1 管理系統的分層控制 ............................................................. 18
2.4.2 風險控制系統 ......................................................................... 20
2.4.3 作業場所預防措施及量測..................................................... 20
第三章 績效指標設計方法 ............................................................................. 23
3.1 以風險控制系統為基準的績效指標................................................ 23
3.1.1 績效指標設計架構 ................................................................. 23
vi
3.1.2 績效指標設計流程 ................................................................. 26
3.2 確認風險控制系統 ............................................................................ 26
3.3 訂定預期成效與被動式指標設計方法 ............................................ 28
3.3.1 訂定預期成效 ......................................................................... 29
3.3.2 被動式指標設計方法 ............................................................. 30
3.4 辨識關鍵項目與主動式指標設計方法 ........................................... 31
3.4.1 辨識關鍵項目 ......................................................................... 31
3.4.2 設計主動式指標 ..................................................................... 36
3.5 績效指標選擇 .................................................................................... 38
3.6 建立報告和蒐集數據的方法 ............................................................ 38
第四章 績效指標設計方法驗證 ..................................................................... 40
4.1 職安衛風險控制系統 ........................................................................ 40
4.2 以侷限空間為案例設計績效指標.................................................... 42
4.2.1 侷限空間作業流程 ................................................................. 43
4.2.2 決定預期成效並設計被動式績效指標 ................................ 49
4.2.3 辨識關鍵項目並設計主動式指標 ........................................ 51
4.3 以動火作業為案例設計績效指標 .................................................... 63
4.3.1 動火作業流程 ......................................................................... 63
4.3.2 決定預期成效並設計被動式績效指標 ................................. 68
4.3.3 辨識關鍵項目並設計主動式績效指標 ................................. 69
第五章 結論與建議 ......................................................................................... 76
5.1 結論 .................................................................................................... 76
5.2 建議 .................................................................................................... 77
參考文獻 ........................................................................................................... 79
參考文獻 參考文獻
[1] Health and Safety Executive, Developing Process Safety Indicators, HSE Books HSG 254, 2006.
[2] Health and Safety Executive, Successful Health and Safety Management, HSE Books HSG 65, 1997.
[3] J. Reason, Human Error, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[4] J. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate Publishing Company,1997.
[5] J. Reason, Human Error: Models and Management, British Medical Journal, 320 (7237), 768–770, 2000.
[6] British Standards Institution, OHSAS 18001:2007-Occupational Health and Safety Assessment Series-Requirements, 2007.
[7] J.A. Lust, Understanding Performance Appraisal：Social Organizational and Goal-based Perspectives, Personnel Psychology, 49(2),511-514, 1996.
[8] 行政院勞工委員會，臺灣職業安全衛生管理系統建置實務參考手冊，2011年。
[9] 行政院勞工委員會，台灣職業安全衛生管理系統指引，2008年。
[10] British Standards Institution, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems –Guidelines for the Implementation of OHSAS 18001:2007, OHSAS 18002: 2008, 2008.
[11] International Labour Office, ILO-OSH 2001, Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems, 2001.
[12] British Standards Institution, BS 18004:2008, Guide to Achieving Effective Occupational Health and Safety Performance, 2008.
[13] R.S. Stricoff, Safety Performance Measurement：Identifying Prospective Indicators with High Validity, Professional Safety, 45(1)： 36-39 , 2000.
[14] 邱欣郁，事業單位導入職業安全衛生管理系統對安全衛生績效影響之研究，國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文，2008年。
[15] 經濟部工業局，績效量測技術手冊， 2001年。
[16] 蘇德勝，我國職業安全衛生績效指標建立之探討,工業安全衛生月刊， 2006年 。
[17] D. Petersen, Safety Improvement: Perception Surveys can Reveal Strengths and Weaknesses, Professional Safety, 50(1), 45-48, 2005.
[18] D. Petersen, Safety Management ：Our Strength and Weaknesses, Professional-179-Safety, 45(1), 16-19, 2000.
[19] 行政院勞工委員會，臺灣職業安全衛生管理系統指導綱領，2007年。
[20] British Standards Institution, BS 8800: 2004, Guide to Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems, 2004.
[21] Health and Safety Executive, A Guide to Measuring Health and Safety Performance, 2001.
[22] 某光電股份有限公司，特殊作業管制作業說明書。
[23] 某光電股份有限公司，侷限作業安全管制，2010年。
[24] 行政院勞委會，動火作業，2000年。
[25] 某電信股份有限公司，高架作業管制要點，2004年。
[26] 行政院勞工委員會南區勞動檢查所，局限空間作業注意事項。
取自http://www.slio.gov.tw
[27] 行政院勞委會，侷限空間安全作業計畫，2001年。
[28] 行政院勞委會，化工安全作業標準參考手冊，2007年。
指導教授 于樹偉(Shuh -Woei Yu) 審核日期 2012-1-19 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit