台灣社會責任投資之績效分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：59

、訪客IP：3.148.108.134

姓名

鍾雨辰(Yu-chen Chung) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

台灣社會責任投資之績效分析
(The Performance of Socially Responsible Investment in Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 企業財務預警模型之研究	★ 現金卡授信風險評估之研究
★ 技術分析在台灣股市擇時能力實證 -以停損點反向操作指標(SAR)為例	★ 購併活動與資訊揭露—以公開收購為例
★ 區間價差交易策略-以台灣五十指數ETF為例	★ 私募股權投資管理公司實證研究與個案探討
★ 國際動能策略：國家與產業觀點之探討	★ 基本面指數化策略之實證研究:以台灣股市為例
★ 以日內資料探討臺股期貨交易人之交易績效	★ 證券借貸市場借券費率決定因子：以台灣借券資料之實證
★ 亞洲新興股市報酬預測及金風暴之衝擊	★ 國際資產配置與投資期限、資產種類關係之實證
★ 台灣上市公司之外匯風險因子與金融風暴前後之變化	★ 兩狀態下的國際資產配置-馬可夫轉換模型之應用
★ 台灣銀行業外匯暴險及其影響因子之研究	★ 新興市場選股策略之研究-以台灣電子股為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

社會責任投資已成為一股新時代的潮流，但台灣既有之文獻多以探討企業社會責任與企業財務績效為主，社會責任投資之研究較為缺乏，因此，本文以獲選天下雜誌第一屆、第二屆以及第三屆企業公民獎之企業為研究對象，分析在評選結果公布後六個月、一年、兩年、三年以及四年的股價表現，以及這些企業相對於市場大盤、對照產業指數與對照公司的股票報酬。實證結果顯示，隨著資料期間增加，社會責任投資組合的標準差有減小的趨勢，且長期下低於對照產業指數與對照公司之標準差，代表獲獎企業的風險程度較低。但就平均日報酬與夏普指標而言，獲獎企業的表現並沒有顯著優於對照產業指數與對照公司。此外，本文運用Carhart (1997)四因子模型評估獲獎企業的績效表現，結果顯示在控制市場風險溢酬、規模大小、帳面市值比以及動能因子後，獲獎企業並無顯著的異常報酬，僅長期下的表現優於產業指數。而由市場風險溢酬、規模因子以及帳面市值比係數可以得知，獲選企業公民獎之企業對市場風險的敏感性顯著較低，且得獎企業以「大公司」為主，股票性質多為「成長股」。根據上述結果，若投資人選擇投資標的是以「風險」為考量，獲獎企業確實為一好的投資標的。但若投資人選擇投資標的是以「報酬」為前提，善盡企業社會責任的優良公司卻不一定是好的投資標的。

摘要(英)

It has become a new trend of Socially Responsible Investment. The researches mainly focus on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance and lack of Socially Responsible Investment in Taiwan. Therefore, this study target at the corporations who earned the award of first, second and third Excelence in Corporate Social Responsibility of CommonWealth Magazine and examine the stock performance after the award release within six months, one year, two years, three years and four years. Besides, we also compare the performance of award companies with market, matching industry index and matching companies. The empirical result shows that as the time horizon increased, the standard deviation of SRI portfolio had a downward tendency and is smaller than matching industry index and matching companies in the long run. This result indicates the award companies have lower risk. But there is no different between award companies and matching industry index/matching companies on the part of equally daily return and Sharpe ratio. Furthermore, we apply Carhart (1997) 4-factor asset pricing model to examine the performance of award companies. The result demonstrates that there is no significant abnormal return in award companies when controlling for market risk, size, book-to-market and momentum and the performance is only better than matching industry index in the long run. And from the coefficient of market risk, size and book-to-market, we could know that award companies tend to have less exposure to the market portfolio, heavily exposed to “large caps” and are more “growth-oriented.” According to the empirical results, we suggest if “risk” is the primary consideration for investors when selecting investment target, award companies definitely are a good target. But if investor view “return” as the primary consideration, good companies excellent in corporate social responsibility are not sure a good target.

關鍵字(中)

★ 企業社會責任
★ 社會責任投資
★ 風險
★ 績效

關鍵字(英)

★ socially responsible investment
★ corporate social responsibility
★ performance
★ risk

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 2
1-3 研究流程與架構 3
二、企業社會責任與社會責任投資 5
2-1 企業社會責任之定義 5
2-2 國際間企業社會責任發展概況 9
2-3 台灣企業社會責任發展概況 11
2-4 社會責任投資之定義 12
2-5 社會責任指數介紹 14
2-6 台灣社會責任投資發展概況 15
三、文獻回顧 17
3-1 企業社會責任與企業財務績效之關聯性 17
3-2 社會責任投資之財務表現 22
四、研究方法 25
4-1 研究對象與樣本描述 25
4-2 績效評估指標 26
4-3 實證模型 27
4-4 分析架構 27
五、實證結果 29
5-1 風險分析 29
5-2 績效分析 31
5-3 CAPM模型 35
5-4 多因子模型 39
六、結論與建議 45
參考文獻 47
附錄一第一屆至第三屆天下企業公民獎與對照公司 53
附錄二第一屆至第三屆市值加權與名次加權之平均日報酬與夏普指標差異T檢定 56
附錄三第一屆至第三屆市值加權與名次加權之CAPM單因子模型 62
附錄四第一屆至第三屆市值加權與名次加權之多因子模型 68

參考文獻

英文部分
[01] Alexander G. J. and Buchholz R. A., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 479–486, September 1978.
[02] Aupperle K. E., Carroll A. B. and Hatfield J. D., “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 446–463, June 1985.
[03] Anginer D., Fisher K. L. and Statman M., “Stocks of Admired Companies and Despised Ones”, Working Paper, University of Michigan, February 2008.
[04] Abbott W. F. and Monsen R. J., “On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 501–515, September, 1979.
[05] Brammer S., Brooks C. and Pavelin S., “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures”, Financial Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 97–116, Autumn 2006.
[06] Becchetti L., Ciciretti R., and Hasan I., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder’’s Value: An Event Study Analysis”, Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, No 2007-06, April 2007.
[07] Bauer R., Guenster N. and Otten R., “Empirical Evidence on Corporate Governance in Europe: The Effect on Stock Returns, Firm Value and Performance”, Journal of Asset Management, Vol.5 August 2004.
[08] Bauer R., Koedijk K. and Otten R., “International Evidence on eEthical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 29, No.7, pp. 1751–1767, July 2005.
[09] Carroll A. B, “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 497–505, October 1979.
[10] Carroll A. B, “Corporate Social Responsibility – Evolution of a Deﬁnitional Construct”, Business and Society, Vol.38 No.3, pp. 268–295, September 1999.
[11] Carhart M. M., “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 57–82, March 1997.
[12] Chen K. H. and Metcalf R. W., “The Relationship between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 168–177, January 1980.
[13] Cornell B. and Shapiro A. C., “Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance”, Financial Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 5–14, Spring 1987.
[14] Cochran P. L. and Wood R. A., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 42–56, March 1984.
[15] DiBartolomeo D., “Explaining and Controlling the Returns on Socially Screened US Equity Portfolios” Presentation to New York Society of Security Analysts, September 1996.
[16] Derwall, J., Gunster, N., Bauer, R., and Koedijk, K. “The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 51–63, March/April 2005.
[17] Friedman M., “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”, The New York Times Magazine, September 1970.
[18] Fama E. F. and French K. R., “Common Risk Factors in Returns on Stocks and Bonds”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 3–56, 1993.
[19] Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B., “Pollution Disclosures, Pollution Performance and Economic Performance”, Omega, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 167–76, 1982.
[20] Freedman, M. and Jaggi, B., “An Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Pollution Disclosures Included in Annual Financial Statements on Investment Decisions”, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 1, pp. 193–212, 1986.
[21] Fogler H. R. and Nutt F., “A Note on Social Responsibility and Stock Valuation”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 155–160, March 1975.
[22] Guerard J. B., “Is There A Cost to Being Socially Responsible in Investing?”, The Journal of Investing, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 11–18, Summer 1997.
[23] Goldreyer E. F. and Diltz J. D., “The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: Incorporating Sociopolitical Information in Portfolio Selection”, Managerial Finance, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 23–36, 1999.
[24] Gompers P., Ishii J. and Metrick A. “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 107–155, Feburary 2003.
[25] Hamilton S., Jo H. and Statman M., “Doing Well while Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 62–66, November - December 1993.
[26] Jensen M. C., “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 389–416, May 1968.
[27] Jones s., Laan S. Van der, Frost G.and Loftus J. (2008), “The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.80, No. 2, pp. 181–203, 2008.
[28] Jegadeesh N. and Titman S., “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 65–91, March 1993.
[29] Kurtz L., “No Effect, or No Net Effects? Studies on Socially Responsible Investing”, The Journal of Investing, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 37–49, 1997.
[30] Kempf A. and Osthoff P., “The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance”, European Financial Management, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 908–922, 2007.
[31] Luther R. G., Matatko J. and Corner D. C., “The Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 57–70, 1992.
[32] Moskowitz M., R. “Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks” Business and Society Review, Vol. 1, pp. 71–75, 1972.
[33] Moore G., “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 34, pp. 299–315, 2001.
[34] Makni R., Francoeur C. and Bellavance F., “Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 89, No 3,pp. 409–422, 2009.
[35] Mahoney L. and Roberts R. W., “Corporate Social Performance, Financial Performance and Institutional Ownership in Canadian Firms”, Accounting Forum, Vol.31, No.3, pp. 233–253, September 2007.
[36] McWilliams A. and Siegel D., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 603–609, May 2000.
[37] McWilliams A. and Siegel D., “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117–127, January 2001.
[38] Mallin C. A., Saadouni B. and Briston R. J., “The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 483–496, June 1995.
[39] McGuire J. B., Sundgren A. and Schneeweis T., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 854–872, December 1988.
[40] Pava M. L. and Krausz J., “The Association between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The paradox of social cost”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.15, No. 3, pp. 321–357, 1996.
[41] Preston L. E. and O’’Bannon D. P., “The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis”, Business and Society, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 419–429, December 1997.
[42] Posner B. Z. and Schmidt W. H., “Values and the American Manager: An Update Updated”, California Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 80–94, Spring 1992.
[43] Russo M. V. and Fouts P. A., “A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 534–559, June 1997.
[44] Renneboog L., Horst J. T. and Zhang C., “The Price of Ethics and Stakeholder Governance: The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 302–322, June 2008.
[45] Sharpe W. F., “Mutual Fund Performance”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 119–138, January 1966.
[46] Statman M., “Socially Responsible Mutual Funds”, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 30–39, May–Jun 2000.
[47] Shen C. H. and Chang Y., “Ambition Versus Conscience, Does Corporate Social Responsibility Pay off? The Application of Matching Methods”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, pp. 133–153, 2009.
[48] Salzmann O., Ionescu-Simers A. and Steger U., “The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options”, European Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 27–36, 2005.
[49] Seifert B., Morris S. A. and Bartkus B. R., “Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance”, Business Society, Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 135–161, June 2004.
[50] Thomas A., “Corporate environmental policy and abnormal stock price returns: An empirical investigation” Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 125–134, May 2001.
[51] Vance S. C. “Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks?”, Management Review, Vol. 64, pp. 18–24, 1975.
[52] Wood D. J., “Corporate Social Performance Revisited”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 691–718, October 1991.
[53] Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B., “The Corporate Social Performance–Financial performance Link”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp.303–319, April 1997.
[54] Walley, N. and Whitehead, B., “Its Not Easy Being Green” Harvard Business Review Vol. 72 No. 3, pp.46–52, 1994.
[55] Yamashita, M., Sen, S. and Roberts, M. C., “The Rewards for Environmental Conscientiousness in the U.S. Capital Markets”, Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, Vol. 12, No. 1 pp.73–82, Spring 1999.
中文部分
[01] 天下雜誌，「CSR—領先者的策略」專題報導，第367期，94–169頁，2007。
[02] 天下雜誌，「二○○八「天下企業公民」大趨勢」，第393期，2008。
[03] 天下雜誌，「二○○九CSR榜單揭曉天下企業公民TOP 50」，第416期，2009。
[04] 天下雜誌，「二○一○天下企業公民獎TOP 50」，第452期，2010。
[05] 「台灣證券交易所銳聯臺灣就業創造99指數」編製規則。
[06] 行政院勞工委員會網站
[07] 江逸之，「從觀望到積極,台灣企業重視社會責任」，遠見雜誌，第239期，5月號，2006。
[08] 江逸之，「CSR大調查∕首度納入外商調查台灣企業社會責任10大進展」，遠見雜誌，第251期，5月號，2007。
[09] 池祥麟和林怡君，「企業社會績效與企業財務績效關聯性之分析—以道瓊STOXX永續性指數為例」，國立台北大學合作經濟學系，碩士論文，民國95年。
[10] 沈中華和張元，「企業的社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎？—以英國FTSE社會責任指數為例」，經濟論文，第三十六卷第三期，339–385頁，民國97年。
[11] 林宜諄，「台灣企業最需要的獎」，遠見雜誌，第228期，6月號，2005。
[12] 哈佛商業評論，「公司與社會有福同享」，第4期，60–77頁，2006。
[13] 哈佛商業評論，「波特：創造共享價值」，第53期，112–129頁，2011。
[14] 深圳證券交易所網站
[15] 陳厚儒，「台灣社會型企業相對股票市場之報酬與風險之比較分析」，逢甲大學合作經濟學系，碩士論文，民國97年。
[16] 「富邦台灣企業社會責任基金簡式公開說明書」，民國98年。
[17] 富邦投信投資月報，「『富邦台灣企業社會責任基金—引領國內CSR投資新潮流』」，民國98年。
[18] 張元，「社會責任公司有較高的股票報酬嗎？」，輔仁管理評論（社會企業專刊），第十八卷第一期，79–118頁，民國100年。

指導教授

何中達(Chung-da Ho)

審核日期

2012-1-13

推文