以微地動量測方法研究順向坡之放大與極化效應

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：3.138.119.68

姓名

林子翔(Tsu-Hsiang Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

應用地質研究所

論文名稱

以微地動量測方法研究順向坡之放大與極化效應
(Detection of site amplification and directivity at dip-slope using microtremor measurements)

相關論文

★ 台灣中部德基至梨山地區岩石劈理位態分布特性之研究	★ 台北盆地松山層土壤性質之空間分析
★ 新店溪之地形研究	★ 運用類神經網路進行隧道岩體分類
★ 大肚溪流域河階地形研究	★ 台南台地暨鄰近地區之台南層及其構造運動
★ 台灣東北部地區隱沒帶地震強地動衰減式之研究	★ 運用類神經網路進行地震誘發山崩之潛感分析
★ 地形地質均質區劃分與山崩因子探討	★ 由世界應力量測資料探討不同地體構造區的應力特性
★ 921集集地震造成之地表變形模式	★ 運用模糊類神經網路進行山崩潛感分析—以台灣中部國姓地區為例
★ 運用判別分析進行山崩潛感分析之研究 – 以臺灣中部國姓地區為例	★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸法進行山崩潛感分析-以臺灣中部國姓地區為例
★ 台灣西南平原末次冰期以來之地層及構造運動	★ 利用近年大規模地震的強震資料修正Newmark經驗式

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

地振動在邊坡上的動態反應是地震誘發邊坡破壞的重要考量。過去因缺乏現地的地動觀測資料使此議題較少被了解，而多限於地形放大效應的少數觀測資料及相關之數值模擬。直到2007年，Del Gaudio及Wasoski才首次以實際觀測資料提出在邊坡上的震波極化現象。目前了解，在某些特定地形及地質構造之邊坡上可觀察到地振動放大與極化現象，而且常沿著可能滑移方向產生最大放大，這是以往未曾被瞭解而且被遺漏的重要地震誘發山崩議題。本研究在台灣碧山巖、草嶺、九份二山等順向坡進行寬頻地震儀佈設及微地動的量測，分析地動在順向坡之放大與極化情形。結果顯示，碧山巖在單一地質條件影響之下，放大效應主要受地形控制，坡頂處譜比值可達4至5，且低頻部分（1-3Hz）之方向性放大與地形相符合。綜合在順向坡坡面上之觀測結果，判定符合主頻與極化判定準則的測站，其極化方向平行於順向坡地層之傾向，譜比值可到3-5之間。然而部分同樣位於坡面上之測站受現地構造影響而呈現不同極化方向。這顯示微地動測量之結果易受局部地形地質特徵控制。另外在與CHY080強震站之強地動觀測結果比較中，可在同樣的頻率帶（1-3Hz）觀測到主頻放大，且從可判定極化方向之地震結果中發現，其極化方向與微地動之結果一致。但若單一比較集集地震與微地動資料，其極化方向差異約70度。主要因微地動反應現地局部地形與構造作用結果，但強震資料結果同時反應了震源特性與區域性構造，未來需要更多強地動資料進行歸納與比較分析場址極化效應。

摘要(英)

The influence of site effects can be an important factor in seismic triggering of landslides on unstable slopes. However, dynamic responses of unstable slopes to seismic shaking are poorly understood, because the scarcity of relevant seismometric data and its evaluation is made difficult by the complexity of the phenomena involved, link to surface geometry, local geology, amplified wave propagation, etc. The analysis presented by Del Gaudio and Wasowski (2007) show that slope response to seismic shaking can be characterized by directional variations with maxima amplification oriented along local topography features. The site amplification and directivity appears has occasionally been detected with maximum slope direction. This work attempt to explore the phenomenon based on microtremor measurement, and the test were performed at Bishan, Jiufengershan and Tasoling in Taiwan. At Bishan, all measurements are located on the same stratum, it points out that the amplification of these sites are influenced by topography and the value of HVNR of these sites near ridge can be 4-5. Further, we observed the response directivity at 1-3Hz are coincided with local topography. Summarize all directivity measured at dip-slope faces, most results are with dip direction and some exceptions are linked to the local site features. It shows that microtremor is easily affected by local geology and topography conditions. A comparison of microtremor results with records of an accelerometer CHY080 station at Tasoling shows that the microtremor and the strong motions have the same dominant frequency (1-3Hz). The directivity of the earthquakes which are met the criteria for site response directivity identification presence the same amplification oriented with microtremor. However, the maximum amplification direction of Chi-Chi earthquake event provides a different of 70 degrees from microtremor results. It might due to the nature different between microtremor and seismic, the former is more related to local structures and the latter combines source properties and site effect. Considering the non-linearity of site response, it would need more investigation with moderate-strong earthquake data recorded at those unstable slopes to understand dynamic responses.

關鍵字(中)

★ 微地動
★ 方向性
★ 場址放大
★ 順向坡
★ 單站頻譜比

關鍵字(英)

★ Spectral ratio
★ Microtremor
★ Site Effect
★ Directivity
★ Dip-slope

論文目次

目　錄
頁次
中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目 VII
表目 X
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 1
1.3 文獻回顧 3
1.4 研究架構與流程 4
第二章研究區域地質與地形概況 5
2.1 前言 5
2.2 碧山巖地區 7
2.3 九份二山地區 12
2.4 草嶺地區 18
第三章研究原理與方法 26
3.1 微地動介紹 26
3.2 理論基礎 26
3.3 微地動量測 31
3.4 資料處理 33
3.5 場址特性分析 43
第四章結果 48
4.1 碧山巖結果分析 49
4.2 九份二山結果分析 56
4.3 草嶺結果分析 63
4.4 與CHY080結果比較 70
第五章討論 78
5.1 地形效應 78
5.2 極化作用 83
5.3 信號水平的問題 85
第六章結論與建議 88
6.1 結論 88
6.2 建議 89
參考文獻 90
附錄一　測站資訊 95
附錄二　測站照片 98
附錄三　各測站結果 110
附錄四　草嶺CHY080鑽井資料 128

參考文獻

李錫堤（2011）草嶺大崩山之地質與地形演變，中華水土保持學報，第42卷，第4期，第175-186頁。
林立青、梁茂昌、戚務正（2010）地表微振動與海洋波浪之相關性研究，2010中央氣象局天氣分析與預報研討會論文集，第40-46頁。
洪如江、林美聆、陳天健、王國隆（2000）921集集大地震相關的坡地災害、坡地破壞特性、與案例分析，地工技術，第81期，第17-32頁。
黃鑑水、何信昌、劉桓吉(1983)，「台灣中部草嶺地區之地質與山崩」，經濟部中央地質調查所彙刊，第2號，第95-111頁。
黃鑑水、陳勉銘、曹恕中、許銘義（2000）國姓鄉九份二山大崩山，台灣山崩災害專輯（一），經濟部中央地質調查所，第139-145頁。
黃鑑水、陳勉銘、許銘義（2003）九份二山大山崩，地工技術; 第96期, 第79-86頁。
葉俊岑（2001）利用單站頻譜比法探討集集地震造成之土壤非線性反應，國立中央大學應用地質研究所碩士論文，共120頁。
廖軒吾（2000）集集地震誘發之山崩，國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文，共90頁。
富國技術工程股問有限公司（2002）雲林縣強震儀測站地質鑽探調查工程紀實報告書（九十年度），共34頁。
工研院能資所（2002）內湖地區五千分之一環境地質圖。
Bonamassa, O., Vidale, J. E.(1991) Directional site resonances observed from aftershocks of the 18 October Loma Prieta earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 1945-1957.
Bonnefoy-Claudet, S., Cotton, F. and Bard, P.-Y. (2006) The nature of the seismic noise wave field and its implication for site effects studies: a literature review, Earth Sci. Rev. 79, nos. 3–4, 205-227.
Borcherdt, R.D.(1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay, Bull. seism. Soc. Am.,60,29-61.
Boore, D. M., Seekins, L., and Joyner, W. B.(1989) Peak acceleration from the 17 October 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, Seism. Res. Lett. 60, 151-166.
Chávez-García, F.J., Sánchez, L.R., Hatzfeld, D.(1996) Topographic site effects and HVSR. A comparison between observations and theory. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 86, 1559-1573.
Del Gaudio, V., Wasowski, J.(2007) Directivity of slope dynamic response to seismic shaking, Geophys. Res. Lett.,34,L12301, doi:10.1029/2007GL029842.
Del Gaudio, V., Coccia, S.,Wasowski, J., Gallipoli, M.R., Mucciarelli, M.(2008) Detection of directivity in seismic site response from microtremor spectral analysis. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 8, 751-762.
Del Gaudio, V., Wasowski, J.(2010) Can landslide-prone slope response to strong shaking be inferred from weak motion data? First answer from 2009 L’’Aquila earthquake, EGU General Assembly 2010, 5741
Del Gaudio, V., Wasowski, J.(2011) Advances and problems in understanding the seismic response of potentially unstable slopes, Engineering Geology, 122, 73-83.
Field, E. H. and Jacob, K. H., (1993) The theoretical response of sedimentary layers to ambient seismic noise. Geophysical Research Letters 20, 2925-2928.
Field, E.H., Jacob, K.H.(1995) A comparison and test of various site response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference site dependent. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1127-1143.
Guthrie, R.H., and S.G. Evans (2007) Work, persistence, and formative events: The geomorphic impact of landslides, Geomorphology, 88, 266-275.
Havenith, H.-B., M. Vanini, D. Jongmans, and E. Faccioli (2003) Initiation of earthquake-induced slope failure: Influence of topographical and other site specific amplification effects,J. Seismol., 7, 397-412.
Kurita,T, Annaka,T, Takahashi,S, Shimada,M and Suehiro,T.(2005) Effect of irregular topography on strong ground motion amplification, Journal of JAEE, 5:3, 1-11
Konno, K. & Ohmachi, T.(1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of mi-crotremor,Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 88, 228-241.
Lachet, C. and P. -Y. Bard (1994) Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitationsof Nakamura`s technique, J. Phys. Earth 42, 377-397.
Lermo, J., Chavez-Garcia, F.（1993）Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 83, 1574-1594.
Meric, O., Garambois, S., Malet, J.P., Cadet, H., Guéguen, P. and Jongmans, D.,（2007）. Seismic noise-based methods for soft-rock landslide characterization, Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr., 178, 137-148.
Moore, J., Gischig, V., Burjanek, J., Loew, S., Fäh, D.（2011）Site Effects in Unstable Rock Slopes: Dynamic Behavior of the Randa Instability (Switzerland). Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 101(6), 3110-3116, doi: 10.1785/0120110127.
Meunier, P., Hovius, N., Haines, J.A.（2008）. Topographic site effects and the location of earthquake induced landslides. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 275, 221-232
Nakamura, Y.（1989）A method for dynamic haracteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremors on the ground surface, Quarterly Rept. RTRI, Japan, 30, 25-33.
Newmark, N.（1965）Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments, Geotechnique, 15, 139-160.
Paolucci, R.,（2002）Amplification of earthquake ground motion by steep topographic irregularities, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 1831-1853.
Pedersen H., Le Brun B., Hatzfeld D., Campillo M., Bard P.-Y.（1994） Ground-motion amplitude across ridges. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 1786-1800.
Peng, W.-F., Wang, C.-L., Chen, S.-T., Lee, C.-T.（2009）Incorporating the effects of topographic amplification and sliding areas in the modelling of earthquake-induced landslide hazards, using the cumulative displacement method. Computer and Geoscinces, 35, 946-966.
Spudich, P., M. Hellweg, and Lee W. H. K. (1996) Directional topo-graphic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for mainshock motions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, 193-208.
The SESAME project (Site EffectS assessment using AMbient Excitations) (2004) Guidelines for the implementation of the h/v spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations, Deliverable D23.09.
Vidale, J.E.（1986）Complex polarisation analysis of particle motion,Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 76,1393-405.
Willenberg, H., Evans, K.F., Eberhardt, E., Spillmann, T., Loew, S.（2008） Internal structure and deformation of an unstable crystalline rockmass above Randa (Switzerland). Part II: three-dimensional deformationpatterns. Eng. Geol., 101, 15-32.

指導教授

李錫堤、邱宏智
(Chyi-Tyi Lee、Hung-Chie Chiu)

審核日期

2012-8-24

推文