高績效工作系統對員工離職傾向之影響～以心理契約為中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：31

、訪客IP：3.138.179.119

姓名

謝宜珊(Yi-shan Shieh) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

高績效工作系統對員工離職傾向之影響～以心理契約為中介變項
(The Relationship Between High Performance Work System and Turnover Intention: Mediating Effect of Psychological Contract Abstract)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

回顧2011，歐債危機層出不窮，全球經濟復甦不確定性增加，放眼2012仍充滿著不安與動盪。而「人」身為企業的主體，便是企業面對挑戰、達成組織目標首能運用的利器。Guest(1997)找出組織層次人力資源措施與企業績效間的關聯，組織層次人力資源措施先影響到員工態度，而後改善個人績效，進而影響公司的整體績效。但究竟人力資源措施是透過什麼樣的作用對員工、對組織產生影響力？則為本研究的動機來源。
　　本研究係以台灣上市櫃公司為研究母體，分為兩階段進行問卷調查，第一階段針對81家企業發出公司層次問卷，回收有效問卷75家，回收率92.6%。接著針對75家回覆公司層次問卷的企業中發出1875份問卷，回收有效問卷1520份，回收率81.1%。並透過因素分析、相關分析、階層迴歸分析等統計方法探討變數間的關聯。經實證分析結果如下：
1.高績效工作系統中長期發展人力資源管理活動，與員工離職傾向有負向關係；短期聚焦的人力資源管理活動，則對關係型心理契約無顯著影響。
2.高績效工作系統中長期發展人力資源管理活動對關係型心理契約存在顯著影響；短期聚焦人力資源管理活動，對關係型心理契約無顯著影響。
3.員工知覺到的關係型心理契約與員工離職傾向之間有顯著影響
4.關係型心理契約對高績效工作系統中長期發展人力資源管理活動與員工離職傾向具有中介效果。

摘要(英)

Looking back in 2011, the Europe’’s debt crisis took place in rapid succession with no sign of abating which resulted into increased worldwide uncertainty of economic recovery. With the advent 2012, the uneasy turbulence remains to be felt. “Employees” being a major part of an enterprise, becomes an important instrument in facing enterprising challenges and help the company achieve its goal. Mr. Guest explained in 1997 how the organizational level human resources practice is closely related to business performance. The organizational level human resources practice initially influences employees working attitude, then it improves their performance, and ultimately stimulate the whole company’s overall performance. What is it that allows human resources effective measures to effectively influence the employees and its organization? It is a motive of this research to find the answers.
This study specifically targeted Taiwan’s stock listed companies as research subjects with a survey conducted in two stages. In the first stage, survey questionnaires were sent out to 81 selected companies. 75 valid responses or 92.6% feedback were received. In the next stage, another batch of 1875 questionnaires was sent out to the previous 75 respondent companies. A total of 1520 valid responses or 81.1% of the sent questionnaires were returned. Then, statistical methods: such as factor analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis were used to explore into the relations of and between the resulting parameters. The verified results of the analysis are shown below:
1. HRM practices of adaptability within the high performance work system have a negative correlation with employees’ turnover Intention. HRM practices of alignment have no influence on employee relational contract.
2. HRM practices of adaptability within the high performance work system have a positive correlation with employee relational contract. HRM practices of alignment have no influence on employee relational contract.
3. Relational contract has an obvious influence on employees’ turnover Intention.
4. Employee relational contract has mediating effect on HRM practices of adaptability within the high performance work system and employees turnover Intention.

關鍵字(中)

★ 高績效工作系統
★ 心理契約
★ 離職傾向

關鍵字(英)

★ turnover intention
★ psychological contract
★ HPWS

論文目次

一、緒論…………………………………………………………… 1
1-1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………1
1-2 研究目的…………………………………………………4
二、文獻探討……………………………………………………… 5
2-1 高績效工作系統………………………………………… 5
2-2 心理契約………………………………………………… 9
2-3 離職傾向………………………………………………… 15
2-4 高績效工作系統與離職傾向…………………………… 19
2-5 高績效工作系統與心理契約…………………………… 24
2-6 心理契約與離職傾向…………………………………… 25
2-7 高績效工作系統、心理契約與離職傾向……………… 27
三、研究方法………………………………………………… 28
3-1 研究架構………………………………………………… 28
3-2 研究假設………………………………………………… 30
3-3 變數操作型定義與研究工具…………………………… 31
3-4 研究對象與資料收集…………………………………… 34
3-5 資料分析與統計方法…………………………………… 35
四、實證分析……………………………………………………… 37
4-1 樣本基本資料分析……………………………………… 37
4-2 信度與效度分析………………………………………… 40
4-3 相關分析………………………………………………… 42
4-4 階層迴歸分析…………………………………………… 45
五、結論與建議…………………………………………………… 49
5-1 結論……………………………………………………… 49
5-2 管理意涵………………………………………………… 52
5-3 研究限制與建議………………………………………… 54
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………… 55

參考文獻

(一)中文部分
1.吳秉恩，1992，策略性人力資源管理：理念、運作與實務，台北中國經濟企業研究所。
2.何永福、楊國安，1995，人力資源管理，再版，台北：三民書局。
3.黃英忠，1998，現代管理學，台北：華泰。
4.黃家齊，2002，「人力資源管理活動認知與員工態度、績效之關聯」，管理評論，民國91年10月，第二十一卷第四期。
5.黃家齊，2002，「人力資源管理活動與組織績效-員工技能與動機的中介效果」，人力資源管理學報，2002冬季號，第二卷第四期。
6.陳漪珮，2004，「人力資源管理措施對非功能性離職與組織績效之影響」，中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
7.邱豔婷，2005，「人力資源高績效工作實務對員工工作績效、組織公民行為關聯性之探討」，中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
8.賴彥如‧黃同圳，2007，「人力資源管理措施對情感性承諾之影響-轉換型領導知覺之調節效果探討」，人力資源管理學報，2007 夏季號，第七卷第二期。
9.蕭婉鎔‧黃同圳‧林瑞娟，2009，「績效管理制度與組織績效關係之探討」，輔仁管理評論，民國98年1月，第十六卷第一期。
10.周瑛琪，2009，人力資源管理第五版，台北：東華書局。
11.吳明隆，2009，SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務第二版，台北：五南書局。
12.陳春希‧高瑞新‧湯雅云，2009「我國港務警政機構的人力資源管理實務、人力資本與服務品質關係之研究」，人力資源管理學報，2009 夏季號，第九卷第二期。
13.許玉琴，2009，「高績效工作系統與知識分享行為之探討-組織創新氣候之中介效果」，中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
14.張火燦，2010，「心理契約對工作生活平行的影響:社會支持與情緒智力的干擾角色」，人力資源管理學報，第10卷第3期。
(二)英文部分
1.Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL:Dorsey.
2.Arthur, J. B. (1992). “The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.45, pp.488-506.
3.Arthur, J. B. (1994). “Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, pp.670-687.
4.Becker, B.E. and Huselid, M.A. (1998). “High-performance work system and firm performance: a synthesis of research and managerial implications”. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 16, pp. 53-101. G.R. Ferris (ed). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.Beers, M., Spector, B., Lawrence, P., Mills, D., & Walton. (1985). Human Resource Management: A general Manager’s perspective. New York: Free Press.
6.Batt, R. (2002), “Managing Customer Service: Human Resource Practices, Quit Rates, and Sales Growth”, Academy of management Journal, Vol.45(3), pp.587-597.
7.Chang, P. L. and Chen, W. L. (2002). “The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance: Empirical evidence from high-tech firms in Taiwan”. International Journal of Management, Vol.19(4), pp. 622-631.
8.Chay, T-W, & Aryee, S. (1999). Potential moderating influence of career growth opportunities on careerist orientation and work attitudes: Evidence of the protean career era in Singapore. Journal of Organization Behavior, 20, 613-623.
9.Colarelli, S. M. (1984). Methods of communication and mediating processes in realistic job previews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4): 633-642.
10.Davis, Keith and Newstrom John W. (1989). Human Behavior at Work：Organizational
Behavior（8th ed.）. McGraw-Hill.
11.Dessler, G. (1994). Human Resource Management. 6th ed. Prentice Hall.
12.Dessler, G. (1998). Managerment fundamentals: Modern principles & practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
13.Drummond, I. & Stone, I (2007). “Exploring the potential of high performance work systems in SMEs”, Employment Relations, Vol.29(2) , pp.192-207.
14.Eisenberger, R.,Huntington,R.,Hutchison, S. and Sowa, D. (1986).Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology,71（3）：500-507.
15.Evans, W.R. and Davis, W.D. (2005). “High performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure”. Journal of Management, Vol. 31(5), pp. 758-775.
16.Ghiselli, R.F., La Lopa, J.M., & Bai B. (2001). “Job Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction and Turnover Intent”, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly,
Vol.42, pp.28-37.
17.Gumez-Melia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (1998). Managing human resource. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
18.Guzzo, Richard A., Noonan, Katherine A. and Elron Efrat. (1994.) Expatriate Managers and Psychological Contract,Journal of Applied Psychology,79（4）：617-626.
19.Hall, D. T. and Associates 1988, “Career Development In Organizations”, Jossey-Base, publishers. Pp54.
20.Huselid, M. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on
turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635-672.
21.Kickul, J. Lester, S. W., & Finkl, J. (2002). Promise breaking during radical organizational change: do justice intervations make a difference? Journal of Organization Behavior, 23, 469-488.
22.Lawler, E. E., III, Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1992). Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.Lepak, D. P. & Snell, S. A. (2002). “Examining The Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource
Configurations”, Journal of Management, Vol.28, pp.517-543
24.Lo, S., & Aryee, S. (2003). Psychological contract breach in a Chinese context: an integrative approach. Journal of management studies, 40, 1005-1020.
25.MacNeil, Ian R. (1985). Relational Contract：What We Do and Do Not Know,
Wisconsin Law Review,pp.483-525.
26.Martell, K. & Carroll, S. J. (1995). How strategic is HRM? Human Resource Management, 1995,34(2):253-267.
27.Miller, H. E., Katerberg, & Hulin, C. L. (1979). Evaluation of the mobley, horner, andhollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64,509-517.
28.Mobley, W.H., Horner, S.O. & Hollingswoth A.T. (1977).“An evaluation of precursorsof hospital employee turnover”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.63,p.410
29.Moorhead, G., & Griffin, R. W. (1998). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30.Morrison ,E. W. (1994). Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior：TheImportance of Understanding the Employee’’s Perspective," Academy of Management Journal,37（6）：1543-1567.
31.Morrison ,E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violations. Academy of Management Review, 22:226-256.
32.Lee, C., Liu, J., Rousseau, D.M., Hui, C., & Chen, Z. 2010. Inducements, contributions, and fulfillment in new employee psychological contracts. Human Resource Management, 50(2): 201-226.
33.Lengnick-Hall, C. A. & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (1988). Strategic human resource management: A review of the literature and a proposed typology. Academy of Management Journal, 13:454-470.
34.Levinson, H., Price, C. R., Munden, K. J., & Solley, C. M. (1962). Men, management, and mental health. Cambridge, MA: HARVAED University.Lester, S.W., Claire, E., Kickul, J. (2001).Psychological Contracts in the 21st Century：What Employees Value Most and How Well Organizations Are Responding to These Expectations. Human Resource Planning,24（1）：10-21.
35.Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2: 121-139.
36.Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer’s obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of organizational behavior. Vol. 11 389-400.
37.Rousseau and Parks, Judi McLean, (1993).The Contracts of Individuals and Organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior,15：1-43.
38.Robinson, S.L. & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract：Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior,15：245-259.
39.Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contract in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.Schein, E. H. (1980). Organizational psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
41.Suazo, M. M., Turnley, W. H. & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (2005). The role of perceived violation in determining employees’ reactions to psychological contract breach. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(1),24-36.
42.Vandenberg, R. J., Richardson, H. A., & Eastman, L. J. (1999), “The Impact of Hig Involvement Work Processes on Organizational Effectiveness”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 24, pp.300-339.
43.Zachoratos, A., Barling, J., and Iverson, R.D. (2005). “High-performance work systems and occupational safety”. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 77-84.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-chi Liu)

審核日期

2012-7-4

推文