工作自主對知識分享行為影響的探討-以組織心理所有權為中介效果

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：56

、訪客IP：18.191.198.56

姓名

曾彥傑(Yen-chieh Tseng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

工作自主對知識分享行為影響的探討-以組織心理所有權為中介效果
(The Relationship Between Autonomy and Knowledge Sharing Behavior: Mediating Effect of Organization Psychological Ownership)

相關論文

★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應	★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯	★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響	★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響	★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例	★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯－以IC設計產業為例	★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例	★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要動機，是想瞭解在台灣產業當中，如何經由賦予員工工作自主影響員工知識分享行為，並且進一步探討，組織心理所有權是否會影響工作自主與知識分享行為間之中介效果。
因此，本研究的目的是要了解員工認知的工作自主對員工的知識分享行為的影響，研究對象是台灣企業從業員工為主要抽樣對象。本研究共發出1,875份問卷，回覆75家公司，回收有效問卷1,520份，員工填答之工作自主、組織心理所有權與知識分享行為問卷，有效樣本回收率為81％。本研究是透過因素分析、相關分析及迴歸分析來探討各變數間的關係。經由實證分析，本研究之結果如下：
一、員工工作自主感知的程度增加，有助於員工知識分享行為。
二、員工工作自主的程度增加，員工感知的組織心理所有權的程度增加。
三、當員工感知的組織心理所有權程度增加，員工知識分享行為的程度亦會增加。
四、員工感知的組織心理所有權在工作自主與知識分享行為之間，具有部分中介的效果。

摘要(英)

This research is designed to understand how job autonomy influences employees’ knowledge sharing behavior.Moreover, this study tries to examine if organization psychological ownership mediate the positive relationship between Job Autonomy and knowledge sharing behavior.
Therefore, the purpose of this research is to understand if employee’s cognition of job autonomy influences employee’s knowledge sharing behavior, the research objects are employees Taiwan companies are taken as sampling main body. In this research had sent 1875 questionnaires to 75 companies.There are 1520 target-employee version questionnaires. The percentage of valid respondents is 81%.
After the works of recording and transforming survey data, we proceed statistical analysis, including factor, correlation and regression analysis. Research findings can be summarized as follows,
First, the degree of employees’ perceived job autonomy increases, it contributes the employee’s knowledge sharing behavior.
Second, the degree of employees’ perceived job autonomy increases, the degree of employee’s organization psychological ownership also can increase.
Third, when the degree of employees’ perceived organization psychological ownership increases, the degree of employee’s knowledge sharing behavior also can increase.
Fourth, employees’ perceived organization psychological ownership could partially mediate the positive relationship between job autonomy and knowledge sharing behavior.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工作自主
★ 組織心理所有權
★ 知識分享行為

關鍵字(英)

★ Job autonomy
★ knowledge sharing behavior
★ Organization psychological ownership

論文目次

第一章緒論 .............................................................. 1
第一節研究背景與動機 ................................................ 1
第二節研究目的 ...................................................... 4
第三節研究流程 ...................................................... 5
第四節章節架構 ...................................................... 6
第二章文獻探討 .......................................................... 7
第一節知識分享行為 .................................................. 7
第二節工作自主 ..................................................... 13
第三節心理所有權 ................................................... 17
第四節工作自主、知識分享行為、組織心理所有權之關聯 ................. 21
第三章研究方法 ......................................................... 27
第一節研究架構 ..................................................... 27
第二節研究假設 ..................................................... 28
第三節問卷設計與變數定義 ........................................... 28
第四節抽樣方法 ..................................................... 30
第五節資料分析方法 ................................................. 31
第四章實證分析 ......................................................... 33
第一節樣本基本資料分析 ............................................. 33
第二節信度分析&因素分析 ............................................ 36
第三節相關分析 ..................................................... 38
第四節迴歸分析 ..................................................... 41
第五章結論與建議 ....................................................... 45
第一節實證研究結論 ................................................. 45
第二節研究限制 ..................................................... 47
第三節後續研究建議 ................................................. 48
第四節管理意涵 ..................................................... 49
參考文獻 ................................................................ 50

參考文獻

一、中文部份：
方世杰、方世榮，「知識管理－觀念架構的建立」，商管科技季刊，第一卷第三期，355~374
頁，民國89年。
王文彥，「知識分享內外在動機與知識分享行為之研究--以A 公司為例」，國立中央大學人
力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國91年。
古金英，「工作自主性、員工股權擁有滿意、自主性需求與組織承諾間關係之再探討--以台
灣電子業員工為例」，科技管理學刊，第九卷第二期，131~161頁，民國93年。
邱淑芬、韓志翔、林盈君，「員工參與制度與組織公民行為之關係--以台灣電子業為例」，
管理學報，第十九卷第六期， 1009~1043頁，民國91年。
馬家媛，「員工對授權賦能的認知對其工作態度之影響」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究
所研究所，碩士論文，民國93年。
張媛，「人力資源活動對高科技研發人員知識分享行為之影響」，國立中央大學人力資源
管理研究所，碩士論文，民國92年。
張忠禧，「知識心理所有權形成之機制以及知識分享--知識心理所有權之中介效果」，義守
大學管理研究所，碩士論文，民國96年。
許玉琴，「高績效工作系統與知識分享行為之探討--組織創新氣候之中介效果」，國立中央
大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國98年。
陳家聲、方文昌、蔡儀華，「企業員工知識分享效能之質性研究--以知識接收者的觀點」，
人力資源管理學報，第五卷第一期，029~051頁，民國94年春季號。
董玉娟，「知識分享意願影響前因之研究：威脅之情境效果」，人力資源管理學報，第四卷
第三期，117~137頁，2004年秋季號
劉京偉譯，勤業管理顧問公司，知識管理的第一本書，商周出版城邦發行，台北，民國八
十九年。
劉敏熙，「知識治理機制對個人知識管理行為的影響─從所有權觀點探討」，國立中央大學
人力資源管理研究所，博士論文，民國97年。
蔡昕妤，「知識心理所有權對知識分享的影響--以知識分享認知為干擾變項」，義守大學管
理研究所，碩士論文，民國96年。
鄭臻妹，「內外控人格特質、工作特性及工作績效之分析研究--以台灣高科技產業員工為
例」，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文，民國90年。
二、英文部份：
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E., “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management
Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues”MIS Quarterly, Vol
25(1),pp.117-136,2001.
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., and Luthans, F., “Psychological Ownership:
Theoretical Extensions, Measurement, and Relation to Work Outcomes”, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol 30, pp.173-191, 2009.
Belk, R. W., “ Possessions and the extended self”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol 15,
pp.139-168,1988.
Csikszentmihalyi, & Rochberg-Halton, The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1981.
Davenport, T. H., and Pursak, L., “Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they
know”, Harvard College Press,1998.
Dittmar, H., “The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be”, New York: St.
Martin’s Press,1992.
Dyne, L. V., and Pierce, J. L., “Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field
studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior”, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol 25, pp.439~459,2004.
Furby L., “Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: A personal memoir and
an appraisal of our progress”, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, Vol 6(6)pp.
457-463,1991.
Furby, L., “Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation”, Social
Behavior & Personality, Vol 6(1), pp.49-65, 1978.
Hackman, J. R., and Lawler, E. E., “Employee reactions to job characteristics”, Journal of
applied psychology, Vol 55, pp.259-286,1971.
Hackman, J. R., and Oldham, G. R. , Work redesign. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley, Publishing
Co,1980.
Hackman, J. R., and Oldham, G. R., “Development of the job diagnostic survey”, Journal of
applied psychology, Vol 60, pp.159-170,1975.
Hackman, J. R., and Oldham, G. R., “Motivation Through the design of work: test of a
theory” ,Organizational behavior and Human Performance, pp.250-279, August 1976.
Han, T. S., Chiang, H. H., and Chang, A., “Employee participation in decision making,
psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: mediating role of organizational
commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations”, The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, Vol 21(12),pp.2218–2233,2010.
Hendricks, P., “Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge
sharing”, Knowledge and Process Management, Vol 6(2),pp.91-100,1999.
Hendriks, P.H., “The Organizational Impact of Knowledge-based Systems: A Knowledge 52
Perspective”, Knowledge-based Systems, Vol12(4), pp.159-169,1999.
Isaacs, S., “Social development in young children”, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.,1933.
Kim, T.Y., Cable, D.M,, Kim, S.P., and Wan, J., “Emotional competence and work performance:
The mediating effect of productivity and the moderating effect of job autonomy”, Journal
of Organizational Behavior, Vol 30, pp.983-1000,2009.
Matson, E., Patiath, P., and Shavers, T., “Stimulating knowledge sharing: Strengthening your
organization’s internal knowledge market”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol
32(3),pp.275-285,2003.
Morgeson, F. P., and Klinger, K. D., “The Importance of Job Autonomy, Cognitive Ability, and
Job-Related Skill for Predicting Role Breadth and Job Performance”, Journal of Applied
Psychology, Vol90, No2, pp.399–406,2005.
Nonaka, I., “The knowledge-creating company”, Harvard Business Review, pp.96-104,
Nov-Dec 1991.
Nonaka, I., and Konno, N., “The Concept of ‘Ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge
Creation”, California Management Review, Vol 40(3), pp.40-54, Spring 1998.
Nonaka, I., and Takaeuchi, H., “The knowledge creating company”, Oxford University
Press,1995.
Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., “A dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation“,
Organizational Science, Vol 5(1),pp.14-37,February 1994.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., and Konno, N., “SECI, Ba and Leadership：a Unified Model of
Dynamic Knowledge Creation”, Long Range Planning ,Vol 33, pp.5~34,2000
Pei, W., Shujuan. C., “Psychological Ownership in Organizations and Its Relationship to
Employee’s Working Attitudes and Behavior”, Advances in Psychological Science ,Vol
13(6),pp.774-779,2005.
Pierce, .J L., Kostova, T., Dirks, K. T., “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and
Extending a Century of Research”, Review of General Psychology, pp.1~45,2002.
Pierce, J. L., Dyne, L.V., and Cummings, L. L., “Psychological ownership: A conceptual and
operational exploration”, Southern Management Association Proceedings, USA,
pp.203-211,1992.
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, K. T., “The state of psychological ownership : Integrating
and extending a century of research”, Review of General Psychology, Vol 7,
pp.84-107,2003.
Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., and Morgan, S., “Employee ownership: A conceptual model of
process and effects”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 16,pp.121-144,1991.
Pierce, J.L., Jussila, I., and Cummings, A., “Psychological ownership within the job design
context: revision of the job characteristics model” ,Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol
30, pp.477-496, 2009.
Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, K.T., “Toward a theory of psychological ownership in 53
organizations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 26,pp.298-310,2001.
Pierce, O’Driscoll ,and Coghlan , “Work Environment and Psychological Ownership: The
Mediating Effects of Control”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol
144(5),pp.507-534,2004
Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S., “Managing Professional intellect: making the most
of the best”, Harvard Business Review, pp.71-80, March-April 1996.
Senge, P., “Sharing knowledge”, Executive Excellence, Vol 14(11), pp.17-18,1997.
Senge, P., “Sharing knowledge”, Executive Excellence, Vol 15( 6), pp.11-12,1998.
Spreitzer, G. M., “Psychological empowerment in workplace: dimensions, measurement, and
validation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 38(5), pp.1442-1465,1995.
Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P., Christiansen, N. D., “Employees that think and act like owners:
Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness”,Personnel
Psychology, Vol 56(4),pp.847-871,2003.
Wagner, S. L., and Rush, M. C., “Altruistic Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Context,
Disposition, and Age”, Journal of Social Psychology, Vol 140(3), pp.379-391,2000.
Zack, M. H., “Developing a know-ledge strategy ”, California Management Review, Vol 41(3),
pp.125-145,1999.

指導教授

劉念琪(Nien-Chi Liu)

審核日期

2012-7-5

推文