徒弟對導師的信任對正式化師徒功能的影響─以權力距離為干擾變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：69

、訪客IP：3.141.42.116

姓名

胡淑惠(Shu-Hui Hu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

徒弟對導師的信任對正式化師徒功能的影響─以權力距離為干擾變項
(Impact of Protege's Trust to Formal Mentoring Functions : Power Distance as a Moderator)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

企業競爭、知識經濟時代，資深人員的實務經驗與專業知識的傳承與發展更顯珍貴，而企業正式化師徒制度的落實確能使新進員工提高環境適應性、融入組織文化，導師也能獲得領導力和專業力的提升，不但使組織降低新進員工的離職率，也讓資深員工及新進員工共同獲益，提升組織績效，優化企業競爭力。Kram(1985)指出在組織中師徒制度參與者，有職涯方面、社會心理方面及角色楷模方面(Scandura & Ragins, 1993)的好處。
本研究主要探討以社會交換理論為基礎的正式化的師徒制，以具體驗證徒弟對導師的信任程度對正式化師徒功能的影響，另外由於組織中存在有職務層級的制度，部屬能接受與主管的權力不平等程度，是華人社會相當關鍵的文化價值變項，本研究亦欲了解徒弟權力距離與導師權力距離是否會強化或弱化其知覺導師與徒弟關係對表現師徒功能之影響，做為遴選導師與招募新人時，提供實地推動企業正式化師徒制度策略者之參考。本研究以企業實施正式化師徒制之導師與徒弟為對象，採一對一配對問卷共計 177對師徒進行資料蒐集與驗證。
研究結果為 : (一)徒弟對導師的情感型信任對師徒功能職涯支持、社會心理支持、角色楷模有顯著正向影響。(二)徒弟對導師的認知型信任對師徒功能職涯支持、角色楷模有顯著正向影響。(三)徒弟權力距離對徒弟對導師的認知型信任與師徒功能職涯支持、角色楷模關係有顯著正向調節效果。(四)導師權力距離對徒弟對導師的情感型信任與師徒功能職涯支持關係有負向調節效果。
綜合上述研究結果，本研究發現實施正式化師徒關係時，徒弟對導師的信任確實有顯著正向影響，創造徒弟、導師及組織三方面受益效果，同時建議實務界在實施正式化師徒制時，可針對本研究所提出的徒弟權力距離與導師權力距離等調節因素於實務上增強，以提升組織實施正式化師徒制時的關係效能、進而提升新進員工的適應性及工作績效。
關鍵詞 : 信任、師徒功能、師徒制度、權力距離

摘要(英)

In this age of enterprise competition and information knowledge economy, it becomes ever precious with the heritage and development of organizing practical experience from senior mentors. The implementation of formalized mentor function system enables protégé to improve adaptability, and integration into specific enterprise culture. In return mentors themselves will improve upon their leadership and professional skills as well in the process. This application will not only enable enterprise reduce turn-over rate of new employees, but also benefit both senior mentors and protégé. In addition, it can improve enterprise performance, upgrade organization efficiency, and optimize enterprise competitiveness. Kram (1985) pointed out protégé in mentor function system can benefit in professional career, psychosocial function and role modeling application. (Scandura & Ragins, 1993).
This study investigates the formal apprenticeship based on social exchange theory, use formalized mentor function system to verify different levels of trust with specific practice between protégé and mentor. In addition, among the existing internal enterprise job-level system, subordinates can accept inequality from superiors to a certain degree, this is a critical cultural value in the Chinese society. This study is intended to understand whether protégé power distance and mentor power distance can strengthen or weaken their perception of protégé and mentor relationship. As to the selection of mentors and new recruits, this study provides on - site reference to facilitate companies that utilize formalized mentoring system strategy. This study adopted a one-to-one matching questionnaire for data collection and verification, totally 177 pairs of mentor-protégé dyads with the objective to implement the formalized apprentice and mentor system.
The findings are: ( 1 ) If there is affect-base trust between protégé and mentor, then there is significant positive impact among career-related function, psychosocial function, and role modeling. ( 2 ) If there is cognition-base trust between protégé and mentor, then there is significant positive impact among career-related function, and role modeling. ( 3 ) If the protégé power distance between protégé and mentor is in cognition-base trust, then there is significant positive impact on career-related function and role modeling. ( 4 ) If the mentor power distance between protégé and mentor is in affec-base trust, then there is significant negative impact on career-related function.
To summarize the above findings, this study discovered that when implementing a formal protégé and mentor function, trust between protégé and mentor has a significant positive impact, and creates benefit for all three parties involved: protégé, mentor, and enterprise.
This study recommends when practitioners implement formal protégé and mentor function system, adjustments can be made to factors involved in protégé power distance and mentor power distance proposed in this study, so that to achieve enhanced performance of enterprise practice on mentor function. And further to achieve improved adaptability and subsequent job performance for protégé.
Key words: trust, mentoring function, mentoring relationship, power distance

關鍵字(中)

★ 師徒功能
★ 師徒制度
★ 權力距離
★ 信任

關鍵字(英)

★ mentoring function
★ trust
★ power distance
★ mentoring relationship

論文目次

目錄
摘要 ii
Abstract iv
目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景及動機 1
第二節研究目的 2
第二章文獻探討 4
第一節師徒關係相關理論 4
第二節信任 5
第三節權力距離 7
第三章研究方法 11
第一節研究對象與流程 11
第二節研究架構 11
第三節變數衡量 12
第四章研究結果 15
第一節驗證性因素分析 15
第二節相關分析 16
第三節階層迴歸分析 18
第五章結論與建議 24
第一節研究結論與討論 24
第二節管理意涵 26
第三節研究限制及建議 27
參考文獻 29
附錄一 : 徒弟問卷 36
附件二 : 導師問卷 39

參考文獻

中文部分
江珮莼（2005）。台灣企業使用職涯導師制之現況探討。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局泰山職業訓練中心 (2012)。Talent 師徒傳承再現風雲，No.17。
吳宗祐 (2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究，2008 年10 月，第30 期，第3～63 頁。
李宛真（2010）。部屬知覺上下關係對組織公民行為之影響-以權力距離為調節變項。銘傳大學管理研究所碩士論文，台北。
李碧芬譯、威克曼(Floyd Wickman)著（1998）。成功，有師為伴--Mentoring。台北市：麥格羅希爾。（原作1999年出版），弗洛伊德. 威克曼(Floyd Wickman), 泰莉. 柔丁(Terri Sjodin)原著。
林佳暖（2005）。師徒關係與組織承諾。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
張瑞元、陳心懿、林金賢、施佩玲 (2011)。「師徒功能對工作倦怠的影響—組織社會化程度的中介作用」，人力資源管理學報，第11卷2期，71~94。
陳嘉彌 (2009)。師徒制創造成功的職涯—徒弟密笈。台東：國立台東大學。
劉怡蘭 (2006)。師徒關係對組織社會化的影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
劉筱寧（2001）。徒弟個人特質、性別角色與師徒關係類型、性別組合對師徒功能影響之研究。私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，中壢。
蔡宛妮（2011）。導師對徒弟的信任程度對正式化的師徒關係的影響—以師徒權力距離差距做為干擾變項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，中壢。
蔡松純、鄭伯壎、周麗芳、姜定宇、鄭弘岳(2009)。領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行為：權力距離之調節效果。中華心理學刊民98，51卷，1期，121-138。
蔡融潤 (2010)。企業實習生師徒制之發展研究—以外商企業為例。國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部份
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Allen, T, Poteet, M, & Russell, J. (2000). Protégé selection by mentors: What makes the difference? Journal of organizational behavior, 21(3), 271-282.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., & Lentz, E. (2006). Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring program: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied sychology, 91(3), 567–578.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégé’s: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–136.
Begley, T. M., Lee, C., Fang, Y., & Li, J. (2002). Power distance as moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 692-711.
Bozionelos, N., & Wang, L. (2006). The relationship of mentoring and network resources with career success in the Chinese organizational environment.
Castro, S. L., & Scandura, T. A. (2004, November 3-6). The tale of two measures: Evaluation and comparison of Scandura’s (1992) and Ragins and McFarlin’s (1990) mentoring measures. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association Meeting, San Antonio, TX.
Chao, G. T., Walz, P. M., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 619-636.
Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P, & Morris, M. W. (2009). Guanxi versus networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese versus American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 490-508.
Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need nonfulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns:Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127-150.
Earley, P. C., & Erez, M. (1997). The transplanted executive. New York: Oxford University Press.
Eby, L. T., Durley, J. R., Evans, S. C., & Ragins, B. R. (2008). Mentors’ perceptions of negative mentoring experiences: Scale development and nomological validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 358–373.
Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support-employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual review of psychology, 58(1), 479-514.
Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5-21.
Hu, C. (2008). Analyzes of measurement equivalence across gender in the Mentoring Functions Questionnaire (MFQ-9). Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 199-205.
Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744-764.
Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural value framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320.
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives,enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50,569-598.
Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. S. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26(4), 685-704.
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
Noe, R. A. (1988a). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41(3), 457-479.
Noe, R. A., Greenberger, D. B., &Wang, S. (2002). Mentoring: What we know and where we might go. Research in personnel and human resources management, 21, 129-173.
Olian, J. D., Carroll, S. J., & Giannantonio, C. M. (1993). Mentor reactions to protégés: An experiment with managers. Journal of Vocational Behavior,43, 266-278.
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2005). Construct equivalence across groups: An unexplored issue in mentoring research. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 323-335.
Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, researchand practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177–1194.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. D. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95- 112.
Richard, O. C., Ismail, K. M., Bhuian, S. N., & Taylor, E. C. (2009). Mentoring in supervisor-subordinate dyads: Antecedents, consequences, and test of a mediation model of mentorship. Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1110-1118.
Scandura, T. A., & Pellegrini, E. K. (2007). Workplace mentoring: Theoretical approaches and methodological issues. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 71-91). Malden, MA, US: Blackwell Publishing.
Scandura, T. A., & Ragins, B. R. (1993). The effects of sex and gender role orientation on mentorship in male-dominated occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 251–265.
Turban, D. B., & Lee, F. K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships: Formation, dynamics, and outcomes. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 21–50). Los Angeles, CA: Sage
Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J., & Marchese, C. (2006). Mentor and protégé predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(3), 410–423.
Wang, S., Tomlinson, E. C, & Noe, R. A. (2010). The role of mentor trust and prote´ge´ internal locus of control in formal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 358–367.
Wang, Y. H., Hu, C., & Yang, C. C. (2011, August). Antecedents and outcomes of career plateau: The roles of mentoring others and proactive personality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, Texas, USA
Willbur, J. (1987). Does mentoring breed success? Training and Development Jouranl, 41(11):38-41
Zucker, L. G. (1986). The production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 55-111. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2012-7-26

推文