以網絡觀點探討技術與營運績效相關性-以LED產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：18.224.55.82

姓名

鄭亦君(I-Chun Cheng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

以網絡觀點探討技術與營運績效相關性-以LED產業為例
(The Relationship between Technology and Firm Performance from The Network Perspective — The Case of LED Industry)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

技術為組織資源的一種，具有獨特性、專屬性與模糊性，其他企業無法輕易模仿且為組織長期競爭優勢來源，技術的發展是具有相互依賴關係的科學成果逐步累進，因此可說技術之相依乃因其有某些共通性，學者表示技術的發展如同社會結構，因此以社會網絡的觀點角度分析技術之間依賴性，可進一步了解其相互影響關係，理解技術發展情境並有效的辨認影響創新、開發的重點技術以及預測新科技的方向。
本研究以發光二極體(light-emitting diode, LED)產業為例，利用美國專利資料庫(USPTO)蒐集前20大廠商專利資料加以統整，將個別企業視為行動者，企業間專利引證代表關係之連結而形成技術網絡。利用社會網絡分析法三種中心性衡量指標(程度、中介、接近中心性)探討個體於網絡位置之差異與其專利數及營運收入之相關性。此外另分析網絡中小團體之情形探討團體密度與團體程度中心性與專利數及營運收入之相關性。研究結果顯示，接近中心性對專利數有顯著正向影響；程度中心性對營運收入有顯著正向影響。群體密度與群體程度中心性對專利數及營運收入皆有正向顯著影響。

摘要(英)

Technology is one of organizational resources and has the characteristics such as unique, specific and fuzzy so that other firms cannot easily imitate. Technology can be organization’s long-term competitive advantage. The development of technology is the interdependence of scientific achievements and it can said that the dependent of technology is because of some commonality. Scholars claimed that the development of technology can be regareded as a social structure. From the viewpoint of social network analysis can further understand the relationship between technologies, and the situation of technological development, identify innovation factors, develop key technologies and predict the direction of the new technology.
In this study, we use the case of light-emitting diode (light-emitting diode, LED) industries. By collecting the top 20 companies’ patents from American patent databases (USPTO) , regarding firms as actors, the citation of inter-firms as linkages and form the relationship called technology network. This study use the measurement of social network analysis. Centrality includes degree centrality, betweenness centrality and closeness centrality to explore the relationship of individuals in the network position with its number of patent and operating income. In addition, we analysis the circumstances of small group in the network to explore the relationship of group density and the group degree centrality with its average number of patents and average operating income. The results show that the closeness centrality has significant positive impact on number of patent; The degree centrality has significant positive impact on operating income. Group density and group degree centrality has positive and significant impact on its number of patents and operating income.

關鍵字(中)

★ 營運績效
★ 專利引證
★ 技術網絡
★ 網絡

關鍵字(英)

★ Patent Citation
★ Performance
★ Technology Network
★ Network

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 ............................................................... I
ABSTRACT .............................................................. II
誌謝 ................................................................. III
圖目錄 ................................................................ VI
表目錄 ............................................................... VII
第一章緒論 ............................................................ 1
第一節研究動機與目的 ................................................... 1
第二節研究流程 ......................................................... 3
第二章發光二極體(LED)產業 .............................................. 4
第一節 LED簡介 ......................................................... 4
第二節 LED市場趨勢 ..................................................... 6
第三節 LED產業發展概況 ................................................ 12
第三章文獻探討 ....................................................... 19
第一節網絡理論 ........................................................ 19
1. 網絡定義 ........................................................ 19
2. 網絡形成原因 .................................................... 21
3. 社會網絡分析 .................................................... 23
第二節專利分析 ........................................................ 26
1. 專利資訊 ........................................................ 26
2. 專利分析 ........................................................ 28
3. 專利引證與技術網絡(Technology Network) .......................... 30
第三節營運績效 ........................................................ 32
1. 營運績效定義 .................................................... 33
2. 營運績效指標 .................................................... 33
第四節網絡關係與績效相關研究 .......................................... 37
第四章研究方法 ....................................................... 39
第一節研究架構 ........................................................ 39
第二節資料來源 ........................................................ 40
第三節社會網絡分析法 .................................................. 40
第四節研究假設 ........................................................ 46
第五章資料分析與實證研究 .............................................. 50
第一節資料蒐集結果 .................................................. 50
第二節資料分析流程 .................................................. 52
第三節網絡分析結果 .................................................. 52
1. 整體網絡 ........................................................ 52
2. 網絡中心性分析 .................................................. 53
3. 子群分析 ........................................................ 58
第六章結論與建議 ..................................................... 65
第一節研究結果 ...................................................... 65
第二節結論建議 ...................................................... 66
第三節研究限制與未來方向 ............................................ 67
參考文獻 .............................................................. 68

參考文獻

中文部分
(1) 方世杰. (1999). 台灣中小企業之產業網路構形與企業國際化關係研究. 企業管理學報, 45, 99-126.
(2) 任慶宗. (2003). 集團企業子公司之綜效利益與彈性限制－網絡觀點. 博士論文, 國立政治大學.
(3) 吳萬益, & 吳志正. (1996). 台美日企業在台灣及大陸企業經營環境及競爭策略之研究. 台大管理論叢, 7(1), 49-84.
(4) 李志華、方文寶. (1996). 企業績效評估理論與實務: 超越企管.
(5) 李沛錞, & 蘇信寧. (2009). 以專利引證網絡分析探討技術發展之動態演化. 科技管理學刊, 14(3).
(6) 周麗芳. (2002). 華人組織中的關係與社會網絡. 本土心理學研究, 18, 175-228.
(7) 邱晶晶. (2007). LED 廠商之競爭策略分析-以Cree 公司為例.
(8) 翁順裕, & 賴奎魁. (2009). 從社會網絡分析觀點探討技術的趨同性-以保險商業方法專利為例. 管理學報, 26(5), 485-506.
(9) 許財良. (2003). 廠商創新能力、產業發展與政府科技政策對科學園區廠商競爭優勢及績效影響之研究. 台南.
(10) 郭敏華. (2009). 營運總部獎勵措施與企業經營績效關聯性之研究-以臺北市為例. 碩士, 國立政治大學.
(11) 黃汝慧, & 郭雪芳. (2001). 專利資料庫之檢索與應用.
(12) 榮泰生. (1997). 策略管理. 台北: 華泰.
英文部分
[1] Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
[2] Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
[3] Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A
Review and Recommended Two-step Approach. Psychological Bulletin,, 103(3),411-423.
[4] Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and External Linkages: The Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361-379.
[5] Badaracco, J. (1991). The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliances.
[6] Barnes, J. A. (1954.). Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Human Relations, 7(1), 39-58.
[7] BarNir, A., & Smith, K. A. (2002). Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 219-232.
[8] Bekkers, R., Duysters, G., & Verspagen, B. (2002). Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure. Research Policy, 31(7), 1141-1161. doi: 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00189-5
[9] Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2001). Real Options,Patents, Productivity and Market Value: Evidence from a Panel of British Firm. Working Paper,Institute for Fiscal Studies,London.
[10] Borgatti, S. P. (1998). what is social network analysis?
[11] Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. (1993). Potential ower and Power Use: An Investigation of tructure and Behavior. Academy of Management.
[12] Breitzman, A. F., & Mogee, M. E. (2002). The many applications of patent analysis. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 187-205.
[13] Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a Structure Theory of Action: Network Models of social Structure. New York: Academic.
[14] Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes : The Social Structure of Competition: Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
[15] Carroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance Appraisal and Review Systems: The Identification, Measurement and Development of Performance in Organizations:
Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
[16] Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1953). Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. Evanston, Ill.: Row & Peterson.
[17] Chakravarthy, B. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Managemen Journal, 7(5), 437-458.
[18] Chiu, Y. T. H. (2009). How network competence and network location influence innovation performance. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(1), 46-55. doi:
10.1108/08858620910923694
[19] Cho, T.-S., & Shih, H.-Y. (2011). Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997–2008. Scientometrics, 89(3), 795-811. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0457-z
[20] Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 35-50.
[21] Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management：Test of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance
Predictions. Academic of Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.
[22] Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.
[23] Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. social networks, 1(3), 215-239.
[24] Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review,26(3), 431-445.
[25] Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,78(6), 1360-1380.
[26] Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators - a Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-1707.
[27] Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
[28] Hakansson, H., & Ford, D. (2002). How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 133-139. doi: 10.1016/s0148-2963(00)00148-x
[29] Hakansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5(3), 187-200. doi:
10.1016/0956-5221(89)90026-2
[30] Hakansson., H., & Snehot, I. (1995). Developing Relationships in Business Networks: Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE.
[31] Hall, M., Oppenheim, C., & Sheen, M. (2000). Barriers to the use of patent information in UK small and medium-sized enterprises. Part 2: Results of in-depth interviews
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE, 26(2), 87-99.
[32] Hanneman, R., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods: Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
[33] Harary, F., & Norman, R. Z. (1953). Graph Theory as a mathematical Model in Social
Science. AnnArbor: Institute for Social Resarch.
[34] Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions. Review of Economics Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.
[35] Ho, Y., & Chiu, H. (2011). A social network analysis of leading semiconductor companies’ k owledge flow etwork. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9268-2
[36] Hufker, T., & Alpert, F. (1994). Patents: A Managerial Perspective, Journal of Product and Brand Management. 3, 4(44-54).
[37] Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (1997). An Emergent Theory of Structure and Outcomes in Small Firm Strategic Manufacturing Networks. Academy of Management Journal,, 40,
368 - 403. .
[38] Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patent, citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge: MIT.
[39] Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On Strategic Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 31-34.
[40] Johanson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (1987). Interorganizational relations in industrial
systems : a network approach compared with the transaction cost approach.
[41] John w, M., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organications：Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
[42] Jung, S., & Imm, K.-Y. (2002). The Patent Activities of Korea and Taiwan: a Comparative Case Study of Patent Statistics. World Patent Information, 24, 303-311.
[43] Kamann, D. J. F., & Strijker, D. (1991). The Network Approach: Concepts and Applcations: London: Belhaven Press.
[44] Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272. doi: 10.1016/s0172-2190(97)00033-1
[45] Kenneth N. Walker, Arlene MacBride, & Vachon, M. L. S. (1977). Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement. Social Science & Medicine, 11(1), 25-41.
[46] Kilduff, M. T., W. (2003). Social networks and organizations: London: SAGE.
[47] Kim, J., & Marschke, G. (2004). Accounting for the recent surge in U.S. patenting: changes in R&D expenditures, patent yields, and the high tech sector. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 543-558. doi: 10.1080/1043859032000124693
[48] Knight, G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and marketing strategy: The SME under globalization. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 12-32.
[49] Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S. (1983). Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[50] Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis: Newbury park, Calif: Sage.
[51] Krackhardt, D., & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks: the company behind the chart. Harv Bus Rev, 71(4), 104-111.
[52] Lai, K. K., & Wu, S. J. (2005). Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system. Information Processing & Management, 41(2), 313-330. doi:DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2003.11.004
[53] Larson, A. (1992). Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1),76-104.
[54] Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V.(1978). Community Structure as Interorganizational Linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455-484.
[55] Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
[56] Lewis, J. D. (1990). Partnerships for profit: structuring and managing strategic alliances: Free Press (New York and London).
[57] M’CHIRGUI, Z. (2007). The Smart Card Firms’Network Positio s:A Social NetworkAnalysis. European Management Journal, 25(1), 26-49.
[58] Madhavan, R., Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (1998). Networks in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management Journal,19(5),
439-459.
[59] Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2004). The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2),
183-197. doi: 10.1007/s10961-004-4365-8
[60] Mattsso , L. G. ( 997). “Relatio ship marketi g” a d the “markets ‐ as ‐ networks approach”—a comparative analysis of two evolving streams of research. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(5), 447-461. doi: 10.1080/0267257x.1997.9964485
[61] McLoughlin, D., & Horan, C. (2000). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the Markets-as-Networks Tradition. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8, 89-103.
[62] Mitchell, J. C. (1969). The concept and use of social networks. Mitchell: Manchester U.P.
[63] Mitchell, J. C. (1973). Networks, Norms and Institutions. Boissevain: The Hague: Mouton.
[64] Mogee, M. E. (1997). Patent Analysis Methods in Support of Licensing. Paper presented at the Technology Transfer Society Annual Conference.
[65] Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as Indicators of Corporate Technological Strength. Research Policy, 16, 143-155.
[66] Noel M. Tichy, Tushman, M. L., & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social Network Analysis for Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507-519.
[67] Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions. The Academy of management Review, 15(2), 241. doi:10.2307/258156
[68] Papakyriazis, N. V., & Boudourides, M. A. (2001). Electronic weak ties in network organizations. Paper presented at the 4th German Online Research 2Conference, Gottingen,Germany.
[69] Pavitt, K. (1988). Uses and Abuses of Patent Statistics. Raan: Elsevier,Amsterdam.
[70] Pfeffer, J., & Nowak, P. (1976). Joint Ventures and Interorganizational International Interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly,, 21, 398-418.
[71] Porter, M. E., & Fuller, M. B. (1986). Coalitions and global strategy: Harvard Business School Press.
[72] Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & SmithDoerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration
and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
[73] Prahalad., C. K., & Hamel., G. (1994). Competing for the Future.
[74] Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V., & Parisi, D. (2004). Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101(9), 2658-2663. doi:
10.1073/pnas.0400054101
[75] Reitzig, M. (2003). What Determines Patent Value?Insight from the Semiconductor Industry. Research Policy, 32, 13-26.
[76] Ritter, T. a. G., H. G. (2004). The Impact of A Compa y’s Busi ess Strategy o It’s Technological Competence, Network Competence and Innovation Success. Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 548-556.
[77] Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
[78] S.Burt, R., & Janicik, G. (1996). Social Contagion and social structure. Network in marketing, 32-49.
[79] Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. [Review]. Adm Sci Q, 23(2), 224-253.
[80] Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (1998). A paradigm for social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(4), 481-501.
[81] Schmookler J. (1966). Invention and Economics Growth: Harvard Univ. Press.Cambridge, MA.
[82] Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: a handbook: . London: Sage.
[83] Scott, J. (2003). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook , 2nd edition. London: Sage Publications.
[84] Seed, P. (1990). Introducing network analysis in social work. London: J. Kingsley
[85] Sloma, R. S. (1980). How to Measure Managerial Performance. New York: Macmillan. .
[86] Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(21-38), 21-38.
[87] Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
[88] Teece, D. J. (1996). Firm Organization, Industrial Structure and Technological Innovation. Journal of Economic
[89] Behavior and Organization, 31(2), 193-224.
[90] Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 37-51.
[91] Tichy, N. M. (1981). Networks in organizations (Vol. 2): New York: Oxford UniversityPress.
[92] Trajtenberg, M. (2001). Innovation in Israel 1968-1997: a comparative analysis using patent data. Research Policy, 30(3), 363-389.
[93] Trappeya, C. V., Wua, H.-Y., Taghaboni-Duttab, F., & Trappey, A. J. C. (2011). Using patent data for technology forecasting: China RFID patentanalysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(1), 53-64.
[94] Tsai, W. P. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational net- works: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J., 44(5), 996-1004.
[95] Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations: Wiley(New York).
[96] van der Valk, T., & Gijsbers, G. (2010). The use of social network analysis in innovation studies: Mapping actors and technologies. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice,12(1), 5-17. doi:10.5172/impp.12.1.5
[97] Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & Noorderhaven, N. (2002). External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific
Integrated Circuits Industry. Organization Science, 13(6), 714-733. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.6.714.496
[98] Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of businessperformance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4),801-815.
[99] Wang, C.-c., Huang, M.-h., & Chen, D.-z. (2011). Evolution of technology dependence among leading semiconductor companies. Industrial Management & Data Systems,111(7), 1136-1152. doi:10.1108/02635571111161316
[100] Wassermann, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social NetworkAnalysis. Methods and Applications: New York:Cambridge University Press.
[101] Wellman, B., & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach: New
York: Cambridge University Press.
[102] Wolpert, J. (2002). Breaking out of the innovation box. Harvard Business Review, 80,77–83.
[103] Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge
acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 587-613.
[104] Young Gil Kim, Jong Hwan Suh, & Park, S. C. (2008). Visualization of patentanalysis for emerging technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1804-1812.
[105] Yujin, J., & Yoon, B. (2011). Technology roadmapping based On patent citation
network considering technology life cycle. 731-738. doi: 10.1109/itmc.2011.5996050
[106] Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance. Strategic Management Journal 26(9), 809-825.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung)

審核日期

2012-6-27

推文