博碩士論文 994201045 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:51 、訪客IP:3.143.17.175
姓名 吳政翰(Cheng-han Wu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 智慧型教學媒合網站的建立與應用:以音樂教學媒合為例
(The development of a tutor recommendation system for music learning)
相關論文
★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素:以智慧節能裝置為例★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析-以酒的消費為例★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展:以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究:以第三方物流公司為例★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢:以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來網路人力資源媒合已相當普及,人力資源網站也都快速成長,透過人力資源網站能夠求職、求才,其中也包含家教網中,教師與學生的媒合。然而現今家教網只依據教師與學生所提供的基本條件做媒合,此種媒合方式可能會產生大量的配對結果,讓使用者難以做決策;再者並沒有考量到師生間的適配度,缺乏進一步的配對機制,以提高媒合適配度。而本研究是針對學生找尋教師的部分加以探討,以音樂教師媒合為例,加強人力資源網站在配對機制的不足之處。
本研究先探討工作推薦系統及個人與環境適配的議題;再找尋教學媒合的衡量工具,發現麥布二氏人格類型量表(MBTI)及教學活動偏好問卷(TAP)為合適的衡量指標;之後利用相似吸引模型理論,以餘弦相似性計算其指標相似程度,藉以創造智慧型媒合配對機制;最後建立智慧型教學媒合網站,以提供有效率及高適配度的教師推薦系統。
摘要(英) Although most of the human resources websites can provide matching function for students and tutors, these websites only allow users to refine their search results through basic query criteria such as gender, location and tuition. Besides, such search mechanism generally does not take into account of the goodness of fit between teachers and students. Accordingly, this study applies the approaches of job recommendation system and person-environment fit to develop a smart matching mechanism for students who want to look for suitable music teachers. This mechanism includes the consideration of personality fit and teaching type fit, which adopts the measurements from the approaches of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Teaching Activities Preference Questionnaire (TAP). Then we use cosine similarity to calculate the closeness of the measurements, which are then transformed into weighted scores to rank the suitability of teachers for a student. Finally this matching mechanism was programmed and deployed into a human resource website, which can provide efficient and reliable matching results for students and teachers.
關鍵字(中) ★ 個人與環境適配
★ 工作推薦系統
★ 人格特質
★ MBTI
★ 媒合機制
關鍵字(英) ★ MBTI
★ personality
★ matching
★ job recommendation system
★ person-environment fit
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 工作推薦系統及個人與環境適配 4
2.2 人格特質與測量 9
2.3 MBTI與學習風格 17
2.4 MBTI與教學風格 20
第三章 智慧型配對機制 22
3.1 麥布二氏人格類型量表(MBTI) 23
3.2 教學活動偏好問卷(TAP) 25
3.3 向量相似度計算 28
第四章 智慧型教學媒合網站 30
4.1 系統架構與功能介面設計 30
4.2 使用者介面設計與系統展示 34
第五章 結論與建議 39
參考文獻 40
參考文獻 Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Anderson, H. H., & Brewer, J. E. (1946). Studies of teachers’’ classroom personalities, II. Effects of teachers’’ dominative and integrative contacts on children’’s classroom behavior. International Review of Applied Psychology.
Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspectives: Sage Publications, Inc.
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 802-836.
Behaz, A., & Djoudi, M. (2012). Adaptation of learning resources based on the MBTI theory of psychological types.
BongGuk, J., & Austin, D. R. (2000). Personality types of therapeutic recreation students based on the MBTI. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 34(1), 33-41.
Bowen, D. E., Ledford Jr, G. E., & Nathan, B. R. (1991). Hiring for the organization, not the job. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 35-51.
Bretz Jr, R. D., Ash, R. A., & Dreher, G. F. (1989). Do people make the place? An examination of attraction-selection-attrition hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 561-581.
Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 129-140.
Byrne, D. E. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. Advances in experimental social psychology, 4, 35-89.
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press.
Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875.
Caldwell, D. F., & O’’Reilly, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of applied psychology, 75(6), 648.
Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 248-267.
Cattell, H. B. (1989). The 16PF: Personality in depth: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing Illinois.
Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780.
Chuang, A., & Sackett, P. R. (2005). The perceived importance of person-job fit and person-organization fit between and within interview stages. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 33(3), 209-226.
Cohen, J. H., & Amidon, E. J. (2004). Reward and punishment histories: A way of predicting teaching style? The Journal of Educational Research, 97(5), 269-280.
Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Van Vianen, A., & Anderson, N. (2004). Changes in person–organization fit: The impact of socialization tactics on perceived and actual P–O fit. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(1), 52-78.
Cooper, T. C. (2001). Foreign language teaching style and personality. Foreign Language Annals, 34(4), 301-317.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications: University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis.
Day, D. V., & Bedeian, A. G. (1995). Personality similarity and work-related outcomes among African-American nursing personnel: A test of the supplementary model of person-environment congruence. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46(1), 55-70.
Day, D. V., & Silverman, S. B. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1979). Learning Styles/Teaching Styles: Should They... Can They... Be Matched? Educational Leadership, 36(4), 238-244.
Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique: John Wiley & Sons.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311-327.
Ferris, G. R., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective. Journal of Management, 17(2), 447-488.
Fischer, B. B., & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in Teaching and Learning. Educational Leadership, 36(4), 245-251,254.
Friedman, M., & Rosenman, R. H. (1974). Type A behavior and your heart: Knopf New York.
Gagne, F. (1993). The cognitive psychology of learning. 2nd Edition. New York: Harper Cdlins College Publisher.
Goldberg, L. (1981). Developing a taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: Problems with Language Imprecision, 43-65.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist; American Psychologist, 14(8), 469.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
Hilgard, E. R., Atkinson, R., & Seidman, J. (1969). The Developmental Viewpoint. The Child. Jerome Seidman, ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 36.
Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. Handbook of Work Group Psychology, 53-75.
Jacobs, G. A., Latham, L. E., & Brown, M. S. (1988). Test-retest reliability of the state-trait personality inventory and the anger expression scale. Anxiety Research, 1(3), 263-265.
Jansen, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 193-212.
Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work values on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 262-271.
Jung, C. G. (1921). Psychological Types or the Psychology of Individuation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.
Keefe, J. W. (1988). Profiling & Utilizing Learning Style: NASSP, 1904 Association Drive, Reston, VA 22091-1578 ($6.00).
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1): Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kolenko, T., & Aldag, R. (1989). Congruence perceptions and managerial career/work outcomes: An exploratory analysis.
Kristof‐Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees’’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 454-470.
Lawrence, G. (1984). A synthesis of learning style research involving the MBTI. Journal of Psychological Type, 8(1), 2-15.
Leiter, M. P. (1988). Burnout as a function of communication patterns. Group & Organization Management, 13(1), 111-128.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality.
Malinowski, J., Keim, T., Wendt, O., & Weitzel, T. (2006). Matching people and jobs: A bilateral recommendation approach.
Moody, R. (1988). Personality preferences and foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 72(4), 389-401.
Muchinsky, P. M., & Monahan, C. J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 268-277.
Myers, I. B., & Briggs, K. C. (1977). Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., & Most, R. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Consulting Psychologists Press Palo Alto, CA.
Myers, P. B., & Myers, K. D. (1998). Myers-Brigs type indicatol, Form M. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
Pervin, L. A. (1989). Persons, situations, interactions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review, 350-360.
Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, International Thomson Publishing Book Distribution Center, 7625 Empire Drive, Florence, KY 41042.
Resnick, P., & Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3), 56-58.
Ridgell, S. D., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2004). Predicting academic success: General intelligence,“Big Five” personality traits, and work drive. College Student Journal, 38(4), 607-618.
Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19, 131-173.
Rossi-Le, L. (1995). Learning styles and strategies in adult immigrant ESL students. Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom, 118-125.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1), 1.
Rynes, S., & Gerhart, B. (1990). Interviewer assessments of applicant “fit”: An exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43(1), 13-35.
Saks, A. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (1997). A longitudinal investigation of the relationships between job information sources, applicant perceptions of fit, and work outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 395-426.
Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. K. (2002). How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1120-1136.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437-453.
Schneider, B. (2001). Fits about fit. Applied Psychology, 50(1), 141-152.
Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 747-773.
Silvernail, D. L. (1979). Teaching styles as related to student achievement: National Education Association Washington, DC.
Supjarerndee, S., Temtanapat, Y., & Phalavonk, U. (2002). Recruitment filtering with personality-job fit model.
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly(37), 549-579.
van Vianen, A. E. M., De Pater, I. E., & Van Dijk, F. (2007). Work value fit and turnover intention: same-source or different-source fit. Journal of managerial Psychology, 22(2), 188-202.
Warren, B. Z. (1999). Assessing the impact of college teachers’ learning style on student outcomes: a pilot study at the university of central Florida. (ERIC No. ED434083).
Westerman, J. W., & Cyr, L. A. (2004). An integrative analysis of person–organization fit theories. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(3), 252-261.
Wu, M. (1991). A few issues in the teaching of correspondence writing for foreign trade. In Y. Li (Ed.), Fudan work papers on the teaching of English to non-majors (pp. 103–111)(Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press).
Zhang, L. F. (2004). Thinking styles: University students’’ preferred teaching styles and their conceptions of effective teachers. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 138(3), 233-252.
王珩. (2005). 國小英語教師學習與教學風格之研究. 臺中教育大學學報: 人文藝術類, 19(2), 71-88.
朱敬先. (1995). 教學心理學. 台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
巫靜宜. (2000). 比較網路教學與傳統教學對學習效果之研究---以Word 2000之教學為例. 碩士, 淡江大學, 新北市.
林欽榮. (1983). 管理心理學. 台北: 五南圖書出版有限公司.
張春興. (1991). 現代心理學. 台北: 東華書局.
張春興, & 林清山. (1996). 教育心理學. 台北: 東華書局.
莊璦嘉, & 林惠彥. (2005). 個人與環境適配對工作態度與行為之影響. 5, 123-148.
陳志欣. (2003). 應用適性化技術與學習風格改善影片教學:以材料力學為例. 碩士, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市.
楊淑晴. (1999). 麥布二氏心理類型量表 (MBTI) 之綜覽. 教育研究資訊, 民國 88 年, 7(2), 100-110.
管怡婷. (2004). 以學習風格為基礎之學習資源推薦機制研究. 碩士, 中原大學, 桃園縣.
鄭復源. (2010). 人格特質、自我導向學習、組織承諾與工作績效之相關性研究. 碩士, 東海大學, 台中市.
蘇順發、鄭勝耀、單文經. (1999). 國小低年級教師教學風格、班級情境及學生參與行為觀係之探討. 國民教育研究學報, 5, 155-177.
指導教授 沈建文 審核日期 2012-7-26
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明