台灣選擇權市場法人交易獲利與風險承受的關係

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：35

、訪客IP：3.16.83.150

姓名

關靈峰(Ling-Fung Kwan) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

台灣選擇權市場法人交易獲利與風險承受的關係
(The relationship between trading profits and subsequent risk taking by institutional investors on Taiwan option market)

相關論文

★ 最適指數複製法之自動化建置：以ETF50為例	★ 台灣公債市場與台幣利率交換交易市場動態關聯性之研究
★ 企業貸款債權證券化--信用增強探討	★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣期貨市場實證
★ 投資型保單評價-富邦金吉利保本投資連結型遞延年金保險乙型(VANB5)	★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣債券市場實證
★ 匯率風險值衡量之實證研究-以新台幣、日圓、英鎊、歐元匯率為例	★ 探討央行升息國內十年期指標公債未同步上升之原因
★ 信用風險模型評估—Merton模型之應用	★ 資產管理公司購買不動產擔保不良債權評價之研究
★ 股票除息對期貨與現貨報酬之影響	★ 主權基金的角色定位與未來影響力之研究
★ 我國公債期貨之研究分析	★ 用事件研究法探討希臘主權債信危機-以美國及德國公債為例
★ 企業避險及財務操作之實例探討	★ 台灣期貨市場之量價交易策略

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本篇論文延伸Liu et al.(2010)探討造市者投資交易獲利與風險承受程度關係的模型，並且在計算模型變數時考慮投資人過去的存貨與不同種類法人持有部位的時間。本文將法人交易者分為投信、外資、自營商、與造市者四種，並且發現外資為台灣選擇權市場最大的贏家。此外，我們進一步研究各種法人是否存在賭資效應，結果發現外資與投信有顯著的賭資效應，而造市者與自營商並沒有存在此現象。我們推論造市者及自營商沒有賭資效應的主因與其投資獲利及交易成本有關。

摘要(英)

This study extends Liu et al. (2010) research in the trading profits and the subsequent risk taking by market makers for Taiwan option market, and considers investors’ inventory-before and holding period. This study distinguishes institutional investors from security investment trust, foreign institutions, dealers and market makers. We find that foreign institutions are the biggest winner in Taiwan option market, and we test whether institutional investor existed house money effect. We find that foreign institutions and security investment trust existed notable house money effect, but market makers and dealers do not. We also give the reasons why these two types of investors did not notable and we infer that it’s about to investor’s trading consequences and trading costs.

關鍵字(中)

★ 交易獲利
★ 風險承受
★ 賭資效應

關鍵字(英)

★ trading profit
★ risk taking
★ house money effect

論文目次

中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝 III
Contents IV
List of Tables V
1.Introduction 1
2.Data 3
2.1 Data description 3
2.2 Data selection 6
3.Methodology 8
4.Empirical results 13
4.1 Summary result 13
4.2 Regression analyses 14
5.Conclusions 17
References 18

參考文獻

Barberis, N., M. Huang, T. Santos, (2001), Prospect Theory and Asset Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (1): 1-53.
Barberis, N., W. Xiong, (2009), What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation. Journal of Finance 64 (2): 751-784.
Chevalier, J., and G. Ellison, (1997), Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives. Journal of Political Economy 105 (6): 1167-1200.
Coval, J. D., T. Shumway (2005), Do Behavioral Biases Affect Prices? Journal of Finance 60 (1): 1-34.
Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer and A. Subrahmanyam (1998), ‘Investor Psychology and Security Market Under- and Overreactions’, Journal of Finance, 53: 1839-85.
Grinblatt,M., Keloharju,M., (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. Journal of Finance 64, 549-578.
Haigh, M, J. List, (2005), Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Finance 9(1): 523-535.
Keasey, K., P. Moon, (1996), Gambling with the House Money in Capital Expenditure Decisions: An Experimental Analysis. Economic Letters 50 (1): 105-110.
Locke, P.,S. C. Mann,( 2005), Professional Trader Discipline and Trade Disposition. Journal of Financial Economics 76 (2): 401-444.
Liu, Yu-Jane, Chih-Ling Tsai, Ming-Chun Wang and Ning Zhu (2010) “Prior Consequence and Subsequent Risk Taking: New Field Evidence from the Taiwan Futures Exchange, ” Management Science, Vol. 56 No. 4(SSCI) pp.606~620
Odean, T. (1998), ‘Volume, Volatility, Price and Profit when all Traders are Above Average’, Journal of Finance, 53: 1887-934.
Shefrin, H. and M. Statman (1985), ‘The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Finance, 40: 777-90.
Thaler, R., E. Johnson, (1990), Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice. Management Science 36 (6): 643-660.
Weber, M., H. Zuchel, (2005), How Do Prior Outcomes Affect Risk Attitude? Comparing Escalation of Commitment and the House-Money Effect. Decision Analysis 2 (1): 30-43.

指導教授

張傳章(Chuang-chang Chang)

審核日期

2012-6-29

推文