員工認股權的評價：以三元樹模型

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：52

、訪客IP：3.135.195.91

姓名

何玠澤(CHIEH-TSE HO) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

員工認股權的評價：以三元樹模型
(Pricing Executive Stock Options: Using a Trinomial Tree)

相關論文

★ 從銀行業角度探討反向抵押貸款在臺灣實行之可行性研究	★ 金融科技與監理沙盒對臺灣保險業影響之探討
★ 線上課程學習成效與影響之研究-以壽險從業人員為例	★ 公司治理與風險性資本的關係：以美國壽險及健康險業為例
★ 實際波動度模型下的VIX選擇權定價	★ 經濟供需模型評價死亡率債券
★ 保險業外匯價格變動準備金之研究	★ 隨機模型建構在保險業現金流量測試之應用
★ Solvency II 量化分析──以反向抵押貸款為例	★ 反向抵押貸款採用隨機房價模型之分析
★ VIX金融衍生性市場的價格發現和跳躍行為之研究	★ 企業社會責任對上市公司獲利影響分析：以台灣50成分股為例
★ 權益連結年金保險之定價 — 考慮GARCH 效果	★ 壽險保單準備金之有效存續期間分析─利率風險與死亡率風險
★ 運用關聯性結構方法及GARCH過程評價權益連結型年金內含二元選擇權	★ 公司治理對台灣銀行業獲利及逾放比的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來員工認股權被廣泛使用作為激勵員工的手段，這種獎勵方式可讓員工與股東的目標一致。但員工認股權相對於一般美式選擇權也多了一些限制，譬如其無法在公開市場進行交易、授予期(Vesting period)的限制等等，使得它會面臨一些評價上的困難。而當會計上需要將員工認股權的發放認列為成本之時，正確的評價就很重要了。因為無法公開交易員工認股權，持有者無法避險，評價時須考慮風險偏好、加入效用模型(utility-based model)。本文使用公司資產的三元樹模型來模擬公司資產的變化，並且將多點執行(Multiple Exercise)以及選擇權執行時公司價值的改變納入評價模型，另外，也考慮了稅盾、破產成本與選擇權執行時所造成的稀釋效果。本文評價了員工認股權的主觀價值及客觀價值，證明了員工認股權的發放對普通債持有人有正的外溢效果，也探討了最適資本結構在員工認股權發放之後所產生的改變。

摘要(英)

For last decade, employee or executive stock options(ESOs) have been used widely as compensation. This method can align the goal of employees and stockholders. Because ESOs can account for a lot of cost to company, pricing ESOs correctly is important. But there are more limits on employee stock option than ordinary American options. Therefore, pricing ESOs correctly is difficult and many literatures made research on it. Because ESOs are not tradable in public, the holders can’t hedge the risk. We should take risk preferences into account and use utility-based model while pricing ESOs. This essay uses trinomial structure to model the changes of firm value. We value the options assuming that the employee may exercise his/her options in multiple future dates. Moreover, the firm value would increase upon options exercising. So we take this effect into account and consider tax shield effect, bankruptcy cost, and dilution effect, too. This essay values the effective cost of ESOs to shareholders and the subjective value of it while proving the positive effect of issuing ESOs to bond holders and discovering the changes of optimal capital structure after issuing ESOs.

關鍵字(中)

★ 三元樹模型
★ 員工認股權
★ 多點執行

關鍵字(英)

★ Trinomial Structure
★ Employee Stock Option

論文目次

目錄
摘要 I
Abstract II
誌謝 III
圖目錄 VI
一、緒論 1
1-1 員工認股權介紹與研究動機 1
1-2 研究架構 3
二、文獻回顧 4
2-1 評價員工認股權 4
2-2 三元樹模型 5
三、研究方法 8
3-1 使用三元樹之原因 8
3-2 基礎假設與參數介紹 10
3-3 模型的建構方法 13
3-3-1 模擬員工認股權的執行比例 14
3-3-2 三元樹架構介紹 14
3-3-3 計算式 18
3-3-4 倒推法(Backward Induction) 22
3-3-5 員工認股權之客觀價值及其對普通債價值的影響 26
四、數值分析 28
五、結論與後續研究發展 33
5-1 結論 33
5-2 後續研究發展 33
參考文獻 35
附錄一 39

參考文獻

1. Hemmer T., S. Matsunaga and T. Shevlin, 1994, Estimating the “fair value” of employee stock options with expected early exercise. Accounting horizons 8, 23-42.
2. Aboody, D., 1996, Market valuation of employee stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22, 357-391.
3. Huddart, S. and M. Lang, 1996, Employee stock option exercises: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 5-43.
4. Tian-Shyr Dai., 2009, Efficient Option Pricing on Stocks Paying Discrete or Path-Dependent Dividends with the Stair Tree. Quantitative Finance, Volume 9, 827-838.
5. Merton, R.C., 1974, On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of
interest rates. Journal of Finance, 449-470.
6. Black, F., and Scholes, M, 1973, The pricing of options and corporate
liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 637-659.
7. Black, F. and J.C. Cox, 1976, Valuing corporate securities: Some effects of bond
indenture provisions. Journal of Finance 31, 351-367.
8. Kulatilaka, N. and A. J. Marcus, 1994, Valuing employee stock options. Financial
Analysts Journal 50, 46-56.
9. Huddart, S., 1994, Employee stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18, 207-231.
10. Hall, B. J. and K. J. Murphy, 2002, Stock options for undiversified executives. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, 3-42.
11. Detemple, J. and S. Sundaresan, 1999, Non-traded asset valuation with portfolio constraints: A binomial approach. Review of Financial Studies 12, 835-572.
12. Ingersoll, J. E., 2002, The subjective and objective evaluation of incentive stock options. The Journal of Business 79, 453-487.
13. Carpenter J. N., 1998, The exercise and valuation of executive stock options. Journal of Financial Economics 48, 127-158.
14. Jennergren, L. P. and B. Naslund, 1993, A comment on “Valuation of executive stock options and the FASB proposal”. The Accounting Review 68, 179-183.
15. Carr, P. and V. Linetsky, 2000, The valuation of executive stock options in an intensity-based framework. European Finance Review 4, 211-230.
16. Cvitanic, J., Z. Wiener and F. Zapatero, 2008, Analytic pricing of employee stock
options. Review of Financial Studies 21, 683-724.
17. Ammann, M. and R. Seiz, 2004, Valuing employee stock options: Does the model matter? Financial Analysts Journal 60, 21-37.
18. Hull, J. and A. White, 2004, How to value employee stock options, Financial Analysts Journal 60, 114-119.
19. Lambert, R., D. Larcker and R. Verrecchia, 1991, Portfolio considerations in valuing executive compensation. Journal of Accounting Research 29, 128-149.
20. Cai, J. and A. M. Vijh, 2005, Executive stock and option valuation in a two state-variable framework. Journal of Derivatives, 9-27.
21. Jain, A. and A. Subramanian, 2004, The intertemporal exercise and valuation of
employee options, The Accounting Review 79, 705-743.
22. Roger, L. C. G. and J. Scheinkman, 2007, Optimal exercise of executive stock options, Finance and Stochastics 11, 357-372.
23. Leung, T. and R. Sircar, 2009, Accounting for risk aversion, vesting, job termination risk and multiple exercises in valuation of employee stock options, Mathematical Financial 19, 99-128.
24. Ruey-Jenn Ho, 2011, Two Essays on the Applications of Contingent Claim Approach: The Cases of Pricing Deposit Insurance and ESO, The Ph.D. thesis of Institute of Finance of National Central University
25. Cox, J.C., S.A. Ross and M. Rubinstein, 1979, Option pricing: A Simplified
Approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 229–263.
26. Brennan, M.J. and E.S. Schwartz, 1980, Analyzing Convertible Securities,
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, XV, 4,907-929.

指導教授

楊曉文(Sharon S. Yang)

審核日期

2012-7-22

推文