台灣企業的借款利差與利差變動之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：49

、訪客IP：3.15.211.55

姓名

杜玠瑤(Chieh-Yao Tu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

台灣企業的借款利差與利差變動之研究
(A study of lending premium and discrete of premium in Taiwan's corporates)

相關論文

★ 金融機構不良債權處理機制之研究	★ 放款作業流程的滿意度調查研究 —以S銀行為例
★ 最適指數複製法之自動化建置：以ETF50為例	★ 台灣公債市場與台幣利率交換交易市場動態關聯性之研究
★ 企業貸款債權證券化--信用增強探討	★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣期貨市場實證
★ 投資型保單評價-富邦金吉利保本投資連結型遞延年金保險乙型(VANB5)	★ 工業銀行持股公司多角化策略、董事會特性及經營績效之研究
★ 停損點反向操作指標在台灣債券市場實證	★ 匯率風險值衡量之實證研究-以新台幣、日圓、英鎊、歐元匯率為例
★ 探討央行升息國內十年期指標公債未同步上升之原因	★ 台灣企業的大陸經營模式、治理機制與盈餘管理之研究
★ 信用風險模型評估—Merton模型之應用	★ 資產管理公司購買不動產擔保不良債權評價之研究
★ 外資進入對本國問題銀行之影響	★ 銀行如何訂定建築業的授信政策

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

由於借款利差為銀行重要的收入來源，但在制訂過程中可能受到不同因素的影響，本研究除探討企業信用風險對利差與利差變異的影響外，也說明不同的銀行與企業之往來關係在借款利差訂定中有否差異，使借款利差產生高低，抑或改變審件人員的主觀態度。
在借款利差的方面主要支持道德風險假說，即在資訊不對稱情況下銀行對於信用風險較高的借款企業給予較高的借款利差。其次，往來關係方面發現，民營非金控銀行和外資銀行依賴度較高之企業，會隨著依賴度的提高增加借款利差，但與公營和民營金控銀行往來較密切的企業，其借款利差較低。也發現銀行對於往來關係較佳(往來銀行家數較少)的企業會給予較低的借款利差。借款契約條件的討論不支持訊號發射假說，銀行傾向將擔保品視為降低道德風險的工具，藉由保證增加降低信用風險的承擔。
借款利差變動的探討中，主要支持人為主觀因素造成利差變動的概念：(1)銀行規模越大、授信人員較多，故借款利差加減碼部分難趨統一；(2)成本費用與變動的正向關係顯示增加的成本反映在人為因素影響的利差波動；(3)由於公營行庫薪資結構與放款績效連結較小，使授信人員無動機以人為方式壓低借款利差以求競爭，故較民營銀行在利差變動的程度較小。

摘要(英)

Since the loan Premium is an important source of income for the bank, but the processes are determined by different factors. This study exams how the corporate credit risk affect the loan premium and the discretion of loan premium, also shows that whether the different relationships between banks and enterprises changes the processes of loan premium setting, including the level of loan premium and the “discretion” comes from officers’ subjective experiences.
The finding supports the moral hazard hypothesis that banks grants the borrowing enterprises of higher credit risk a higher loan premium, due to the asymmetric information exists in borrowers and lenders. Secondly, in the relationships dimension, the corporate rely in a high borrowing level on private but non-financial holding banks and foreign banks will increase the loan premium as the their dependence getting closer; On the other hand, the loan premium decreases with more closer relationship between firms and public sector banks. Also, if companies have a better relationships with banks (dealing with fewer banks), they receive a lower loan premium. And the discussion of the conditions in loan contracts do not support the signaling hypothesis, banks tend to treat collaterals as a tool to reduce moral hazard risk and reduce the possible loss from defaults.
In the investigation of dispersion in loan premium, the empirical results illustrate the main factor of “discretion” caused by officers’ subjective experiences: (1) the larger the bank, with more staffs, the method of loan premium granting may be difficult to consist; (2) the positive relation between bank costs and dispersion explain the additional expense may reflect on “discretion”; (3) The salary structure of public sector banks and lending performance link weakly, the officers have no incentive to reduce loan premium to attract their customers, so the public sector banks grants lower loan premium than private banks..

關鍵字(中)

★ 借款利差
★ 利差波動
★ 往來關係
★ 信用風險

關鍵字(英)

★ discrete
★ relationship
★ credit risk
★ Loan Premium
★ dispersion

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第二章文獻回顧 5
第一節交易型放款與關係型放款 5
第二節銀行與企業建立往來關係 6
第三節企業借款利差的影響因素 7
第四節借款利差變動的影響因素 9
第三章研究方法 11
第一節選樣設計 11
第二節實證模型 12
第三節變數定義 20
第四節研究假說 28
第四章實證結果 35
第一節敘述統計結果 35
第二節實證分析 45
第五章結論 61
參考文獻 64

參考文獻

中文部份：
沈中華(2002)，金控公司的銀行與獨立銀行CAMEL比較：1997~1998，台灣金融財務季刊，3，2，73-94。
李思慧(2010)，金融變革下之授信行為對企業投融資決策之影響，國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
李榮謙與林曉伶(2009)，外資銀行擴大在國內版圖可能帶來的影響，國際金融參考資料，57， 95-105。
李婉慈(2000)，銀行往來關係與公司經營績效及財務危機之關聯性分析，中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
林俊宏(2004)，台灣上市上櫃公司企業特性與授信銀行特質影響其貸款條件之研究，世新大學管理學院財務金融學系碩士學位論文。
俞海琴、劉維琪、林炯垚與陳隆麒(1992)，資訊不對稱下，借款者型態與放款契約中擔保品、利率間之關係──不連續情況，管理評論, 11, 59-80。
陳安琳、李文智與周士雄(1999)，銀行存放款利率差距因素之研究，中華管理評論，2，6，1-16。
陳昭如(2005)，銀行往來關係中斷之研究，世新大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
陳家彬與賴怡洵(2003)，銀行往來關係和授信行為之研究，經濟論文, 31, 3, 497-539。
______________與許茲盈(2004)，商業銀行關係放款之實證研究，Journal of Financial Studies, 12, 2, 43-86。
陳彥芝(2011)，往來密切程度對企業借款利差與資本投資之影響，，國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
陳錦村與郭碧雲(2012)，銀行的所有權類型對企業借款多重往來關係之影響─以台灣的微小型與中大型企業為例，經濟論文, 40, 1, 111-161。
______ (1998)，競爭、往來關係與銀行授信行為之研究，Journal of Financial Studies, 5, 3, 61-90。
陳盈樺(2000)，台灣地區銀行與企業融資關係之探討─主力銀行機制，銘傳大學金融研究所碩士論文。
張家銘(2005)，銀行往來關係與授信條件及企業對銀行利潤貢獻之關聯性分析，國立中興大學高階經理人班碩士學位論文。
張秋娟(2008)，企業放款訂價利率加碼之實證研究，國立雲林科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
黃文靜(2010)，金融海嘯對銀行承做企業放款類型影響之研究，國立台灣科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
黃慶堂、汪志勇與董沿(2011)，中小企業與銀行往來關係對其授信條件之影響，中小企業發展季刊，21，135-160。
游金華(2002)，銀行徵信基致對受信品質影響之研究─以台灣銀行個案分行為例，朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
蔡宗諺(2011)，銀行往來關係對中小企業授信利率加碼數及額度之影響─以台灣某商業銀行之雲嘉南地區授信資料為例，南華大學財務金融學系財務管理碩士論文。
鄭婷婷(2011)，商業銀行資本適足程度與治理機制對經營績效的影響，國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
謝易宏(2008)，台灣「金融控股公司」競爭規範之探討，公平交易季刊， 16，3，1-20。
謝琛琦(2002)，銀行放款人員核貸行為之研究，國立高雄第一科技大學財務理財研究所碩士論文。
簡桂方(2009)，利率及擔保品：借款契約工具的替代性及互補性之研究，輔仁大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
蘇容瑩(2006)，銀行利差決定分析，淡江大學財務金融系碩士論文。
英文部分：
Agarwal, R. and J. A. Eiston (2001), “Bank-Firm Relationships, Financing and Firm Performance in Germany,” Economics Letters, 72, 225-237.
Akhavein, J., Frame W., White L. (2005), “The Diffusion of Financial Innovations: an Examination of The Adoption of Small Business Credit Scoring by Large Banking Organizations,” Journal of Business, 78, 577-596.
Berger, A. N. and G.F. Udell (1995), “Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance,” Journal of Business, 68, 351-381.
______________________ (2002), “Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending: The Importance of Bank Organizational Structure,” The Economic Journal, 112, 32-53.
______________________ (2005), “A More Complete Conceptual Framework for Financing of Small and Medium Emterprises,” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series: 3795.
___________, I. Hasan, and L.F. Klapper (2004), “Further Evidence on the Link between Fance and Growth: An International Analysis of Community Bnking and Economic Performance,” Journal of Financial Services Research, 25, 169-202.
___________, L. F. Klapper, M. S. M. Peria, and R. Zaidi (2008), “Bank Ownership Type and Banking Relationships,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 37-62.
Bester, H. (1993), “Bargaining versus Price Competition with Quality Uncertainty,” American Economics Review, 83, 278-288.
Black, S. E. and P. E. Strahan (2002), “Entrepreneurship and Bank Credit Avaailability,” Journal of Finance, 57, 2807-2833.
Bolton, P. and D. S. Scharfstein(1996), “Optimal Debt Structure and the Number of Creditors,” Journal of Ploitical Economy, 104, 1-25.
Boot, A W. (2000), “Relationship Banking : What Do We Know?” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 7-25.
________, A. V. Thakor (1994), “Moral Hazard and Secured Lending in an Infinitely Repeated Credit Market Game,” International Economic Review, 35, 899-920.
Breusch, T. S. and A. R. Pagan (1980), “The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification tests in econometrics,” Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-253.
Brick, I. E. and D. Palia (2007), “Evidence of Jointness in the terms of Relationship Lending,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16,452-476.
Campbell, T. S. 1979, “Optimal Investment Financing Decision and the Value of Confidentiality,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14, 232-257.
Cetorelli, N. and M. Gambera (2001), “Banking Market Structure, Financial Dependence and Growth : International Evidence from Industry Data,” Journal of Finace, 56, 617-648.
Cerqueiro, G., J. Degryse, S. Ongena(2011), “Rules Versus In Loan Rate Setting,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20, 503-529.
Datta, S., Mai I. D., and Ajay P. (1999), “Bank Monitoring and Pricing of Corporate Public Debt,” Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 435-449.
Detragiache, E., P. Garella, and L. Guiso (2000), “Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Finance, 55, 1133-1161.
Degryse, H. and Cayseele P. V. (2000), “Relationship Lending Within a Bank-Based System: Evidence from European Small Business Data,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 90-109.
Diamond, D. W. (1989), “Reputation Acquisition in Debt Market,” Journal of Political Economy, 97, 828-862.
Diamond, D. W. (1991), “Monitoring and Reputation: The Choice between Bank Loan and Directly Placed Debt,” Journal of Political Economy, 99, 689-721.
Elsas, R. and J. P. Krahnen (1998), “Is Relationship Lending Special? Evidence from Credit-File Data in Germany,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 1283-1316.
Gopalan, R., Udell G. and Yerramilli V. (2011), “Why Do Firms Form New Banking Relationships?” Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis, 46, 5, 1335-1365.
Greenbaum. S., G. Kanatas, and I. Venezia (1989) “Equilibrium Loan Pricing under the Bank-Client Relationship,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 221-235.
Harhoff, D. and T. Ko ̈rting (1998), “Lending Relationship in Germany-Empirical Evidence from Survey Data,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, 1317-1353.
Harvey , A. (1976), “Estimating Regression Models with Multiplicative Heteroscedasticity,” Econometrica, 44, 461-465.
Hausman, J. A. (1978), “Speci.cation tests in Econometrics,” Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
Houston, J. F. and C. M. James(1996), “Banking Information Monopolies and the Mix of Private and Public Debt Choices,” Journal of Finance, 51, 1863-1889.
Lummer, S. L. and J. J. Mcconnel (1989), “Further Evidence on The Bank Lending Process and The Capital-Market Response to Bank Loan Agreements,” Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 1, 99-122.
Mester, L. J., Nakamura L. I., Renault M. (1998), “Checking Accounts and Bank Monitoring,” Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Myers, S.C., Majluf, N. (1984), “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information Investors Do Not Have,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187-221.
Ongena, S. and D. C. Smith (2000), “What determines the number of bank relationships? Cross country evidence,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 1, 26-56.
Ono, A. and Uesugi I. (2009), “Role of Collateral amd Personal Guarantees in Relationship Lending: Evidence from Japan’s SME Loan Market,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41, 5, 935-960.
Palia, D. and Brick I. E. (2007), “Evidence of Jointness in the Terms of Relationship Lending,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16, 452-476.
Petersen, M. A. and R. G. Rajan (1994), “The Benefits of Firm-Creditor Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data,” Journal of Finance, 49, 3-37.
_________________________ (1995), “The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationship,” Quarterly Journal of Economics ,49, 407-443.
Salop, S. and Stiglitz, J. (1982), “The Theory of Sales: a Simple Model of Equilibrium Price Dispersion with Identical Agents,” American Economics Reviews, 72, 1121-1130.
Sharpe, S. (1990), “Asymmetric Information, Lending and Implicit Contract: a Stylized Model of Customer relationships,” Journal of Finance, 45, 1069-1087.
Stein, J. C. (2002), “Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized versus Hierarchical Firms,” Journal of Finance, 57, 1891-1921.
Stigler, G. (1961), “The Economics of Information.” Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213-225.
Uchida, H., Udell G.F., Yamori Nobuyoshi (2012), “Loan Officers and Relationship Lending to SMEs”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21, 97-122.
von Thadden, E. L. 1992, “The Commitment of Finance, Duplicated Monitoring and the Investment Horizon,” ESF-CEPR Working Paper in Financial Markets, 27.
von Thadden, E. (2004), “Asymmetric Information, Banking Lending, and Implicit Contracts: The Winner Curse,” Financial Res. Letters, 1, 11-23.
Wang, R. (1995), “Bargaining versus posted-price selling,” European Economic Review, 39, 1747-1764.
Weinstein, D. E. and Y. Yafen (1998), “On The Cross –Centered Financial System: Evidence from The Changing Main Bank Relation in Japan,” Journal of Finance, 53, 2, 635-672.

指導教授

陳錦村、張傳章
(Jing-Twen Chen、Chuang-Chang Chang)

審核日期

2012-7-25

推文