博碩士論文 994307004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:67 、訪客IP:18.226.52.179
姓名 俞志緯(Chih-wei Yu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所在職專班
論文名稱 任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效對晉升力之影響
相關論文
★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究-一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討-以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 過去的文獻指出員工的工作績效對其晉升力具有預測效果,同時學者亦陸續將工作績效區分為三種各自獨立的績效構面(包含任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效),但迄今卻尚未有研究探討這三種績效構面對晉升力的影響,有鑑於此,本研究藉由區分工作績效構面對晉升力評分的影響,將能了解任務性、脈絡性、適應性績效是否影響主管對於部屬晉升力的評分;此外,透過本研究結果可探究任務性、脈絡性與適應性績效中,哪一種績效對員工晉升力評分有最強的預測能力。
本研究採取跨產業樣本蒐集的方式,共回收243份有效問卷,並以敘述性統計分析,信、效度分析,驗證性因素分析及階層迴歸分析等方式,檢驗數據資料並驗證本研究之假設。
根據迴歸分析的結果顯示,若從績效主構面來看並同時考慮三種績效時,僅有適應性績效對晉升力評分具顯著正向影響,其餘任務性績效及脈絡性績效則無預測效果。若再細分各績效子構面,則結果顯示對晉升力評分具顯著正向影響者,依序為壓力管理、工作奉獻、創新思考、危機處理。

摘要(英) Previous research has demonstrated the impact of job performance on employee promotability. However, even other literature has divided job performance into three separate facets, including task performance, contextual performance and adaptive performance, yet further research of how these three facets influence promotability has been presented. In this study, it’s better understood the impact of task performance, contextual performance and adaptive performance altogether on promotability, and also found what specific performance aspect is best predictive of promotability.
243 valid questionnaires from multiple industries were collected in the present investigation. We adopted analysis of descriptive statistics, reliability, validity, confirmatory factor and hierarchical regression to test data and also examine assumption of this stury. According to the result of hierarchical regression analysis with three main performances, only adaptive performance influenced promotability. While analyzing with detailed aspects of three performance, the result indicated that the handling work stress, job dedication, solving problems creatively and handling emergencies/crisis situations could predict promotability.
關鍵字(中) ★ 任務性績效
★ 脈絡性績效
★ 適應性績效
★ 員工晉升力
關鍵字(英)
論文目次 摘要i
目 錄iii
表 目 錄iv
第一章 研究動機與目的1
第二章 文獻探討及假設4
第一節 任務性、脈絡性及適應性績效4
第二節 晉升力評分7
第三節 績效與晉升力評分的關係 8
第三章 研究方法11
第一節 研究對象與程序11
第二節 研究變項衡量 11
第四章 研究結果14
第一節 衡量變項模式區別效度14
第二節 敘述統計與相關分析15
第三節 階層迴歸分析17
第五章 結論與建議19
第一節 結論與討論19
第二節 對學術與實務的貢獻20
第三節 管理意涵21
第四節 研究限制與建議22
參考文獻24
參考文獻 Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: Capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111.
Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009). The global war for talent. Journal of International Management, Vol.15, 273–285
Bijleveld, E., Custers, R. & Aarts, H. (2011). Once the money is in sight: Distinctive effects of conscious and unconscious rewards on task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.47, 865–869
Bird, R. B., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221-238.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to included elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations, 71-98. New York:Jossey-Bass.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, vol.10, 99-109.
Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of rate task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168-177.
Breaugh, J. A. (2010). Modeling the managerial promotion process. Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 26, No.4, 264-277.
Campbell, J.P. (1983), Some possible implications of “modeling” for the conceptualization of measurement. Performance measurement and theory, 277-298.
Conway, J.M. (1999), Distinguish Contextual Performance from Task Performance for Managerial Jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.84, 3–13
Corporate Leadership Council. (2008). Identifying high-potential employees (HIPOs) through performance management processes. Washington DC: Corporate Executive Board.
De Pater E. Irene, Vianen Van, E. M. Annelies, Myriam N. Bechtoldt, and Ute-Christine Klehe. (2009). Employees’ Challenging Job Experiences and Supervisors’ Evaluations of Promotability. Personnel Psychology, vol.62, 297-325.

Edward, J. E. & Morrison, R. F. (1994). Selecting and classifying future naval officers: The paradox of greater specialization in broader areas. In M. G. Rumsey, C. B. Walker, & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification, 69-84, Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Ferris, G. R., Buckley, M.R. & Allen, G. M. (1992). Promotion systems in organizations. Human Resource Planning, 15, 47-68.
Ferris, G. R. & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective. Journal of Management, 17, 446-488.
Griffin, B. & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable Behaviours for Successful Work and Career Adjustment. Australian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 65-73.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 64-86.
Greenhaus, J. H. & Parasuraman, S. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: an examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 273-297.
Hall, D. T. & Mirvis, P. H. (1995). The new career contract: Developing the whole person at mid-life and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 269-289.
Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J. & Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 939-957.
Hesketh, B. & Neal, A. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for sta Y ng, motivation, and development (pp. 21–55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds), Toward a general theory of expertise, 301-335.
Hu, L. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Hui, C., Lam, S.S.K. & Law, K.S. (2000). Instrumental Values of Organizational Citizenship Behavior for Promotion. Journal Applied Psychology, 85, 822–828.
Ilgen, D.R. & Pulakos, E.D. (Eds.) (1999). The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation, and Development, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
Jawahar I.M., Meurs J..A., Ferris G.R. & Hochwarter W.A. (2008). Self-Efficacy and Political Skill as Comparative Predictors of Task and Contextual Performance: A Two-Study Constructive Replication. Human Performance, 21, 138–157.
Jawahar I.M. & Ferris G.R. (2011). A Longitudinal Investigation of Task and contextual Performance Influences on Promotability Judgments. Human Performance, 24, 251–269.
Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of applied psychology, Vol.86, 984 -996
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
Kiker, D.S. & Motowidlo, S.J. (1999). Main and interaction effects of task and contextual performance on supervisory reward decisions. Journal of applied psychology, Vol.84, 602 -609.
Kinicki, A. J. & Latack, J. C. (1990). Explication of the construct of coping with involuntary job loss. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 339-360.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Salas, E. & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. In M. Beyerlein, S. Beyerlein, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership, Vol. 3, 251-289.
Locke, E. A., Mento, A. J. & Katcher, B. L. (1978). The interaction of ability and motivation in performance: An exploration of the meaning of moderators. Personnel Psychology, 31, 269-280.
Lombardo, M. M. & Eichinger, R. W. (2000). High Potentials as High Learners. Human Resource Management, Winter 2000, Vol. 39, No. 4, 321-329.
London, M. & Stumpf, S. A. (1983). Effects of candidate characteristics on management promotion decisions: An experimental study. Personnel Psychology, 36, 241-259.
London, M. & Mone, E. M. (1999). Continuous learning. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for sta Y ng, motivation, and development (pp. 119–153). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Longenecker, C. O. & Fink, L. S. (2008). Key criteria in twenty first century management promotional decisions. Career Development International, Vol. 13, pp. 241-51.

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. & Fetter, R. (1991). Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Objective Productivity as Determinants of Managerial Evaluations of Salespersons Performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 123-150.
Motowidlo, S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence That Task Performance Should be Distinguish from Contextual Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480.
Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L. & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 58, 367-408.
Noe, R. & Ford, K. J. (1992). Emerging issues and new directions for training research. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 10, 345-384.
Pepermans, R., Vloeberghs, D. & Perkisas, B. (2003). High potential identification policies: an empirical study among Belgian companies. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 660-78.
Powell, G. N. & Butterfield, D. A. (1994). Investigating the glass ceiling phenomenon: an empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 37, 68-86
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M.A. & Plamondon, K.E. (2000). Adaptability in he workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, SJ(4),612-624.
Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Hedge, J. W. & Borman, W. C. (2002). Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299-323.
Rogers, R.W. & Smith, A.B., (2004). Finding Future Perfect Senior Leaders: Spotting Executive Potential. Employment Relations Today, 31, 1.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-374.
Stricker, L. J. & Rock, D. A. (1998). Assessing leadership potential with a biographical measure of personality traits. Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 164-84.
Thach, L. & Woodman, R. W. (1994). Organizational change and information technology: Managing on the edge of cyberspace. Organizational Dynamics, 23(1), 30-46.
Tucker, J. S. & Pleban, R. J. (2010). The Mediating Effects of Adaptive Skill on Values-Performance Relationships. Human Performance, 23:81-99.


Van Scotter, J. R. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job edication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4): 525-531.
Wang, H., Law, K.S. & Chen, Z.X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: an empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol.19, No.10, 1809–1824.
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K. & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50, 979-1006.
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L. & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 577-595.
Williams, L.J. & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.
Zedelius, C. M., Veling, H., Bijleveld, E. & Aarts, H. (2012). Promising high monetary rewards for future task performance increases intermediate task performance. Plos One, 7, Issue 8.
指導教授 林文政 審核日期 2012-12-28
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明