| 摘要(英) |
The scale of public construction work is huge; however, under extreme competition, profitless has become an inevitable phenomena for the construction industry. Contractors are awarded bids through open bid process. The contract price includes compensation for political, economical and construction risks. Any carelessness could lead to serious losses. Thus, in order to gain profit, whether the management could overall control risks and stand it’s rights and interests or not becomes the key point of the project.
Lump-sump public construction work has become more and more popular in Taiwan. Under limited bidding time, bidders estimate cost base on preliminary drawings and specification. Risks could occur due to complicated work condition and impact deeply to the project.
Even after the project is awarded, owner and contractor discusses the design in details. In this stage, if owner or PCM are not aware of the function and scale of the work and cannot get used to proceeding detail design and construction parallelly, the project will suffer from revision of requirements or requirements which are out of contract scope. As a result, the contractor has to revise work plan and will not be able to control schedule and cost which can lead to argument or dispute.
“ Risks allowable margin” is to design a mechanism in project contract, contractor has to complete all scope of work within project duration under a fix price. The difference of “actual quantity take off costs” and “bidding stage estimate quantity take off costs” are “cost misestimate risk”.
The research is to discuss the contractor’s cost risk issues during quotation stage for bidding a fixed lump-sump work. |
| 參考文獻 |
1. 李得璋，公共工程實施統包制度之展望，土木水利半月集第49集，2002。
2. 黃尚元，營造業者承攬統包工程之風險管理，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程研究所，碩士論文， 2008。
3. 吳宗恩，公共工程招標作業風險管理之研究，中國科技大學土木與防災應用科技研究所，碩士論文， 2006。
4. 徐名頤，公共工程統包制度風險評估模式之研究，國立成功大學建築學系碩博士班，碩士論文， 2003。
5. 李明進，國際統包工程報價階段之風險管理研究，國立台灣科技大學管理學院MBA，碩士論文，2007。
6. 黃雅怡，發電廠統包工程統包商索賠類型與文件管理流程之研究，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，碩士論文，2011。
7. 范偉華，統包工程之風險管理，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所，碩士論文， 2003。
8. 王伯儉，「工程契約法律實務」，元照出版，2008。
9. 李得璋，「公共工程統包制度之推動」，營建工程統包制度研討會論文集，2000。
10. 王隆昌，統包工程簡介，台北科技大學，研究報告，2004。
11. 行政院公共工程委員會，政府採購法令彙編，書籍，2006。
12. 李志峰，公共工程統包契約規定之探討，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程所，碩士論文， 2002。
13. 林文盛，公共工程統包制度之研究，國立台灣科技大學營建管理研究所，碩士論文， 1993。
14. 楊人能，營建工程聯合承攬之風險管理，國立高雄第一科技大學營建工程所，碩士論文， 2001。
15. 《工程項目標投標實務》，劉傑主編，人民交通出版社，2000年版。
16. 張志鵬，統包制度對國內營造廠經營策略影響之研究，國立中央大學營建管理研究所，碩士論文， 2008。
17. 陳飛，論投標報價的依據、決策策略及投標技巧，工學論文網，2009。
18. 榮泰生，Expert Choice在分析層級程序法(AHP)之應用，書籍，2011。
19. Greenfield, “Turnkey Construction in the United States”, ASCE, Vol. 108, o.102. ,1982。
20. Haviland, “The Architects’ Hand Book of Professional Practice”, The AmericanInstitute of Architects ,1985。
21. United Nations, “Features and Issues in Turnkey Contracts in DevelopingCountries”, United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, 1990。
20. DBIA, “An Introduction to Design-Build”, DBIA, 1994。
21. FIDIC, “Conditions of Contract for EPC Turnkey Projects”, FIDIC, 1999。
22. Hofer, C.W. & D. Schendel, Strategy Formulation：Analytical oncepts,MnWestPublishing St. Paul, 1978。
23. Williamson, O. E., Markets and Hierarchies. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J, 1978。
24. Carlton, Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization, AddisonWesley Longman,Inc.,Third Edition , 1999。
25. Cable, Current Issues in Industrial Economics, The Macmillan Press L.T.D ,1994。
26. Waldman, Jensen, Industrial Organization — Theory and Practice,Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 1998。
27. Potter, Sanvido, “Implementing a Design/Build Prequalification System”,Journalof Management in Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3 , 1995。
28. Branca, Cost Effective Design-Build Construction, 1st Edition, Rs Means Co.Inc.. Kingston MA, 1987。
29. Molenaar, Public Sector Design-Build: AModel for Project Selection,University of Colorado, Ph. D Thesis, 1997。 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit