博碩士論文 100421019 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:51 、訪客IP:18.118.16.91
姓名 張至賢(Chin-Hsien Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 衡量投資人情緒指標持續效果對投資績效的影響
相關論文
★ 從生態共生觀點發展組織合作模式★ 影響產業垂直分工因素之探討
★ 發展台籍專業管家的人力派遣模式★ 影響軍事機關審計品質之關鍵性因素及其相對效率衡量
★ 台灣光碟片設備供應商競爭策略分析★ 國防科技研發機構組織向心力之研究
★ 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效★ 衡量半導體晶圓代工廠商生產單位之營運績效
★ 商業銀行營運型態與組織調整對分行營運效率的影響★ 發展行動條碼為基礎的隨傳隨用視訊平台之應用
★ 飛機引擎定子零件維修之訂價調整方式★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效:台灣上市公司董事會結構論析
★ 探討網際網路事件達成關鍵多數之影響因素★ 生態循環農業產銷策略個案研究
★ 探討以政策規範高耗能產業參與再生能源開發之綜效-以太陽光電發電系統為例★ 適地性服務(LBS)之顧客體驗整合性設計—以中華電信行動導遊為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 我們都知道在持有資產,價格不斷波動的情況下,只有上漲多於下跌才有可能創造足夠的獲利;同樣地,在持有資產空頭部位的時候,也只有在價格下跌的多於上漲的情況下才能創造出足夠的獲利。
不僅如此,在近期興起的行為財務學領域中,有別於傳統的財務模型,認為投資人的心理狀態才是影響資產價格定價波動的重要因子,因此出現了所謂的投資人情緒指標作為預測資產價格反轉的重要依據。
本研究利用上述的概念,針對持有資產的多頭部位建立一個模型;持有空頭部位建立另外一個模型,使用動態SBM將投資人情緒指標作為資產價格變化波動的持續效果(Carry-over),除了評估這兩種模式的績效和整體大環境對投資的影響,還和未納入持續效果的動態SBM做差異性檢定,評估投資人情緒指標對於投資績效的影響。
研究的結果顯示,在金融海嘯的之後,多方的Model I表現可能受到影響,且影響直到2012年都在,績效雖然時有起色,但是又馬上下滑,顯示績效起伏不定,這段時間持有多頭部位對於投資人而言是件相當辛苦的事;反觀做空的Model II表現卻相對較穩定,且績效幾乎都在高檔徘徊,代表著這段時間持有空頭部位的績效相當優異,從以上幾點來看,在金融海嘯之後的一段期間非常適合做針對群眾恐慌的空頭操作,這是因為2008年到2012年全球市場上還是充滿著恐慌的氣氛的關係。
最後,在用Wilcoxon檢定了一般的動態SBM和未納入持續效果(Carry-over)的SBM是否存在顯著差異之後,發現,兩者間確實存在顯著的差異,投資人情緒指標確實對於投資的績效有顯著的影響,投資人在投資時應該多加注意情緒指標的變化,以防價格反轉。
摘要(英) We all know that in the case that asset’s price fluctuate constantly, only when prices rise more than fall would bring enough profits if you are holding the long position; this is the same for the short position, only in the case that prices fall more than rise create ideal profit.
Moreover, the rising field named behavioral finance has proposed models that are different from traditional ones, the psychological state of investors do influence asset prices and is an important factor for pricing volatility, to observe the change of the psychology state of investors, behavior finance comes the investor sentiment indicator to predict the reversal of asset prices.
In this study, we use the concepts above to build a long position model and another short position model, Dynamic SBM will be used to set investor sentiment as the Carry-over of asset prices change, to evaluate the performances of these two models and the overall environment impact on investment performance. Furthermore we have another dynamic SBM without carry-over, to assess investor sentiment indicators for investment performance.
Results of the study shows that after financial crisis, the long position model’s performance is probably affected, and the effect has been until 2012, although sometimes performance is fine, but it immediately fell, showing ups and downs, this time for investors with long positions is tough; in the contrast, the short position model’s performance was relatively stable and high performance in most time, representing short positions in this time is quite excellent, which means in this period after the financial crisis is very suitable for panic shorting. This was because the market was still panic from 2008 to 2012.
Finally, with the Wilcoxon test, the general dynamic SBM and no Carry-over dynamic SBM exists significant differences, investors should pay more attention on the investment sentiment indicators change, to prevent price reversal.
關鍵字(中) ★ 持續效果
★ 投資人情緒指標
★ 周轉率
★ 資產定價模型
★ 動態SBM
關鍵字(英) ★ Carry-over
★ Investor sentiment
★ Turnover
★ CAPM
★ Dynamic SBM
論文目次 一、緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的 3
1-3研究流程 5
二、文獻探討 6
2-1選股方法探討 6
2-2 DEA在投資股票上的應用 7
2-3行為財務學 9
2-4投資人情緒指標 13
2-5風險的衡量 17
三、研究方法與設計 21
3-1 CCR模式 21
3-2 BCC模式 22
3-3 SBM模式 23
3-4 動態SBM模型 25
3-5 研究設計 31
四、資料來源 37
五、實證結果 39
5-1 Model I的實證結果 39
5-2 Model II的實證結果 47
5-3 投資人情緒指標對投資績效的影響 54
六、結論與建議 57
6-1 研究結論 57
6-2 研究限制與建議 61
七、參考文獻 63
八、附錄 67
附錄(1) 各DMU基本資料 67
附錄(2)各Model敘述統計 69
附錄(4) 情緒指標差異顯著性檢定 73
附錄(4) 無情緒指標績效變化圖 77
附錄(5) 無情緒績效平均 79
參考文獻 中文部分
1.吳濟華 and 何柏正 (2008). "組織效率與生產力評估: 資料包絡分析法, 台北: 前程."
2.周賓凰, 池祥萱, 周冠男 and 龔怡霖 (2002). "行為財務學: 文獻回顧與展望." Review of Securities & Futures Markets 14(2): 1-48.
3.林美珍*, 周. 張. (2007). "投資人情緒與股票報酬互動關係." 證券市場發展季刊(SSCI) 第二期.
4.溫文漢 (2000). "EVA 與 MVA 作為投資組合管理依據的績效表現-以台灣全體上市公司為例."
5.謝劍平 (2001). 現代投資學案例與習題解答, 智胜文化事业有限公司.
6.謝劍平 (2007). 現代投資學: 分析與管理, 智勝文化總經銷.
7.Rubinstein, M. (2008). 金融投資理論史. 台北市, 寰宇出版股份有限公司.

英文部分
1.Antoniou, C., J. A. Doukas and A. Subrahmanyam (2013). "Sentiment, Noise Trading, and the CAPM." Abacus.
2.Baker, M. and J. Wurgler (2000). "The equity share in new issues and aggregate stock returns." The Journal of Finance 55(5): 2219-2257.
3.Banz, R. W. (1981). "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks." Journal of Financial Economics 9(1): 3-18.
4.Benson, K. and R. Faff (2013). "β." Abacus 49: 24-31.
5.Biddle, G. C., R. M. Bowen and J. S. Wallace (1997). "Does EVA beat earnings? Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values." Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(3): 301-336.
6.Campbell, J. Y., S. J. Grossman and J. Wang (1993). "Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(4): 905-939.
7.Chen, H.-H. (2008). "Stock selection using data envelopment analysis." Industrial Management & Data Systems 108(9): 1255-1268.
8.Chordia, T. and B. Swaminathan (2000). "Trading volume and cross‐autocorrelations in stock returns." The Journal of Finance 55(2): 913-935.
9.Chung, H.-Y. (2008). Appraising Hedge Fund Performance by Data Envelopment Analysis, Master Dissertation, Shin Hsin University, Taiwan.
10.DeLong, J. B. (1989). "Noise trader risk in financial markets."
11.Dempsey, M. (2013). "The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM): The History of a Failed Revolutionary Idea in Finance?" Abacus 49(S1): 7-23.
12.Embrechts, P., R. Frey and A. McNeil (2005). "Quantitative risk management." Princeton Series in Finance, Princeton.
13.Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and R. Brännlund (1996). Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA, Kluwer Academic Boston.
14.Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1998). "Value versus growth: The international evidence." The Journal of Finance 53(6): 1975-1999.
15.Graham, B., D. L. F. Dodd and S. Cottle (1934). Security analysis, McGraw-Hill New York.
16.Gregoriou, G. N., K. Sedzro and J. Zhu (2005). "Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis." European Journal of Operational Research 164(2): 555-571.
17.Harlow, W. V. (1991). "Asset allocation in a downside-risk framework." Financial Analysts Journal: 28-40.
18.Horcher, K. A. (2011). Essentials of financial risk management, Wiley.
19.Kadoya, S., T. Kuroko and T. Namatame (2008). "Contrarian investment strategy with data envelopment analysis concept." European Journal of Operational Research 189(1): 120-131.
20.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1973). "PSYCHOLOGICAL."
21.Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979). "Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk." Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 263-291.
22.Lee, C., A. Shleifer and R. H. Thaler (1991). "Investor sentiment and the closed‐end fund puzzle." The Journal of Finance 46(1): 75-109.
23.Lee, C. and B. Swaminathan (2000). "Price momentum and trading volume." The Journal of Finance 55(5): 2017-2069.
24.Lintner, J. (1965). "The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets." The Review of Economics and Statistics 47(1): 13-37.
25.Markowitz, H. (1952). "Portfolio Selection." Journal of Finance March: 77-91.
26.Miller, K. D. and M. J. Leiblein (1996). "Corporate Risk-Return Relations: Returns Variability Versus Downside Risk." Academy of Management Journal 39(1): 91-122.
27.Mossin, J. (1966). "Equilibrium in a capital asset market." Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society: 768-783.
28.Neal, R. and S. M. Wheatley (1998). "Do measures of investor sentiment predict returns?" Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 33(4).
29.Othman, I. W., P. W. Ching and A. W. Ghazali (2012). The relationship between Economic Value Added and Malaysian stock market performance. Innovation Management and Technology Research (ICIMTR), 2012 International Conference on, IEEE.
30.Pätäri, E. J., T. H. Leivo and J. S. Honkapuro (2010). "Enhancement of value portfolio performance using data envelopment analysis." Studies in Economics and Finance 27(3): 223-246.
31.Powers, J. and P. McMullen (2000). "Using data envelopment analysis to select efficient large market cap securities." Journal of Business and Management Volume 7(2).
32.Reuer, J. J. and M. J. Leiblein (2000). "DOWNSIDE RISK IMPLICATIONS OF MULTINATIONALITY AND INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES." Academy of Management Journal 43(2): 203-214.
33.Sharpe, W. F. (1964). "CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*." The Journal of Finance 19(3): 425-442.
34.Tone, K. and M. Tsutsui (2010). "Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach☆." Omega 38(3-4): 145-156.
35.Watsham, T. J. and K. Parramore (1997). Quantitative methods in finance, Cengage Learning Business Press.
36.Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver, Kluwer academic publishers.
指導教授 張東生 審核日期 2013-6-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明