參考文獻 |
壹、中文文獻
文崇一、楊國樞(2000)。訪問調查法,社會及行為科學研究法(下冊)。臺北:東華。
王中天(2003)。社會資本:概念、源起及現況。問題與研究,42(2),139-163。
王光旭(2012)。文官政治認知是否與行政中立行為衝突?2008年臺灣政府文官調查的初探性分析。政治科學論叢,52,117-170。
王甫昌(1994)。族群同化與動員:臺灣民眾政黨支持之分析。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,77,1-34。
王甫昌(1996)。臺灣反對運動的共識動員:1979-1989年兩次挑戰高峰的比較。臺灣政治學刊,創刊號,129-210。
王甫昌(1998)。族群意識、民族主義、與政黨支持:1990年代臺灣的族群政治。臺灣社會學研究,2,1-45。
王甫昌(2003)。當代臺灣社會的族群想像。臺北:學群出版社。
王甫昌(2008)。族群政治議題在臺灣民主化轉型中的角色。臺灣民主季刊,5(2),89-140。
王明珂(2001)。華夏邊緣—歷史記憶與族群認同。臺北:允晨文化公司。
王俐容(2010)。客家文化政策與文化創意產業的發展。載於江明修(主編),客家政治與經濟(頁161-188)。臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
王振寰、瞿海源(1999)。社會學與臺灣社會。臺北,巨流。
丘昌泰(2007)。政策篇。載於徐正光(主編),臺灣客家研究概論(頁535-562)。臺北:行政院客家委員會與臺灣客家研究學會。
丘昌泰(2008)。族群、文化與認同:連鎖關係的再檢視。國家與社會,5,1-35。
丘昌泰(2009)。臺灣客家的社團參與與族群認同。載於江明修、丘昌泰(主編),客家族群與文化再現(頁4-23)。臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
江彥震(2003)。客家危機。臺北:世界客屬總會。
何義麟(2006)。跨越國境界—近代臺灣去殖民化之歷程。臺北:稻鄉。
余致力(2000)。論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色:黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示。公共行政學報,4,1-29。
余致力(2006)。倡廉反貪與民主治理。臺灣民主季刊,3(3),165-176。
余致力(2007)。性別差異對公共管理者任用之影響:代表性文官體系的理論省思與實證探索。國家菁英季刊,3(4),61-84。
吳乃德(1993)。省籍意識、政治支持和國家認同:臺灣族群政治理論的初探。載於張茂桂(主編),族群關係和國家認同(頁27-49)。臺北:業強出版。
吳乃德(1994)。社會分歧與政黨競爭:解釋國民黨為何繼續執政。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,78,101-130。
吳英明、張其祿(2006)。全球化下的公共管理。臺北:商鼎文化出版社。
吳重禮、李世宏(2005)。政治賦權、族群團體與政治參與—2001年縣市長選舉客家族群的政治信任與投票參與。選舉研究,12(1),69-115。
吳學明(2007)。移墾開發篇。載於徐正光(主編),臺灣客家研究概論(頁42-61)。臺北:行政院客家委員會與臺灣客家研究學會。
呂育誠、陳文學(2011)。從代表性官僚概念論身心障礙人員考試改進。國家菁英季刊,7(1),97-119。
巫達(2006)。理性選擇與族群內心情感—中國四川爾蘇人族群認同的個案研究。臺灣人類學刊,4(1),113-147。
房學嘉(1994)。客家源流探奧。梅州:廣東高等教育。
林佳龍(1989)。威權侍從政體下的臺灣反對運動—民進黨社會基礎的政治解釋。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1), 117-143。
林宗憲(2012)。民主系絡下我國事務官官僚代表性研究:2000年後之觀察。東吳大學政治學系碩士論文,臺北市。
林恩顯(1997)。族群認同與族群關係。載於洪泉湖、劉阿榮(主編),族群教育與族群關係。臺北:時英出版社。
林鍾沂(2004)。行政學。臺北:三民書局。
邱彥貴、吳中杰(2001)。臺灣客家地圖。臺北:貓頭鷹出版社。
邱榮舉、謝欣如(2006)。多元文化政策與戰後臺灣客家發展。載於張秀雄、鄧毓浩(主編),多元文化與民主公民教育(頁143-144)。臺北:公民與道德教育學會。
施正鋒(1998)。臺灣族群政治。載於施正鋒(主編),族群與民族主義—集體認同的政治分析(頁190-229)。臺北:前衛。
施正鋒(2004)。臺灣客家族群政治與政策。臺北:翰蘆。
施正鋒(2005)。臺灣原住民族政治與政策。臺北:財團法人新新臺灣文化教育基金會。
施正鋒(2006)。臺灣族群政治與政策。臺北:財團法人新新臺灣文化教育基金會。
施能傑(2009)。公務人力年齡結構分析及對人力資源管理的意涵。文官制度季刊,1(3),1-24。
洪泉湖(2005)。臺灣的多元文化。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
范振乾(2002)。臺灣客家社會運動初探─從客家發聲運動面相說起。載於徐正光等(主編),臺灣客家族群史:社會篇(頁185-270)。南投:國史館臺灣文獻館。
范振乾(2008)。從臺灣發展史看客裔之未來。載於張維安、徐正光、羅烈師(主編),多元族群與客家—臺灣客家運動20年(頁35-70)。臺北:臺灣客家研究學會。
孫本初(2010)。公共管理。臺北,智勝文化事業有限公司。
孫煒(2010a)。設置族群型代表性行政機關的理論論證。臺灣政治學刊,14(1),105-158。
孫煒(2010b)。我國族群型代表性行政機關的設置及其意涵。臺灣民主季刊,7(4),85-136。
孫煒(2010c)。客家行政與政策。載於江明修(主編),客家政治與經濟(頁79-99)。臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
徐正光(1991)。徘徊於族群和現實之間:客家社會與文化。臺北:正中。
徐正光、鄭力軒(2002)。當代臺灣客家社會生活。載於徐正光(主編),臺灣客家族群史:社會篇)(頁271-405)。南投:國史館臺灣文獻館。
翁興利、陳文學(2008)。我國原住民文官之研究:消極代表性官僚的測量。國家菁英季刊,4(1),1-18。
張茂桂(1993)。族群關係與國家認同。臺北:業強。
張維安(2011)。99年至100年全國客家人口基礎資料調查研究報告。臺北:客家委員會。
許立一(2003)。黑堡觀點的核心價值及其內在弔詭。空大行政學報,13,37-73。
陳秀容(1999)。族群權利理論:Vernon Van Dyke 的理論建構。政治科學論叢,10,131-170。
陳淳文(2003)。公民、消費者、國家與市場。人文及社會科學集刊,15(2),263-307。
陳運棟(1996)。客家文化的源流。苗栗文獻,11,142-157。
陳運棟(2007)。源流篇。載於徐正光(主編),臺灣客家研究概論(頁19-41)。臺北:行政院客家委員會與臺灣客家研究學會。
游盈隆(1994)。政黨形象、意識型態與臺灣選舉變遷。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,78,27-59。
游盈隆(1996)。臺灣族群認同的政治心理分析。臺灣政治學刊,創刊號,41-84。
黃子堯(1998)。認識客家族群。臺北市立社會教育館館刊,9,15-18。
楊文山(2004)。93年全國客家人口基礎資料調查研究報告。臺北:客家委員會。
楊文山(2008)。97年全國客家人口基礎資料調查研究報告。臺北:客家委員會。
劉阿榮(2003)。多元文化與族群關係:臺灣的抉擇。論文發表於國家展望文教基金會主辦之迎接全球化超越2008系列研討會。
蔡秀涓(2009)。臺灣文官的公共服務價值觀與新公共服務精神的比較:經驗調查初探。文官制度季刊,1(4),117-118。
蔡英文(2005)。公民身分的多重性及其民主政治的意涵。政治與社會哲學評論,14,1-35。
鄧紅風(譯)(2004)。Will Kymlicka著。少數族群的權利:民族主義、多元文化主義與公民權。臺北:左岸。
蕭全政(2001)。臺灣威權體制轉型中的國家機關與民間社會。載於中央研究院臺灣研究推動委員會(主編),威權體制的變遷—解嚴後的臺灣(頁63-88)。臺北:中研院臺灣史研究所。
蕭新煌、黃世明(2001)。臺灣客家族群史:政治篇(下冊)。南投:國史館臺灣文獻館。
蕭新煌、黃世明(2008)。臺灣政治轉型下的客家運動及其對地方社會的影響。載於張維安、徐正光、羅烈師(主編),多元族群與客家—臺灣客家運動20年(頁157-182)。臺北:臺灣客家研究學會。
賴澤涵、劉阿榮(2006)。多元文化與族群關係:臺灣的抉擇。載於劉阿榮(主編),多元文化與族群關係(頁1-28)。臺北:楊智文化。
鍾國允(2010)。《客家基本法》之分析。載於江明修(主編),客家政治與經濟(頁50-78)。臺北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
瞿文芳(2001)。行政院客家委員會設置之背景說明。國家政策論壇,1(9), 211-214。
藍於琛(2012)。基層官僚與政策執行成效:整併前高雄市與高雄縣客語生活學校政策比較分析。論文發表於開南大學公共事務管理學系暨研究所主辦之2012年第七屆「全球化與行政治理」國際學術研討會。
羅香林(1950)。客家源流考。香港:崇正總會。
貳、網路資料
施正鋒(2002)。客家族群與國家─多元文化主義的觀點。論文發表於行政院客家委員會主辦之客家公共政策研討會。檢索日期:2012年9月27日。http://www.ihakka.net/hakka-public/conference/
陳板(2002)。化邊緣為資源:臺灣客家文化產業化的策略。論文發表於行政院客家委員會主辦之客家公共政策研討會。檢索日期:2012年9月27日。http://www.ihakka.net/hakka-public/conference/
參、英文文獻
Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In F. Barth (Ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference (pp. 9-38). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bradbury, M. D., & Kellough, J. E. (2007). Representative Bureaucracy: Exploring the Potential for Active Representation in Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-Part, 18( 4), 697-714.
Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
Brudney, J. L., Hebert, F. T., & Wright D. S. (2000). From Organizational Values to Organizational Roles: Examining Representative Bureaucracy in State Administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-Part, 10(3), 491-512.
Chang, Mau-Kuei Michael (1989). The Formation of Partisan Preference in Taiwan’s Democratization Process, 1986-1987. In Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao, Wei-Yuan Cheng and Hou-Sheng Chan (Eds.), Taiwan: A Newly Industrialized State (pp. 313-344). Taipei: Department of Sociology, National Taiwan University.
Chang, Mau-kuei Michael (1994). Toward An Understanding of the Sheng-chi Wen-ti in Taiwan: Focusing on Changes after Political Liberation. In Chung-Min Chen, Ying-Chang Chuang and Shu-Min Huang (Eds.), Ethnicity in Taiwan: Social, Historical, and Cultural Perspectives (pp. 93-150). Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.
Cheng, Tun-jen (1989). Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(4), 471-99.
Chu, Yun-Han, & Tse-Min Lin (1996). The Process of Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan: Social Cleavage, Electoral Competition, and the Emerging Party System. In Hung-Mao Tien (Ed.), Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave (pp. 79-104). Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Denhardt, R. B. & Denhardt, J. V. (2003). The New Public Service. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Diamond, L. (1997). Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dolan, J. (2000). The Senior Executive Service: Gender, Attitudes, and Representative Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-Part, 10(3), 513-529.
Dolan, J., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2003). Representative Bureaucracy: Classic Readings and Continuing Controversies. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Edwards, M. (2004). Civil Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Egeberg, M. (1999). The Impact of Bureaucratic Structure on Policy Making. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 155-170.
Elster, J. (1986). Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press.
Esman, M. J. (1997). Public Administration, Ethnic Conflict, and Economic Development. Public Administration Review, 57(6), 527-533.
Fennema, M. (2004). The Concept and Measurement of Ethnic Community. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(3), 429-447.
Frederickson, H. G. (2005). Public Administration with an Attitude. Washington, DC: American Society of Public Administration.
Goodsell, C. T. (2005). The Bureau as Unit of Governance. In Paul Du Gay (Ed.), The Values of Bureaucracy (pp. 17-40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gruber, J. E. (1987). Controlling Bureaucracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hale, M. M., & Kelly, R. M. (1989). Gender, Bureaucracy, and Democracy. New York: Greenwood Press.
Hanifan, L. J. (1920). The Community Centre. Boston: Silver, Burdette.
Hargrove, E. C. (1975). The Missing Link: The study of the Implementation of Social Policy. Washington : Urban Institute.
Harsanyi, J. C. (1986). Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior. In Jon Elster (Ed.), Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press.
Henderson, R.I. (1979). Compensation Management: Rewarding Performance. Reston, Viginia: Reston Publishing Co.
Hindera, J. J. (1993). Representative Bureaucracy: Further Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-Part, 3(4), 415-429.
Hindera, J. J., & Young, C. D. (1998). Representative Bureaucracy: The Theoretical Implications of Statistical Interaction. Political Science Quarterly, 51(3), 655 –671.
Hondeghem, A. (1997). The National Civil Service in Belgium. Paper Presented at Civil Service Systems in a Comparative Perspective. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington (USA), 5-9 April.
Horn, M. J. (1995).The Political Economy of Public Administration: Institutional Choice in the Public Sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). Democracy for the Long Haul. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 3-13.
Joireman, S. F. (2007). Multiculturalism and the Politics of Naming. In S. Philip Hsu and Chang-Ling Huang (Eds.), Political Challenges and Democratic Institutions: International and Taiwan’s Perspectives (pp. 245-266). Taipei: Taiwan Foundation for Democracy Publication.
Kelly, R. M. (1998). An Inclusive Democratic Polity, Representative Bureaucracies, and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 201-208.
King, C., & Stivers, C. (1998). Government is Us:Public Administration in Anti- Government Era. Thousand Oak, CA:Sage Publication.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston. MA: Little, Brown.
Kingsley, J. D. (1944). Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service. Yellow Spring, OH: Antioch Press.
Krislov, S. (1974). Representative Bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffe, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, G. B., & Nice, D. (1994). Race, Sex, and Occupational Segregation in State and Local Government. American Review of Public Administration , 24(4), 393-410.
Light, P. C. (1999). The New Public Service. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Lin, Chia-Lung (1998). Path to Democracy: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, Yale University.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Long, N. E. (1952). Bureaucracy and Constitutionalism. The American Political Science Review ,46(3), 808-818.
Luckham, R. , Goetz, A. M., & Kaldor, M. (2003). Democratic Institutions and Democratic Politics. In Sunil Bastian and Robin Luckham (Eds.), Can Democracy be Designed? The Politics of Institutional choice in Conflict-torn Societies (pp. 14-59). London: Zed Books
Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. C. (1999). Elections and Representation. In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes and B. Manin. (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Marshall, T. H., & Bottomore, T. (1992). Citizenship and Social Class. London, England: Pluto Press.
Meier, K. J. (1975). Representative Bureaucracy: An Empirical Analysis. The American Political Science Review, 69(2), 526-542.
Meier, K. J. (1993a). Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government. 3rd. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole.
Meier, K. J. (1993b). Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy Testing the Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-Part, 3(4), 393-414.
Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and Democracy: The Case for More Bureaucracy and Loss Democracy. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 193-199.
Meier, K. J., & Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2006). Gender, Representative Bureaucracy, and Law Enforcement: The Case of Sexual Assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850-860.
Meier, K. J., & Nigro, L. G. (1976). Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences: A Study in the Attitudes of Federal Executives. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 458-469.
Meier, K. J., & Stewart, J. S. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157-171.
Miller, T. (2007). Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, Consumerism, and Television in a Neoliberal Age. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University press.
Mosher, F. C. (1968). Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nabatchi, T. (2007). The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Federal Government. Public Administration Review, 67 (4), 646-61.
Nachmias, D., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1973). Measuring Bureaucratic Representation and Integration. Public Administration Review, 33(6), 590-597.
Olson, J. P. (2008). The Ups and Downs of Bureaucratic Organization. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 13-37.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Pitkin, H. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pitts, D. W. (2007). Representative Bureaucracy and Ethnicity in Public Schools: Examining the Link Between Representation and Performance. Administration & Society, 39(4), 497-526.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Okaland. University of California Pressman, Berkeley, CA.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
Ranson, S., & Stewart, J. (1994).Management for the Public Domain: Enabling the Learning Society. Hong Kong: St. Martin’s Press.
Redford, E. S. (1969). Democracy in the Administrative State. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reilly, B. (2001). Democracy in Divided Societies: Electoral Engineering for Conflict Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ripley. R. B., & Franklin, G. A. (1980). Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy. Pacific Grove, CA: Dorsey Press.
Romzek, B., & Hendricks, J. (1982). Organizational Involvement and Representative Bureaucracy: Can We Have It Both Ways? American Political Science Review, 76(1), 75-82.
Rosenbloom , D. H., & Kravchuk, R. S. (2005). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector (6th). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Rosenbloom, D. H., & Featherstonhaugh, J. G. (1977). Passive and Active Representation in the Federal Service: A Comparison of Blacks and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 873-883.
Rourke, F. E. (1984). Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. 3rd. Bostom: Little, Brown, and Company.
Saltzstein, G. H. (1992). Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conceptual Issues and Current Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 63-88.
Selden, S. C. (1997). The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Selden, S. C., Brudney, J. L., & Kellough, J. E. (1998). Bureaucracy as a Representative Institution: Toward a Reconciliation of Bureaucratic Government and Democratic Theory. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 717-744.
Shafritz, J. M., & Russell, E. W. (2003). Introducing Public Administration. Addison Wesley Longman: Inc.
Shumavon, D. H., & Hibbeln, H. K. (1986). Administrative Discretion: Problems and Prospects. In D. H. Shumavon, & H. K. Hibbeln (Eds.), Administrative Discretion and Public Policy Implementation (pp. 233-247). New York: Praeger.
Sjoberg, G., Brymer, R. A., & Farris, B. (1966). Bureaucracy and the Lower Class, Sociology and Social Research, 50, 325-377.
Sowa, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (2003). Administrative Discretion and Active Representa tion: An Expansion of the Theory of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700-710.
Starling, G. (2005). Managing the Public Sector. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College.
Stivers, C. (2001). Citizenship Ethics in Public Administration. In Terry L. Cooper (Ed.), Hand book of Administrative Ethics (pp. 583-602). New York : Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Thompson, F. J. (1976). Minority Groups in Public Bureaucracies: Are Passive and Action Representation Linked? Administration and Society, 8(2), 201-226.
Thompson, F. J. (1978). Civil Servants and the Deprived: Socio-political and Occupational Explanations of Attitudes Toward Minority Hiring. American Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 325-347.
Waldo, D. (1952). Development of Theory of Democratic Administration. The American Political Science Review, 46(1), 81-103.
White, H. L., & Rice, M. F. (2005). The Multiple Dimensions of Diversity and Culture. In M. F. Rice. (Ed.), Diversity and Public Administration: Theory, Issue, and Perspectives. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Wilkins, V. M., & Williams, B. N. (2008). Black and Blue: Racial Profiling and Representation. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 654-664.
Wilson, H. T. (2001). Bureaucratic Representation: Civil Servants and the Future. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Wilson, S. & Mullins, W. A. (1978). Representative Bureaucracy: Linguistic/Ethnic Aspects in Canadian Public Policy, Canadian Public Administration, 21(5), 513-538.
Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222.
Wise, L. R. (1990). Social Equity in Civil Service Systems. Public Administration Review, 50(5), 567-575.
Wise, L. R. (2003). Representative Bureaucracy. In B. G. Peters and J. Pierre. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration. London, England: Sage.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208.
Woolock, M. (2001). The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcome. ISUMA: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 1-17.
Ziegler, L. H., Jennings, M. K., & Peak, J. W. (1974). Governing American Schools. North Scituate, Mass: Duxbury Press. |