線上討論一定就會更好嗎？探討影響群體創造知識過程中知識分享與知識採用因素之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：72

、訪客IP：18.220.140.32

姓名

吳勇奇(Yung-chi Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

線上討論一定就會更好嗎？探討影響群體創造知識過程中知識分享與知識採用因素之研究
(Does Online Discussion Assure Better Discussion? Explore the Factors that Influence Groups’ the Knowledge Sharing and Knowledge Adoption in Knowledge Creation Process)

相關論文

★ 以破壞性創新理論分析中國山寨產業--以手機產業為例	★ 初探線上遊戲對未來領導力的影響
★ 研究機構之開放創新模式－以工研院為例	★ 由組織層面探討軟體程序成熟度
★ 影響個人在虛擬社群環境中知識分享因素之探討	★ Wiki使用者與使用行為之研究
★ 醫療院所科技化服務創新與組織能力關係之研究	★ 社會網路服務網站的利益—以Facebook為例
★ 協同寫作工具對寫作成效的影響	★ 部落格之網路口碑評比機制平台管理與應用
★ 虛擬貨幣交易平台之實現	★ 數位匯流創新經營模式研究 - 以台灣電信業者為例
★ SNS遊戲影響社會網路服務持續使用之探討	★ 網路團體購物之使用者行為分析
★ 探討微網誌使用者持續使用意圖之研究	★ 如何透過Facebook成員轉送線上內容來行銷？

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著Web 2.0時代的來臨，許多企業組織開始採用協同思考模式，以提出可行的解決方案來幫助企業作決策，亦即群體知識創造。群體知識創造是指兩個人以上的群體，為完成一個共同目標，進行腦力激盪且彼此相互分享知識的一種互動過程，而組織在進行群體知識創造的過程當中，會體現知識外化、知識結合化與知識內化三種知識轉換過程。有研究報告顯示，將近九成的企業經理人所完成的文件報告是由團隊共同完成的。
群體知識創造的盛行之下，我們開發了一套名為TeamSpirits的系統平台，為一種群體決策支援系統，適合用來讓團隊體現知識外化、知識結合化與知識內化流程的協同平台，以幫助團隊創造知識。為了瞭解團隊使用TeamSpirits進行群體知識創造的過程，本研究使用實驗室之等組前後測實驗法進行群體知識創造的研究，目的是探討在TeamSpirits、面對面與E-mail（過去傳統方式）三種不同模式之下，哪一種模式最能讓團隊體現知識轉換過程（知識外化、知識結合化與知識內化），導致團隊成員在未來更願意分享知識給予其他成員，以及創造出來的知識，會使成員願意去採用。研究結果發現，團隊使用TeamSpirits，其知識轉換過程（知識外化、知識結合化、知識內化）皆顯著高於面對面與E-mail的團隊，且團隊成員的知識分享意圖與知識採用，也是TeamSpirits高於其他兩組。本研究的結果可作為TeamSpirits應用在企業組織支援群體知識創造之量測指標，以幫助企業創造出較佳的知識。

摘要(英)

In the era of Web 2.0., many organizations begin to use collaborative thinking to present the practical solution called group knowledge creation. Group knowledge creation is an interactive process of brainstorming and sharing knowledge with people to complete a common goal collaboratively. In the process, organization will embody knowledge externalization, knowledge combination and knowledge internalization three processes of knowledge conversion. Some studies show that 90% CEOs’ reports are completed by teamwork.
Within the popularity of group knowledge creation, we developed the group decisional supporting system called TeamSpirits. TeamSpirits is a collaborative platform which is suitable for embodying knowledge externalization, knowledge combination and knowledge internalization to help teams create knowledge. In order to understand teams use TeamSpirits for creating process of group knowledge, this study uses the laboratory experimental method of the pretest-posttest to research group knowledge creation. The purpose of discussing three different modes of TeamSpirits, Face-to-face and E-mail (the traditional way) is to find out the best way for team to embody the knowledge conversion process of knowledge externalization, knowledge combination and knowledge internalization, let team member be willing to share their knowledge with others and adopt it. The study shows that teams use TeamSpirits its knowledge externalization, knowledge combination and knowledge internalization are significantly higher than use Face-to-face and E-mail and team members’ knowledge-shared intention and knowledge adoption are higher, too. This study can be an index of TeamSpirits to apply in the organization of group knowledge creation and to create better knowledge.

關鍵字(中)

★ 知識創造協同平台
★ TeamSpirits
★ 知識轉換過程
★ 知識外化
★ 知識結合化
★ 知識內化
★ 知識分享意圖
★ 知識採用

關鍵字(英)

★ Collaborative knowledge creation platform
★ TeamSpirits
★ Knowledge conversion process
★ Knowledge externalization
★ Knowledge combination
★ Knowledge internalization
★ Knowledge sharing intention
★ Knowledge adoption

論文目次

中文提要 i
英文提要 ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 4
1-3 研究流程 5
二、文獻探討 7
2-1 知識創造協同平台 7
2-2 知識轉換過程 14
2-3 知識分享意圖 16
2-4 知識採用 18
三、研究方法 19
3-1 研究方法的選擇 19
3-2 研究架構 19
3-3 研究假說 33
3-4 變數的定義與衡量 35
3-5 實驗設計 39
四、資料分析 47
4-1 研究前測分析 47
4-2 研究正式分析 53
4-3 結構方程模式分析 60
4-4 研究假說檢定 64
五、結論與建議 74
5-1 研究發現與結論 74
5-2 研究貢獻 80
5-3 研究限制 83
5-4 研究建議 85
參考文獻 87
附錄一前測問卷 91
附錄二正式測實驗前測問卷 96
附錄三正式測實驗後測問卷 101

參考文獻

[1]. Alan R Dennis, Glenda S Hayes, & Robert M Daniel Jr. (1999). Business process modeling with group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 115-142.
[2]. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
[3]. Andrews, K. M., & Delahaye, B. L. (2000). Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 797-810.
[4]. Barkhi, R., & Kao, Y. C. (2011). Psychological climate and decision-making performance in a GDSS context. Journal Information and Management, 48(4-5), 125-134.
[5]. Bhatt, G. D. (2000). Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 15-26.
[6]. Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 14, 14-21.
[7]. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29, 87-112.
[8]. Chen, M., Liou, Y., Wang, C. W., Fan, Y. W., & Chi, Y. P. J. (2007). TeamSpirit: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based group decision support system. Decision Support Systems, 43, 1186-1202.
[9]. Cho, H., Chen, M., & Chung, S. (2010). Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(6), 1198-1212.
[10]. Chu, S. K., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Using online collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge. Online Information Review, 35(4), 581-597.
[11]. Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[12]. Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. Mis Quarterly, 433-457.
[13]. Desanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 589-609.
[14]. Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
[15]. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39-58.
[16]. Er, M. C., & Ng, A. C. (1995). The anonymity and proximity factors in group decision support systems. Decis.Support Syst., 14(1), 75-83.
[17]. Eriksson, I. V., & Dickson, G. W. (2000). Knowledge sharing in high technology companies. Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS), 1, 1330-1335.
[18]. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
[19]. Fisher, M. E. (1974). The renormalization group in the theory of critical behavior. Reviews of Modern Physics, 46(4), 597.
[20]. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, (18), 39-50.
[21]. George, J. F., Easton, G. K., Nunamaker Jr., J. F., & Northcraft, G. B. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 394-415.
[22]. Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (4th ed.). N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
[23]. Huang, J. C., & Newell, S. (2003). Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. Internaltional Journal of Project Management, 21(3), 167-176.
[24]. Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. (1993). Group support systems: A new frontier.
[25]. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
[26]. Kerr, D. S., & Murthy, U. S. (2004). Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 381-399.
[27]. Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179-228.
[28]. Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135-149.
[29]. Lowry, P. B., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2002). Synchronous, distributed collaborative writing for policy agenda setting using collaboratus, an internet-based collaboration tool. System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference On, pp. 10 pp.
[30]. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
[31]. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34.
[32]. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
[33]. Peschon, J. J., Slack, J. L., Reddy, P., Stocking, K. L., Sunnarborg, S. W., Lee, D. C., et al. (1998). An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science, 282(5392), 1281-1284.
[34]. Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. (1989). The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems, 5(2), 197-216.
[35]. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Toward a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
[36]. Ruggles, R. (1996). Knowledge management tools. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
[37]. Sambamurthy, V., & Chin, W. W. (1994). The effects of group attitudes toward alternative GDSS designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups. Decision Sciences, 25(2), 215-241.
[38]. Schulze, A., & Hoegl, M. (2006). Knowledge creation in new product development projects. Journal of Management, 32(2), 210-236.
[39]. Seufert, A., Back, A., & Krogh, G. V. (2003). Unleashing the power of networks for knowledge management: Putting knowledge networks into action. Knowledge Management and Networked Enviornment, Accenture LLP, New York, , 99-136.
[40]. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501-524.
[41]. Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? the interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology; Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 87-97.
[42]. Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47.
[43]. Wijnhoven, F. (1998). Knowledge logistic in business contexts: Analyzing and diagnosing knowledge sharing by logistics concepts. Knowledge and Process Management, 5(3), 143-157.
[44]. Wu, Y., Senoo, D., & Remy, M. W. (2010). Diagnosis for organizational knowledge creation: An ontological shift SECI model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(6), 791-810.
[45]. Yeh, Y. C., Yeh, Y. L., & Chen, Y. H. (2012). From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: A blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 245-257.
[46]. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2000). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-202.

指導教授

謝浩明、粟四維

審核日期

2013-6-26

推文