經理團隊多元化與企業績效之關聯性以最終控制權為調節變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：18.221.139.146

姓名

李雯雯(Wen-Wen Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

經理團隊多元化與企業績效之關聯性以最終控制權為調節變項

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

台灣企業主要發展型態以家族企業為主，董事會扮演決策和指揮核心地位，控制股東擁有控制權形成最終控制者，控制股東對企業決策制定具控制力而團隊成員的特徵與屬性組合在組織運作及決策執行歷程與產出亦具影響力。
　　本研究主要以高層理論及代理理論探討經理團隊多元化程度程和企業績效之間的關係，並以最終控制者權力和韋伯的科層體制觀點來探討最終控制者在經理團隊多元化與企業績效之間的干擾效果。
　　本研究採敘述性統計和多元迴歸分析方式，以公開資訊觀測站及經濟新報2010年資本額150億以上之上市公司共計128家公司為研究樣本。研究結果顯示1.經理團隊的成員隨著多元化分散的程度和在績效之間不是呈現正向線性的關係2.最終控制權的介入在經理團隊多元化與企業績效交互作用下呈現顯著效果，其顯示最終控制權對經理團隊多元化和企業績效之間扮演著調節效果。

摘要(英)

Many of Taiwanese business corporations were operated in family-based. The board of directors becomes the ultimate controller to make control of corporate decisions and commands. The characteristics and attributes of the board members have significant influential power in organization operation and policy/strategy forming and executions.
This research is to study the relationship between the top management team diversity and corporate performance, based on Upper Echelons Theory and the Agency Theory. And also studies the effects of moderating between the top management team diversity and corporate performance from the view of ultimate controlling power and Max Weber’s Bureaucracy System.
This research adopts the methodologies of descriptive statistics, multiple regression analysis, and samples from the 128 companies with NT$15 Billion capital per Market Observation Post System and Taiwan Economic Journal in 2010. The study concludes are
1.The diversity among the top management team is not in positive-linear relation with the corporate performance.
2.The involvement of the ultimate controller shows significant effect between the top management team diversity and the corporate performance, while the ultimate controller plays moderation effect in between.

關鍵字(中)

★ 最終控制者
★ 團隊多元化
★ 企業績效

關鍵字(英)

★ ultimate controller
★ team diversity
★ corporate performance

論文目次

第一章緒論 ………………………………………………………… 1
第一節研究背景與動機 …………………………………………… 1
第二節研究目的 …………………………………………………… 3
第三節論文架構與流程 …………………………………………… 3
第二章文獻回顧及假說發展………………………………………… 5
第一節團隊多元意義………………………………………………… 5
第二節團隊多元和績效……………………………………………… 7
第三節最終控制者的意義…………………………………………… 9
第四節最終控制者扮演的調節……………………………………… 11
第三章研究方法……………………………………………………… 15
第一節研究架構……………………………………………………… 15
第二節研究樣本與資料來源………………………………………… 16
第三節研究變項與衡量工具………………………………………… 18
第四節實証研究方法………………………………………………… 22
第四章研究結果……………………………………………………… 23
第一節基本統計量…………………………………………………… 23
第二節迴歸結果……………………………………………………… 27
第五章結論 ………………………………………………………… 35
第一節研究結論……………………………………………………… 35
第二節管理意涵 ……………………………………………………… 37
第三節研究限制 ……………………………………………………… 38
第四節未來研究建議 ………………………………………………… 39
參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………… 40

表目錄
表3-1 研究樣本產業分布 ………………………………………………… 17
表4-1 研究變數之敍述統計表 …………………………………………… 24
表4-2 解說總變異量 ……………………………………………………… 25
表4-3 轉軸後的成分矩陣 ………………………………………………… 25
表4-4 因素命名 …………………………………………………………… 26
表4-5 經理團隊多元化對和績效影響之迴歸分析 ……………………… 27
表4-6 董事席次控制對於經理團隊多元化與企業績效迴歸分析 ……… 31
表4-7 控制持股對於經理團隊多元化與企業績效迴歸分析……………… 33
圖目錄
圖1-1 論文架構流程圖 …………………………………………………… 4
圖3-1 研究架構 …………………………………………………………… 15
圖3.2 研究樣本產業分布比率 …………………………………………… 18

參考文獻

中文部分:
1.方至民、曾志弘、鐘憲瑞(1999)，「高階經營團隊特質與財務能力對企業研發支出影響之研究-以台灣上市電子產業公司為例」，1999科技管理研討會論文集，中山大學。
2.林泉源(2009), “銀行業股權結構對經營績效、財務績效與股價之影響” (輔仁管理評論), 16(2), 43-76。
3.沈中華、陳錦村與吳孟紋，民90，更早期預警模型:台灣銀行道德指標的建立與影響，討論稿。
英文部分
1.Alkhafaji. 1989. 1989. A stakeholder approach to corporate governance: managing in a dynamic environment. Quorum Books, Westpost, CT.
2.Bantel, K.A.,Jackson, S.E.(1989).Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference?.Supplement to Strategic Management Journal,10,107-124.
3.Barney,J.B. (1991),”Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 1991, pp.99~120.
4.Bishop. J. W.,Scott, K. D.,Burroughs, S. M.(2000).Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment.Journal of Management,26(6),1113-1132.
5.Casson, M. (1999), The Economic of the Family Firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review 47, 10-23.
6.Chami, R. (1999), What’s Different about Family Business, Working paper, University of Notre Dame and the International Monetary Fund. Computer World 1992, 67-69.
7.Charkham, J. P. 1994. Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries. Oxford University Press, New York.
8.Chau, T. T. 1991. Approaches to succession in Asian business organizations. Family Business Review, 4: 161-179.
9.Child, J. (1973). Strategies of control and organizational behavior. Administrative
Science Quarterly, March 1973, pp. 1-17.
10.Claessens, S., Djankov, S. and Lang, L.H.P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.
11.Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. H. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholders. Journal of Finance 57(6)：2741-2771.
12.Corporate Governance : A synthesis of Theory, Research, and Practice R. Anderson and H.K. Baker (eds.) 2010 pp.225-242
13.Crocker, J., & Major, B. 1989. Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96: 608-630.
14.Dickson, G.,Wetherbe, J.(1985), Achieving Job Productivity Satisfaction: The Management of Information Systems. McGraw-Hill, pp.380-409.
15.DiMaggio, Paul J.,Walter W. Powell(1983).The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.American Sociological Review,48(2),147-160.
16.Dunn, P. (2004). The Impact of Insider Power on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Management, 30(3), 397-412.
17.Elsayed, K., 2007, “Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance?”Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(6), 1203-1214
18.Fama, E. F.,1980, “Agency Problem and Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Political Economy , 88, 288-307.
19.Fredrickson, J. M. (1986). An exploratory approach to measuring perceptions of strategic decision process constructs. Strategic Management Journal, 7(5), 473-483.
20.Gedajlovic, E. R. and Shapiro. 1998. Management and ownership effects: Evidence from five countries. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 533-553.
21.Good, L., & Nelson, D. 1971. Effects of person-group and intra-group similarity on perceived group attractiveness and cohesiveness. Psychonomic Science, 25: 215-217.
22.Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. 1996. Teams in organization: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338.
23.Hall, Richard H (2001), & Chapter 7: decision making>, , 1999, N.J.
24.Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–207
25.Hamilton, Gary G. (Ed.) 1996. Asian Business Networks. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
26.Jackson, K.K., Burnham, A.K., Braun, R.L., Knauss, K.G., 1995 Temperature and pressure dependence of n-hexadecance cracking. Organic Geochemistry 23, 941-953.
27.Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., and Erhardt, N. L., 2003, “Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications,” Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 6, 801-830.
28.Jehn, K. A. and Bezrukova, K., 2004, “ A Field Study of Group Diversity, Workgroup Context, and Performance, “Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 6, 703-729.
29.Jehn, K. A., G. B. Northcraft,M. A. Neale(1999).Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups.Administrative Science Quarterly.
30.Jensen, M. C., and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
31.Jones, G. & Rose, B. (1993). Family capitalism. Business History, 35, 1-16.
32.Jones, G. R.(2001). Organizational Theory : Text and Case, 3rd ed. N.Y.: Pearson Education, Inc.
33.Khan , E. H., “The Stages of Evolution of Information System Function,” IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management ,Vol. 39,No. 1,February 1992, pp.84-95.
34.Khan E.H.(1991), “Organization and management of information systems functions: Comparative Study of Selected Organizations in Bahrain, “ Information & Management, No. 21, pp.73-85.
35.Knippenberg, D.,Knippenberg, B.,Cremer, D.,Hogg, M. A.(2004).Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda The Leadership Quarterly,15,825-856.
36.Kozlowski, S. W. J. and Bell, B. S., 2003, “Work Groups and Teams in Organizations” in Borman, W. C., Ilgen, D. R., and Klimoski, R. J. (eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Press, 333-375
37.La Porta, R. Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
38.La Porta, R. Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113-1155.
39.La Porta. R., Lopez-de-Silancs, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999), Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54(2), 471-517.
40.Lemmon, M.L. and Lin, K.V. (2003). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 58, 1445-1468.
41.Lott, B. E., & Lott, A. J. 1965. Group cohesiveness and interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 3: 259-309.
42.Mayers David and Clifford W. Smith, Contractual, 1981, Contractual Provisions, Organizational Structure, and Conflict Control in Insurance Markets, Journal of Business, 54:407-434.
43.McCain, B. E., O’’Reilly, C. A. III, Pfeffer, J.(1983).The Effects of Departmental Demography on Turnover: The Case of A University.Academy of Management Journal,26
44.Michel, J. G., Hambrick, D. C.(1992).Diversification Posture and Top Management Team Characteristics.Academy of Management Journal,35
45.Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21: 402-433
46.Mohammed, S., & Angell, L.C. (2004). Surface-and –level diversity in work group; Examining the moderation effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. Journal off organizational Behavior, 25(8), 1015-1039.
47.Moreland, R. 1985. Social categorization and the assimilation of “new” group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 1173-1190.
48.Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people; Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.
49.Northouse, P.G.(2001).Leadership: Theory and Practice. California Sage.
50.O’’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., Barnett, W. P.(1989).Work Group Demography, Social Integration, and Turnover.Administrative Science Quarterly,34
51.Peffer, J. (1992). Understanding power in Organizations, California Management Review, Winter, pp.29-50.
52.Pelled, L. H. 1997. Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A field investigation. International Journal of Conflict Resolution, 7(3): 230-246.
53.Penrose, E.T. (1995), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Third Edition, New York: Oxford University Press.
54.Pfeffer, J. and G.R. Salancik. The External Control of Organizations; A Resource Dependency Prespective, New York: Harper and Row, 1978.
55.Pfeffer, J.(1983).Organizational Demography. Research in Organizational Behavior,5
56.Phinney, J. 1996. When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51: 918-927.
57.Poter., L.V. & L.M. Sallot(2003). The Internet and public relations: Investigating practitioners’ roles and World Wide Web use. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(3), 603-622.
58.Rechner, P.,Dalton, D.(1991).CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis.Strategic Management Journal,12,155-160.
59.Redding, S. G. 1993. The Spirit of Chinese Capitalism. New York: de Gruyter.
60.Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads.” Academy of Management Journal, 32, pp.402-423.
61.Richard L. Daft , (1998 ) Organization Theory and Design. South-Western College Publishing.
62.Riordan, C. M.,Shore, L. M.(1997).Demographic Diversity and Employee Attitudes: An Empirical Examination of Relational Demography within Work Units.Journal of Applied Psychology,82(3)
63.Robbins, S. P. (1992). Organizational Behavior(6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
64.Robbins, S. P. .(2005).Organization Behavior: Concept, controversies, applications.New Jersey:Prentice Hall Inc.
65.Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 161-186.
66.Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny(1986), Large shareholders, and corporate control, Jounal of Political Economy 94, 461-488.
67.Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making Use Of Difference: Diversity, Debate And Decision Comprehensiveness In Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 662-674.
68.Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2005. Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 346-357.
69.Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. 1994. Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 412-438.
70.Smith, K. G., Smith,K. A., O’Bannon, D. P., Olian, J. D. , Sims, H. P. ＆ Scully, J. (1994), Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 412-438.
71.Smith, K.G.,Smith, K.A.,Olian, J.D.,Smis, H.P.,O`Bannon, D.P.,Scully, J.A(1994).Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication.Administrative Science Quarterly,39,412-438.
72.Stephan, W., & Stephan, C. 1985. Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41: 157-175.
73.Triandis, H. , & Kurowski, L. , & Gelfanc, M. 1994, Workplace diversity, In H. Triandis, & M. Dunnette , & L. Hough（Eds.） Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4：769-827. CA: Consulting Psy chologist Press.
74.Tsui, A. S. and Terri D. Egan & Charles A. O’Reilly III, (1992). Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp. 549─579.
75.Tsui, A. S.,Egan, T. D.,O`Reilly, C. A.(1992).Being different relational demography and organizational attachment.Administrative Science Quarterly,37,549-579.
76.Webber, S. S. & Donahue, L. M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis, Journal of Management, 27: 141-162.
77.Wiersema, M. F., Bantel, K. A.(1992).Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change.Academy of Management Journal,35(1)
78.Williamson, O. E., 1983, “Organization form Residual Claimants and Corporate Control,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 351-366.
79.Wittenbaum, G. M., Stasser, G., & Merry, C. J. (1996). Tacit Coordination In Anticipation Of Small Group Task Completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 129-152): Elsevier Science.
80.Yeh, Y. U., T. S. Lee and T. Woidtke, 2001,“Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan,” International Review of Finance 2, 21-48.
81.Yukl, G. A.(2006).Leadership in organizations.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
82.Zajac, E., Golden, B., & Shortell, S. 1991. New organizational forms for enhancing innovation: The case of internal corporate joint ventures. Management Science, 37: 170-184.
83.Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. 1989. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32: 353-376.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-yuan Chen)

審核日期

2013-7-22

推文