坡地土石流災害脆弱度評估模式之建立與驗證

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：78

、訪客IP：3.14.141.62

姓名

黃建豪(Jian-Hao Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程學系

論文名稱

坡地土石流災害脆弱度評估模式之建立與驗證

相關論文

★ 不均勻圓形橋墩之局部沖刷研究	★ 砂礫河床之跌水沖刷分析
★ 土石流潛勢判定模式及土石壩滲流破壞之研究	★ 港池污染擴散影響因子之探討
★ 不均勻橋墩及群樁基礎之局部沖刷研究	★ 邊牆射流及尾檻對砂質底床之沖刷研究
★ 砂粒受水平振動行為之研究	★ 土石流發生之水文特性探討
★ 不均勻橋墩與套環保護工法之局部沖刷研究	★ 護坦及尾檻下游之局部沖刷分析
★ 橋台束縮與局部沖刷之研究	★ 慢顆粒流之輸送帶實驗與影像分析
★ 均勻入滲時坡面地下水流之理論解析	★ 尾檻設置對下游之局部沖刷效應
★ 二維斜坡顆粒流之輸送帶實驗與分析	★ 斜坡土體滲流破壞引致土石流之探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

近年來由於全球氣候變遷之影響，導致台灣地區極端豪雨型態發生之頻率大增、颱風強度增強，發生的坡地災害強度和頻率都有遽增趨勢。如何運用脆弱度評估及製作脆弱度潛勢圖和進行風險管理，以保障人民的生命安全和財產保護，是未來重要的課題。
構成脆弱度的因子包含暴露量、敏感度與適應能力之修正因子等三者。回復力則可視為災後脆弱度的折減因子。
本研究建立了一個量化坡地土石流災害脆弱度的方法，不僅考慮到災害強度與損失比的關係，亦考慮到空間分布與風險元素之特性。根據脆弱度的構成因子提出改善策略，由可調適策略改變其中因子數值，以達到降低脆弱度之效果。最後以2009年8月莫拉克風災侵襲高雄市那瑪夏區南沙魯里的土石流事件為例所導致之建築物與人員脆弱度，得知人員脆弱度與建築脆弱度在掩埋深度高於2.5m以上時明顯較高，與罹難人員與損害嚴重之建築分布位置相符，並提出調適方法以降低脆弱度。

摘要(英)

In recent years, due to the impact of global climate change, the frequency and intensity of extreme rainfalls and the typhoons increased greatly. Consequently slopeland disasters increased significantly after 2000. The vulnerability assessment, the delineation of vulnerability potential hazard maps and risk management, are important issues to protect human lives and property as the adaption policies for climate change.
Vulnerability, including exposure, sensitivity and the correction factor of adaptability, is the measure of the fragility of risk element under certain level of hazard. Resilience can be used as a vulnerability reduction factor post the disaster event. This study provides a quantitative method of vulnerability assessment for debris flow events, which not only considers the relationship between disaster intensity and loss curve, but also takes the spatial distribution and the characteristics of risk elements into account. According to the vulnerability components , we can propose improvement strategy and reduce vulnerability by adaptions which change the values of vulnerability factors. Finally, a case of the Nansalu, quantifying the vulnerability of buildings and people that caused by the invasive Typhoon Morakot on August 9 2009. The coping strategies to reduce vulnerability are also proposed.

關鍵字(中)

★ 坡地災害
★ 土石流
★ 脆弱度
★ 回復力

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

摘要..............................................................................................................i
Abstract........................................................................................................ii
目錄............................................................................................................iii
表目錄..........................................................................................................v
圖目錄........................................................................................................vi
第一章緒論................................................................................................1
1.1 研究動機.......................................................................................1
1.2 研究目的.......................................................................................4
1.3 研究方法.......................................................................................4
1.4 研究架構.......................................................................................5
第二章文獻回顧........................................................................................7
2.1 脆弱度定義...................................................................................7
2.1.1 物理脆弱度........................................................................20
2.1.2 社會脆弱度........................................................................21
2.2 暴露量.........................................................................................25
2.3 敏感度.........................................................................................26
2.4 適應能力之修正因子.................................................................26
2.5 回復力.........................................................................................27
第三章坡地災害脆弱度..........................................................................29
3.1 風險元素.....................................................................................29
3.2 暴露量.........................................................................................30
3.2.1 人員暴露量......................................................................30
3.2.2 建築暴露量......................................................................32
3.3 敏感度.........................................................................................32
3.3.1 人員敏感度......................................................................33
3.3.2 建築敏感度......................................................................35
3.4 適應能力之修正因子.................................................................36
3.4.1 人員適應能力之修正因子..............................................36
3.4.2 建築適應能力之修正因子..............................................37
3.5 回復力.........................................................................................38
第四章案例分析與討論..........................................................................40
4.1 分析地點：那瑪夏區南沙魯(民族)里......................................40
4.2 事件發生過程分析.....................................................................42
4.3 分析工具與流程.........................................................................43
4.4 分析結果.....................................................................................45
4.4.1 建築脆弱度......................................................................48
4.4.2 人員脆弱度......................................................................52
4.4.3 回復力..............................................................................56
4.5 小結.............................................................................................57
第五章結論與建議..................................................................................60
5.1 結論.............................................................................................60
5.2 建議.............................................................................................62
參考文獻....................................................................................................64

參考文獻

1. Adger, W. N.,B. Nick, G. Bentham(2004), New Indicators of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity, Oxford: Tyndall Centre
2. Adger, W. N.(2006), Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16 (3): 268-281.
3. Akbas, S.O. ,J. Blahut(2012), Critical assessment of existing physical vulnerability estimation approaches for debris flows.
4. Arattano M., L. Marchi (2005), Measurements of debris flow velocity through cross-correlation of instrumentation data, Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(1):137–142.
5. Burton, I., Kates R.W., White G.F.(1978) The Environment as Hazard.Guilford, New York.
6. Buckle, P., G. Marsh , S. Smale(2001),Assessing Resilience and Vulnerability: Principle, Strategies and Actions, Barton: Emergency Management Australia.
7. Clark, G. E. （1998）Assessing the Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Extreme Storms: The Case of Reverne, MA., USA, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 3: 59-82.
8. Cutter, S. L.（1996）Vulnerability to environmental hazards,Progress in Human Geography, 20（4）: 529-539.
9. Cutter ,S. L., J. Bryan ,W. Boruff, S. Lynn(2003),Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards.
10. Dai, F.C. , C.F. Lee,Y.Y. Ngai(2002), Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview, Engineering Geology , 64 , pp.65–87.
11. Dilley, M. , T.E. Boudreau(2001), Coming to terms with vulnerability: a critique of the food security definition,Food Policy,26, 229–247.
12. Dwyer, A., C. Zoppou, S. Day,O. Nielsen,S. Roberts(2004) Quantifying Social Vulnerability: A methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards, Geoscience Australia Technical Record 2004/14, GA, Canberra.
13. Fuchs, S., K. Heiss, J. Hübl(2007), Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 7, 495–506.
14. Fuchs, S., T.C. Tsao , M. Keiler(2012), QUANTITATIVE VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS FOR USE IN MOUNTAIN HAZARD RISK MANAGEMENT THE CHALLENGE OF TRANSFER, 12th Congress INTERPRAEVENT 2012 – Grenoble / France Conference Proceedings.
15. Granger, K.（1995）Dimensions of Vulnerability: The Human Aspects of Disaster, URISA Proceedings, 1: 238-248.
16. Galli, M. , A. F. Guzzetti (2007), Landslide Vulnerability Criteria: A Case Study from Umbria, Central Italy, Environ Manage, 40, pp.649–664.
17. Guzzetti, F., A. Carrara, M. Cardinali , P. Reichenbach (1999), Landslide hazard evaluation: an aid to a sustainable development, Geomorphology, 31, pp.181-216.
18. Gallopı´n ,G.C.,Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity, Global Environmental Change 16 (2006) 293–303.
19. Galli, M. , F. Guzzetti(2007), Landslide Vulnerability Criteria: A Case Study from Umbria,Central Italy, Environ Manage ,40:649–664.
20. HR Wallingford, Middlesex University, Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd.(2006), Flood risk to people Phase 2 - The Flood Risks to People Methodology, London: Environment Agency, Report FD2321/TR1.
21. Hewitt, K.(1983),Interpretations of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology, Boston, MA.,Allen and Unwin.
22. Hewitt, K.(1997),Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters, Harlow: Longman.
23. Hewitt, K. , I. Burton（1971）The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events, Research Paper No. 6 , Department of Geography, University of Toronto.
24. Holling, C. S.( 1973), Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1-23.
25. Hu¨rlimann M., D. Rickenmann, C. Graf(2003), Field and monitoring data of debris-flow events in the Swiss Alps, Can Geotech J 40(1):161–175.
26. Heltberg , R. ,M. Bonch-Osmolovskiy(2011), Mapping Vulnerability to Climate Change, The World Bank Sustainable Development Network Social Development Unit January 2011 WPS5554 Public Disclosure.
27. Hu, K.H., P. Cui, J. Q. Zhang(2012), Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2209–2217.
28. Ives, J. D. , P. V. Krebs（1978）Natural Hazards Research and Land Use Planning Response in Mountainous Terrain: The Town of Vall, Colorado, Arctic and Alpine Research, 10: 213-222.
29. IPCC (2007), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
30. Jan, C-D (2005), Debris flow hazards mitigation in Taiwa, Proceedings of the International symposium on utilization of disaster information, Organizing and Sharing Disaster Information in Asian Country (JSECE publication no. 44), 24–25, Nov 2005, Hiroshima, Japan.
31. Jakob, M.,D. Stein,M. Ulmi(2012), Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact, Nat Hazards,60:241–261.
32. Jakob, M. ,D. Stein, M. Ulmi(2012), The physical vulnerability of roads to debris flow: An expert judgement approach, Landslides and Engineered Slopes: Protecting Society through Improved Understanding,29.
33. King, D. , C. MacGregor（2000）Using Social Indicators to Measure Community Vulnerability to Natural Hazards, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 15（3）: 52-57.
34. Kong, W.K. (2001), Risk assessment of slopes, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 213–222.
35. Klein, R.J.T., M.J. Smit, H. Goosen, C.H. Hulsbergen (1998),Resilience and vulnerability: coastal dynamics or Dutch dikes?,The Geographical Journal 164 (3), 259–268.
36. Kasperson, J., R. Kasperson, B.L. Turner, W. Hsieh and A. Schiller (2005) ,Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change, in J. Kasperson and R. Kasperson, eds, The Social Contours of Risk. Volume II: Risk Analysis, Corporations & the Globalization of Risk, London: Earthscan, pp. 245–285.
37. Ko, H.Y., T.Y. Chou,Y.H. Chang, C.H. Liu (2006) ,Evaluation for the velocity of debris flow through image processing techniques. In: Proceedings of the 27th Asian conference on remote sensing, 9–13, Oct 2006, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
38. Leone, F., J.P., Aste , E. Leroi (1996), Vulnerability assessment of elements exposed to mass-moving: working toward a better risk perception, In: Senneset, K. (Ed.), Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 263– 269.
39. Lo, W. C., T. C. Tsao, C. H. Hsu (2012), Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan - a preliminary study, Natural Hazards, 64(3): pp.2107-2128.
40. Loup , B. , H. Raetzo(2005), Landslide mapping and risk assessment according to the Swiss guidelines, Landslides, Avalanches and Protection Forest Section, Federal Office for the Environment FOEN, Bern,Switzerland.
41. Luers, A. L. (2005), The surface of vulnerability:An analytical framework for examining environmental change, Global Environmental Change 15 ,214–223.
42. Mitchell, T. ,T. Tanner (2006), Adapting to Climatic change: Challenges and Opportunities for the Developing Community, A Publication of Tearfund, UK.
43. Mileti, D. S.（1999）Disaster by Design, Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
44. Mitchell, B.（1989）Geography and Resource Analysis, Longman Inc. New York.
45. Mitchell, J. K.（1975）The Rush to the Shore, Landscape Architecture, 65: 170-175.
46. Mitchell, J. K.（1995）Natural Hazards and Sustainable Development, Abstract Prepared for the Natural Hazards Research and Applications Workshop, Boulder,Co.
47. Mejfa-Navarro M., E.E. Wohl, S.D. Oaks (1994), vulnerability, and risk assessment using GIS model for Glenwood Springs, Colorado, Geological hazards,, 10 , pp. 331-354.
48. Nathan, F. (2005), Vulnerabilities to natural hazards: case study on landslide risks in La Paz, Paper presented at the World International Studies Conference (WISC) at Bilgi University, Istambul.
49. Papathoma-Köhle, M. ,M. Kappes ,M. Keiler , T. Glade(2011),Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards:state of the art and future needs, Nat Hazards , 58:645–680
50. Pimm , S. L. (1984), The Complexity and Stability of Ecosystems, Nature, Vol. 307, pp.321-326.
51. Pappin, J. W. , M. W. Free , J. Haley (2005), "Assessment of the risk
from natural terrain landslides", Ove Arup and Partners Hong Kong Ltd., Hongkong.
52. Petak, W. J. (2004), Earthquake Resilience Through Mitigation: A System Approach: 16.
53. Porter, M. , M. Jakob, K.W. Savigny ,S. Fougere (2007)“Risk management for urban flow slides in North Vancouver, Canada.” In Proceedings, Canadian Geotechnical Conference 2007, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
54. Pelling, M. (2003), The Vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience, London: Earthscan.
55. Papathoma-Köhle,M. ,M.Keiler,R.Totschnig,T.Glade(2012),Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol, Nat Hazards,64:2083–2105.
56. Quan Luna, B., J. Blahut, C. J. vanWesten, S. Sterlacchini, T. W. J. van Asch, S. O. Akbas(2011), The application of numerical debris flow modelling for the generation of physical vulnerability curves, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 2047–2060.
57. Smit, B., J. Wandel(2006), Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability, Global Environmental Change 16 , 282–292.
58. Smith, J.T., M.G. Winter, S. Fotopoulou, K. Pitilakis, O.C. Mavrouli, J. Corominas ,S. Argyroudis(2012), The physical vulnerability of roads to debris flow: An expert judgement approach, Landslides and Engineered Slopes: Protecting Society through Improved Understanding,28.
59. Smithers, J. , B. Smit (1997). Human adaptation to climatic variability and change,Global Environmental Change , 7(2): 129-146.
60. Totschnig, R. ,W. Sedlacek , S. Fuchs(2011), A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport, Nat Hazards ,58:681–703.
61. Tierney, K. ,M. Bruneau(2007) ,Conceptualizing and Measuring Resilience: A Key to Disaster Loss Reduction. In: TR News, pp. 14-17.
62. Timmermann, P. (1981), Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society. Environmental Monograph, vol. 1. Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
63. Uzielli, M. , F. Nadim , S. Lacasse , A.M. Kaynia(2008) , A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides, Engineering Geology 102 ,251–256.
64. UNEP(2011), Assessment of Freshwater Resources Vulnerability To Environmental and Climate Change Implication for Shared Water Resources in West Asia Region, First published by the United Nations Environment Programme in 2011.
65. UN/ISDR(2009), CEDRIG Terminology and Definitions.
66. UNDP(2009), Overcoming barriers:Human mobility and development, Human Development Report 2009.
67. Van Westen, C. J. ,(2010),GIS for the assessment of risk from geomorphological hazards, Geomorphological Hazards and Disaster Prevention.
68. Varnes,D.J. (1978), Slope movements, type and processes. In: Schuster R.L. & Krizek R.J. (eds.), Landslide analysis and control. Washington Transportation Research Board, Special Report 176, NAS, Washington, pp.11-33.
69. Varnes,D.J. , IAEG Commission(1984), on Landslides and other Mass Movements, Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. UNESCO Press, Paris , 63 p.
70. Wu, C. H. ,S. C. Chen , H. T. Chou(2011), Geomorphologic characteristics of catastrophic landslides during typhoon Morakot in the Kaoping Watershed, Taiwan, Engineering Geology 123 ,13–21.
71. Xu, Z., W. K. Lee , H.B. Kwak (2012),”Vulnerability analysis of landslide in south korea”, Department of Environmental Science and Ecological ,Korea University.
72. Zanchetta G,R. Sulpizio,M.T. Pareschi ,F.M. Leoni,R Santacroce (2004) ,Charateristics of May 5–6, 1998 volcaniclastic debris flows in the Sarno area (Campania, southern Italy): relationship to structural damage and hazard zonation, J Volcanol Geoth Res 133(1–4):377–393.
73. 尹孝元、黃清哲、連惠邦、李秉乾、周天穎、王晉倫 (2006)，自動化土石流觀測系統之發展及應用，中華水土保持學報，第37卷第2期，91-109頁。
74. 吳杰穎, 黃昱翔(2011),颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立：以南投縣水里鄉為例,Journal of City and Planning,Vol.38, No.2, pp. 195～218。
75. 李欣輯,楊惠萱,陳怡臻(2012),坡地災害社會脆弱度與家戶損失量化模型建製,NCDR。
76. 李雅芬,紀雲曜(2012), 土石流災害之物理易損性評估方法初探,201
2 Taiwan Rock Engineering Symposium (2012 TRES) ,October, 25-26, 2012 NUU, Miaoli, Taiwan。
77. 林又青,張志新,李香潔,黃柏誠,陳樹群,陳聯光 (2010),全台坡地災害脆弱性及風險區位分析,2010年全國災害危機處理學術研討會,第B1-14-B1-25頁。
78. 林又青,張志新(2011), 莫拉克颱風衝擊後之坡地災害風險分析,NCDR。
79. 財團法人中興工程顧問社(2011),100年土石流易致災因子分析與風險管理應用,農委會水土保持局委託研究報告,SWCB-100-080。
80. 曹鼎志,許文科,賴承農,鄭錦桐,張玉粦,陳振宇,羅文俊(2010),土石流風險分析之建構與應用,中興工程,No.109,p41-52。
81. 陳盈帆(2011),「土石流風險準則探討與建立之研究-以台灣為例」,國立暨南國際大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
82. 溫惠鈺,許世孟,趙啟宏(2010), 土石流潛勢溪流危害度評估模式之研究, 中興工程季刊,第106期,PP. 27-33。
83. 劉格非,李欣輯(2006),土石流直接災損評估之研究,中華水土保持學報,37(2),P.143~155。
84. 蕭煥章(2008),水災脆弱性評估模式之建立—以汐止市為例,中國文化大學地學研究所。
85. 謝承憲,謝龍生,李欣輯,陳永明,柯孝勳,蘇昭郎(2011),災害風險評估名詞一致性研究,NCDR。
86. 謝承憲、蘇昭郎、吳佳容(2010), 災害風險評估技術指引,NCDR。

指導教授

周憲德

審核日期

2013-7-30

推文