應用失效模式及效應分析與設計結構矩陣 於工業電腦之協同設計

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：73

、訪客IP：3.145.66.231

姓名

郭道東(Kuo, Dao-Dong) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

應用失效模式及效應分析與設計結構矩陣於工業電腦之協同設計
(Applying Failure Mode and Effects Analysis and Design Structure Matrix to Collaborative IPC Design)

相關論文

★ 應用MFM 與PPM 監控協同設計之執行流程	★ 應用DSM與DRFT於汽車電子之協同開發流程
★ 一協同設計專案團隊組成方法- 以安全監視器產品為例	★ 應用認知工程開發全球化光纖通訊系統
★ 羽絨產業策略規劃-應用品質機能展開分析法	★ 重電業協同專案管理績效之研究-以變電所統包工程為例
★ 以屬性導向新產品開發之流程塑模與分析– 以醫療器材產業為案例	★ 以品質機能展開法應用於主管管理職能之建構
★ 應用參考模型以及流程建模改善供應鏈績效-以投影機產業為例	★ 協同產品開發之流程管理 - 以汽車零件為例
★ 配電系統之高壓電纜接頭供應商評選	★ 應用品質機能展開於產品開發之流程分析-以刀鋒式伺服器為例
★ 實施精實六標準差改進製程良率－以機頂盒表面黏著技術為例	★ 太陽能模組產業之決策營運研究
★ 新產品開發階段導入替代料之流程建模及潛在風險分析	★ 應用實驗設計研發PET複合膜及改善厚膜翹曲問題

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近幾年來，工業電腦的製造商為了提升公司競爭力，常透過研發新產品來提高品牌價值以及企業營收，而工業電腦主要應用於各種特殊應用平台及不同產業中，因此產品也必須因應不同客戶要求而做不同的設計與開發，通常其產品需長時間連續運作且轉換成本較高，故需求者對產品品質的要求嚴格。由此可知新產品開發在此產業是一項較為困難的挑戰，所以如何使產品從設計至開發成功，是重要且值得討論的議題。
本研究目的於提出一套有效的方法，結合風險管理以及協同設計做為基本架構，並利用ARIS以及設計結構矩陣建立產品開發流程，最終達到預防以及降低新產品開發時失敗的可能性。

摘要(英)

In recent years, the manufacturers of industrial computer often develop new products to enhance its brand values and revenue in order to maintain the competitiveness. And most of the products in the IPC industry are applied to various application platforms and industries, so the products need to redesign and adjust based on different requirements of customers. Otherwise, the products usually have two characteristics, one is long time operation and the other one is high switching cost. Therefore, the customers require high quality and stability products. In spite of this, the new product development in IPC industry is a complex and risky process. Therefore, how to make products successful from design to the official publication is an important issue.
The purpose of this study is to develop an effective method that combined the risk management and collaborative design. This study will use this method as a basic framework, as well as use ARIS and design structure matrix to establish the product development process. Finally, this study expects to help prevention and reduction of failure.

關鍵字(中)

★ 新產品開發
★ 風險管理
★ 設計結構矩陣
★ 工業電腦
★ 協同設計

關鍵字(英)

★ New product development
★ Risk management
★ Design structure matrix
★ Industrial computers
★ Collaborative design

論文目次

Table of Contents
摘要 I
Abstract II
Table of Contents III
List of Figures V
List of Tables VII
1. Introduction 1
1.1. Background Review 1
1.2. Motivation and Objectives 1
1.3. Research Structure 2
2. Literature Review 4
2.1. New Product Development (NPD) 4
2.1.1. Introduction of NPD 4
2.1.2. The Process of NPD 4
2.2. Collaborative Product Design 7
2.2.1. Introduction of Collaboration 8
2.2.2. Collaborative Product Development 9
2.3. Risk Management 10
2.3.1. Introduction of Risk Management 10
2.3.2. The Process of Risk Management 11
2.3.3. Risk Management of Product Development 18
3. Architecture of Collaborative Product Development 19
3.1. Methodological Framework 19
3.1.1. Preparation 19
3.1.2. Design 20
3.1.3. Output 21
3.2. Overview of Methodology 23
3.2.1. Design Structure Matrix 23
3.2.2. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis 29
3.2.3. Architecture of Integrated Information Systems (ARIS) 36
4. Illustrative Example 40
4.1. The Industrial PC (IPC) Industry 40
4.1.1. The definition of IPC Industry 40
4.1.2. The types of IPC 41
4.1.3. The features of IPC Industry 42
4.2. Point of Service (POS) 43
4.2.1. The introduction of POS 43
4.2.2. POS in restaurant 47
4.3. New POS system development 50
5. Conclusion and future research 63
5.1. Conclusion 63
5.2. Future Research 64
Reference 65

參考文獻

Reference
Ahmed, A., Kayis, B., & Amornsawadw, S. (2007). A review of techniques for riskmanagement in projects. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 14(1), 22-36.
AIAG. (1995). Potential failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) reference manual.
Airmic, Alarm, & IRM. (2010). A structured approach to Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and the requirements of ISO 31000.
Anumba, C. J., Catherine Baugh, & Khalfan, M. M. A. (2002). Organisational structures to support concurrent engineering in construction. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 102(5), 260-270.
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343-378.
Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 48(3).
Choi, Y., Kim, K., & Kim, C. (2005). A design Chain collaboration framework using reference models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing
Technology, 26, 183-190.
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-Gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-53.
Cooper, R. G. (1994). Third-generation new product processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(3), 3-14.
Cooper, R. G. (1998). Portfolio Management for New Products: Picking The Winners. Product Development Institute Inc.
Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage-gates® idea-to-launch process - update, what’s new, and NexGen systems. Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213-232.
Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. L. (2005). Rapid and Profitable New Product Development. Product Development Institute Inc.
Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new project development. Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.
Crawford, C. M., & Benedetto, C. A. D. (2006). New products management. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 8.
DeVor, R. E., Chang, T., & Sutherland, J. W. (1992). Statistical Quality Design and Control. New York : Macmillan, 51-57.
Ertas, A., & Jones, J. C. (1993). The Engineering Design Process. New York:Wiley.
Himmelman, A. T. (1996). On the Theory and Practice of Transformational Collaboration: From Social Service to Social Justice. Creating Collaborative Advantage, London: Sage Publications.
Hopkin, P. (2010). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating, and implementing effective risk management. The Insitute of Risk Management.
ISO. (2009a). ISO 31000 - Risk Manaement Standard. International Organization for Standardization.
ISO. (2009b). ISO Guide 73 Risk Management - Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization.
Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights From Complex Systems and Negotiation Research. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11(3).
Kvan, T. (2000). Collaborative design: what is it? Automation in Construction, 9(4), 409-415.
Narahari, Y. (1999). Lead time modeling and acceleration of product design and development. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on, 15(5), 882-896
Nikonov, V., & Kogan, I. (2009). How can ISO Management System Standards contribute to mitigate business risks? Presentation at International Conference on Risk
Assessment and Inovation, 24-25.
Oehmen, J., Dick, B., Lindemann, U., & Seering, W. (2006). RISK MANAGEMENT IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT – CURRENT METHODS. INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE.
Omdahl, T. P. (1988). Reliability, availability, and maintainability dictionary. ASQC Quality Press.
Scheer, A.-W. (1992). Architecture of Integrated Information Systems:. Principles of EnterpriseModeling.
Scheer, A.-W., & Nüttgens, M. (2000). ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management. Techniques, and Empirical Studies, LNCS 1806, 366-379.
Scheer, I. (2007). ARIS Platform Products Version: 7.02. BTTrends.
Song, B., Sun, J. M., & Passey, S. J. (2004). A Preliminary Study and Exploration on a Knowledge-Supported Methodology for New Product Planning and Conceptualization (KM-NPC). Science and Technology Review, 275-278.
Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Fmea from Theory to Execution. American Society for Quality.
Teng, S.-H. G., & Ho, S.-Y. M. (1996). Failure mode and effects analysis: An integrated approach for product design and process control. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13(5), 8 - 26.
Tummalaa, V. M. R., & Burchettb, J. F. (1999). Applying a Risk Management Process (RMP) to manage cost risk for an EHV transmission line project. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 223–235.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2001). Product Design and Development. Irwin McGraw-Hill, 2.
Valsamakis, A. C. ( 2003). Risk Management, s.l. : Heinemann Higher and Further
Edducation (Pty) Ltd ISBN 1868538176.
Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., & Paradasani, A. (2002). Collaborative conceptual design-stage of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design, 34, 981-996.
Yassine, A., & Braha, D. (2003). Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 11(3), 165-176.
Yassine, A. A. An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method. Product Development Research Laboratory”, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Zealand, A. N. (1999). Risk Management Standard AS/NZS 4360.

指導教授

高信培(Hsing-Pei Kao)

審核日期

2013-7-11

推文