個人與組織因素對個人吸收能力之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：158

、訪客IP：3.139.90.131

姓名

賴怡螢(Yi-ying Lai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

個人與組織因素對個人吸收能力之影響
(The Individual And Organizational Antecedents of Individual Absorptive Capacity)

相關論文

★ 以第四方物流經營模式分析博連資訊科技股份有限公司	★ 探討虛擬環境下隱性協調在新產品導入之作用--以電子組裝業為例
★ 動態能力機會擷取機制之研究－以A公司為例	★ 探討以價值驅動之商業模式創新－以D公司為例
★ 物聯網行動支付之探討-以Apple Pay與支付寶錢包為例	★ 企業資訊方案行銷歷程之探討-以MES為例
★ B2C網路黏著度之探討-以博客來為例	★ 組織機制與吸收能力關係之研究－以新產品開發專案為例
★ Revisit the Concept of Exploration and Exploitation	★ 臺灣遠距醫療照護系統之發展及營運模式探討
★ 資訊系統與人力資訊科技資源對供應鏈績效影響之研究-買方依賴性的干擾效果	★ 資訊科技對知識創造影響之研究-探討社會鑲嵌的中介效果
★ 資訊科技對公司吸收能力影響之研究－以新產品開發專案為例	★ 探討買賣雙方鑲嵌關係影響交易績效之機制 ─新產品開發專案為例
★ 資訊技術運用與協調能力和即興能力對新產品開發績效之影響	★ 團隊組成多元性影響任務衝突機制之研究─ 以新產品開發專案團隊為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在動盪的環境之下，公司擁有的知識將是企業最重要的核心能力，追求新知識，並加以運用在組織商業目標上，成為企業追尋的目標。如何協助企業中的個人取得新知、消化獲得的新知並應用其新知識來促進企業創新成為一個重要課題。
在過去關於吸收能力為主題的研究，僅專注在吸收能力帶來有形的結果，在吸收能力的文獻中，組織設計和個人的前因常被忽略。本研究乃將理論與實務進行配合，以實證的方式驗證理論概念，著重於個人前因以及組織前因如何影響個人的吸收能力並進行實證的分析。
本研究主要以實證的角度分析，探討在以新產品開發專案為基礎的情況下，個人及組織前因對於個人吸收能力的影響。本研究以個人前因的個人學習動機、專業能力兩個構面以及組織前因的組織層級結構、策略行為兩個構面，來分別探討對於個人吸收能力兩個階段不同的影響。實證分析是針對台灣的製造業之廠商為研究主體，並請有參與過新產品開發專案的人員及主管為問卷填答對象，所得樣本為256份。經由實證結果發現，學習動機、知識深度、創新導向對於個人潛在吸收能力有正向影響；而組織層級結構、創新導向對於個人實質吸收能力有正向的影響，但組織層級結構對於個人潛在吸收能力影響不顯著。經由實證結果發現，個人學習動機、知識深度越高，以及創新導向行為的組織，個人的潛在吸收能力會有所提升。然而，組織階層化程度越高，以及創新導向行為的組織會提升個人的實質吸收能力，進而積極正面影響新產品開發的績效。

摘要(英)

In the turbulence of environment, the company have the knowledge will be the company’s most important core competencies, seeking new knowledge, as well as its applying on organization business objectives have become the pursuing target of the firms. How to improve individual acquirement new knowledge, assimilation and exploitation capability for innovation in the organizations becomes an important issue.
Previous paper examines absorptive capacity that only focused on the tangible outcomes of absorptive capacity, organizational design and individual level antecedents have been relatively neglected in the absorptive capacity literature. This study is an empirical way to verify the theory. We examine individual antecedent, organizational antecedent and absorptive capacity.
This research is mainly using empirical study for analyzing, and to discuss the hypotheses about how individual antecedent and organizational antecedent effects the individual absorptive capability while new product development project. Individual antecedent separate two parts: motivation to learn, professional capacity . Organizational antecedent separate two parts: organizational structure, innovation oriented. We use individual antecedent and organizational antecedent to find out influences on two phases of individual absorptive capacity.Our empirical analysis focus on Taiwan manufacturing industry and we send the questionnaires to the NPD team, totally we collected 256 questionnaires. Through the empirical result, Motivation to learn and knowledge depth and innovation oriented for potential absorptive capacity has significantly positive effects. Organizational structure and innovation oriented for realized absorptive capacity has significantly positive effects, but organizational structure for potential absorptive capacity not significant.After empirical study, we found the higher the individual motivation, knowledge depth and innovation oriented the higher potential absorptive capacity. Moreover, the higher the organization hierarchy and innovation oriented the higher realized absorptive capacity, furthermore aggressively positive effects the performance of new product development.

關鍵字(中)

★ 吸收能力
★ 學習動機
★ 知識深度
★ 組織層級結構
★ 策略行為

關鍵字(英)

★ Absorptive capacity
★ Motivation to learn
★ Knowledge depth
★ Organizational construct
★ Strategy behavior

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的與問題 2
第二章文獻探討及假說 4
第一節個人的吸收能力 4
第二節個人前因 7
第三節組織層級結構 9
第四節組織策略行為 11
第三章研究方法 14
第一節研究架構 14
第二節研究假說 15
第三節衡量變數定義 16
第四節結構化模型 21
第五節抽樣方法與問卷設計 23
第四章實證分析 24
第一節樣本基本資料分析 24
第二節衡量模型之評估 26
第三節結構模型之評估 31
第四節研究假設分析 33
第五章結論與建議 35
第一節研究結果與貢獻 35
第二節研究限制與未來研究建議 37
參考文獻 38
附錄 45

參考文獻

1. Al-Eisa, A. S., et al. (2009). "An empirical examination of the effects of self-efficacy, supervisor support and motivation to learn on transfer intention." Management Decision 47(8): 1221-1244.
2. Armstrong, J. S. and F. Collopy (1996). "Competitor orientation: Effects of objectives and information on managerial decisions and profitability." Journal of marketing research: 188-199.
3. Augier, M. and D. J. Teece (2009). "Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance." Organization Science 20(2): 410-421.
4. Becker, S. W. and N. Baloff (1969). "Organization structure and complex problem solving." Administrative science quarterly: 260-271.
5. Blackburn, R. and L. L. Cummings (1982). "Cognitions of Work Unit Structure." Academy of Management Journal 25(4): 836-854.
6. Bontis, N. (1998). "Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models." Management Decision 36(2): 63-76.
7. Burns, T. and G. M. Stalker (1961). “University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.” The management of innovation.
8. Campbell, D. T. and D. W. Fiske (1959). "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix." Psychological bulletin 56(2): 81-105.
9. Chen, M.-J. (1996). "Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration." Academy of management review: 100-134.
10. Chin, W. (1998b). The PLS approach to SEM. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Chin, W. W. (1998). "Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling." MIS quarterly: vii-xvi.
12. Christensen, C. M. and J. L. Bower (1996). "Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms." Strategic management journal 17(3): 197-218.
13. Christensen, C. M., et al. (1998). "Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries." Management science 44(12-Part-2): S207-S220.
14. Clark, K. B. and T. Fujimoto (1991). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry, Harvard Business Press.
15. Cockburn, I., et al. (2000). "Untangling the origins of competitive advantage."
16. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990). "Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation." Administrative science quarterly: 128-152.
17. Cooper, J., et al. (1984). "Distribution, population sizes and conservation of breeding seabirds in the Afrotropical region." ICBP Technical publication(2).
18. Cooper, R. G. (1979). "The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure." The Journal of Marketing: 93-103.
19. Courtright, J. A., et al. (1989). "Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems." Academy of Management Journal: 773-802.
20. Crawley, J., et al. (1997). "Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies." Psychopharmacology 132(2): 107-124.
21. Day, G. S. and P. Nedungadi (1994). "Managerial representations of competitive advantage." The Journal of Marketing: 31-44.
22. Dean Jr, J. W. and S. A. Snell (1991). "Integrated manufacturing and job design: moderating effects of organizational inertia." Academy of Management Journal: 776-804.
23. Deshpandé, R., et al. (1993). "Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis." The Journal of Marketing: 23-37.
24. Diamantopoulos, A. and J. A. Siguaw (2006). "Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration." British Journal of Management 17(4): 263-282.
25. Edström, A. and J. R. Galbraith (1977). "Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations." Administrative science quarterly: 248-263.
26. Fornell, C. and F. L. Bookstein (1982). "Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory." Journal of marketing research: 440-452.
27. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker (1981). "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics." Journal of marketing research: 382-388.
28. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
29. Galbraith, J. R. and R. K. Kazanjian (1986). Strategy implementation: Structure, systems, and process, West Publishing Company St. Paul, MN.
30. Gatignon, H. and J.-M. Xuereb (1997). "Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance." Journal of marketing research: 77-90.
31. Gresov, C. and C. Stephens (1993). "The context of interunit influence attempts." Administrative science quarterly: 252-276.
32. Hair, J. F., et al. (1998). “Multivariate data analysis.” New York: Macmillian.
33. Han, J. K., et al. (1998). "Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?" The Journal of Marketing: 30-45.
34. Hurley, R. F. and G. T. M. Hult (1998). "Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination." The Journal of Marketing: 42-54.
35. Ireland, R. D., et al. (2002). "Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage." Journal of management 28(3): 413-446.
36. Jansen, J. J., et al. (2005). "Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?" The Academy of Management Journal: 999-1015.
37. Jarvis, C. B., et al. (2003). "A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research." Journal of consumer research 30(2): 199-218.
38. Johansson, J. K. and G. S. Yip (1994). "Exploiting globalization potential: US and Japanese strategies." Strategic management journal 15(8): 579-601.
39. Johnston, A. C. and M. Warkentin (2010). "Fear appeals and information security behaviors: an empirical study." MIS quarterly 34(3): 549.
40. Kanter, R. M. (1988). "Three tiers for innovation research." Communication Research 15(5): 509-523.
41. Kim, L. (1997). "The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors." California Management Review 39(3): 87.
42. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning, Harvard Business Press.
43. Klein, R., and Rai, A. (2009). Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships. MIS Quarterly , 33 (4), pp. 735-762.
44. Koestler, A. (1966). The lotus and the robot, Hutchinson.
45. Kotha, S. and B. L. Vadlamani (1995). "Assessing generic strategies: an empirical investigation of two competing typologies in discrete manufacturing industries." Strategic management journal 16(1): 75-83.
46. LePine, J. A., et al. (2004). "Challenge and hindrance stress: relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance." Journal of Applied Psychology 89(5): 883.
47. Lin, X. and R. Germain (2003). "Organizational structure, context, customer orientation, and performance: lessons from Chinese state‐owned enterprises." Strategic management journal 24(11): 1131-1151.
48. Loch, K. D., et al. (2003). "Diffusing the Internet in the Arab world: The role of social norms and technological culturation." Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 50(1): 45-63.
49. Lyles, M. A. and C. R. Schwenk (1992). "Top management, strategy and organizational knowledge structures." Journal of Management Studies 29(2): 155-174.
50. Lynn, G., et al. (1996). "Marketing and discontinuous innovation: the probe and learn process." California Management Review 38(3).
51. MacCallum, R. C., et al. (1996). "Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling." Psychological methods 1(2): 130-149.
52. Maitlis, S. (2005). "The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking." Academy of Management Journal 48(1): 21-49.
53. Miles, R. E., et al. (1978). "Organizational strategy, structure, and process." Academy of management review: 546-562.
54. Minbaeva, D., et al. (2003). "MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM." Journal of International Business Studies 34(6): 586-599.
55. Nahapiet, J. and S. Ghoshal (1998). "Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage." Academy of management review: 242-266.
56. Narver, J. C. and S. F. Slater (1990). "The effect of a market orientation on business profitability." The Journal of Marketing: 20-35.
57. Narver, J. C., et al. (2004). "Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New‐Product Success*." Journal of Product Innovation Management 21(5): 334-347.
58. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, USA.
59. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2nd, Ed.) McGraw-Hill, New York.
60. Olson, E. M., et al. (2005). "The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior." Journal of marketing: 49-65.
61. Ouchi, W. G. (1977). "The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control." Administrative science quarterly: 95-113.
62. Parthasarthy, R. and S. P. Sethi (1993). "Relating strategy and structure to flexible automation: a test of fit and performance implications." Strategic management journal 14(7): 529-549.
63. Petter, S., et al. (2007). "Specifying formative constructs in information systems research." MIS quarterly 31(4): 623-656.
64. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
65. Rai, A., et al. (2006). "Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities." MIS quarterly 30(2): 225-246.
66. Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior, Prentice Hall.
67. Robbins, S. P. (2002). Organizational Behavior (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
68. Robert Baum, J. and S. Wally (2003). "Strategic decision speed and firm performance." Strategic management journal 24(11): 1107-1129.
69. Rocha, F. (1999). "Inter-firm technological cooperation: effects of absorptive capacity, firm-size and specialization." Economics of innovation and new technology 8(3): 253-271.
70. Ruekert, R. W. and O. C. Walker Jr (1987). "Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence." The Journal of Marketing: 1-19.
71. Ruekert, R. W., et al. (1985). "The organization of marketing activities: a contingency theory of structure and performance." The Journal of Marketing: 13-25.
72. Sheremata, W. A. (2000). "Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure." Academy of management review 25(2): 389-408.
73. Slater, S. F. and J. C. Narver (1995). "Market orientation and the learning organization." The Journal of Marketing: 63-74.
74. Slevin, D. P. and J. G. Covin (1997). "Strategy formation patterns, performance, and the significance of context." Journal of management 23(2): 189-209.
75. Smith, K. and D. DeGregorio (2002). "In press. Bisociation, discovery, and entrepreneurial action." Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating an integrated mindset. Oxford: Blackwell.
76. Snell, S. A. and J. W. Dean Jr (1992). "Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: A human capital perspective." Academy of Management Journal: 467-504.
77. Snow, C. and R. Miles (1992). "Causes for Failure in Ne-twork Organizations." California Management Review 34(1): 53-57.
78. Szulanski, G. (1996). "Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm." Strategic management journal 17: 27-43.
79. Tannenbaum, A. S. (1968). Control in organizations, McGraw-Hill.
80. Teece, D. J. (1981). "The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology." The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 458(1): 81-96.
81. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory, Transaction Pub.
82. Turner, K. L. and M. V. Makhija (2012). "The role of individuals in the information processing perspective." Strategic management journal 33(6): 661-680.
83. Van de Ven, A. H., et al. (1976). "Determinants of coordination modes within organizations." American sociological review: 322-338.
84. Volberda, H. W., et al. (2010). "PERSPECTIVE—Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field." Organization Science 21(4): 931-951.
85. Walsh, J. P., et al. (1988). "Negotiated belief structures and decision performance: An empirical investigation." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42(2): 194-216.
86. Wixom, B. H. and H. J. Watson (2001). "An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success." MIS quarterly 25(1): 17-32.
87. Wold, H. (1982). Systems under Indirect Observation Using PLS. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis. (F. I. C., Ed.) Praeger, New York.
88. Zahra, S. A. and G. George (2002). "Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension." Academy of management review: 185-203.
89. Zander, U. and B. Kogut (1995). "Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test." Organization Science 6(1): 76-92.
90. Zhou, K. Z. and C. B. Li (2012). "How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing." Strategic management journal 33(9): 1090-1102.
91. Zollo, M., et al. (2002). "Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances." Organization Science 13(6): 701-713.
92. Zollo, M. and S. G. Winter (2002). "Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities." Organization Science 13(3): 339-351.

指導教授

陳炫碩(Ken Chen)

審核日期

2013-7-9

推文