The Relationships between Environmental Performance  and Financial Performance: A Study of the  U.S. Semiconductor Industry

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：19

、訪客IP：3.14.70.203

姓名

柯翰生(Mikhail Kuritsyn) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

英語商業管理碩士學位學程

論文名稱

(The Relationships between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: A Study of the U.S. Semiconductor Industry)

相關論文

★ 美國軟體產業創新活動與財務效率分析	★ Performance Measurements of Web 2.0, Social Media, and Mobile Apps for Municipal Emergency Management
★ 中國大陸股權結構與自願性財務預測之關聯性	★ 我國半導體產業下游公司法人說明會對供應鏈上游公司投資現金流量敏感度的影響
★ 線上串流音樂服務之使用者抗拒意圖研究	★ 從認知理論探討創業機會辨識對績效之影響
★ 影響Y世代消費者對智慧綠色產品購買意圖與使用意圖的因素：以智慧節能裝置為例	★ Application of social media mining on the comparison between two-dimensional barcode and near field communication
★ 應用社群探勘技術分析城市之創業精神與新創公司的特性	★ 科技接受度與學習風格對於頭戴式虛擬實境應用在學習行為意圖的影響
★ 電子發票巨量資料視覺化分析－以酒的消費為例	★ 應用文字探勘分析ERP之趨勢發展：以Twitter為例
★ 社群媒體文字採礦之研究：以第三方物流公司為例	★ 應用文字探勘技術分析遊戲產業趨勢：以兩大遊戲展之相關推文為例
★ 台灣有機食品消費與疾病死亡率之視覺化分析	★ 酒類消費與犯罪率之視覺化分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究探討企業環境表現對其財務績效之影響，以美國半導體產業數值為樣本，觀察1999年至2011年間兩者的相互關係，並深入分析何種財務績效指標之於產業環境污染具有顯著的衝擊影響。本研究採用兩種研究方法：一透過比較半導體產業兩種污染值的平均表現差異，觀察污染值較低的企業是否具有較佳的財務績效。二透過縱橫資料迴歸分析，試圖分析這十年間的環境表現對企業營運表現是溢價或是減損。主要研究實證發現美國半導體產業之環境表現與財務績效呈現正相關，亦即逐年改善污染問題、環境表現較佳的企業，相對於其他污染較高的企業，擁有較佳的財務績效。本研究結果亦顯示半導體公司的環境表現對其研發強度指標具有正向的顯著影響。但對其他財務指標則呈現負向或無顯著的影響。

摘要(英)

This study examines the effect of environmental performance on financial performance using the data of semiconductor manufacturing companies in the United States from 1999 to 2011. The study also analyzes which financial performance indicators have the most significant impact on companies’ pollution measure. The research applies two different approaches: comparison of mean difference between two populations of companies divided by their environmental performance to examine if less polluting companies have better financial performance; and panel data regression analysis to test whether company’s environmental performance determine company’s operational performance. The findings of the research suggest that companies with better environmental performance generally have better financial performance which improves year by year comparing with more polluting counterparts. Findings also show that companies’ environmental performance has significant positive effect on companies’ financial indicator RDIN; significant negative effect on GRTH, AGE and CAPIN, and no significant effect on TA, ROA, EV, CF and LEV.

關鍵字(中)

★ 環境表現
★ 財務績效
★ 美國半導體產業

關鍵字(英)

★ Environmental performance
★ Financial Performance
★ US Semiconductor Industry

論文目次

TABLE OF CONTENTS
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
TABLE OF CONTENTS III
LIST OF TABLES V
LIST OF FIGURES VII
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Motivation and Background 1
1.2 Research Objectives 7
1.3 Research Structure 8
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 Environmental performance and financial performance 9
2.2 Companies motivations for environmental improvement 12
2.3 Semiconductor Industry’s Environmental issues 13
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 19
3.1 Data collection 19
3.2. Hypothesis Development 22
3.3 Methodology 25
3.3.1 Mean difference between populations 25
3.3.2 Panel data regression methodology 29
CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 34
4.1 Descriptive statistics 34
4.2 Findings of the Hypothesis 1 43
4.3 Findings of the Hypothesis 2 45
4.4. Findings of the Hypothesis 3. 51
CHAPTER FIVE SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 59
REFERENCES 62

參考文獻

REFERENCES
Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A Meta-Analytical Investigation of the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines.
Aragon-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic Proactivity and Firm Approach to the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556-567.
Aragon-Correa, J. A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., & Garcia-Morales, V. J. (2008). Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. J Environ Manage, 86(1), 88-103.
Arora, S., & Cason, T. N. (1996). Why Do Firms Volunteer to Exceed Environmental Regulations? Understanding Participation in EPA’s 33/50 Program. Land Economics, 72(4), 413-432.
Balkissoon, R. C., & Newman, L. S. (1999). Beryllium Copper Alloy (2%) Causes Chronic Beryllium Disease. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 41(4), 304-308.
Baltagi, B.H. (1998). Panel Data Methods. Department of Economics Texas A&M University.
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Yue, Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
Cohen, M. A., Fenn, S.A., & Konar, S. (1997). Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related? WP Vanderbilt University. 40 pp.
CPPI. (2009). The Decline in Semiconductor Manufacturing in the United States. Center for Public Policy Innovation.
EPA, US. (2001). National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Source Category: Manufacture of Semiconductors.
EPA, US. (2003). National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Semiconductor Manufacturing.
Fletcher, I. (2001). A small business perspective on regulation in the UK. Economic Affairs, 21(2), 17-22.
Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1992). An investigation of the long-run relationship between pollution performance and economic performance: The case of pulp and paper firms. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(4), 315-336.
González-Benito, J. (2005). A study of the motivations for the environmental transformation of companies. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 462-475. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.08.005
Greenpeace, International. (2005). Dangerous chemicals in electronics products.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Hellström, L., Elinder, C., Dahlberg, B., M., Lundberg, Järup, L., Persson, B., & Axelson, O. (2001). Cadmium exposure and end-stage renal disease. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 38(5), 1001-1008.
Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
Hischier, R., Wäger, P., & Gauglhofer, J. (2005). Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 525-539. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.04.003
Holden, J., & Kelty, C. (2009). The Environmental Impact of the Manufacturing of Seminconductors. Rice University.
Horváthová, E. (2010). Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.004
Hsiao, Cheng. (2003). Analysis of Panel Data. University of Southern California.
Hsiao, Cheng. (2007). Panel data analysis - advanteages and challenges. Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, 1-22.
Huisman, J., & Magalini, F. (2007). Where are WEEE now: Lessons from WEEE Will EPR work for the US. Electronics and the Environment, 10.1109/ISEE.2007.369384, 149-154.
Huisman, J., Stevels, A., Marinelli, T., & Magalini, F. (2006). Where did WEEE go wrong in Europe: Practical and academic lessons for the US. Electronics and the Environment, 83-88. doi: 10.1109/ISEE.2006.1650039
ISMI. (2005). Reduction of Perfluorocompound (PFC) Emissions: 2005 State-of-the-Technology Report. International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative.
Iwata, Hiroki, & Okada, Keisuke. (2011). How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1691-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.010
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does It Really Pay to Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1).
LaDou, J. (2006). Printed circuit board industry. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 209(3), 211-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.02.001
Lin, Chin-Huang, Yang, Ho-Li, & Liou, Dian-Yan. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31(1), 56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.004
Lo, Chris K. Y., Yeung, Andy C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 561-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.010
Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Claver-Cortes, E. (2009). The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. J Environ Manage, 90(10), 3110-3121. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.007
Lou, Chen-Chi, Lee, Tsung-Pei, Gong, Shang-Chi, & Lin, Shu-Ling. (2010). Effects of technical innovation on market value of the U.S. semiconductor industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8), 1322-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.016
McGrady, T. (2006). The EU RollS Directive: Big Issues Linger. Cortland, N.Y.
Morrow, D., & Rondinelli, D. (2002). Adopting Corporate Environmental Management Systems: Motivations and Results of ISO 14001 and EMAS Certification. European Management Journal, 20(2), 159-171.
Murphy, K. J. (1997). Executive compensation and the Modern Industrial Revolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4), 417-425.
Ongondo, F. O., Williams, I. D., & Cherrett, T. J. (2011). How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Manag, 31(4), 714-730. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.023
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
Russo, M. V. , & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Salama, Aly. (2005). A note on the impact of environmental performance on financial performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(3), 413-421. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2004.04.005
Sarkis, J., & Cordeiro, J. J. (2001). An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135(1), 102-113.
Scholtens, Bert. (2008). A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.024
Srebotnjak, T. (2007). The role of environmental statisticians in environmental policy: the case of performance measurement. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(5), 405-418. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.002
Waldman, M. (1996). Planned Obsolescence and the R&D Decision. The RAND Journal of Economics, 27(3), 583-595.
Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of Environmental Behaviour in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 317-330. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1
Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press.

指導教授

沈建文(Chien-Wen Shen)

審核日期

2013-7-25

推文