台灣市場之資訊不對稱、資訊不確定性與動能現象

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：68

、訪客IP：3.15.144.162

姓名

陳鈺洺(Yu-Ming Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

財務金融學系

論文名稱

台灣市場之資訊不對稱、資訊不確定性與動能現象
(Information Asymmetry, Information Uncertainty, and Price Momentum in Taiwan Stock Market)

相關論文

★ 從巴塞爾協定三談商業銀行資金流動性穩健指標	★ 三大法人於台灣期貨市場擇時能力之探討
★ 奢侈稅課徵對於台灣房價之影響	★ 外匯曝險對台灣半導體產業之現金流量的影響
★ 金控法規範的利害關係人非授信交易之探討	★ 歐債危機是否會影響台灣股市?以台灣指數股票型基金為例
★ 寬鬆貨幣政策對於歐元匯率的影響	★ 影響境外人民幣和境內人民幣價差變化的因素
★ 台灣銀行業高階經理人薪酬與銀行特性之關連性分析	★ 承銷業務對證券分析師盈餘預測之影響
★ 經紀業務對分析師盈餘預測影響	★ 領導者或追隨者：被忽略公司分析師盈餘預測行為之研究
★ 個別投資人日內交易損益:臺灣期貨市場實證分析	★ 外匯市場私有訊息之程度對於匯率變動之影響
★ 外國機構投資人和外匯市場：以臺北外匯交易市場為例	★ 散戶與三大法人之處份效果研究:以台灣加權股價指數期貨為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

動能現象的學術研究中，以行為財務學為主要研究觀點，其中以資訊因子最為重要。本文以資訊不確定性以及資訊不對稱程度為解釋變數，研究台灣股票市場的動能現象是否受資訊因子影響。本文研究對象為台灣證券交易所之所有上市公司，研究期間為2003年8月至2011年12月，共101個月份。本文以Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) 所提出的 JT (6.1) 策略建構動能投資組合，檢驗台灣股市的動能效果，並採用投資組合分析法及Fama & French三因子模型 (Fama and French, 1993) 檢驗資訊不確定性及資訊不對稱程度是否能夠解釋台灣股市的動能現象。實證結果發現台灣股票市場存在「中期動能」現象，而且資訊不確定性與資訊不對稱程度分別對台灣股市的動能現象具有解釋能力；然而，在控制資訊不對稱之影響後，資訊不確定性則不再對動能現象具有解釋能力；但是在控制資訊不確定性之影響後，資訊不對稱程度依然對台灣股票市場動能現象存在解釋能力。這些結果顯示，資訊不對稱程度為台灣股市動能現象的主要解釋因子。

摘要(英)

In the academic research about momentum phenomenon, the behavioral finance is the major viewpoint, and information factor plays and important role. This thesis uses information uncertainty and information asymmetry to proxy the information factor, and investigates whether momentum effect can be explained by information factor. The sample data include all listed companies in the Taiwan Stock Exchange, covering the period from August 2003 through December 2011, with a total 101 months. Using the JT (6.1) strategy proposed by Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) to form momentum portfolios, this thesis examines the momentum effect in Taiwan stock market. Adopting the approach of portfolio analysis and Fama & French three factors model (Fama and French, 1993), thesis tests whether information uncertainty and information asymmetry can explain momentum phenomenon in Taiwan stock market. Empirical results show that there exists mid-term momentum in Taiwan stock market, and that information uncertainty and information asymmetry can individually explain such momentum phenomenon. However, after controlling the information asymmetry, information uncertainty cannot explain the momentum phenomenon anymore. After controlling information uncertainty, information asymmetry still can explain the momentum phenomenon in Taiwan stock market. These results suggest that information asymmetry is the major factor that explains momentum phenomenon in Taiwan stock market.

關鍵字(中)

★ 動能現象
★ 資訊不確定性
★ 資訊不對稱

關鍵字(英)

★ Momentum
★ Information uncertainty
★ Information asymmetry

論文目次

中文摘要..........................................i
Abstract.........................................ii
目錄.............................................iii
表目錄............................................iv
圖目錄............................................iv
第一章緒論........................................1
第一節研究動機..................................1
第二節研究目的..................................3
第三節論文架構..................................5
第二章文獻回顧與探討................................6
第一節動能策略相關文獻...........................6
第二節解釋動能相關文獻............................8
第三節機構法人資訊地位相關文獻....................11
第三章樣本、研究方法與設計..........................16
第一節資料來源與研究期間.........................16
第二節變數定義..................................17
一、動能部分..................................17
二、資訊不確定性代理變數.......................18
三、資訊不對稱代理變數.........................19
第三節研究假說..................................20
第四節研究方法與設計..............................20
一、動能投資組合...............................21
二、Fama and French 三因子模型.................21
三、動能報酬與資訊不確定性相關性.................22
四、動能報酬與資訊不對稱相關性...................22
五、資訊不確定性及資訊不對稱與動能報酬相關性.......22
第四章實證結果與分析.................................24
第一節動能投資組合...............................24
第二節動能報酬與資訊不確定性相關性.................24
第三節動能報酬與資訊不對稱相關性...................25
第四節控制資訊不確定性後，資訊不對稱與動能現象相關性..27
第五節控制資訊不對稱後，資訊不確定性與動能現象相關性..28
第五章結論..........................................30
參考文獻.............................................31

參考文獻

1.游智賢，賴育志，1999。外資資訊領先地位之探討。中國財務學刊，第七卷第三期，2-26。
2.陳彥豪，2002。外資與投信法人持股比率變化對股價報酬率影響之研究-以上市電子股為例。國立中山大學財務管理學研究所碩士論文，高雄市。
3.林哲鵬，黃昭祥，李春安，2006。機構投資人行為與台灣股市報酬的關聯性。財務金融學刊，第十四卷第二期，111-150。
4.蕭朝興，黃聖棠，黃聖志，2008。臺灣股市外資之投資行為。商管科技季刊，第九卷第四期，547-573。
5.Agarwal, S., S. Faircloth, C. Liu, and S. G. Rhee, 2009. Why do foreign investors underperform domestic investors in trading activities? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Financial Markets 12, 32-53.
6.Badrinath, S.G., J.R. Kale, and T.H. Noe, 1995. Of shepherds, sheep, and the cross-autocorrelations in equity returns. Review of Financial Studies 8, 401-430.
7.Bae, S., J. H. Min, and S. Jung, 2011. Trading behavior, performance, and stock preference of foreigners, local institutions, and individual investors: evidence from the Korean stock market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 40, 199-239.
8.Barber, B., Y.T. Lee, Y.J. Liu, and T. Odean, 2009. Just how much do individual investors lose by trading. Review of Financial Studies 22, 609-632.
9.Chan, K.C. Louis, N. Jegadeesh, and J. Lakonishok, 1996. Momentum strategies. Journal of Finance 51, 1681-1713.
10.Chen, Y., H. Zhao, 2012. Informed trading, information uncertainty, and price momentum. Journal of Banking and Finance 36, 2095-2109.
11.Choe, H., B. Kho, and R. M. Stulz. 2005. Do domestic investors have an edge? The trading experience of foreign investors in Korea. Review of Financial Studies 18, 795-829.
12.Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer, and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998. Investor psychology and security market over-and under-reactions. Journal of Finance 53, 1839-1885.
13.Daniel, K., D. Hirshleifer, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2001. Overconfidence, arbitrage, and equilibrium asset pricing. Journal of Finance 56, 921-965.
14.Doukas, J., and P. McKnight, 2005. European momentum strategies, information diffusion, and investor conservatism. European Financial Management 11, 313-338.
15.Dvorak, T., 2005. Do domestic investors have an informational advantage? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Finance 60, 817-839.
16.Easley, D., S. Hvidkjaer, and M. O’Hara, 2002. Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? Journal of Finance 57, 2185-2221.
17.Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on bonds and stocks. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-53.
18.George, T., and C.Y. Hwang, 2004. The 52-week high and momentum investing. Journal of Finance 59, 2145-2176.
19.Grinblatt, M., and M. Keloharju, 2000. The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: A study of Finland’s unique data set. Journal of Financial Economics 55, 43-67.
20.Grinblatt, M., S. Titman, and R. Wermers, 1995. Momentum investment strategies, portfolio performance, and herding: A study of mutual fund behavior. American Economic Review 85, 1088-1105.
21.Hameed, A., D. Hong, and M. Warachka, 2008. Momentum and informed trading. Working paper. National University of Singapore and Singapore Management University.
22.Hirshleifer, D., 2001. Investor psychology and asset pricing. Journal of Finance 64, 1533-1597.
23.Hong, H., and J.C. Stein, 1999. A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets. Journal of Finance 54, 2143-2184.
24.Huang, B. N., 2000. Impact of domestic investment companies, registered trading firms and foreign institutional investors on the Taiwan Stock Exchange after the financial market liberalization. Working paper, National Chung-Cheng University.
25.Huang, R.D., C.Y. Shiu, 2009. Local effects of foreign ownership in an emerging financial market: evidence from qualified foreign institutional investors in Taiwan. Financial Management 38, 567-602.
26.Hwang, C.Y., and Q. Xiaolin, 2011. Information risk and momentum anomalies. Working paper, Nanyang Technological University and University of Macau.
27.Jegadeesh, N., and Titman S., 1993. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance 48, 65-91.
28.Kalev, P., A. Nguyen, and N. Oh, 2008. Foreign versus local investors: Who knows more? Who makes more? Journal of Banking and Finance 32, 2376-2389.
29.Moskowitz, T. J., and M. Grinblatt, 1999. Do industries explain momentum? Journal of Finance 54, 1249-1290.
30.Nofsinger, J. R., and R. W. Sias, 1999. Herding and feedback trading by institutional and individual investors. Journal of Finance 54, 2263-2295.
31.Novy-Marx, R., 2012. Is momentum really momentum? Journal of Financial Economics, 429-453.
32.Gong, Q., M. Liu, and Q. Liu, 2011. Is momentum really momentum? International evidence. Working paper, International University of Japan.
33.Sias, R.W., and L.T. Starks, 1997. Return autocorrelation and institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 46, 103-131.
34.Taechapiroontong, N., and P. Suecharoenkit, 2008. Trading performance of individual, institutional, and foreign investors: Evidence from the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Manuscript, College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
35.Verardo, M., 2009. Heterogeneous beliefs and momentum profits. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 44, 795-822.
36.Walther, B., 1997. Investor sophistication and market earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting Research 35, 157-179.
37.Zhang, X.F., 2006. Information uncertainty and stock returns. Journal of Finance 61, 105-137.

指導教授

高櫻芬(Yin-Feng Gau)

審核日期

2013-7-15

推文