讓思考看得見：基於案例式推理學習的心思記錄器

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：32

、訪客IP：3.135.205.24

姓名

蕭力翔(Li-Hsiang Hsiao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

讓思考看得見：基於案例式推理學習的心思記錄器
(Make thinking visible: A Mind Recorder Based on Case-based Reasoning)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

一位國文老師的自白：「以語文教學而言，語言文字的教學可以有方法步驟引導學生學習，但是關於思考深層思維的認知部分，無法在有限的課堂中完全實踐教學理想，礙於時間、礙於學生數眾多，但是思考的教學卻是一種必備且需要的能力，思維的教學需要時間、需要等待，這是否可以透過數位或科技解決呢?」因此本研究想運用資訊科技的技術協助老師們教導思維的教學，另外對於要學習的事物，會有新手與專家之差別，我們試圖去釐清專家與新手思考上的差距與造成專家和新手差距的關鍵能力。我們設計了一套心思記錄器，將老師的心思記錄下來作為典範並輔以教導閱讀理解策略。我們希望學生能藉由閱讀老師的心思記錄進而學習到閱讀理解的關鍵性進展，並以之為典範，碰到類似新問題時能夠連結過去經驗進行推理解決，讓新手可以跨越成為專家的鴻溝躍昇為專家。本研究以HCI(Human Computer Interaction)中的星狀設計循環模型進行系統的設計，我們期望以人的角度去設計，讓系統是容易接近的，容易使用的。
我們實際將原型系統拿入教學現場訪談國高中的國文老師進行系統評估，並在訪談之前請了一位閱讀新手錄製心思記錄，將新手編製的心思記錄交予現場國文老師進行評論。我們將訪談結果整理並進行探討：老師們普遍認為有所謂的閱讀理解關鍵點存在，但要依文章的文體、脈絡、章法、表意來去探詢；老師們對於「讓學生觀看教師的心思想法能夠幫助學生閱讀理解」有著肯定的態度；新手與專家所編輯的心思記錄的差別在於：1閱讀新手會一開始就埋頭苦讀，不先理解文章的架構再進行細部分析，編輯出來的心裡想法會瑣碎繁多。2.閱讀新手心中閱讀策略的概念僅限於記憶流程步驟，鮮少牽涉為何運用該策略，是如何是運用該策略進行推理的；系統要推廣於課堂教學的困難點在於老師們害怕系統取代自己於教學現場的地位。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to help the students learn reading strategies from how an expert reader thinks when he read, and is to assist Chinese teachers in teaching thinking by using information technology. In order to achieve this purpose, we design and build a computer tool “mind recorder “ can share the intellectual work of reader in (1) metacognition, (2) reading strategies, and (3) case based reasoning. We assume case based reasoning is a good approach when one reads a text/book, so that trying to let students to learn reading comprehension strategies by case based learning, and trying to model the mental process when a case based reasoning is used. At the same time, we are trying to record the readers’ reading process and product in their mind so that they can learn by comparing expert mind processing and their own mind processing.
We apply the HCI (Human Computer Interaction) theorem “star model” to design and implement our system. For evaluating the usability of our system and answer these questions: (1) Can a student learn better if we post think process of problem solving? (2) How should we present the thinking process? (3) How experts invoke and use strategies in the thinking process. How a student can learn a strategy by reading the thinking process, we have semi-structured interviews with the middle and high school Chinese teachers. We analyzed interview data and found :(1) Most of the teachers think that student can learn better if we post think process of problem solving (2) The reading comprehension key points of article are exist, but to consider the style of article (3) The difference between novice and expert’s mind processing are: (I) A novice seldom skims through article and seldom tries to find text structure. (II) A novice’s focus is steps of comprehension strategies to follow, not the thinking one does to complete the steps. (III) Mind recorder is difficult to promote in the classroom because teachers are afraid of system to replace their position.

關鍵字(中)

★ 後設認知
★ 閱讀理解策略
★ 案例式推理
★ 心智示範
★ 讓思考看得見

關鍵字(英)

★ Metacognition
★ Reading Comprehension Strategies
★ Case-based Reasoning
★ Mental Modeling
★ Make Thinking Visible

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 研究動機 4
1-3 研究目標 5
1-4 研究假設 6
1-5 研究問題 6
1-6 論文架構 6
二、相關研究理論 8
2-1 後設認知(Metacognition) 8
2-2 閱讀理解策略(Reading Comprehension Strategies) 10
2-3 案例式推理與案例式學習(Case-based Reasoning & Learning)
2-4 讓思考看得見(Make Thinking Visible) 13
2-5 心智示範(Mental Modeling) 18
2-6 小結 20
三、人機互動分析 21
3-1 需求分析 23
3-1-1 Persona 24
3-1-2 Scenario 28
3-2 概念設計 33
3-3 實體設計 36
3-3-1 操作與互動設計 37
3-3-2 表現設計 43
3-4 原型設計 44
四、系統設計與實作 50
4-1 心思記錄系統架構 50
4-2 心思記錄閱讀介面 52
4-2-1 互動按鈕功能與畫面呈現 53
4-2-2 心思記錄畫面呈現 56
4-3 心思記錄編輯介面 58
4-3-1 功能工具列 58
4-3-2 心靈編輯模式 59
4-3-3 事件編輯模式 61
五、系統評估與討論 66
5-1 受訪者背景 66
5-2 訪談目的 66
5-3 訪談問題 67
5-4 訪談流程 68
5-5 訪談結果 69
5-5-1 閱讀與教學 69
5-5-2 系統使用與功能 73
5-5-3 額外的建議與想法 78
5-5-4 專家對於新手的心思記錄看法 80
5-6 討論 81
5-6-1 老師們的閱讀與教學 81
5-6-2 閱讀理解關鍵點 82
5-6-3 心思想法對於閱讀理解的幫助 83
5-6-4 心思記錄器之設計 84
5-6-4-1 心思記錄撥放事件 84
5-6-4-2 功能操作 85
5-6-4-3 當聲音遇上閱讀理解 86
5-6-4-4 樣式、配色與版面配置 86
5-6-4-5 可擴充之功能 87
5-6-5 專家與新手的心思想法比較 87
5-6-6 教學應用情境 89
5-6-6-1 課前、課後自學情境 89
5-6-6-2 課堂中教學情境 89
5-6-6-3 老師的觀摩與互助學習情境 90
5-6-6-4 推廣的問題 90
六、結論與未來研究 91
參考文獻 94
附錄一 97

參考文獻

[1] j. Lerner, Learning Disabilities: Theories, Diagnosis, and Teaching Strategies, 8 ed., Boston,MA: Houghton Mifflin, 2000.
[2] Richek, M., Caldwell, J., Jenning, J., Lerner, J, Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon, 1996.
[3] F. P. Robinson, Effective study, Rev. ed., New York: Harper, 1961.
[4] OECD, PISA 2009 Assessment Framework - Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science, OECD Publishing, 2009.
[5] Ina V.S. Mullis, Michael O. Martin, Ann M. Kennedy, and Pierre Foy, PIRLS 2006 International Report, Chestnut Hill, MA,USA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center,Lynch School of Education, Boston College, 2007.
[6] Ina V.S. Mullis, Michael O. Martin, Pierre Foy, and Kathleen T. Drucker, PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center,Lynch School of Education, Boston College, 2012.
[7] G. D. Borich, Effective teaching methods, 5 ed., Pearson Education, Inc, 2004.
[8] J. H. Flavell, "Metacognitive aspects of problem solving," The nature of intelligence, vol. 12, pp. 231-235, 1976.
[9] R. J. Sternberg, "Inside Intelligence: Cognitive science enables us to go beyond intelligence tests and understand how the human mind solves problems," American scientist, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 137-143, 1986.
[10] J. H. Flavell, "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring," American psychologist, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 906-911, 1979.
[11] Ridley, D.S., Schutz, P.A., Glanz, R.S. & Weinstein, C.E., "Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting," Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 293-306, 1992.
[12] Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P., Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995.
[13] M. A. Barnett, "Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension," The Modern Language Journal, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 150-162, 1988.
[14] Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A., "Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text," The Elementary School Journal, pp. 3-32, 1989.
[15] M. &. H. K. R. Pressley, "What We Really Know about Strategy Instruction," Educational leadership, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 31-34, 1990.
[16] E. Block, "The comprehension strategies of second language readers," Tesol Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 463-494, 1986.
[17] Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Pearson, P. D., "Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction," Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 239-264, 1991.
[18] Y. F. Yang, "Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies?," Reading Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 313-343, 2006.
[19] Salma Mahgoub, Farrukh Nadeem, "Interactive case based learning in teaching decision support systems and business intelligence," in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Interacción Persona-Ordenador 2012, New York, USA, 2012.
[20] K. K. Merseth, The Case for Cases in Teacher Education, One Dupont Circle, Suite 610, Washington, DC 20036-2412: AACTE Publications, 1991.
[21] K. K. Merseth, "Cases for Teacher Decision Making," in Case Methods in Teacher Education, New York, Teachers College Press, 1992, pp. 50-63.
[22] D. B. Leake, "CBR in context: The present and future," in Case-based reasoning: experiences, lessons, and future directions, AAAI Press/MIT Press, 1996, pp. 3-30.
[23] Christopher K. Riesbeck, Roger C. Schank, Inside case-based reasoning, 1 ed., Psychology Press, 1989.
[24] Aamodt Agnar, Enric Plaza, "Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches," AI communications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39-59, 1994.
[25] H. G. S. o. Education, "VISIBLE THINKING," [Online]. Available: http://www.visiblethinkingpz.org/.
[26] H. G. S. o. Education, "PROJECT ZERO," [Online]. Available: http://projectzero.gse.harvard.edu/.
[27] Ritchhart, R., Church, M., Morrison, K., Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners, Jossey-Bass, 2011.
[28] Anderson, L. W., Sosniak, L. A., Bloom’s Taxonomy, National Society for the Study of, 1994.
[29] P. Bell, "Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups," in Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, 1997.
[30] Collins, Allan, John Seely Brown, Ann Holum, "Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible," American Educator, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 38-46, 1991.
[31] Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., Herrmann, B. A., "Modeling mental processes helps poor readers become strategic readers," The Reading Teacher, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 762-767, 1988.
[32] Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., "Why strategy instruction is so difficult and what we need to do about it," Cognitive strategy research, pp. 133-154, 1989.
[33] David Benyon, Phil Turner, Susan Turner, Designing Interactive Systems: People, Activities, Contexts, Technologies, Addison Wesley, 2005.
[34] Dunn, R., Dunn, K., Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach, Prentice Hall College Div, 1978.

指導教授

黃興燦、陳國棟
(Shing-Tsaan Huang、Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2013-7-24

推文