摘要(英) |
Abstract
Tests conducted by the Atomic Energy Council in August 1992 revealed that 1,659 houses in Taiwan are contaminated with radiation. Apart from negatively affecting both the wellbeing and the financial circumstances of residents, these houses may also impact on neighboring houses. This study explored whether radiation-contaminated houses affect the prices of neighboring houses, and if so the extent to which distance from the radioactive house in question affects housing prices. We sourced transaction data from real estate market reports on Taipei City and New Taipei City during 1993-1996. Using geographic information systems (GIS), we calculated the distance of specific houses from radiation-contaminated properties, then employed the hedonic price method to study price differences.
Using the semi-logarithmic linear and nonlinear (Box-Cox) hedonic pricing methods, we developed models for gradient distance intervals and straight-line distance intervals. Houses in Taipei City situated more than 1,000 m from radiation-contaminated homes and houses in New Taipei City located more than 800 m apart were eliminated as samples. The conclusions are as follows:
Although Model 1 (gradient distance interval) in Taipei had comparatively lower goodness of fit (39.67%), all other semi-logarithmic linear models showed model fitness of approximately 60% or higher, indicating relatively high explanatory capacity for housing prices. The Box-Cox transformation coefficient θ was below 1% for empirical results in both Taipei City and New Taipei city, which is statistically significantly different from 0. Therefore, the two types of model both have relatively high explanatory capacity.
The hedonic pricing model for housing produced results that were in line with our expectations. The floor area and type of house, specifically townhouse or villa, were shown to be significantly positively correlated with house price. Houses that had been listed on the market for a considerable length of time and properties in apartment complexes were shown to fetch lower prices. All other independent housing variables have a significant influence on house price.
Based on studying houses in Taipei City and New Taipei City situated less than 10 m from radiation-contaminated houses, a positive relationship was demonstrated between increased distance from the radioactive property and housing price, indicating higher marginal price. Model 1 shows that the marginal price calculated by the non-linear (Box-Cox) model is relatively lower, while in Model 2 the marginal price of the non-linear (Box-Cox) model is lower than that of the semi-logarithmic linear model. Once distance was increased to 600-800 m, however, the influence of radiation-contaminated homes on real estate prices was gradually reduced. |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
一、 中文部分
1、王玉麟(1996),《揭露輻射汙染大弊案》,輻射汙染白皮書,國家圖書館出版。
2、王蓉君、張武修、王榮德(1999),《游離輻射暴露對孩童成長影響之探討》,國立陽明大學環境與職業衛生研究所。
3、王恭棋(2006),《房價指數模型建構之研究—以桃竹地區市鎮交易資料為例》,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
4、王俊仁(2008),《特徵價格在住宅價格之應用探討》,國立台灣科技大學營建工程系碩士論文。
5、王潔敏(2009),《大眾運輸系統對房地產價格之影響研究-以高雄大都會區為例》,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
6、 吳錫政(1995),《台北都會區空氣污染之價格估算-特徵價格法之應用-》,國立中興大學資源管理研究所碩士論文。
7、 吳秋霞(2007),《以特徵價格法探討航空噪音對於大園鄉房地產之影響》,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所在職專班碩士論文。
8、李慧珍(2007),《輻射污染建築物健檢居民生活品質之研究》,國立陽明
大學公共衛生研究所。
9、何俊男(2008),《行動電話基地台對於住宅價格影響之研究》,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
10、林婉瑜(2011),《變電所對於住宅價格之影響-以台中市南區為例》,國立中興大學都市應用經濟所碩士論文。
11、柯乃芸 (1999),《輻射屋居民長期健康照護之資料評估》,私立淡江大學數學系碩士論文。
12、姜堯民(2001),《不動產投資理論與實務》,新陸書局股份有限公司。
13、胡志平(2005),《新竹科學園區設置之環境風險認知分析與價值評估》,建築與規劃學報第一期第六卷,p63~80。
14、翁淑貞(1992),《台北都會區空氣污染對住宅價格影響之研究-應用特徵價格法》,國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
15、張金鶚(1997),《房地產投資與決策分析理論與實務》,華泰書局p56~59及p423~566。
16、畢恆達、郭一勤(1999),《科技神話的夢魘:民生別墅住宅輻射災害的社會心理衝擊》,臺灣社會研究35期,p203~254。
17、許雅慧(2003),《長期低劑量率游離輻射暴露對水晶體混濁度影響之研究》,國立陽明大學環境與職業衛生研究所。
18、曾明遜(1992),《不寧適設施對於住宅價格影響之研究-以垃圾處理場為個案》,國立中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
19、邱志宏(2002),《工程小叢書-核子工程系列 輻射防護》,財團法人中興工程科技研究發展基金會。
20、彭宴玲(2005),《台北市綠地效益之評價﹘特徵價格法之應用》,中國文化大學景觀學系碩士論文。
21、楊易達(2007), 《長期低劑量率游離輻射暴露人群健康風險追蹤調查研究》, 國立陽明大學環境衛生研究所。
22、楊宗憲和蘇倖慧(2011),《迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究》,住宅學報20卷 2期。
23、劉紹興、張俊彥、李俊賢、江淑娥、楊雅婷、周澤志、劉婉燕(2011),《輻射屋居民流行病學調查及研究》,行政院原子能委員會之委託研究計劃期末報告,國家衛生研究院環境衛生與職業醫學研究組。
24、陳相如(2005),《都市林特徵價格之研究-以台南市東區為例》,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
25、謝宗佑(2003),《汐止水患災害評估-特徵資產價格法之應用》,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
26、鄭景育(2009),《房地產政策與地價關聯性之研究-桃園縣為例》,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
二、 英文部分
1、Adelman, I. and Griliches, Z. (1961), “On an Index of Quality Change , ”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(295):535-548.
2、Bolitzer ,B. and Netusil, N. R.(2000), “The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon, ” Journal of Environmental Management ,59(3):185–193.
3、Deaton ,B.J. and Hoehn, J.P. (2004), “Hedonic analysis of hazardous waste sites in the presence of other urban disamenities,” Environmental Science & Policy, 7(6): 499–508.
4、Espey , M. and Lopez, H.(2000), “The Impact of Airport Noise and Proximity on Residential Property Values,” Gatton College of Business and Economics ,Growth and Change, 31(3): 408-419.
5 Eshet T., Baron MG., Shechter M., Ayalon O. (2007), “Measuring externalities of waste transfer stations in Israel using hedonic pricing, “Waste Management ,27(5): 614–625.
6、Kong F. ,Yin H. ,and Nakagoshi N. (2007), “Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: A case study in Jinan City, China, “Landscape and Urban Planning,79(3-4): 240–252.
7、Lancaster, Kelin J.(1996), “A New Approach to Consumer Theory, “Journal of Political Economy,74(2): 132–157.
8、Morita H.(2012), “A Hedonic Approach to Radiation Contamination Damages,” Gender Equality and Multicultural Conviviality Journal,6:26-36.
9、Nelson J.P. (1981), “Three Mile Island and Residential Property Values: Empirical Analysis and Policy Implications,” Land Economics,57(3): 363-372.
10、O’Sullivan, A.(2003), “Urban economics,5th edition, ” international edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin,433-435.
11、Rosen, S.,(1974), ”Hedonic price and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition, ” Journal of Political Economy,82(1):34-55.
12、Sander H.A. and Polasky S.(2009), “The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA,” Land Use Policy ,26(3) :837–845.
13、Waugh F.V.(1928),” Quality Factors Influencing Vegetable Prices,” Journal of Agricultural Economics,10(2): 185-196.
14、Winstrand J.(2007), “Hedonic Valuation of Health Risks Due to Residential Radon,” Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University
15、Yamane F., Ohgaki H., and Asano K. (2011), “Nuclear Power-Related Facilities and Neighboring Land Price: A Case Study on the Mutsu-Ogawara Region, Japan, ”Risk Analysis, 31(12):1969-94 |