摘要(英) |
Over the past 10 years , the IC Design industry in Taiwan was quickly blooming because of the growth of consumer products .According to the MIC’s research , the total production value has became USD14.5 Billion in 2012 which is 7% YOY(Year-On-Year growth rate) than the year of 2011(USD 13.5 Billion).In order to keep their own market position, the market strategy are to develop the new market and to protetct their own market to avoid the attack from the new market player. The best way to protect their own profit is to use the advanced technology to build the high entry barriers, and to increase the market to enjoy the monopoly profit and increase the company’s market value. The objective of this study is to use the different variables ,like RD expense, Stock of RD expense , weight average patents(WAP) ,market share , and other variables to study the determinants can increase the company’s market value and how is the impact of this variable..
The empirical results show the RD expenses and RD stock have the positive influence on the market value and the RD expense which measured by stock point of view also have positive influence on the market value.But the variable WAP(weight average patents) has negative influence on the market value. Other variables , growth and profit rate, also have positive influence with the 1% of significant level,but market share have different results under the different model . |
參考文獻 |
參考文獻
一、英文文獻
(1). Philipp G. Sandnerc, , Joern Blocka, (2011),“ The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks”, Research Policy 40,969-985
(2). BH Hall, A Jaffe, M Trajtenberg(2005).“ Market value and patent citations”, RAND Journal of Economics 36,16-38
(3). BH Hall, AB Jaffe, M Trajtenberg(2000).“Market value and patent citations: A first look.”NBER Working Papers 7741
(4). Zvi Griliches, Bronwyn H. Hall, Ariel Pakes(1991).”R&D, Patents, and Market Value Revisited: Is There A Second (Technological Opportunity) Factor? “Economics of Innovation and New Technology,Volume 1, 183-201
(5). Hall, Bronwyn H., Oriani, R(2006).” Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy.”
(6). Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt.( 1994.) A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74.
(7). Cockburn, I. And Z. Griliches (1988), Industry Effectsand Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D and Patents, American Economic Review, 78, 419-423.
(8). Griliches, Z. (1981). Market Value, R&D, and Patents,Economics Letters, 7, 183-187.
(9). Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661-1707.
(10). Hall, B. (1993), The Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980’s, AmerICanEconomIC Review, 83, 259-264.
(11). Jose, M. L., L. M. NIChols, and J. L. Stevens. 1986. Contributions of diversifICation,promotion, and R&D to value of multiproduct firms: A tobin’s q approach.Financial Management (Winter): 33-42.
(12). Megna, P., and M. Klock. (1993). The impact of intangible capital on Tobin’s q in thesemIConductor industry. AEA Papers and Proceedings 83 (May): 265-269.
(13). Tobin, J., and W. Brainard. 1968. Pitfalls in financial model building. American Economic Review 58 (May): 99-122.
(14). Wernerfelt, B., and C. A. Montgomery. 1988. Tobin’s q and the importance of focus infirm performance. The American Economic Review 78 (March): 246-50.
(15). Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch,1987 INNOVATION, MARKET STRUCTURE, AND FIRM SIZE.The Review of Economics and Statistics
(16). Chih-Hai Yang,Jong-Rong Chen(2003).” Innovation and Market Value in Newly-Industrialized Countries:The Case of Taiwanese Electronics Firms” Asia Economic Journal,Vol.17 No2,P205-220
(17). Hall, B., Z. Griliches and J.A. Hausman (1986),Patents and R&D: Is There a Lag?,International Economic Review, 27, 65-83.
(18). Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, NY: Harper.
77.Shin, H. and Stulz R. (1998), Are Internal Capital Market Efficient?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 531-552.
二、中文文獻
(1). 陳正倉,林惠玲,陳忠榮,莊春發,產業經濟學, 二版,雙葉書廊,2007年
(2). 台灣類比半導體發展趨勢,拓璞產業研究所,2010年
(3). 蔡明介,競爭力的探求,財信出版,2008年
(4). IC設計產業版圖,財訊出版社,2007年
(5). 黃台心,計量經濟學,2版,新陸書局,2009年
(6). 楊志海,「創新環境、專利品質與專利價值」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,民國88年
(7). 楊志海、陳忠榮,「研究發展、技術引進與專利‐一般動差法於可數追蹤資料的應用」,經濟論文叢刊,29(1),頁69-87,2001年。
(8). 陳忠榮,「研究發展、專利與市場價值-Tobin’s Q理論的運用」,手稿,頁1-20,2000年。
(9). 楊志海、陳忠榮,「專利保護與專利價值-專利維護費的實證分析」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫,民國91年。
(10). 劉正田,「研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價」,會計評論,第33期,頁1-26, 2001年7月
(11). 林炯壵,「半強勢效率市場檢定之實證方法」,管理評論,第45頁至68頁,民國77年7月。
(12). 黃政仁、陳淑雲,「研發投資與企業績效之非線性關性-以台灣電子業為例」,東海管理評論,第35頁至74頁,民國99年。
(13). 姜義軒,「台灣電子產業與非電子產業Tobin’s Q值之差異及其成因之研究」,交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,2000年。
(14). 黃則智,「專利,研發支出與廠商市值—半導體産業之實證研究」,國立台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,2002年。
(15). 陳政宇,「Tobin’s Q對製造業廠商投資率的影響---以台灣上市公司為例」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文,民國94年。
(16). 劉峻豪,「經濟附加價值對市場附加價值及股票價格之關聯性研究-以IC 設計產業為例」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文,民國97年。
(17). 莊育勳,「公司多角化,R&D 與Tobin’s Q」,東海大學經濟系碩士班碩士論文,民國99年。
(18). 楊志海,「技術來源、創新與生產力」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所博士論文,1999年。
(19). 張惠真,「廠商研發能力對績效影響之研究」,台北大學企業管理學系博士論文,民國95年。
(20). 陳奐伃,「創新活動與市場價值-以台灣及南韓電子產業為例」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文,民國99年。
(21). 張晉誠,「IC設計公司研究發展活動與經營績效之關聯性研究」,東吳大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,民國95年。
(22). 江芳儀,「參進型態與創新活動―台灣電子業的實證研究」,淡江大學產業經濟學系碩士論文,民國94年。
(23). 產業情報研究所(MIC):2011全球資訊電子產業發展十大趨勢
(24). 專利資料來源:中華民國專利資訊檢索系統
取自:http://twpat1.tipo.gov.tw/tipotwoc/
(25). IEK:台灣IC設計產業Q3產值估季成長10%
取自:http://news.cnyes.com/Content/20130816/KH9OJ2X3Z2G0Y.shtml
(26). 顧馨文:全球暨台灣IC 設計產業回顧與展望
取自:www.nspark.org.tw/webfiles/files/Analysis_20120316_1(1).pdf |