博碩士論文 104429003 完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位 語言
DC.contributor經濟學系zh_TW
DC.creator吳易修zh_TW
DC.creatorYi-Shiou Wuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-7-31T07:39:07Z
dc.date.available2017-7-31T07:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=104429003
dc.contributor.department經濟學系zh_TW
DC.description國立中央大學zh_TW
DC.descriptionNational Central Universityen_US
dc.description.abstract摘要 台灣目前主要生產能源的燃料是煤炭及天然氣,而在發電的過程中汙染物的排放主要是經由煙囪排放散佈至環境中,廢氣的成分除了氣體也包含懸浮顆粒(particulate matter, PM),人體吸入直徑10微米以下的懸浮顆粒後將積聚在支氣管或肺泡中,無法經由身體循環的自然地排出體外,若人體長時間的暴露在細懸浮顆粒濃度高的環境之中,將對身體產生不可逆的後果。 本研究係根據歐盟研究能源外部性的組織Extern E的方法”影響路徑分析"(Impact Pathway Approach,IPA),計算本國兩種不同燃料的發電廠來量化能源生產過程中會產生的外部性,包含了健康成本及清潔成本,並配合環保署在102發布的空氣汙染排放清冊,試圖把各縣市污染物造成的健康及清潔成本做責任歸屬,使得能源外部性之估計更為精確。 本研究結果發現,雖然協助金的總金額已足夠彌補其排放之汙染物對所影響區域造成的人體健康影響,但協助金的發放對象必須根據其排放之汙染物對不同區域的濃度增量,做比例配額的發放。平均而言燃煤發電必須發放的補償金是燃氣發電的70倍,立足於在政府的角度而言,雖然燃氣發電成本相較燃煤發電成本高,但燃氣發電是對人體及環境都是較好的選擇。雖然汙染物的濃度歷年來呈下降的趨勢,但污染物是積年累月的對人體造成傷害,故空氣汙染歷年皆有改善,但補償金不一定要隨之減少。然而站在公司治理的角度,可根據本研究的方法將健康成本納入每度電的成本,再而衡量其成本。雖然本研究的結果仍受到許多資料的限制而產生些許偏誤,但仍提供一個具體的方法衡量台灣能源生產過程中所產生的外部性,並期許受汙染者能夠得到適當的補償。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract ABSTRACT The main material of producing energy is coal and liquid gas in Taiwan. During the process of generating electricity, however, pollutions are discharged into the environment via chimneys. The main ingredient of pollution is particulate matter, PM, can’t be naturally excreted. It will have serious impact to human body, not to mention exposure to such an environment in long-term. This study is based on the Extern E’s approach, which is European organization, “Impact pathway approach, IPA” to calculate two different kind of fuels for power plants. It can be quantify the externalities that will be generated during energy production. It could be distinguished the responsibility of pollution more accurately by TEDS. The results of this study have found that although the total amount of compensation fee is sufficient to cover the human health impact of the pollutants. But the object of payment must be issued according to the emissions of pollutants in different regions of the concentration increase. On average, the compensation for coal-fired power generation is 70 times that of gas-fired power generation. Based on the social planner, gas-fired power is a better choice, although the cost wold be more expensive. Although the concentration of pollutants over the years showed a downward trend the pollutants harmed the human body over the decades. However, at the point of corporate, health costs should be included in the cost of electricity per unit of electricity, and the cost is measured.en_US
DC.subject補償金zh_TW
DC.subject能源外部性zh_TW
DC.subject健康成本zh_TW
DC.subject火力發電廠zh_TW
DC.subjectcompensationsen_US
DC.subjectenergy externalityen_US
DC.subjecthealth costen_US
DC.subjectpower planten_US
DC.title火力發電廠周邊居民健康成本的推估與補償機制研究zh_TW
dc.language.isozh-TWzh-TW
DC.type博碩士論文zh_TW
DC.typethesisen_US
DC.publisherNational Central Universityen_US

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明