| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, insider trading has been extensive discussion in the community. Insider trading seemed to frequently appear in the news. But in fact, insider trading really appears so frequently? And whether the punishment of insider trading had deterrence or not? In this article, I will use Empirical Method of Studies to realize some factor of insider trading, like change of quantity, the severity of sentencing, discuss requisite elements, etc., contrasting with the theories, discussing insider trading regulate images and prospecting future. In this paper, I used Empirical Method of Studies, committed to dialogue with the law and doctrine, put forward hypotheses and tested. After the study, it was found that regulate of the Insider Trading were hard to be demonstrated in court, and the legal did not have any significant effect on the effect. Besides, the most controversial issues considered in the doctrine were not considered as substantive judgments Influential. All kinds of phenomena show that we think the insider trading is different from the actual insider trading status. Using the above results, we look forward to a more accurate view of the insider trading and some impact on the aftermath of the insider trading. | en_US |