| DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
| DC.contributor | 法律與政府研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | 許雅晶 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | YA-CHIN HSU | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-8-11T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-8-11T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=106724014 | |
| dc.contributor.department | 法律與政府研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | 現行海上運送人簽發之載貨證券絕大部分有管轄權條款之記載，而在當今海運糾紛之複雜狀況下，載貨證券上記載之管轄權條款效力為何，是否具有絕對拘束託運人、受貨人及運送人之效力？是否具有排除訴訟法院管轄權之效力？有加以研究之必要。本文共計五章。分別從實務及學理層次探究國際海上貨物運送裁判管轄權。第一章緒論提出本文之研究背景、問題意識及研究方法及範圍，為本文所要探討之議題拉開序幕。第二章整理各國對國際海上貨物運送裁判管轄之規範及其歷史發展。第三章則整理各個重要國家對國際管轄權之制度規範。第四章檢視我國近年來，法院實務判決之於國際管轄權的幾項原則，及其趨勢轉換，並試圖從既有的判決檢討現行制度操作上的爭議。第五章結論及建議強調透過對國際海上貨物運送裁判管轄之各種觀點探討，及與我國制度之比較，提出個人意見，期有助於瞭解現行制度面臨的問題，作為我國法制之修正之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In light of the complex circumstances from which disputes regarding the carriage of goods by sea arise from, it is necessary to examine and assess the validity of the jurisdiction clause contained in bills of lading issued by carriers, that is, whether the jurisdiction clause absolutely binds the Shipper, Consignee and the Carrier and whether the clause has the effect of excluding the operation of the domestic law on jurisdiction in the country hearing the case. This paper contains five chapters. It examines and analyses the law on adjudicative jurisdiction in relation to the international carriage of goods by sea. The first chapter sets out the background, the issue to be discussed, and the methodology adopted in examining and analyzing the issue. The second chapter traces the emergence of the Rotterdam Rules and analyzes the relevant Articles governing jurisdictional clauses contained in international carriage of goods by sea contracts. The third chapter examines the law on international adjudicative jurisdiction in Anglo-American law and in civil law countries, namely, France, China, Germany, and Japan, and analyzes the underlying principles of the law in the different countries while comparing them with legal and political theories on international adjudicative jurisdiction. The fourth chapter examines the principles underlying recent judgments on international adjudicative jurisdiction in the Republic of China and analyzes the change in trends to point out contentions in the practical implication of the current law. The fifth chapter concludes and provides insights to further the understanding of the challenges the Republic of China legal system faces on the issue of international adjudicative jurisdiction with the hope to facilitate conversations to improve the system. | en_US |
| DC.subject | 載貨證券、國際裁判管轄權、海商法第78條、鹿特丹規則、漢堡規則 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | Bill of Lading, International Adjudicative Jurisdiction, s. 78 Maritime Act, Rotterdam Rules, Hamburg Rules. | en_US |
| DC.title | 國際海上貨物運送裁判管轄權之研究 —以載貨證券記載之管轄條款為中心 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
| DC.title | Research on International Carriage of Good Jurisdictional Issue - Focusing on the Jurisdiction Clauses shown on Bill of Lading | en_US |
| DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| DC.type | thesis | en_US |
| DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |