| dc.description.abstract | The 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction is an agrarian reform policy that implemented on April 14, 1949, and ＂ The 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction Act ＂ were promulgated on June 7, 1951. The policy objective is improving the cultivated land of uncertain lease term, high rent, arbitrary recovery of cultivated land, etc. It stipulates that landowners shall not charge rents exceeding the total annual harvest of the main crop products by 37.5%. The 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction in addition to protecting the rights of lease farmers, it also establishes a good foundation for the follow-up agrarian reform policies.
However, with the evolution of time and changes in the environment, the 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction has been implemented for 70 years, but its legal source basis, ＂ The 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction Act ＂, only after three amendments, of which in response to the time changes, loosening the termination of contract in 1983, the rest were dispute handling procedures, or administrative organizations, professional functions of adjustment.
In order to explore the reasons why the 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction was unchanged, this study use the research structure of Advocacy Coalition Framework by P. A. Sabatier and H. C. Jenkins-Smith, find the policy ideal of landlords and lease farmers in the 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction. What resources are available and what strategies are used to influence policy direction? How the policy brokers, relatively stable parameters, and external events affect policy changes? Therefore, this study uses the literature analysis method to summarize the various changes of the Advocacy Coalition Framework, and then interview with the research object by in-depth interview method, so as to correct the deviation of the literature analysis, and find out the reasons for the policy unchanged.
Through the literature analysis and in-depth interview obtained research data, the results of this study found that: the 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction is sustainable and unchanged or repaired, the reasons are that administrative agency attitude negative, conservative, and legislators consider political as a revision of the law. Namely, the administrative agency with the power to adjust policy do not face up to the policy issue of the 37.5% Arable Rent Reduction, and the legislators with legislative power do not take a properly point as the basis for amending the law. In addition, this study also proposes possible future research direction, it is hoped that this study can provide the basis for follow-up related research. | en_US |