| dc.description.abstract | The corporate social sustainability report has been the focus of attention of leaders of various countries, capital management markets, supply and demand chains and related international organizations in recent years. To promote the development of a sustainable environment, ＂Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)＂ is not a new and unfamiliar concept. After the ＂GRI Sustainability Report＂ was jointly established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and until 2000, the United Nations issued the ＂First Generation GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines＂ and incorporated the guidelines into the Global Covenant. The general agreement among business organizations has effectively led to the promotion of social responsibility, and more large multinational enterprises have begun to pay attention to and implement it, promoting the development of social responsibility by leaps and bounds. So far, it has become a common trend for companies to disclose information through annual reports or through web pages. While supervising the development of the commercial market economy, they must promise to abide by the ethics of social responsibility. Stakeholders should undertake different responsibilities. While creating economic profits and being responsible to capital shareholders, we should not forget to take into account the quality of life of other stakeholders, including employees, the community and the social environment. Take the technology industry as an example. In recent years, globalization has led to rapid changes in the digital transformation of the industry, and the CSR and ESG waves have also been hotly debated with the attention of the society. The sudden and rampant epidemic has further reminded enterprises that immediate change is imperative. Therefore, it is very important for companies to disclose information in their sustainability reports. This research intends to analyze Taiwan′s technology industry-T case technology company′s corporate social responsibility reports over the year, and set its information as a sample for discussion. The extent to which the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) normative guidelines are followed. In view of the technology industry′s commitment to the social environment and its determination to implement sustainable development, through the research results, it is hoped that companies that have not yet promoted can be provided as a reference for selecting norms when evaluating future sustainability reports in advance. Help organizations respond to corporate responsibility-related issues, effectively identify disclosure topics, and properly express responses to relevant issues, improve readable information for stakeholders, and achieve a more complete compilation.
Since 2013, the company has voluntarily compiled it in accordance with the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), serving as an important channel for communicating non-financial information to review and improve sustainability performance. Subsequent reports published in succession have expanded to various aspects of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility and the period of standard promotion, and the numbers may vary over the years. This research mainly quantifies the amount of the company′s disclosure projects through the discussion of various aspects of the corporate sustainability reports over the years, showing the sincerity of the response is remarkable. The results of the case study of this study are summarized as follows. The analysis results show that enterprises voluntarily issue their own products with good corporate citizenship. However, under the influence of indirect business impacts such as industry acceptance, policy feasibility and environmental effectiveness, it is obvious that over the years, according to Although the sustainability report has been issued in multiple editions over the years, it has not been committed to its evolution due to the annual promotion. The similarity has been high over the years. The corporate value in the report has obviously not been fully demonstrated. The performance of corporate social responsibility implementation has limitations.
The conclusion of this study is that the implementation of ＂social responsibility＂ by enterprises can indeed improve the business performance of enterprises. On the one hand, they comply with the regulations of government agencies. performance, and take the initiative to show relevant indicators to the public′s attention. Society′s measurement of enterprises is no longer limited to operations. remuneration. In order to improve the accessibility, transparency, timeliness, completeness and interactivity of information, we will collect feedback from all walks of life and continuously improve the content and presentation of the report. It can provide substantial contribution, participation feedback and social commitment to the society, and is committed to corporate social responsibility to help improve the corporate image, and create invaluable praise in social recognition. | en_US |