| dc.description.abstract | Criminal methods are in a constant state of change and evolution due to the exponential growth of technology. In an effort to combat crime more effectively, numerous technological surveillance methods, including Global Positioning System(GPS), Cloud Search, Source Telecommunications Surveillance, Drone and Cell-Site simulators(M-car), have come to light since the development of the internet and mobile communication. However, the legal regulation in Taiwan currently imposes significant restrictions on the methods of surveillance that are considered permissible. The legality of the surveillance methods utilized by government agencies may be questionable, and operations ostensibly justified by technological advancements have been subject to considerable criticism. The media has lavished praise on the utilization of M-car, the most accurate monitoring and locating device presently implemented by law enforcement agencies in Taiwan, for its effectiveness in solving crimes. The implementation of this technology in criminal investigations has produced prompt outcomes, however, it also poses a dual-edged situation. The matters at hand comprise, at first, interference upon fundamental rights and, secondly, the delicate balance between safeguarding the public interest in national surveillance and ensuring the efficacy of criminal investigations. Hence, achieving a harmonious balance between allowing law enforcement agencies to utilize M-car tracking technology for criminal investigations grounded in a solid legal foundation and in accordance with appropriate legal procedures, and safeguarding the fundamental rights of the populace in accordance with the intent of Article 23 of the Constitution, is of the utmost importance. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to persuade the legislature of Taiwan to expeditiously implement regulations, thereby safeguarding the fundamental principles of the rule of law in Taiwan. | en_US |