| DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
| DC.contributor | 法律與政府研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | 王書倩 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | Shu-Chien Wang | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-7-28T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-7-28T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=110754020 | |
| dc.contributor.department | 法律與政府研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | 我國公務人員權利救濟範圍隨著釋憲的實踐逐漸擴張，至釋字第785號解釋揭示「有權利，即有救濟」之憲法原則，指明憲法訴訟權保障並不因公務人員身分而不同，且不限制申訴、再申訴後續提起行政訴訟。惟其修正雖突破「特別權力關係」的桎梏，但現行公務人員保障法制以「行政處分」作為復審之程序標的，與申訴、再申訴形成雙軌救濟途徑。在合憲性解釋下，對於具體個案能否合理有效處理，以保障訴訟基本權，恐仍有其限制，至解釋文有關「顯然輕微之干預」之判斷基準，則有待行政法院判例積累予以建立原則性之標準，以為妥適。
為建立完善無缺漏之權利保障，應由行政法院直接定性行政處分，另以日本、德國及美國公務人員救濟制度建議修正我國救濟制度走向單軌制，並應強化正當程序原則之適用，以及擴大調處制度之運用，並配合行政訴訟法增訂之調解與濫訴機制，以提供及時有效的權利救濟。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The scope of remedies for civil servants in our country has gradually expanded with the practice of constitutional interpretation. The interpretation revealed in Constitutional Interpretation No. 785 establishes the constitutional principle that ＂where there is a right, there is a remedy,＂ indicating that the constitutional litigation right is protected regardless of the status of being a civil servant, and it does not restrict the subsequent filing of administrative litigation after filing an appeal or a second appeal. However, although its amendment breaks through the constraints of the ＂special power relationship,＂ the current legal framework for protecting civil servants utilizes ＂administrative sanctions＂ as the target of administrative review, creating a dual-track remedy approach with appeals and second appeals. Under the interpretation of constitutionality, there may still be limitations on whether specific cases can be reasonably and effectively handled to safeguard the fundamental right to litigation. The establishment of principles regarding the criteria for determining ＂obviously minor interference＂ as stated in the interpretation document should be developed through the accumulation of administrative court precedents to ensure appropriateness.
In order to establish a perfect protection of rights, the administrative court should directly determine the administrative punishment. In addition, it is recommended to revise the relief system of our country to a single-track system based on the relief system of public servants in Japan, Germany, and the United States. The application of the principle of due process should be strengthened, and mediation should be expanded. The application of the system, and cooperate with the new mediation and abuse mechanism of the Administrative Litigation Law, in order to provide timely and effective rights relief. | en_US |
| DC.subject | 行政處分 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 管理措施 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 救濟制度 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 顯然輕微 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | Administrative sanctions | en_US |
| DC.subject | management measures | en_US |
| DC.subject | relief system | en_US |
| DC.subject | obviously minor | en_US |
| DC.title | 我國公務人員權利救濟制度之研究―釋字第785號解釋後法制之發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
| DC.title | Research on the Relief System of Civil Servants′ Rights in my country―Development of the Legal System after Interpretation No. 785 of Interpretation | en_US |
| DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| DC.type | thesis | en_US |
| DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |