| dc.description.abstract | The category of military construction disputes are affected by types of built facilities or demands of armament duties. In this research, a survey was conducted on military engineers via questionnaires. It was found that the construction disputes were mainly resulted from terms of contracts, calculations of project duration, quantities of bidding documents, quality of project, design drawings and specifications, and change orders.These disputes were often found in the construction of Chung-Cheng Halls,recreation centers, land and drainage works, gunpowder containers,landscaping projects, and fortification works.
This research studied processes of dispute resolution for military construction projects. Advantages and disadvantages of conciliation,
arbitration, and litigation were also investigated, along with functions of lawyers in the dispute resolution processes. It was concluded that the key issues in winning a case lie in finding of weakness of the opponents,
gathering and analysis of evidence, and presentation skills. In the future,
military construction related personnel should work on (1) improving basic engineering knowledge, understanding organizational behaviors and working environments, and (2) reinforcing professional knowledge about regulations and laws, engineering design, construction practice, and site management.
Three previous dispute cases were also studied in the research. The above findings were proven to be effective if they had been adequately
executed. It is anticipated that findings of this research be helpful to personnel who are related to disputes of military construction. | en_US |