DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
DC.contributor | 中國文學系 | zh_TW |
DC.creator | 黃昱章 | zh_TW |
DC.creator | Yu-jhang Huang | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-1-23T07:39:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-1-23T07:39:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=92121007 | |
dc.contributor.department | 中國文學系 | zh_TW |
DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | 宋代老子學受到當代學術背景的帶動,對於「心性問題」等課題有諸多著墨,此一特點使宋代老子學在中國老學史中,成為魏晉、唐代以外最重要的一個朝代;另一方面,在《老子》諸多注家中,因「御注派」的注家們的統治者身份,與其他注家相比之下較為特殊,故其注書動機引起筆者的好奇與注意。職是之故,本論文以宋徽宗所撰寫之《御解道德真經》作為研究對象,擬就探析其如何接受《老子》文本、如何與《老子》思想互動而提出詮解,而此詮解之方式與內容,是否因注者的「統治者」身份,對《老子》思想有所創發,抑或僅是沿襲舊說。諸此種種為本論文研究動機與目的。
由於《御解道德真經》的原本已經失傳,故初步工作乃就《道藏》本《宋徽宗御解道德真經》、章安《宋徽宗道德真經解義》、江澂《道德真經疏義》與彭耜《道德真經集注》四書所保留的徽宗《御注》內容進行互勘點校,再就點校結果(如附錄)重複研讀、歸納分析之後,而逐步形成本論文之章節架構。本論文共分五章,首尾二章分為「緒論」與「結論」,主體部分區分為兩層次:一者針對徽宗《御注》注《老》動機及其體例與詮釋方式等外緣問題,作成檢索資料,而寫成第二章〈徽宗《御注》外緣問題之考察〉;一者則為徽宗《御注》內在義理架構的解析,從微觀角度探究徽宗《御注》對《老子》「道」、「德」之概念的理解,以及其從老子思想所推衍而出的「聖人形象」、「治身論」、「治國論」等議題,分別撰寫為第三章及第四章,期能接續前人所奠立之基礎,為徽宗《御注》勾勒出思想架構。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Studies of Lao-tzu’s Philosophy in Song Dynasty emphasize “the inward cultivation” which makes Song become one of the most significant dynasties studying Lao-tzu’s Philosophy as well as Wei-jin and Tang. Among those interpreters on Lao-tzu’s philosophy, the imperial interpreters are more special because of their status as an emperor. Therefore I am particularly interested in the imperial interpreters’ motives to interpret Tao Te Ching.
This essay aims at Emperor Hui-tsung‘s Interpretation Of Tao Te Ching and discusses if Hui-tsung’s methods and content correspond to the original ideas of Lao-tzu or the interpreter himself innovates something else because of his own status.
However, the complete version of Emperor Song Hui-tsung‘s interpretation has been failed to hand down from the past generations. Therefore, my first step to work is to collect and compare four books which used to quote Hui-tsung‘s interpretation to rehabilitate his fully ideas. Through repeatedly reading up, generalizing and analyzing the resources, this essay has been carried out.
The content of this essay is as following—First, I investigate Emperor Song Hui-tsung‘s motives, the format of writing and the interpreting methods used. Second, I analyze the framework of the interpretation and Hui-tsung‘s comprehension of the concept “Tao” and ”Te” in Lao-tzu. And next, I discuss how Hui-tsung replies to “the figure of a saint”, “life theory” and “political theory” developed from the philosophy of Lao-tzu.
Hopefully by following the predecessors’ research accomplishments, this essay integrates and outlines Hui-tsung’s opinions about Tao Te Ching. | en_US |
DC.subject | 老子 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 道 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 宋徽宗 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 宋代老子學 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 德 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 治國論 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 治身論 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 聖人形象 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | political theory | en_US |
DC.subject | Lao-tzu | en_US |
DC.subject | Song Hui-tsung | en_US |
DC.subject | Studies of Lao-tzu’s Philosophy in Song Dynasty | en_US |
DC.subject | Te | en_US |
DC.subject | the figure of a saint | en_US |
DC.subject | Tao | en_US |
DC.subject | life theory | en_US |
DC.title | 宋徽宗《御解道德真經》之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
DC.title | A Study in Emperor Song Hui-tsung‘s Interpretation Of Tao Te Ching | en_US |
DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
DC.type | thesis | en_US |
DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |