dc.description.abstract | Facing the challenge of global tough environment is a big trouble to business all over the world. How to take action and try best for cost down plan has been a trend for business to survive. This research defines “Organization Downsizing” as an action to reduce manpower and this way has become the favorite action of business. Even Japan, which was famous for insisting on hiring employees till retirement, has also put it into practice. It also caused great damage to Hsinchu Science Park definitely.
Most documents about the research of survivors’ reaction after layoff operation are focus at working related topic and the results are negative impact always. However, Cascio (1993) also found there have been increases in productivity in half the companies. Based on the international business research of Judge (1999), the factors about personality and working attitude will influence managers’ reaction when organization changes. Dubrin (1992) pointed out that response is an internal and external reaction from people through dealing process of some inner factors and comes from stimulation outside. This research takes “Organization Downsizing” as an external force which has great influence. It’s in order to study the relationship among survivors’ surviving strategy at the field of their job, family, friendship and staying alone when they have different types risk perception of Organization Downsizing.
This research is based on survivors in Hsinchu Science Park and studies their surviving strategy. And there are a significant relationship between survivors’ surviving strategy and different types risk perception of Organization Downsizing. Moreover, personality and the stress of work will interfere the survivors’ strategy selecting. It’s also echo to Judge’s research.
The results are as follows:
1. There is a significant relationship between different types of Organization Downsizing perception and survivors’ surviving strategy.
2. Quantity Load of job will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s working strategy selecting.
3. Quantity Load of job will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s family life strategy selecting.
4. Quality Load of job will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s working strategy selecting.
5. Quality Load of job will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
6. Positive Self-concept will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s family life strategy selecting.
7. Positive Self-concept will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s friendship running strategy selecting.
8. Positive Self-concept will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
9. Risk Tolerance will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s family life strategy selecting.
10. Risk Tolerance will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s friendship running strategy selecting.
11. Risk Tolerance will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
12. Gender will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s working strategy selecting.
13. Gender will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s family life strategy selecting.
14. Gender will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
15. To be only financial source in family or not will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s working strategy selecting.
16. To be only financial source in family or not will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s friendship running strategy selecting.
17. To be only financial source in family or not will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
18. Working years in currently job will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s family life strategy selecting.
19. Working years in currently job will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
20. To be manager or not will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s family life strategy selecting.
21. To be manager or not will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s friendship running strategy selecting.
22. To be manager or not will interfere the relationship of Organization Downsizing risk perception and survivor’s alone releasing strategy selecting.
According to above conclusions, there are some suggestions for management: we should realize survivors will have different kind of surviving strategy at different kind of Organization Downsizing risk perception. Maybe we could conduct survivors to adopt aggressive working strategy by creating perception, considering different personality, the stress of work and the variances of population statistics, such as gender, marriage, financial burden, and working years. As for other surviving strategy, we could also take it for reference and support survivors’ preference.
| en_US |