| dc.description.abstract | In the past, the training result evaluations were mainly focus on the study of individual training program, by study the post training effects to understand whether the training program is effective and also expect to find the best strategies to improve the current training program. However, this kind of methodology does not fit into some industries that traditionally have high turn over rate and would require standardized training program. In order to shorten the preparation time and enter into production stage earlier, they usually try to design the Vestibule Training program in a systematic approach and standardized the training program. If we are able to discover the key personality trait that demonstrate more effective training results compare to others, then we will be able to recruit the candidates who have the same personality traits that we will be able to reduce the potential training cost.
The distinct characteristic for Security Guards are mainly high turnover rate, easy to find a new employment. And in order to let new comer quickly obtain the necessary on job skill, generally speaking, the security companies will pay more attention on the Vestibule Training for new comers, but still, lack of systematic and objective way to evaluate the training results. Therefore the purpose of this study is use the Security company’s standard Vestibule Training program as the sample, and according to the 4 level theories of the training results evaluation model provided by Donald L. Kirkpatrick〈Reaction level、Learning level、Behavior level and Result level〉to verify the training results for Security company’s Vestibule Training program.
The derived results are:
1.The training program shows effective training results on the Learning level
2.The training results on Reaction level and Learning level have positive significant correlation.
3.The training results on Learning level and Behavior level have no significant correlation.
4.Service department, on board days, age, educational background, and major subject will have no impact on the training results of Reaction level
5.Educational background and major subjects will impact the training results on Learning level.
6.Service department, on board days, age, educational background, and major subject will have no impact on the training results of Behavior level.
7.The factor of service department, on board days, age, educational background, will not transfer from the training results of Learning level to the training results of Behavior level. | en_US |