| DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
| DC.contributor | 營建管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | 林姵廷 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | Pei-ting Lin | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-7-24T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-7-24T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=963205014 | |
| dc.contributor.department | 營建管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | 營建工程之規模已朝向大型化、複雜化發展，管理技術也隨著科技的進步而日新月異。需要具有專業技術以及管理能力之團隊，在整個工程生命週期各階段執行營建專案管理。在傳統工程中，參與之成員包含業主、設計單位、承包商等。為了增加工程的績效，業主需要協調各成員在工作上彼此有效的配合，以提升效率，並減少爭議。自營建專案管理實行以來，業主將協調之角色轉給營建專案管理廠商。但往往增加與營建專案管理的協調和爭議處理，在遭遇爭議問題時，常以調解或仲裁之程序解決，對於營建專案管理廠商而言，不是最好的解決方式，一則是因為花費的時間冗長；再則是仍受限契約的內容而無法獲得所請求之服務費用，若是能有一個完整的契約條文將能保障雙方的權利義務。因此本研究藉由文獻收集探討國內營建專案管理之權責、服務費用、窒礙問題等相關研究；對案例爭議分析各階段執行上之困難以及實際上爭議後續解決方式的探討，並以問卷調查加以驗證。
依據「政府採購法第三十九條」以及「機關委託技術服務廠商評選及計費辦法」中之規定，機關得委託廠商承辦專案管理技術服務。一般營建專案管理契約訂定的工作項目多參照「機關委託技術服務廠商評選及計費辦法第四之ㄧ條」，然而「其他事項」的規定卻不明確，造成業主對於服務項目不斷延伸或是權力的劃分不明確，對於法令的解釋各不相同。此外，礙於法令的限制，公共工程的承辦人員為避免爾後契約之爭議，故訂定契約時大都延用以前相似工程的契約範本，一樣的問題在不同的工程案件中重複出現，造成許多時間以及人力上不必要的花費。
本研究期望1.對於營建專案管理在實務上所遭遇之困難進行分析，了解問題的重心及研擬改善建議，俾能減少爭議的發生及爭議處理之必要性；2.分析營建專案管理者之工作項目與工作內容，釐清契約中超過營建專案管理者服務範圍的項目，與法令相較之下，工作項目的內容是否符合營建專案管理者之專業；3.對於未標示於契約中之工作項目，探討其服務項目增加需另外酌收服務費用之可能性；4.縱使契約服務期限設定為工程完工日，但工期延長期間，營建專案管理廠商仍需對工程投入人力，對於其超出工期之服務費用探討合理之計算方式，以期能對法令提出相關建議。
| zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Construction management is complicated nowadays as the scale of construction project enlarged and the technology involved modernized. It is becoming more popular nowadays to have professional construction management team (PCM) participating throughout the life cycle of construction to help the client coordinating all the participants including the designer, the contractor, and the client itself. However, when PCM is employed, a new interface between the PCM team and the client created and additional disputes may arise. This study collects the many disputes related to the contractual responsibilities and the service fee issues incurred in practice. A questionnaire survey was conducted and expert opinions obtained for formulating the solutions.
For most of the PCM contracts, the PCM contractor’s responsibility has been drafted based on the provisions in the regulations related to Government Procurement Law. However, in many contracts, the responsibility listed as ”others” were not defined precisely and the client frequently utilized this undefined item to expand the responsibility of the PCM contractor endlessly. This kind of disputes repeats again and again and created more disputes and wasted a lot of manpower, time and money.
The purpose of this study is to
(1)Analyze the difficulty that the PCM encountered in practice.
(2)Define clearly the service items in contracts which exceed the typical PCM service scope.
(3)Discuss the necessity of increasing the fee payment with reasonable profit for those increased service items and the extended time for completion.
(4)Discusses the reasonable scale to compute the additional fee.
| en_US |
| DC.subject | 專案管理 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 政府採購法 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 服務費用 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | Construction Management | en_US |
| DC.subject | Government Procurement Law | en_US |
| DC.subject | Service Fee | en_US |
| DC.title | 營建工程專案管理廠商執行困難之案例分析研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
| DC.title | Case study on the Difficulty Related to Professional Construction Management Practice | en_US |
| DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| DC.type | thesis | en_US |
| DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |