dc.description.abstract | Some leading abilities for excusives, whatever is how to manage outstanding talents, make subordinates self growth, and perform their values with releasing their potentiality fully in enterprise in order to increase group’’s performance and enterprise’’s competitiveness, have already become most important subjects for executives or leaders. This research is to regard humanistic management as the aspect and adopt the foreign “Behavior Style” theory. This research would explain 4 typical behavior styles in job market from relevant documents at first, discuss the property and differences between them, then gather discriminated skill and assessment for reference.
This research carries on surveying and analyzing the behavior style of domestic staffs in Taiwan job market, and investigating respondents with several lead-interaction discussion topics to estimate whether staffs with each behavior style would have a preference for the interaction manner. It would help executives to understand the behavior content of different style among staffs and advise a interacting strategy while leading. It also can increase leaders’ comprehend and respect for difference of staff’s personality, improve communication and cooperation of the work group, and make progress in the interpersonal communication and interactive way between executive and subordinate finally.
The result of this research shows the categorized method by 4 behavior styles can be workable for domestic staffs in Taiwan, moreover, it shows the difference and property of domestic respondents’ behavior style in gender, age level, industry, profession, and the group between executives and subordinates. On the whole, the leading-interaction strategy which’s recommended from documents for these discussion topics of leading situation have correlated with 4 properties of behavior style. But the interacting manners to deal with 4 behavior styles among subordinates by each discussion topic of leading situation have not totally matched the preference of each style regarding the result of 4 manners’ expectance survey by 4 divided style groups of respondents, and it is worthy to follow up with further research, discussion and tracking.
| en_US |